I searched for your site but it appears to be down at the moment. What types of insects do you carry?
Typically that translates into a spin on a carbon-fiber-based core but Cechetti decided to try using coconut fiber instead.
The new Coco Mat core which is used now in boards from Australian brand NSP is stronger than carbon fiber and more sustainable.
Next they lay them out randomly sandwich the layer of strands in fiberglass and insert a polystyrene core.
but it comes in dried compressed blocks about 1'x8x8 that have to be soaked in water-hot to start-for about 24 hours before it can be incorporated in to the growth medium.
Bt Delta Endotoxin-The Bt delta endotoxin was selected because it is highly effective at controlling Lepidoptera larvae caterpillars.
For this reason GMOS that have the Bt gene are compatible with biological control programs
The Bt endotoxin is considered safe for humans other mammals fish birds and the environment because of its selectivity.
Bt has been available as a commercial microbial insecticide since the 1960s and is sold under many trade names.
Bt-corn is a type of genetically modified organism termed GMO. A GMO is a plant
Examples of GMO field crops include Bt-potatoes Bt-corn Bt-sweet corn Roundup Ready soybeans Roundup Ready Corn
www. axismundionline. com/blog/the-new-is-gm-food-safe-meme/www. axismundionline. com: Rave Rockstep Party Madness with added Science I think you've been Rave Rockstepping to some really bad sources during your Party Madnessthis is not a news source...
it's a blog. For ravers...I'm 30 so I think I'm over raving.
This is a Photoshop image from the memes that are being passed around on the internet. Most of those studies mentioned were no more than 90 day case studies. Just
I suggest to just Google it. Caen University-The study published in the peer-reviewed journal Food
Google: NK603 corni don't want to come off as rude or arrogant. I really just want everyone to know about this.
http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/S%C3%A9ralini affairsoon after the study was published in September of last year six French national academies of science issued a joint statement condemned the study
http://dotearth. blogs. nytimes. com/2012/10/19/six-french-science-academies-dismiss-study-finding-gm-corn-harmed-rats/?
but convincing looking âÂ#Âoeexperimentã¢Â# that âÂ#Âoeprovedã¢Â# that cell phone use caused accidents.
âÂ# Just like the criminally fraudulent âÂ#Âoestudyã¢Â# on cell phones did find that they did cause accidents.
They claims the following on their website. Monsanto website states this: Can a farmer be sued
when a small amount of GM crop seed blows into a neighbor s fields? Do you sue this farmer?
A study was published recently examining adverse effects of Bacillus thuringensis (aka the Bt toxin) that Monsanto builds into their corn and soy.
and he's kind of an expert. http://wwwi-sis. org. uk/Bt-toxin. phpit is no coincidence that Monsanto has invested so much money in our politicians and against measures such as California's Prop 37.
And it's Likely in Your Water articles. mercola. com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/19/gmo-corn-resulting-livestock-deaths. aspx?
They are already working on better solutions than GMO foods. 3-D printers can now print food that provides everything you need to survive.
http://newsfeed. time. com/2013/05/24/nasa-funded-3d-food-printer-could-it-end-world-hunger/Here is an article from Popsci detailing the same thing:
http://www. popsci. com/technology/article/2013-05/nasa-funding-3-d-printer-thatll-make-pizzai can't speak to taste
I use this web-site...zee44. comthe phrase older than dirt would mean soil to most people.
and got a cheque for more than $9744 parttime from their mac. follow the information on this web-site...
The final image covers the globe in lines from bomb development sites until they converge on Hiroshima.
He was carried the biggest guilt of Hiroshima as it was his equation E=mc2 that made the realization that a small core of uranium could unleash huge amounts of power.
The same neutrinos that start the chain reaction in fissile material can also be used to reduce the radioactive cores in nukes to something that would not go critical.
The detonation of a nuke is a 2 step process. 1.)Implode the core of fissile material. 2.)Send neutrons in at the same time to begin a chain reaction that causes the material to go critical.
Ban me POPSCI I'm about sick of your liberal bullshit website anyways. Sickening. Do not try
my co-worker's mother-in-law makes $87/hr on the laptop. She has been out of a job for 9 months
but last month her check was $14411 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this web site...
zee44. comso sick of revisionist trying to make it out the the US was a bad guy in WWII.
and cookies to quench the blood thirst of a killer in your own house. Go hug trees somewhere else until you acknowledge that the US didn't create the sins of man that cause war.
#How 3-D Printing Body parts Will Revolutionize Medicinea device the size of an espresso machine quietly whirs to life.
more sophisticated printers advances in regenerative medicine and refined CAD software. To print the liver tissue at Organovo Vivian Gorgen a 25-year-old systems engineer simply had to click run program with a mouse.
They resembled cheap desktop printers because in fact that's what they were. In 2000 bioengineer Thomas Boland the self-described grandfather of bioprinting eyed an old Lexmark printer in his lab at Clemson University.
Scientists had modified already inkjet printers to print fragments of DNA in order to study gene expression. If an inkjet could print genes Boland thought perhaps the same hardware could print other biomaterials.
After all the smallest human cells are 10 micrometers roughly the dimension of standard ink droplets.
Boland emptied the Lexmark's ink cartridge and filled it with collagen. He then glued a thin black silicon sheet onto blank paper and fed it into the printer.
He opened a Word document on his PC typed his initials and hit print. The paper spooled out with TB clearly delineated in off-white proteins By 2000 Boland
and his team had reconfigured a Hewlett-packard Deskjet 550c to print with E coli bacteria. Then they graduated to larger mammalian cells farmed from Chinese hamsters and lab rats.
After printing 90 percent of the cells remained viable which meant the product was useful not simply art.
In 2003 Boland filed the first patent for printing cells. While Boland's lab worked out the problem of bioprinting other engineers applied 3-D printers to different medical challenges.
They printed bone grafts from ceramic dental crowns from porcelain hearing aids from acrylic and prosthetic limbs from polymer.
But those engineers had an advantage that Boland and his colleagues did not: They could print in three dimensions rather than just two.
So Boland and other bioprinting pioneers modified their printers. They disabled the paper-feed mechanisms in their inkjets
It was like magic says James Yoo a researcher at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine who is developing a portable printer to graft skin directly onto burn victims.
The advantage of the printer is that you can deliver cells more accurately and precisely.
A printer that can dispense the right ink in other words is only the first step. Cells have specific requirements depending on the tissue they're destined to become.
So as mechanical engineers began to build early 3-D printers tissue engineers tried growing replacement organs in a lab. They started by pipetting cells into petri dishes by hand.
Researchers soon adopted 3-D printers to make scaffolds more precisely. But manually placing the cells onto them remained a time-consuming and arduous process.
They also designed one printer to create both the synthetic scaffold and tissue in one fell swoop;
The magic he says happens after printing has taken place. Therein lies the biggest misconception about bioprinting:
Another key lies in printing cellular aggregates. You will never build an extended biological structure a big organ
An organ requires networks of blood vessels to distribute nutrients and oxygen. Without this core function cells will wither and die.
Organovo's researchers have made relatively robust vasculature by printing filler such as hydrogel among tubes of tissue cells.
The filler can later be extracted leaving empty channels for blood cells. Ibrahim Ozbolat a mechanical engineer at the University of Iowa has developed also a bioprinter
which uses multiple arms moving in tandem to deposit a vascular network and cellular aggregates at the same time.
what will enable the field's next wave of breakthroughs is sophisticated biologically software. With an inanimate object like a coffee mug a 3-D scanner can create a CAD file in minutes
and upload the design to a 3-D printer. There is no medical equivalent. An MRI doesn't tell you where the cells are says Lipson.
There's also no Photoshop no tools to move cells around. That's not a coincidence.
what most computer software can handle. You can't have a software model of a liver.
It's more complicated than a model for a jet plane. Instead of printing a test tube out of plastic to do chemistry in let's print our test tube out of tissue.
Sensing an opportunity Autodesk has teamed with Organovo to develop CAD programs that could be applied to bioprinting.
but they may have one in the coming years says Carlos Olguin head of Autodesk's Bio nano/Programmable Matter Group.
As a first step Autodesk plans to create a modern cloud-based CAD shell to help streamline the design process.
Eventually its goal is to integrate the math that describes self-assembly and other cellular processes into bioprinting software.
In April Olguin's team released Project Cyborg a Web-based platform geared toward nanoscale molecular modeling and simulations for cellular biology.
But in the mid-term by removing them from this amazingly tedious work of creating the most basic shapes we would hope they would then be able to focus on more interesting applications.
Scientists at MIT have built miniature liver models using micropatterning the same soft lithography technique used to put copper wires onto computer chips.
and nanoscientist developing a 3-D printer to manufacture medicine using chemical inks. Instead of printing a test tube out of plastic to do chemistry in let's say we now print our test tube out of tissue
The system could pick up radio frequencies beyond the range of normal human hearing. In a similar manner bioengineers might one day incorporate sensors into other tissues for example creating a bionic meniscus that can monitor strain.
A printer can put all the human pieces in the right places. But as Forgacs continues to wonder why do those pieces do
Printing livers? and Hearts? And Kidneys? Thousands of people a year are going to benefit. This is simply amazing.
Will they be able to change out parts as easily as we change a hard drive?
Now if they can only solve the problem of exploding bullpen phones when they are hit by these bats. why not just laminate the bat?
well my thought would be that a laminate film would hold the external structure togther thus holding the core togther.
Glassified a project from the MIT Media Lab is a ruler with a transparent screen on one end.
Creative Applications Network Great to see more ideas using the 4d systems transparent OLED display module!
Interesting thing would be nice wireless and if need a battery a transparent one. And pray tell why would I want to measure the angles of a hand-drawn triangle as indicated as one possible use for this contraption?
So Slide-rules are superior to calculators abacuses are superior to computers gas lamps to electric lighting and so on?
Something tells me the ruler will eventually be Wifi capable and then you will really see it become useless among teenagers.
Overall I think the abundant existence of pocket calculators on phones and a computer at every turn means we'll be alright without everyone knowing how to do too much math in their head.
We'll leave it to the engineers and specialists as we have many other skills throughout history.@
For why would anyone want to argue between a slide-rule to a pocket calculator or an abacus to a computer.
(and garbage collectors weren't unionized so they never had garbage strikes). He realized that where there are lots of people all their garbage
*Seriously though I'm usually the guy defending the liberal slant of this website's writers from overzealous conservative counter-arguments in the name of an improved discussion.
I'm surprised that any body can profit $4097 in one month on the internet. did you look at this website...
while the negative emotional valence of pain isn't there to interfere Hurley explained via email.
and we weren't laughing. my classmate's sister makes $70/hour on the internet.
but last month her check was $16110 just working on the internet for a few hours. Here's the site to read more...
www. cnn13. comyet another example of the technique of âÂ#Âoeexpertsã¢Â# to âÂ#Âoeanswerã¢Â# situations simply by tossing several related
#The 10 Coolest Things You Can 3-D Print Right Nowone survey of the 3-D printing landscape will quickly show you that it's brimming with novelty items and useless junk.
Don't have a 3-D printer yet? Chicago's got you covered...Click here to enter the galleryhow about 3d coping a Tree.@
I get it how everybody wants to start printing out everything. As pointed out here much of
Not even counting the 9 out of 10 printer units ever manufactured in these first second
Then in 2006 Anderson began conducting research with Venus a cabled ocean observatory that broadcasts underwater views of offshore British columbia live over the Internet.
A two-ton node basically a large waterproof Ethernet hub connects the experimental setup to a 1. 5-inch cable
and data over the Internet for scientists and the public to check out. Two pigs are tethered to an instrument platform to keep sea critters from dragging them out of camera range.
The deep-sea vehicle Ropos (remotely operated platform for ocean sciences) delivers the pigs and their instrument platform to a node and plugs in a webcam and sensors with dexterous arms.
The platform's bottom is plastic mesh which lets silt microbes eat away at the pigs while collecting the bones for later study (by Lynne Bell a forensics anthropologist at Simon Fraser University).
if the null holds true. https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/National childhood vaccine injury actnot all vaccines are safe for everyone all of the time.
Yes there is a link to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia web page addressing individual ingredients âÂ#Âoesafetyã¢Â#Â. Yet not once do they ever discuss what combinations of these ingredients cause
And note that the web page on ingredients describes them as âÂ#Âoenecessaryã¢Â#Â. Edward Jenner was extraordinarily successful
and your children and are worth the risk. http://blogs-images. forbes. com/matthewherper/files/2013/03/c6fb5feb7f1ee71b7e725277d30999161. jpgthis Chart shows exactly why you should vaccinate.
I find most they arguments to be utter BS the majority of Pro vaccine websites are run by the drug companies.
or if your research consists of going on the internet with no ability to tell which sites are actually backing up their claims with real scientific evidence then doing your own research means absolutely nothing.
The site is the last great largely unexplored dinosaur boneyard in the lower 48 states according to Sampson.
I use this website...zee44. comi bet no would dare to milk it lol l
Millions of years after that our planet would reach a stable âÂ#Â00°the temperature at which the heat radiating from the planet's core would equal the heat that the Earth radiates into space explains David Stevenson a professor of planetary science at the California Institute of technology.
Like all stars as the hydrogen fuel in the core is used up the outer parts of the Sun will begin to expand.
A quick Google search makes it clear why you all are having such a hard time reconciling your different interpretations of the question:
Oh yes and gravity*does*work at the speed of light you might check wikipedia on'gravity waves'.'Sorry JRHELGESON the only thing that was correct in your post was-most probably-your name.
A few days later a new and better science website would go up and Earth would be slightly happier.
The beets conduct body capacitance or the electrical energy stored inside humans to a sensor plugged into a Raspberry Pi minicomputer (Pi for short.
Each touch triggers software to produce one of six percussion sounds. Garner hid the electronics inside a wooden enclosure with a lid
To the 12-inch-tall sides add an 8-inch-square plank that's bored to fit six beets. 2. Computer.
Load touch-sensing software onto the Pi so it can interpret the signals. 3. Beets.
Use a wire to connect the SDA port of the breakout board to pin 3 on the computer and the SCL port to pin 5. Link the board and the Pi's grounds.
Android is used by poorer people and ios is used by richer people. A Pew survey taken last month bears this out:
Android is beating ios in all income brackets except one. Among users in households that earn $75000
or more a whopping 40 percent identify as ios users compared to 31 percent who identify as Android users.
Compare that to the users in sub-$30000 households--only 13 percent use ios while 28 percent use Android.
Android is popular because it's cheap not because it's good wrote Sam Biddle for Gizmodo earlier this year about the reason for the success of Android phones.
But that's changing. The HTC One and especially the contract-free version of the One released this month with stock Android like Google intended is good.
It might be the best phone I've ever used. The tide is turning and that means one thing.
It's time for rich people to gentrify Android. Android is the formerly bad neighborhood that brokers are starting to describe as up and coming.
Rents were cheap--you could snag a phone for free or for $50 or $100 with a two-year contract.
You could get an Android phone on whatever network you want including those that deal significantly
or even primarily to lower-income customers like T-Mobile or Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOS) like Metropcs Boost or Virgin Mobile who rent tower space from other larger networks.
You could get a buy-one-get-one-free deal on a phone. That's why the lower-income set opts for Android over ios. The iphone is for rich people not necessarily
because it's more expensive; a current-generation iphone costs as much and sometimes less than a current-generation top-of-the-line Android phone.
But it came first and so it grabbed the money and loyalty of the early adopters who are by definition rich folks--it initially cost a whopping $500
and it remained pricey for a few generations. And its advertising focused on its premium materials its high-end manufacturing processes and its fancy (paid) apps.
Apple successfully marketed the iphone as high-end. But even bad neighborhoods have strengths. Android has flexibility ios doesn't;
there's only one iphone but there are dozens of Android phones at any given point. You have space to stretch out
if you want it. And slowly Google and the Android hardware makers are realizing what landlords
and shop owners in up-and-coming neighborhoods realize: your profit margins are an awful lot bigger when you sell to rich folks.
The HTC One with its big gorgeous aluminum body its vivid and spacious screen its wildly superior versions of GMAIL Google maps and the Chrome browser its voice control that crushes Siri in every way possible
and its genuinely futuristic and exciting Google Now is a perfect trigger for Android gentrification.
It's a badass affordable loft in a neighborhood you'd been eyeing but couldn't quite bring yourself to move To that makes it different from the other top-tier Android phones on the market like the Samsung Galaxy S IV a more-of-the-same sequel to a phone we didn't much like last year. iphone users might look at a Galaxy S
and think Why ditch my comfortable luxurious iphone ecosystem for a chintzy plastic Samsung phone with desperately overstuffed featuresets?
It'd be like moving from a comfortable old brownstone to a brand-new spacious apartment in an up-and-coming neighborhood...
that's made with paper-thin drywall and the cheapest possible kitchen appliances. And a clothes dryer that singes your underwear.
But the HTC One changes all that: it's something new and perhaps even better.
Android phones are now a legitimate option for the wealthy. And as the rich people come to Android the apps will follow
just as the organic grocery stores and adventurous Japanese fusion tapas restaurants come to gentrifying neighborhoods. A smartphone ecosystem is not unlike a neighborhood:
when that 31 percent percent of $75000+households rises to 40 percent you can bet the New yorker will hurry a little bit harder to bring its digital magazine to Android.
What happens to the lower-income types when Android starts marketing more heavily to the wealthy?
I'm not sure. Maybe nothing! Just because there's previously un-accessed profit to be made on the high end of things doesn't mean manufacturers will stop catering to the (also profitable) lower end.
There are hardware manufacturers who have shown no interest at all in the more premium side of the business like ZTE Kyocera and Haier.
Or maybe another platform like Windows phone or Blackberry will start marketing more heavily to the lower-income segment.
But assuming the HTC One sells well this could be the first major step towards Android gentrification.
Some day the rich kids who've grown up with Android will look back at the HTC One.
That was when my parents knew that Android was safe they'll say. Customer accumulated data bases making bold assumptions about people are a perspective of technology will constantly grow in both the civilian and government view.
I find some of the above assumptions completely absurd but I am sure somebody is looking over some data base somewhere to make these assumptions.
There could be a large Popsci article written about this topic itself. Besides NSA listening to all communications of everyone real time I am sure they are developing data bases on individuals in hopes of guessing their next move too.
I'm a Apple/iphone and would really like to get the HTC1 my coworker has it and I really like the feel of it.
The only thing I can think that I will miss from iphone is the Photo Stream but even that
I hardly use. Have any of you switched from the iphone maybe you guys can help me switch.
Thanksi don't doubt the statistics regarding income but the vast majority of fellow Android users I know chose the platform not because of the cost
but because they abhor the arrogance of Apple and the Don't tamper with the perfection we've created mentality that they apply to their (lack of) configurability.
The bottom line is that Apple makes undeniably beautiful hardware geared to users who would rather be driven passengers through the technological countryside as opposed to grabbing the wheel themselves for a truly personalized and open user experience.
Android has a huge problem to solve before any real progress can be made in getting more upscale users-security.
ALL OF the mobile viruses are on Android and more every day. Combined with vendors being reluctant to update the system this makes using Android dangerous for nontechnical people
-and the more well off you are the more you have to lose in terms of a virus getting into a bank account or something else.
Another reason why more well off users are using Apple products is it's simply where the apps are.
There are a lot more high quality applications on ios than on Android and it makes a lot more sense to buy a platform for the software you want to use rather than the operating system.
I recently switched from an iphone 5 to the HTC One. I am pleased very so far.
One responder mentioned Photostream HTC One (Android) also has the option to sync all of the photos you take to the cloud create albums and share photos.
The shouldn't be much of a concern. At my house we did some printing from our iphones.
After switching to Android I have found that Google Cloud Print is much nicer. I can print from anywhere
I am (not just when I'm connected to my home network). It requires a little bit of configuration to get things to your individual tastes
but once you've done that the experience can be much more rewarding and personalized than with iphone.
I was an early adopter of ios 7 (mobile developer) and I really didn't like the direction the OS was going in.
I preferred a bit of skeuomorphism and felt that it made things a bit more intuitive. This is really what lead me to take the plunge and try something different
(I've been using iphones since the original iphone came out). kgelner-name anyone you know have heard of anywhere at anytime in the US who has ever ever got a virus on Android.
Stats from virus scanner software doesn't count people who pirate apps don't count people in Russia an China don't count.
Ask around. Post it on your favorite social media site and ask. Go ahead I dare you.
FUD pure and simple. As for money I spent $450 cash for my Nexus 4 and know a few hundred thousand who did likewise.
The pure Android Galaxy 4 and HTC One cannot be purchased from a a carrier and run $599+.
+There are people who are willing to buy them at that price. Meanwhile the IPHONE 4 and 4s can be had on contract for<$50.
In fact when the IPHONE 5 was released the 4s became a big seller because of the price drop.
Don't believe me take a look at Apples earnings reports from that quarter. Their margins took a hit because of the increase sales of the 4s.
A majority of Iphone users I know either got them as hand-me-downs or for $50 or less.
I prefer Android because I can make my phone mine not some companies vision of what
I want. If I have nearly $500 to spend on a phone and didn't choose Apple I'm obviously not doing so because
I don't have the cash. Many of us choose Android because we actually want to not
because we have to. You CAN'T compare ios with android on a socioeconomic scale
because android includes several brands that range in price and functionality vs ios which is one brand of phone.
It's absurd and elitist. And just because someone may spend more money on one product over another doesn't mean that product is superior.
I don't recall any high end android phones having any major defects with their antenna's or mapping capabilities.
Everyone knows apple has exceptional marketing. They have succeeded in getting tech-ignorant people to buy products with outdated and sometimes faulty components.
Android developed a visionary OS that hardware is now able to fully match--meanwhile Apple's limited OS is falling way behind the times (widgets themes custumizations.
and once you go AMOLED you will never go back to LCD. my buddy's sister-in-law makes $70 every hour on the laptop.
but last month her paycheck was $16749 just working on the laptop for a few hours...www. bay9ã. cããwith the exception of the spammer preceding this comment the quality of commentary on Popsci is very high.
As has been pointed out Android runs on hardware ranging from nearly free to $600+.+I believe this variety fosters an analogous range in the socio-economic class of users.
Android's greatest fault isn't its perceived complexity (versus ios) or its insecurity but rather the fragmentation allowed by Google.
Device makers are allowed to change the ROM and other features of the OS to suit their hardware (perhaps even preferences) all
while having no obligation to roll out the latest Android version. I think it's this fragmentation that creates the notion of it being unsecured and difficult to use.
If Canonical can create a fluid user experience with its Ubuntu mobile OS while preventing hardware makers from altering that interface
I think they'll be able to take the middle ground in the smartphone market.
This entire is based upon conjecture and fallacy quite disappointing actually. On the flipside most of the comments here are spot-on couldn't agree more.
My'ancient'Galaxy S2 modified to my tastes and recently updated to Android 4. 2 blows away my buddies vanilla iphone 5 in almost all regards period.
I haven't upgraded not because I can't afford to but simply because I don't HAVE to.
I had a Sony Android fone but got worried by the inability to update the OS.
Sony rubbed my nose in it by promising that an update was due later that year but after 2 years
I saved up over nearly a year and bought an iphone 5. Some of its quaint ways are bloody irritating
There's a steady stream of updaters both for ios and and the 100*-odd apps & games that
brothers friend was actualey receiving cash part-time from there new portable computer..there dads pal has been doing this for beneath fifteen months
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011