GMO is a very scary idea. We have no idea what may become to the long term effects to humans or plant and animal life.
To date there has been no reliable study to indicate any notable harm to humans from GMO crops.
because the genetic material of the food they collect--the nectar--may have already been contaminated heavily from contact with GMO material that has escaped from dedicated-GMO farms. bee larvae do feed on honey
because researchers fear that consumers won't eat GMO berries. Major science organizations have concluded that just
Nevertheless many consumers find GMOS strange or scary. Some individuals and organizations worry that GMOS have long-term risks that studies haven't yet detected.
Such worries come through in Europe's stringent genetically modified food laws and recent ballot initiatives in the U s. to label genetically modified items.
Just look at GMO's not all GMO's are the same some have not been tested thoroughly
and have been shown by examples to be harmful to the public so those particular GMO's have been denied access in certain economies because of their harmful affects on people
recall the controversial Flavrsavr from the mid-90s which quickly went off the market leaving no GMO tomatoes available for purchase.
GMO's have delivered negative nutritional returns and may be contributing to disease. Now to strawberries. Remember that the whole house smelled of them 50-60 years ago o
whether GMO foods are good or bad she says. She simply doesn't have the facilities to genetically modify rice.
In fact I don't think GMOS are a problem she says. My personal opinion is I would eat them.
GMO rice can't be bred organic but rice even if it's bred using the genetic knowledge Pinson develops may still be grown organically.
and many countries don't wish to import GMO foods. Throughout life insist to only eat white rice
I don't see what the big deal is over GMO foods. They don't seem drastically harmful.
In fact I kind of changed my mind thinking that we should probably keep things in their natural state as God would probably want them that way. nebulation the primary issue with GMO's is the lack of documented long term studies to back the claims made by the manufacturers regarding our health. julianpenrod-you speak like an advantaged person meaning that
in a word Monsanto and genetically-altered organisms (GMO. With flowering plants now contaminated with pollen from plants w/re-engineered DNA like rapeseed
European activists are saying NO to GMO and Monsantos so-called trial plantations. Wow I think I need to go hug a tree.
Corn soybeans and all other Midwestern crops with GMO'S counterparts are self pollinating-hives are introduced not.
Once the bees have malnutrition ANYTHING could kill them easily. how bout we get one hive that only has gmo flowers
It is GMO crops watch the documentary on Netflix or go to rt. com Brainless Americans you are the reasons corporations have taken over our government
and the supreme court and Obama just signed a bill protecting monsanto and GMO crops. I bet you watch fox news
Please research Monsanto GMOS and sugar beets. This is not good news s
#16,000 Dead Pigs In The Huangpu: Can You Still Drink Shanghai's Water? Chinese officials have fished more than 16000 pig carcasses from the Huangpu River from
#Pest In Brazil Has evolved Resistance Against GMO Corncrop-munching caterpillars in Brazil are no longer put off by genetically modified plants designed to kill them Reuters reports.
One group of Brazilian farmers even wants GMO companies to reimburse them for the additional insecticides they had to use
Companies are also likely developing new GMO crops perhaps with more insect toxins engineered into them to combat the newly evolved resistance.
There are some scientifically proven ways to slow bugs'ability to adapt to GMO toxins. Planting a mix of GMO
and non-GMO plants helps. So does planting first-and second-generation Bt crops separately.
Both strategies lessen the deadly pressure against insects susceptible to Bt poisoning so they'll evolve more slowly.
and there were not enough non-GMO seeds available for them to really put the strategies to work.*
#Another Chinese National Indicted For Stealing American GMO Cornsometimes even a high-tech heist requires a little digging around in the dirt.
Earlier this month a federal court indicted a Chinese national for trying to steal GMO corn technology from Dupont Monsanto and Agreliant Genetics.
and signing an agreement with a GMO company (although that might present its own difficulties:
Parent plants are much more valuable than the GMO seeds farmers buy. A farmer who plants a crossbred GMO corn crop could keep the resulting seeds
and replant them if she wanted. I mean technically she could because the seeds aren't sterile as is alleged often
10 Common GMO Claims Debunkedlater this year the U s. Department of agriculture may approve the Arctic Granny
Although it will probably be another two years before the non-browning fruits appears in stores at least one producer is already scrambling to label its apples GMO-free.
The looming apple campaign is just the latest salvo in the ongoing war over genetically modified organisms (GMOS) ne that's grown increasingly contentious.
Over the past decade the controversy surrounding GMOS has sparked worldwide riots and the vandalism of crops in Oregon the United kingdom Australia and the Philippines.
But the truth is GMOS have been studied intensively and they look a lot more prosaic than the hype contends.
those traits dominate the more than 430 million acres of GMO crops that have already been planted globally.
To find out Popular Science chose 10 of the most common claims about GMOS and interviewed nearly a dozen scientists.
In that sense GMOS are not radical at all. But the technique does differ dramatically from traditional plant breeding.
With GMOS we know the genetic information we are using we know where it goes in the genome
One frequently cited study published in 2012 by researchers from the University of Caen in France claimed that one of Monsanto's corn GMOS caused tumors in lab rats.
More recently researchers from the University of Perugia in Italy published a review of 1783 GMO safety tests;
. since these GMOS were introduced in 1996. But glyphosate is among the mildest herbicides available with a toxicity 25 times less than caffeine.
A 2012 paper from Iowa State university and the University of Minnesota suggested glyphosate-tolerant GMOS are responsible for monarchs'recent population decline.
Farmers with adjacent GMO and organic fields already do this. And if some GMO pollen does blow into an organic field it won't necessarily nullify organic status. Even foods that bear the Non-GMO Project label can be 0. 5 percent GMO by dry weight.
As for a GMO infiltrating wild plants the offspring's survival partly depends on whether the trait provides an adaptive edge.
Genes that help wild plants survive might spread whereas those that say boost Vitamin a content might remain at low levels
In the U s. farmers have been planting increasing amounts GMO crops since the seeds became commercially available in 1996.
Corn cotton and soy hich together occupy about 40 percent of U s. cropland re the three crops with the highest GMO fraction by area each more than 90 percent in 2013.
The GMO fraction by area of corn cotton and soy in the top states that grow those crops.
Today's most common GMO technology RECOMBINANT DNA inserts genes into a plant's cells via bacteria or specialized delivery tools but it involves some trial and error.
Current GMO methods leave a trace behind or example a bit of the DNA from bacterium used to insert new genes.
Have these scientists never read the comments on an article about GMOS/been on Facebook?
and Australia and it has the market advantage of not being a GMO banana; the technique used to develop it involves somoclonal variation or hand-selection and rebreeding of hardier varieties.
The problem with GMO bananas isn t the fruit or the technology it s that most consumers wouldn t buy them banana marketers say.)
#How Hawaii's Big Island Became GMO-Freeso what exactly is the science on the safety of GMOS?
There are a lot of pro-and anti-GMO claims to filter through. The New york times published a great spoonful of sugar this weekend to help that medicine go down:
Amy Harmon profiled the GMO debate in Hawaii and followed County Council member Greggor Ilagan as he plowed into research to decide
whether to vote for or against a Big Island-wide GMO ban. Ilagan learned that widely publicized studies purporting to show ill health effects from eating genetically modified foods have been discounted.
He found that there is little risk of genetically modified genes cross-pollinating with plants of other species
but not necessarily one that has to come with GMO foods. At the same time Ilagan grappled with passionate well-meaning constituents who use incorrect
or confused science to oppose GMOS. As it is for many the path is not at all clear for him at first.
The trees are one of the best successes to date in the genetic modification of forest trees a field that is much less advanced than GMO products in crop agriculture.
In terms of wood yield plantation health and productivity these GMO trees could be said very significant Steven Strauss a distinguished professor of forest biotechnology in the OSU College of Forestry.
A number of the GMO trees in this study also had improved significantly growth characteristics the researchers found.
Annual crops such as cotton and corn already are grown routinely as GMO products with insect resistance genes.
but none in the United states. The use of GMO trees in the U s. still faces heavy regulatory obstacles Strauss said.
#New non-GM technology platform for genetic improvement of sunflower oilseed cropscientists have developed techniques for the genetic improvement of sunflowers using a non-GMO based approach.
scientists saythe European union cannot meet its goals in agricultural policy without embracing genetically engineered crops (GMOS).
Many aspects of the EU agricultural policy including those concerning GMOS are internally inconsistent and actively obstruct what the policy sets out to achieve Christou and his colleagues continued.
and recognizes the potential of GMOS to deliver it but EU policy on the cultivation of GMOS has created an environment that makes this impossible.
In reality there is a de facto moratorium in Europe on the cultivation of genetically engineered crops such as maize cotton
experts sayscientists say amending an EU directive on GMOS could help stimulate innovation in making cheaper vaccines pharmaceuticals
The average cost for having GMOS approved in Europe is estimated at-10 million per event compared to $1-2 million in the US.
Rodent studies for genetically modified organism (GMO) safety have recently been in the news. Seralini et al. showed untoward effects in rats fed GM corn
and add to the controversy of using rodents to study GMO safety (see EFSA report). The study is important
and the role science can play in decision-making around the introduction of GMOS into the food system.
#No sign of health or nutrition problems from GMO livestock feed, study findsa new scientific review from the University of California Davis reports that the performance
#Most famous wheat gene discovered, clears way for non-GMO breedingwashington State university researchers have found the most famous wheat gene a reproductive traffic cop of sorts that can be used to transfer valuable genes from other plants
while foregoing the cost regulatory hurdles and controversy of Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOS. The real exciting part of this gene is that it has tremendous potential for application said Kulvinder Gill a WSU professor who reports his findings in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
and other chromosomes pair with wheat and transfer genes by a natural method into wheat without calling it GMO Gill said.
With awareness of what makes these biotechnologies new and different genetically edited fruits might be met with greater acceptance by society at large than genetically modified organisms (GMOS) so far have been especially in Europe they say.
This could mean that genetically edited versions of GMOS such as super bananas that produce more Vitamin a
and perhaps allow their commercialization even in countries in which GMOS have met so far with harsh criticism and controversy.
We would like people to understand that crop breeding through biotechnology is restricted not only to GMOS he said.
or are now debating GMO regulations it's essential that consumers know that a locally labeled product does not imply non-GMO Campbell said.
We are not saying GMO is bad or good but rather that local does not imply GMO-free he said.
Local and organic products have seen increasing consumer demand over the last decade with sales of organic products reaching $26. 7 billion in the U s
#GMO soybean pollen threatens Mexican honey sales, report findsmexico is the fourth largest honey producer and fifth largest honey exporter in the world.
A Smithsonian researcher and colleagues helped rural farmers in Mexico to quantify the genetically modified organism (GMO) soybean pollen in honey samples rejected for sale in Germany.
when their product contains pollen from GMO crops that are not for human consumption. The regional agricultural authorities furthermore seemed unaware that bees visited flowering soybeans to collect nectar and pollen.
As far as we could determine every kind of GMO soybean grown in Campeche is approved for human consumption said Roubik.
But honey importers sometimes do no further analysis to match GMO pollen grains with their source.
To test the honey for GMO pollen researchers from the Smithsonian El Colegio de la Frontera Sur la Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan
Two samples tested positive for GMO pollen. We cautiously interpret these results as significant for elsewhere in Mexico where some five times the GMO soy grown in Campeche is found
and beekeeping is alive and well not to mention the rest of the world said Roubik. Bee colonies act as extremely sensitive environmental indicators.
since 1995 acknowledges that the cotton plants developed in the project technically are modified genetically organisms (GMOS) a controversial subject.
A major criticism of GMOS Pepper notes focuses on cases where genes from other species â#even bacterial ones â#have been added to an organism to achieve a desired trait.
include mandates such as working with the seasons, no artificial ingredients, no antibiotics for animals, cage free birds and no GMO ingredients or hormones.
Frankenfood the very term is evidence that the communications environment around genetically modified foods (GMOS) is charged highly emotionally.
a small but vocal minority is driving the discussion about GMO foods. In the process the majority mainstream consumers wants
and sugar beet currently sold in the U s. are GMO, but apples would be the only mainstream commercially available fruit with the treatment.
He also says we shouldn't fear pollen from his GMO spreading to other orchards.
Whether or not consumers are ready for more GMO fruit, Okanagan is preparing to release Gala and Fuji varieties of Arctic Apples,
or GMOS, is picking up steam in statehouses across the United states. This year alone, 28 states have introduced legislation for mandatory labeling of such foods.
The measures have been a major setback to seed giants like Monsanto who argue that GMOS--like those that produce crops resistant to disease--are feed necessary to a growing planet and pose no harm to humans or the environment.
whether GMOS harm humans or the environment. Little wonder that the biotech companies are worried. A June ABC News poll found that 52 percent of the respondents felt GMO food was unsafe to eat
and slightly more said theyã¢â â¢d be less likely to buy foods labeled as genetically modified or bioengineered.
GMO trees for sequestering more carbon? Salvaging biofuel from West's pine beetle devastation Could biodiesel be worse for the environment than diesel?
was made it by one of 36 companies that funded the opposition to GMO labeling in California?
The largest campaign at the moment is called Demand GMO Labeling. It a boycott of 36 companies that donated $150, 000 or more to oppose GMO labeling in California during the last election cycle.
They â â¢ve got about 137,000 members at this Point the way it works is each member can scan any product barcode they come into contact with--whether it food or from the pharmacy or hardware store.
So the user might discover their shampoo is related to a company that opposed GMO labeling
what the potential consequences of genetically modified organisms (GMOS) are, and what the global public role is in their use or disuse.
and the use of technology to produce GMOS was born. GMOS: What they are and why they re used According to THE WHO,
GMOS oecan be defined as organisms in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally it allows selected individual genes to be transferred from one organism into another, also between non-related species. Simply put,
genetic modification involves manipulating the genetic makeup of food to create or enhance characteristics that are desired by humans.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011