Synopsis: Transport & travel:


popsci_2013 02128.txt

Apparently all you really need to stop them is two pretty cow girls with a jeep and a couple of dogs.

So you get your standard breaktime snack truck add barbeque and 20 year old Hooters girl with 30-.06 rope and offroad motorcycle.

Yeah we'll let em sell us through the Dept. of Education enough of a firearm assortment to let each field unit train new personnel in the latest and most entertaining rifle/sword positions

So that means we'll need real serious high-speed offroading capability out of these trucks. Yes.

while free-roaming they should taste good--provided they be gutted asap once killed. a trip in southern Spain exposed


popsci_2013 02168.txt

The elderly obese man had drugs in his system as he stepped in front of the bus that squished him running away from his angry wife with that machete.

It does not show deaths from chronic health problems caused by drug use nor accidents (car crashes falls) nor suicides while intoxicated.


popsci_2013 02178.txt

Last summer you announced new regulations that would double the average fuel economy standard for cars sold in this country

which was an achievement because most automakers agreed. But you kicked the can down the road.

A new standard of 54.5 miles per gallon is great but by 2025? Can't we do better than three presidential terms from now?

Are you willing to pay 2x the cost for power transportation and fuel? I don't understand why reversing the effects of the azolla event is seen as such a negative thing.

I'm driving around a vehicle which if I run in my garage with everything closed will kill me...

-consensus-on. htmlsimilar results shown from nasa http://climate. nasa. gov/scientific-consensussomething a little more recent http://www. guardian co uk/environment/2013/mar 27/climate-change-model


popsci_2013 02261.txt

In this transit period radiation cancer deaths will multiply into the 100k yearly for humanity. See these links:

The biggest road block to humanity is to find out we are a lot older than previously known

if there is nothing else to choose From there should be thousands of insects on the ground today with different kinds of undeveloped wings that don't work

but are in transition for their future descendants to have working wings to support Darwins theory.

Wings are not necessary for survival. There are many insects that move slowly across the earth's surface

and survive just fine without wings. I get tired of hearing from evolutionsist that it takes millions of years for a species to transition to a different type.

Like thought I can only look at the effects of it which are cars rockets and etc. but still not have a grasp of

Specialize them for low light levels high light levels swimming in water and flying in the air.


popsci_2013 02281.txt

Samsung Announces Enormous Phone Called Galaxy Mega""Somewhere at Samsung's sprawling campus deep in the headquarters of the mobile phone division there is a Powerpoint slide with a simple line graph.

Whenever a reviewer says phones like the newly announced Samsung Galaxy Mega which has either a 6. 3

and increasingly useless list of numbers that constitute speed as the Galaxy S 4 . I won't list them here.

The Samsung Galaxy Mega will be available in May starting in Europe. One day when the cell phone is big enough

and cables to jump start my car lol. Not that I'm a fan of the prospect of this phone

Reviewers hated the Galaxy Note. Turns out they were completely wrong. I personally agree that this phone is going to be a little too large.

-and despite the plastic backing everyone complains about on the Galaxy S series it is a brilliant design b c it is lightweight cheap and replaceable

I have a galaxy note and when I hold up an iphone its screen looks like a minature toy.

Like the bulls are so big you can only get one in a boxcar. So Globegenius you're from Texas?

I remember when the first Galaxy Note came out. At the time it seemed similar in size to a Kindle...

I've begged them for a Galaxy SIII or SIV with a slide-out keyboard but apparently that would be...

and recently cleard the morgage on their appartment and bourt a brand new Ford focus. we have a tendency to looked here...


popsci_2013 02289.txt

To be fair the poll also asked Americans about robots in the military which is like a legitimate question given our recent discovery that we can have robots shoot people as well as questions about robotic (autonomous) cars and robots in the workplace.

Google and various automakers are testing autonomous cars robots have a huge effect on the workplace


popsci_2013 02298.txt

But because the red photons travel a longer distance in between scattering events they manage to penetrate both layers of skin.


popsci_2013 02308.txt

and water outside the hive using the sun as their compass. However scientists have discovered this job change is flexible:


popsci_2013 02309.txt

or around the bed to keep bed bugs from biting as he traveled through Europe. In the early twentieth century the approach was also common throughout the Balkans according to a 1927 report from the Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Army.

That report suggested the leaves stunned the bloodsucking bugs as they traveled from hiding places to their sleeping hosts during the night;


popsci_2013 02352.txt

and dexterity to debone a bird in four seconds flat on par with a human butcher. 1) Queue Gutted whole chickens sit on metal cones as they travel along a conveyor belt

and paint car parts. The prototype features six degrees of freedom (one less than a human arm) to make cuts as fluid and graceful as possible.


popsci_2013 02378.txt

and so that the lines of trucks waiting to unload their drums would stretch for blocks.

Now the chemical-waste haulers from Newark Elizabeth and Perth Amboy started to follow suit pointing their big rigs south on Route 9 in search of cheaper dumping grounds.

but trucks were banned north of Toms River.)They found plenty of willing partners among the farmers of Monmouth Burlington and Ocean counties.

--which were also popular destinations for industrial waste from out of town because they charged less

The Ocean County Prosecutor's Office did not begin going after dumpers until 1980 when an investigator named Dane Wells started trying to track them down.

According to Wells the midnight dumpers (though they sometimes operated in broad daylight) would use horseshoe roads in the woods narrow dirt paths with only one entrance and exit.

An explosion summoned a town fire truck and Frank lost that permit too. Nick Fernicola needed a cheap place to dump all that waste a place where no one would ask any uncomfortable questions.

He was crazy about motorcycles and worked as an auto mechanic before opening a used car salvage and sales business in Newark.

In 1966 when he was followed 31 he his brother south to Toms River running a gas station for a few years

and then moving briefly to Idaho. When he returned to Toms River Nick Fernicola bounced through a series of construction jobs:

Toms River Chemical and the Lakehurst Naval Air station. Its wooden tables and stools would fill up at the four o'clock shift change and again at midnight.

For a bargain-basement price of $10 per truckload Fernicola could dump the drums in the town landfill on Church road

He rented three trucks and hired two drivers to help him with the hauling. When Fernicola carried his first load to Toms River on April 1 a low-level manager at Union carbide followed him to confirm that he was dumping at the town landfill.

It would be the last time for eight months that Union carbide would take an interest in where thousands of its waste-filled drums were going.


popsci_2013 02387.txt

#NASA Is Using Tech From The Columbia Crash Investigation To See How Trees Failstereo photogrammetry is used a process to determine the strain on a certain structure which is why it was used to investigate the causes of the Space shuttle Columbia disaster.

But NASA engineers--including one who worked on that investigation--are looking into using it to determine how and why trees fall.

NASA Glenn engineer Matt Melis joined forces with Cleveland arborist Mark Hoenigman and used stereo photogrammetry to examine the trees.

NASA says a consulting firm has approached the researchers since then looking to see if they'll examine branch structures to find ways of fighting against extreme weather events like Hurricane Sandy.

NASA If this tree fell in a forest and did not make a sound NASA would know about this tree lol l


popsci_2013 02388.txt

#Over Time, Nuclear power Would Kill Fewer People Than Petroleumusing nuclear power for energy instead of coal has prevented almost 2 million pollution-related deaths around the world

It's the latest publication from James Hansen NASA's fiery climate change scientist who is retiring on Wednesday after 46 years with the space agency.

and its lead author Pushker A. Kharecha of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

With his departure from NASA the climate research community loses one of its most vocal members

The safety of nuclear energy is equal to flying an airplane. On a typical day life is good

but when an airplane falls from the sky and you are in it it only ends in as a gigantic disaster.

Flying (at least flying in commercial airliners which the rest of your comment indicates you were talking about) is by far the safest mode of transportation.

Many times more people are killed per mile traveled in automobiles. Bicycling is about 10 times again more likely to get you killed.

Motorcycling is about three times again as dangerous as pedal cycling. We (mis) perceive the risk of airline travel

because every airliner crash becomes a major international news story. Meanwhile tens of thousands of auto (and cycle) deaths every year barely rate a mention in the local paper.

The same holds for nuclear power vs. other energy sources. The*real*risk of a nuclear power disaster is far less than the*(mis) perceived*risk.

and see that travel by almost any other mode of transportation is inherently more dangerous.@@Him:

and Fukushima. 3 mile island caused less extra radiation than you'd get from a cross-country flight.

and about as mature as your avatar. 1. A quick trip to wikipedia shows many many nuclear meltdowns and accidents such as Santa Susana in California and the Urals in Russia which spewed tons of radiation

over unsuspecting populations. 2. Comparing radiation received from an airplane flight to exposure to nuclear radiation

They travel long distances and will contaminate all regions on earth. www. abs-cbnnews. com/insights/04/01/11/nuclear-radiation-there-no-safe-dose4.

Not even U s. commercial aviation widely acknowledged as the safest form of travel can match that safety record.

I do agree with Anyicon's statement about comparison to air travel yes it's by all means the safest mode of travel out there


popsci_2013 02418.txt

last saturday I bought a new Chevrolet from having earned $4701 this-last/4 weeks


popsci_2013 02453.txt

The idea is complicated that large indoor areas like malls airports casinos and public transit hubs would be mapped the same way that cities are.

It's a lot trickier than outdoor mapping; your location needs to be much more precise along with


popsci_2013 02459.txt

The biofuel could go into specially-designed ethanol vehicles as well as regular U s. gasoline most of which is composed of 10 percent ethanol.


popsci_2013 02480.txt

Here's One That Cana Toyota Prius is many things but a convenient lawn mower isn't one of them.

and cut down on gasoline usage in all your vehicles--even the ones that never hit the streets.

The hybrid tag may put you in mind of a Toyota Prius but in reality this thing is more like a Chevy Volt--its electric motor provides the drive

while the single-cylinder 420cc gasoline engine is used to generate the electricity it uses. Because of the electric direct drive Raven says it transfers more power to the wheels than most mowers on the market

Not that anyone uses these to make long trips anyway so just be happy it can sip gas at a slower rate than its entirely-gasoline equivalents.

This article written by Antony Ingram was published originally on Green Car Reports a publishing partner of Popular Science.

More from Green Car Reports and affiliates: 2013 New york Auto Show Preview2014 Mitsubishi Outlander: First Drive2014 Lexus IS First Drive:

Videoa hybrid mower makes no sense. A full EV mower DOES make sense--especially if charged from solar power. http://www. hustlerturf. com/products/zeon. htmlzero turn

Did you know the average lawn mower pollutes more in 30 minutes of cutting a lawn that a car does in a week and in some cases a month of use?

First hybrid vehicles are justified just not for the cost if you remove the government discounts.

Especially not since we tested their MPGS at near highway speed against high mileage combustion engine cars (The Aveo and Smart Car.

I just got a great new volvo after I been earnin $6718 this-last/4 weeks


popsci_2013 02492.txt

and women in lab coats and blue sanitary shoe covers tootle here and there pushing metal carts.

when he develop foods for NASA's Apollo program. The fundamental challenge of the pet food professional Moeller is saying is to balance the wants


popsci_2013 02556.txt

#Are Birds Evolving To Not Get Hit By Cars? If you've ever had the soul-crushing misfortune of hitting a bird

while speeding down the road you can at least take heart in the fact that some birds are on the whole getting better at dodging them.

A new paper published today in the journal Current Biology theorizes that today's natural predators (like the Ford f-150) are causing birds to adapt.

and so occasionally get hit by cars. The researchers tracked birds who've died by car

and then compared them to birds who accidentally died some other way. They've found that during the last three decades the swallows have been dying less by car

and it's not caused by the number of birds in the area or number of cars on the road.

Something else is up the researchers surmised. The roadkill surveys indicate it's the long-winged swallows who are getting hit by cars;

the shorter-winged birds may be able to turn and take off faster than their counterparts avoiding oncoming traffic.

when it comes to crossing the road too. They are just so SO cute! It's hardly evolution;

I believe the term they were looking for was natural selection. obviously the animals smart enough to not get hit by cars would be selected the ones for based on the new environment the birds live in currently.

Natural selection (along with mutations) is one of the fundamental drivers of evolution. Your statement makes no sense.

One thing I notice is that some insects try desperately to land on the tarmac before being hit by a (my) car.

(along with mutations) is one of the fundamental drivers of evolution. Your statement makes no sense.

If those birds are quicker--maybe by shorter wings or smarter then they survive and the others get hit by cars

and die off. Even when the evidence stares them in the face all the religious nutcases--billions of them--refuse to accept the facts.

Anyicon and wheresfluffy let's start off with something a bit simpler such as teaching people to look both ways so that they don't step out in front of moving cars?@

I said one of the fundamental drivers of evolution. In other words: a necessary but not sufficient condition. wheresfluffy's original post was wrong.

The way this article writes it It sounds more like scientists observed that birds with shorter wings spans are less likely to get hit by cars than birds with longer wingspans.

I didn't read anything about long winged swallows developing shorter wings and to imply that these shallows are going to die off

and the fitter ones will survive is to put far too much stock in the Ford assembly line.

It compares long and short wing swallows--not swallows and some brand new species. No body (with the possible exception of wheresfluffy) was discussing the kind of evolution you so adamantly argue against.

and perhaps to travel later the cosmos. Our greed never ends lol! democedes Oh I just notice lol.


popsci_2013 02587.txt

If you want to make a fun loudspeaker (that works well) tape a coil to the side of an inflated balloon feed a signal in


popsci_2013 02615.txt

#NYC Wants To Sterilize Its Subway Ratsthe rats of NYC subways are resilient. The city is an especially well-suited home for the critters

even if some were displaced from the subway after Sandy. The latest plan to stem the tide?

A sweet-salty sterilizing chemical called Contrapest will be placed in subway bait boxes. When a female rat ingests some it'll target the ovarian follicles permanently sterilizing it.

Along with those more traditional techniques Metro Transit Authority officials are hoping this puts a dent in the rodent population.

And there's a lot of discarded food around the subway to compete with. New york times As this chemical melts and gets into the water system how will it effect humans?


popsci_2013 02639.txt

and zones seven through nine will contain a hotel and an observation deck. Each sky-lobby floor will have its own retail shops

which will shoot passengers up to the sky lobbies will feature pressurized cabins and converters that regenerate electricity reducing energy use by 30 percent.

Seven of the 106 elevators will be double-deckers. Not every supertall tower requires deep foundations says Leonard Joseph of Thornton Tomasetti.


popsci_2013 02683.txt

#Yesterday morning an Alitalia pilot reported seeing a remote-controlled aircraft near New york's JFK AIRPORT where he was landing.

The drone was flying about 4 to 5 miles west of the airport at an altitude of about 1750 feet

and it came within just 200 feet of the Alitalia plane the pilot said. The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating the incident

and the FBI announced that it is looking for information leading to the drone operator.

Until then unmanned aircraft are governed by model airplane rules and model airplane rules are pretty lax.

Older laws for model aircraft forbade flying anything above 400 feet. This is still a recognized guideline by the Academy of Model Aeronautics the lobbyist group that represents model aircraft hobbyists

but the height ceiling hasn't been on the books since at least 2012. Instead unmanned remotely piloted aircraft have to be visible to the naked eye

which might mean just a couple hundred feet in cloudy weather or much further than the recommended 400 feet in good weather.

Visual range notwithstanding 1750 feet of altitude is well beyond the reach of most commercially available model aircraft.

While the 2012 act re-authorizing the FAA removed the height ceiling for model aircraft it was very clear about boundaries around an airport.

Flying a drone within 5 miles of an airport requires notifying that airport; otherwise you risk prosecution.

Initial reports place the drone at 4 to 5 miles away from the airport which means it isn't clear

whether this drone broke that rule or not. If the drone flew closer than that

and did so without notifying air traffic control it would've been illegal. The construction of the drone however is very likely to have been totally legal.

Model aircraft regulations let you fly anything under 55 pounds and following AMA guidelines everything from absolute altitude to size to any sensors a drone might have on board is legal.

Finally there's H r. 658 SEC. 336 (a) 4. This part of the 2012 FAA reauthorization states explicitly flying a model aircraft is legal

only if the aircraft is operated in a manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft.

Flying within 200 feet of an airliner definitely absolutely in no uncertain terms violates that law

so let's just say this is very illegal. Should the incident worry us? Probably. Think about your last driving commute

Now imagine that in three dimensions with some vehicles as small as a frisbee and others as large as a 747 zooming around side by side.

In 2009 US AIRWAYS flight 1549 made a crash landing in the Hudson river after geese knocked out both engines.

It's incredibly unlikely that model airplanes will regularly pose as great a threat as geese

but the introduction of a whole new category of aircraft to the skies will make things a lot more crowded.

Until then we're stuck with the increasingly outdated model airplane laws we have. A clarification on the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 cited earlier.

Rather than setting out specific legal restrictions on model aircraft the law as written spells out five criteria that

if met put the model aircraft beyond FAA regulation. These criteria are hobbyist purpose under 55lbs kept in line of sight doesn't interfere with manned aircraft

and if flown within 5 miles of an airport the air traffic controller is notified beforehand.

The FAA is free to regulate drones and model airplanes that don't meet those five criteria.

It just doesn't. A drone besides a remote camera is also a remote weapon.

One of these drones sucked into a jet engine would be catastrophic. And result probably in a crash and massive loss of lives.

So hell yes it should be illegal within 5 miles of any airport. This part of the 2012 FAA reauthorization states explicitly flying a model aircraft is legal

only if the aircraft is operated in a manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft.

Flying within 200 feet of an airliner definitely absolutely in no uncertain terms violates that law

so let's just say this is very illegal. How is that very illegal? It was not in the airliner's way

and it didn't interfere with it. It was just close. Also it couldn't have been close very long because

I doubt it was going at most third as fast as the jet...No harm no foul.

I suppose a civilian drone with an attach laser pointer pointing into the cockpit of a plane would be bad too.@

@gizmowiz FAA guidelines are VERY stringent about object ingestion and the resulting after effects. If a small drone were ingested it would cause the failure of the engine.

Jets can fly on one engine. It would mean that the flight would be promoted to emergency status

but may not necessarily result in a crash. Don't let your paranoia dictate policy. Yes drones shouldn't fly near airports

but drones are not inherently evil. Drones can save lives as well as end them. If you want to talk about vehicles acting as weapons I give you the average car.@

@mayan Laser pointers are almost completely harmless and aiming one well enough to temporarily blind one of the pilots

(and there are two) is almost completely impossible. Stop inciting peoples fears. If you want to scare people

If anything this incident should highlight the immediate need for a new air traffic control system. The one we have is overtaxed ancient and incapable of meeting future needs as few as 10 years from now.

If the drone was only 200 feet away from the plane that is a bit worrisome. But I'd wait to hear results from the full investigation before judging it completely.

If the quadcopter operator was intentionally trying to get close to the plane that is reckless and should be punished IMO

Make it socould Popsci please talk to an aviation lawyer or at least someone from the Academy of Model Aeronautics before writing a story like this?

You got ever single aspect of the law wrong here. I happen to be both an attorney

and a first-person view (FPV) model aircraft enthusiast who has studied this extensively. The truth is that at present there are absolutely no legally binding rules or regulations governing hobbyist model aircraft.

The FAA's rules which include the mythical 400'altitude limit are in fact nothing more than advisory guidelines.

And the model aircraft provision in the law passed by Congress last year do nothing more than define the parameters to qualify for a relatively narrow exemption for a particular subset of model aircraft from any future FAA regulations.

which may affect certain types of model aircraft but those have yet to even be published let alone take legal effect.

Now I certainly don't condone flying any kind of model aircraft at 1500'in the middle of an approach route to a major airport

And doing so in that particular place could indeed still be considered illegal under a general provision in the Federal Aviation Regulations prohibiting careless or reckless operation of an aircraft.

either imposing any kind of altitude requirement on recreational model aircraft or requiring you to keep the model in visual line of sight.

While the FAA officially expects model aircraft to remain within visual line of sight and recommends that you stay below 400'there is no actual legally enforceable requirement to do so.

Personally I own a 5 foot-long video piloted flying wing that is capable of flying up to several thousand feet above the ground and which

I usually do stay below 400-500 feet to make sure to stay away from aircraft which except for around airports almost always fly much higher.

There is nothing illegal about what I do and I always make sure to take every safety precaution possible keeping aware of any aircraft in the area

and making sure to avoid flying anywhere near them. As for this story I find it rather doubtful a pilot could actually see a quadcopter in the middle of the sky (it's hard enough to see them from the ground only a few hundred feet away which is why most quadcopters are flown through video cameras)

and the last time an airplane pilot reported seeing a drone in the air it turned out to be a wayward Chinese lantern.

But if there really was a quadcopter near the airliner I just want people to know that such foolishness is extremely rare among drone hobbyists who are generally very good at flying safely

and using common sense. People who do things like this give the rest of us a bad name

and endanger a harmless and fun hobby that an ever-growing number of people enjoy.

Blatantly false news stories like this which misrepresent the law and our legal status are not helping as they only cause hobbyists like myself to come under criticism for supposedly violating nonexistent laws.

In an area like this where everything having to do with these pilotless aircraft is coming under scrutiny they've got their work cut out for them.

We may end up with Wifi ATC and hobbyists filing flight plans.@@Serithian Laws don't mean shit.

I won't set foot on a flight without at least 3 drinks. Even when I do the driving.

No one is assignedlike A 1970 JET MARVELFLASH GORDON! THERMIC JET PLANE MODEL! MATCH LITE JET ENGINE! JOHN JET ROCKET INSTANTSUPER MARVEL JET DRONE FLIGHT!

I have a great role for you (2? Me Too! OR AMY GOODMAN ALEX JONES!

ON ANY JULIAN ASSANGE! TOO FREE! AND BRADLEYMANNING! AND EDWARD SNOWDEN! LIKE PUSSY GALORE OO7 GOLDEN GUN!

and I am adolph hitler gimmie allyour guns!?LIKE NEROS CEASER. I'D KILL JESUS!?

NASA BOEING GENERALDYNAMICS! J. P. L. NORAD! ONE NASA MONKEY OUTER SPACE SHOT FOR THE MOON AND REMOTE ORBIT LUNAR FLIGHT SPLASH DOWN!

FOR J f k. & JOHN GLENNONE STALIN GORBACHAVESPUTNIK! ALL VIA VON BRAUN!?TAG 707 REMOTED JETSFOR ONLY TESLA G. E. ROCKET DYNE ALL REMOTE ROCKET NIKESIGHT'SCOVERT ROSWELL AND EDISON!

>JUST BOEING NORTHRUP SKUNKWORKS TAG RYAN! PALMDALE PLANT 42 DRONES VIET WERNER FORD!@@GERALD FORD COVERT ANY WARFOR A SHWARTZCOFF YOUTHEN!

THREATEN ANTHRAX OFGENERAL GULF OF TONKIN OFCOLIN POWELL AND JOHN KERRY CON'S! MOCK HORTON ADOLPHHITLER NASA BOEING REMOTESATELITE OR NORAD HARRP TOO NOMEON HARRPP CONTROLS MUNITION DRONESAPOCALYPSE NOW!

FOR ARAYAN HITLER FJORD'S! SO HITLER YOUTHEN JOHN BOEHNERTOM FRIEDMAN JESSIE HOLDER! UGANDA BARAC OBAMA PICK fiat& facist.

OR BUSHES FORD'S BILDERBERGSYOUTHEN OR FIAT NAZI! SO! NUREMBERG'S RELEASED! and mildenstien and iechmann.

SPOKEN FIAT N w. O AND NAZI! in OLD BERLIN PAPER'S LIKE. A Paper An Griff!

E. X. P. HORTON MESHHER SHMITT FLIGHT NAZI FIAT FOKKER DRONE WING ALSO! AND DROP ANY BOMBHOLDERJONES!

I CITE IN 1873 CHINESEIMMAGRANTSBORDEN PACIFIC RAILROAD &mining ARCOLA ALABAMALIKE SAINT VITUS! HONG KONG AND KING KONG CRIMSON!

OR NASA! ON lyin jeb bush or cheney noradtag harrp remote control Utah rocket site roads to edwardsrocket site road!

Unmanned drone boeing norton air base nasa eaglescanlike horton hitler remote drones! G. P. S. WORLD MAP MICROSOFT OR APPLE FORMATWITH REMOTE ROBO HANS BLIXMOUSE click g. e. TEPCO?

estes rocket HIGH FLIGHT NASAMUNITIONFEDERAL harrpp ROBO DRONE'S!?TAG ANY 9-11 FEDERALASTRONAUTAND FEDERAL MAJOR NUCLEARATOM BUSTER HANS BLIX!

ONE MORE REMOTE HORTONLIKE BOEING DRONE COVERTWAR OP. IS ON NUREMBERG HAUGEDOCKET 2013! VIA VLADIMIR PUTIN!

and screamin fiats and nazis! and that blow's! barac cussed russian 2013 G-20summit!

all you hockey puck with johnboners and boehner. norad harrpp too nasa. floridas zimmermans and boehneryouthen's!

puck john brennan you puck'syou all get nuremberg. all you nazi ford's and bushes. pucks biden's clinton's and gore's. puck's!

all federal permits d. o. t. too nasa! one j f k. airport not osama's! federal dynamite permit's baracobama!

bushes capitol pawn! like silver stien westfield'sdemolition's! twin towers han's blix yousupreme building seven blown clerical cop shop courtcrone's!

jeb bushes nasa floridastennis center boeing goringnorton horton skunkwork's rocket dyne robo ma belle nasacovert any war remote munitiondrone's!

to norad or nasa again! or with john kerry too tonkin forasia! swarztkoff colin powell and hillary condileeza!

like 707 jumbo jet's were boeingmartinlocheed skunkwork's and thespace shuttle did a piggy backjumbo jet boeing fact!

and 707's were all remote controlin the 70's! at edwards air force base fact!

fiat's like golden dawn's! bill gate's your barbados n s. a. intel eproms get you PIG ONE!

NASA KNEW ABOUT REMOTEBOEING 707 JETS ON 2001september 11th! ALL WITH CEASERS AND REMOTEPILATES!?AND AIRPLANE PETER GRAVES!

ABOUT 1970'S A FACT! I CITE GET SMART! 2013 REMOTE BOEING EAGLE SCAN DRONE.

YOUR GOOSES ARE COOKED! BARAC OBAMA! AND YOUR JOE BUSH SHOE NASANORAD AND THREATEN INWARDAND MUNITION ON ALL UNITEDSTATES CITIZENS!

BOEING HORTON REMOTE DRONEFIAT RED BARON DOWNFEDERAL'S! SHUT DOWN! ON NORTON OR ANY LIKE ANORAD HORTON NASA WAR GAMENEAR NEW YORK TWIN TOWERS!

2001! WITH A 2013 GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN AND TOO THREATEN ANOTHERAGAIN IN JANUARYAND that is! CAPITOL impeachment enough?

you crass nazi youthen fiat's! and you fiat youthen! BUSHES OBAMADUCK step shut down SEPTEMBER2013 SUMMIT Russian G-20 ONJACK ass!

for cairo!?or syria!?BARAC you cusssed it! Barac Obama IDI AMIN! AND LIKE AL CAPONE JONES!

Nazi JOHN BOEHNER Old pomp. ugandas rome fiat dicks. on kissinger wolf blitzerall pissed for fiat hans blix youthennazi's!

ON GERMAN JET FRANKFURTHORTON HITLER DRONES ALLC. I. A f. B. I. NOW. BOTH SIEZED IN 1945!

mayor and tag f b i. and c i a. and john boehner or brennanfor REMOTE JUMBO JET 1970707's A FACT!

for jumbo jet 707's! and northrup boeing's onskunkworks remote control tower at edwards high desert like roswell E t. air base!

in The 1970's! from edwards air base with nasa pentagon harrppgenerals Drone Noses! these all!

ON THIS YEAR OF 2013 OFFICIALNUREMBERG HAUGE DOCUMENT! ARE Ripe For Nuremberg! for al capone remote hitler. hitler youthen unmannnedmunition covert war drone. comes the drone of fiat facist. crunk's!

GO figure! Adolph Hitler! repop lola new berlin!.REPOP LOLA NEW BERLIN!.!REPOP LOLA NEW BERLIN!.

DRONE BOEING1970S 707 JET! ALL REMOTE AT EDWARDS HIGH DESERTS NORAD UTAH EVERY KIKE NIKESIGHT KNOWS!

AND WITH 9-11 NORAD'S AND JEB BUSH NASA WAR GAMES BUSHES! YOUR SILVERSTIENSWESTFUIELDS BUSTES ROCK OBAMA BARRAK!

REMOTE 1970jumbo JETS AND JOHN BOEHNERSN. S. ABUSH SPOKE N w. O. ALL ADOLPHHITLERS! YOUTHEN NAZI HANS BLIX AND IECCHMANN FITS SILVERSTIEN GUN CONTROLFIENSTIEN!

D. O. T TOO NASA! THE MOON TOO PLUTO! ALL FEDERAL SINCE 1877! BUSHES FORDS HOES BOYS!

LIKE AL CAPONE OR GRONK A BONE! ADOLPH HITLER NAZI MUNITIONDRONE GETSA EAGLE SCAN DRONEON NUREMBERG HAUGE DOCKET2013!

CONNET BOEING REMOTE 707 JETS EDWARDS FEDERALS IMCE JOHNSON! ALL NIXON INVESTIGATED EVERY FEDERAL! BARAC OBAMA BUSHES OPEC RAG HEAD PAWN OF UNITED NATIONS AND MAORE THAN THAT BILDERBERG BOHEEMIAN GROVES!

M d. N. A.))JOHN MOON WOLF LONDON No one is assignedlike A 1970 JET MARVELFLASH GORDON!

THERMIC JET PLANE MODEL! MATCH LITE JET ENGINE! JOHN JET ROCKET INSTANTSUPER MARVEL JET DRONE FLIGHT! I have a great role for you (2?

Me Too! OR AMY GOODMAN ALEX JONES! ON ANY JULIAN ASSANGE! TOO FREE! AND BRADLEYMANNING!

AND EDWARD SNOWDEN! LIKE PUSSY GALORE OO7 GOLDEN GUN! and I am adolph hitler gimmie allyour guns!?

NASA BOEING GENERALDYNAMICS! J. P. L. NORAD! ONE NASA MONKEY OUTER SPACE SHOT FOR THE MOON AND REMOTE ORBIT LUNAR FLIGHT SPLASH DOWN!

FOR J f k. & JOHN GLENNONE STALIN GORBACHAVESPUTNIK! ALL VIA VON BRAUN!?TAG 707 REMOTED JETSFOR ONLY TESLA G. E. ROCKET DYNE ALL REMOTE ROCKET NIKESIGHT'SCOVERT ROSWELL AND EDISON!

>JUST BOEING NORTHRUP SKUNKWORKS TAG RYAN! PALMDALE PLANT 42 DRONES VIET WERNER FORD!@@GERALD FORD COVERT ANY WARFOR A SHWARTZCOFF YOUTHEN!

THREATEN ANTHRAX OFGENERAL GULF OF TONKIN OFCOLIN POWELL AND JOHN KERRY CON'S! MOCK HORTON ADOLPHHITLER NASA BOEING REMOTESATELITE OR NORAD HARRP TOO NOMEON HARRPP CONTROLS MUNITION DRONESAPOCALYPSE NOW!

FOR ARAYAN HITLER FJORD'S! SO HITLER YOUTHEN JOHN BOEHNERTOM FRIEDMAN JESSIE HOLDER! UGANDA BARAC OBAMA PICK fiat& facist.

OR BUSHES FORD'S BILDERBERGSYOUTHEN OR FIAT NAZI! SO! NUREMBERG'S RELEASED! and mildenstien and iechmann.

SPOKEN FIAT N w. O AND NAZI! in OLD BERLIN PAPER'S LIKE. A Paper An Griff!

E. X. P. HORTON MESHHER SHMITT FLIGHT NAZI FIAT FOKKER DRONE WING ALSO! AND DROP ANY BOMBHOLDERJONES!

I CITE IN 1873 CHINESEIMMAGRANTSBORDEN PACIFIC RAILROAD &mining ARCOLA ALABAMALIKE SAINT VITUS! HONG KONG AND KING KONG CRIMSON!

OR NASA! ON lyin jeb bush or cheney noradtag harrp remote control Utah rocket site roads to edwardsrocket site road!

Unmanned drone boeing norton air base nasa eaglescanlike horton hitler remote drones! G. P. S. WORLD MAP MICROSOFT OR APPLE FORMATWITH REMOTE ROBO HANS BLIXMOUSE click g. e. TEPCO?

estes rocket HIGH FLIGHT NASAMUNITIONFEDERAL harrpp ROBO DRONE'S!?TAG ANY 9-11 FEDERALASTRONAUTAND FEDERAL MAJOR NUCLEARATOM BUSTER HANS BLIX!

ONE MORE REMOTE HORTONLIKE BOEING DRONE COVERTWAR OP. IS ON NUREMBERG HAUGEDOCKET 2013! VIA VLADIMIR PUTIN!


< Back - Next >


Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011