Synopsis: 3. food & berverages: Food:


impactlab_2014 00353.txt

Sensors, Food, Automation and Engineering. Sensors help agriculture by enabling real-time traceability and diagnosis of crop, livestock and farm machine states.

Food may benefit directly from genetic tailoring and potentially from producing meat directly in a lab. Automation will help agriculture via large-scale robotic

Food Genetically designed food: The creation of entirely new strains of food animals and plants in order to better address biological and physiological needs.

A departure from genetically modified food, genetically designed food would be engineered from the ground up.

Scientifically viable in 2016; mainstream in 2021; and financially viable in 2022. In vitro meat: Also known as cultured meat or tubesteak, it is a flesh product that has never been part of a complete, living animal.

food and water in order to support life-forms inhabiting the system. Such systems already exist in small scales,

produce energy, provide food, and maintain and enhance human health and our environment. Scientifically viable in 2013;

including year-round crop production, protection from weather, support urban food autonomy and reduced transport costs. Scientifically viable in 2023;


impactlab_2014 00526.txt

Cost Estimators 59. 3dimensionalists Those with an innate ability to think three dimensionally. 60. 3d Printerink Developers 61. 3d Food Printer Chef 62.

and the flavorings we add to food, the future will seem boring if our reality hasn t been augmented in some way. 71.

Urban Agriculturalists Why ship food all the way around the world when it can be grown next door 133.


Livescience_2013 03530.txt

which are tiny organs within cells that convert the molecules in the food we eat into chemical energy the cell can use.

Any work of the sort would need Food and Drug Administration approval in the United states not a given by any means but rogue clinics or scientists in less-regulated nations could make attempts he said.


Livescience_2013 03771.txt

This means having the right food and habitat and evading predators especially humans. Conservation controversy Critics of de-extinction say reviving extinct animals would do more harm to conservation efforts than good.


Livescience_2013 05232.txt

When German vineyards wanted an automatic process for sorting their grapes Fraunhofer IOSB presented an obvious choice owing to its experience developing machines that sort tobacco minerals foods and more.


Livescience_2013 05489.txt

and by 2050 food production must increase by at least 70 percent to keep pace. Unfortunately about half of the world's food is consumed never due to inefficiencies in the harvesting storage and delivery of crops.

Even in developed nations about 30 percent of purchased food ends up going to waste and supply-chain inefficiencies only exacerbate the problem.

Certainly weather-related events like the current and long-lasting drought in portions of the U s. add further complexity to the science of farming as resultant crop damage food supply shortages

and rising commodities prices frequently illustrate. To help reverse this sobering trend and to generate enough food to meet the ever-growing demands of a growing global population today's

and tomorrow's agribusinesses need to embrace smarter farming methods. Fortunately the technology to do so is available and working right now.

and more food makes it to the dinner table. The development and use of those predictive analytics based techniques and technologies is limited not to mega-farms.

which routes and methods will be fastest to transport harvested food. That is especially critical in countries like Brazil where many of the roads are unpaved


Livescience_2013 06825.txt

Printing food seems more like an idea based in Star trek rather than in the average home.

With everything from printed metal airplane wings to replacement organs on the horizon could printed food be next?

In some ways we have oeprinted food for decades. Think of making a sundae using a self-dispensing ice-cream machine.

Researchers at Cornell pioneered some of this work adapting an open source extrusion printer called the Fab@Home Lab to work with food in 2007.

Novelty food suppliers have become early adopters of similar technology. Various chocolate printers are on the market

Other 3d printing technologies have been investigated for use with food. In 2007 Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories introduced the Candyfab 4000 a DIY printer based on a modified selective laser sintering technique.

Beyond novelty printed food could provide serious medical benefits. The netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific research (TNO) announced they ll build printers to reassemble pureed food to look like the original think 3d printed broccoli florets from pureed broccoli.

TNO has targeted printers for nursing homes in order to help elderly people who have chewing and swallowing problems.

Beyond medical conditions TNO has proposed printing customised meals with varied levels of the basic food components like carbs protein and fat for everyone from seniors to athletes to expectant mothers.

And NASA sees 3d printed food as a revolutionary way to make personalised meals for astronauts.

They are funding development of a 3d printer that premixes basic food components before spraying the mix on baking tray.

Beyond providing cosmic delivery food would also be tailored for astronauts'daily activities. will printed food go beyond novelty value?

Should it replace other foods or supplement the nutritional value of existing foods? In this area one of the most interesting and perhaps controversial areas is the debate about printing meat.

Some suggest 3d printed meat could provide high quality protein for a growing global population without increasing stress on arable land

For vegetarians printed meat somewhat circumvents concerns about harmful or destructive use of animals for food.

Printed meat may result in a debate akin to that on GMO foods. Certainly the public will want to know

whether printed foods are safe for human consumption. Consumers will most likely demand adequate protections to ensure the development of printed foods does not limit their access to

or contaminate organic foods. It is reasonable to assume most will want to decide whether they eat oereal meat

Farming communities and those in agricultural food production will also want a voice about if when and how their industry will be transformed by industrialised printed meat.

Early identification or those affected and extensive engagement with the range of community concerns about printed foods is warranted.

While no specific printed food exploration exists yet similar forms of community engagement have been developed in Australia through the Science and Technology Engagement Pathways framework (STEP.

With no slow down in 3d printing developments there will certainly be new advances in printed food.

Whether the technology can truly move from the novelty sector will most likely depend on the ability to process a wider range of foods requiring influence from both the kitchen and from printer developers.

whether 3d printed food can integrate in the global supply chain particularly if printed meat can be made economically viable

However the benefits of 3d printed food could be monumental. Time will tell if the next fad will be the 3d printed diet.

Until then the community should be involved in the discussion of printed food. Dr. Robert Gorkin is a Strategic Development Officer at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (ACES.


Livescience_2014 01041.txt

and explore Mars will certainly have to bring their food with them. However if a permanent settlement on Mars is to be both physically

and economically sustainable eventually settlers will have to grow most if not all of their food on the Red planet.

First unlike hardware or electronics food is a consumable which means that the settlers will need a continuous supply.

Sending a kilogram (2. 5 pounds) of basic food to Mars would likely cost many times more than a similar amount of Beluga caviar consumed On earth.

which means that settlers will have to store some food for two-plus years before a new shipment arrives.

It is not possible to ship certain types of food such as fresh vegetables and fruits that far or to store them for many months.

In fact very few foods remain viable over such durations without losing many of the characteristics that make them wholesome and nutritious.

NASA has been funding research into methods of storing food for long periods while keeping astronauts healthy.

However there has been limited only research into actually growing food under the conditions plants are likely to encounter on Mars. The Red planet's gravity is 38-percent that of Earth

or dock with the ISS to replenish food. Powered by two solar panels pointed toward the sun the lab would rotate at two revolutions per minute (rpm) simulating Mars's gravity.

Even without such studies it is still possible to speculate about food sources for Mars settlers.

All would be likely choices as mainstay foods if they can thrive under Mars-like conditions.

In addition to providing a food source greenery offers the added benefits of converting carbon dioxide exhaled by settlers into oxygen essential for maintaining a long-term bio-regenerative life support system.

Fungi specifically mushrooms are excellent low-maintenance food sources that require little or no light.

Mars settlers could also turn to grasshoppers as an additional food resource. While not popular in most European countries and the Anglo-sphere grasshoppers are a major source of animal protein in Asia Africa and South america.

Speaking of Star trek a version of its food replicator is in the process of moving from science fiction to science fact.


Livescience_2014 01408.txt

Nearly a third of all the food produced in the world is lost or wasted according to the UN s World Resources Institute.

If we convert this mass into calories it constitutes nearly a quarter of all food produced

It is a sad irony that we waste so much food especially fruit and vegetables but still fail to feed the world s ever increasing population.

We need to start minimising the amount of food that is produced and then lost. Loss happens when food is spilt in transit

or spoilt from heavy bruising or wilting. It is unplanned the result of an agricultural process gone wrong or technical limitations in storage infrastructure packaging or marketing.

Good food is wasted also when it is thrown simply away before or after it spoils. A key way to minimise the amount of food lost is through postharvest technology

which can help make food last longer without losing nutrients. Once developed it needs to be integrated into the global supply chain of food production.

We need to optimise the food we already produce especially in developing countries. This can be done by significantly improving the way food is handled after harvesting particularly to make the process more hygienic.

We should make sure postharvest techniques are environmentally friendly and of course nontoxic to humans when applied to food.

The use of natural biodegradable products as an alternative to synthetic chemicals has shown remarkable improvements in maintaining fruit quality

and extending shelf life. These natural products are nontoxic to humans and safe. Chitosan for example is a natural product obtained from crustacean shells.

It has been shown to significantly maintain papaya fruit when applied to it. In combination with Gum arabic (hardened sap obtained from the acacia tree) it can also delay the ripening of bananas.

This includes packing food in containers that modify the atmosphere to prevent decay hot water treatment

Once proper postharvest technologies are used efficiently food losses can be minimised and the problem of food insecurity alleviated.

Hopefully too we can develop better ways of reducing the huge amount of food loss that takes place

and focus on getting food to those who need it. Asgar Ali receives funding from the Ministry of Agriculture Malaysia.


Livescience_2014 01633.txt

and it competes with the food supply. Mango Materials'process uses bacteria grown in fermenters to transform methane and oxygen along with added nutrients (to supply excess carbon) into PHA.


Livescience_2014 03250.txt

#New Tech Sheds Light on the Future of Food#This article was published originally at The Conversation.

The challenges of growing enough food to feed the world have grown more severe in the 21st century.

And we need to incorporate zero-waste and low-energy technologies into the task of food production.

What can achieve the intensification of food supply we require but in a way that is also sustainable and less harmful to the environment?

There is an urgent need to develop new methods for sustainable food production. This includes a greater emphasis on urban agriculture such as vertical farming

and planned could provide the sustainable means to improve food supply we need. Ideally urban agriculture fits neatly alongside

There is potential for these multifunctional techno-greenhouses built around LED grow lights to increase the quality of the food we eat


Livescience_2014 03800.txt

For countries like the UAE which imports 90 percent of its food this technology could be crucial for fighting food scarcity and conserving water.


Nature 01906.txt

and do not compete for land with food, but the cellulose they contain is hard to break down.


Nature 01919.txt

Nature Newsresearch Policy Events People Business Trend watch Research Crop catalogue A global search to gather the wild relatives of essential food crops such as wheat,


Nature 01967.txt

Studies in animals suggest that exposure to bisphenol A a hormone-disrupting plasticizer used in food-can linings


Nature 02517.txt

and former head of the USDA's National Institute for Food and Agriculture. The Kentucky bluegrass decision drives this point home,


Nature 03796.txt

yet many Americans are concerned increasingly about the health and safety of our food. The use of hormones, antibiotics and pesticides,

What steps would you take to ensure the health, safety and productivity of America s food supply?

One in four people were getting sick every year due to food-borne illness, and children and the elderly were more at risk.

I signed the most comprehensive reform of our nation s food safety laws in more than 70 years â oe giving the Food and Drug Administration the resources,

prevented food from being contaminated with dangerous bacteria, bolstered surveillance used to detect contamination problems earlier,

and minimize pesticides and antibiotics in our food. I set the ambitious goal to increase the number of certified organic operations by 20 percent â oe

I am protecting human health by ensuring that the foods the American public eats will be free from unsafe levels of pesticides by making sure that all new,

Preventive practices are the best tool to reduce the incidence of food-borne illnesses because they provide the greatest control over the potential risks of contamination

to develop specific guidance for the commodities most often associated with food-borne illness outbreaks.

and a collaborative instead of combative relationship between regulators and businesses, America s food system will continue to be the world s best.


Nature 03900.txt

Originally, engineered animals were produced with the aim of making food safer, healthier and more abundant.


Nature 03923.txt

Biofuels are falling from grace around the world as critics charge that devoting millions of hectares of agricultural land to fuel crops is driving up food prices


Nature 04218.txt

a seed that could be harvested for food but would not produce offspring. The controversial proposal raised concerns that it would make farmers dependent on industry for their livelihood.

and food safety groups are concerned about contamination of food crops with products from a new generation of crops engineered to produce chemicals or pharmaceuticals.


Nature 04895.txt

might help to halve the amount of fertilizer needed to bring food self-sufficiency to Sub-saharan africa, according to proponents.

Widespread use of chemical fertilizer has increased greatly food sufficiency in many countries, for example in China and India,

"We do need to increase food productivity in a sustainable way, says Ronald  Vargas, a soils and land management officer at the FAO in Rome."


popsci_2013 00933.txt

but that CO2 is reintegrated into either the manmade agricultural food system or the natural system.

Food production technology continues to improve worldwide as does energy production. We feed more produce more energy

I but our system of infrastructure for food and water is tenuous. Now I don't know who GFN is

what scientists and engineers can do to continue food and energy for a massive population.


popsci_2013 00966.txt

As they wait for their food Mark Moline an oceanographer from the University of Delaware opens a Toughbook laptop


popsci_2013 01048.txt

#Genetically modified food has all the ingredients to scare the pants off us: Chemicals! Technology! Big ag!

or any approved genetically modified food on the market to allergies one of his sources plant geneticist Pamela Ronald told him.

I quickly discovered that blaming GMO foods for any kind of health problem is controversial in the medical

Food scientist Richard Goodman for example told Entine The risks from GM foods are infinitesimally small though no such viewpoints made it into Elle's pages.

or stopped if the genetically modified food causes harmful side effects. Why would they do that?!

The scientific consensus is that all GMO products currently on the market are as safe or in many cases safer than conventionally grown food.

/27/the-genetics-and-politics-of-genetically-modified-foods/Good article natarajanganesan. Did you write that?

And thank you Empmortakaten for pointing out that there is greater public health risk from so-called organic foods than from GMO foods.

They rarely provide studies of GMO foods that show measurable harm (because there aren't any)

Like it or not GMO foods are here to stay and all the studies so far show that they are just as safe as non-GMO foods.

Empmortakaten you're information source is this: www. axismundionline. com/blog/the-new-is-gm-food-safe-meme/www. axismundionline. com:

Rave Rockstep Party Madness with added Science I think you've been Rave Rockstepping to some really bad sources during your Party Madnessthis is not a news source...

Sincerely-Joehttp://www. joesid. comso TANGSTEN point us to a study not tainted by seed dispensary money that shows that GMO foods are measurably more dangerous than non-GMO foods.

if you happen to be a lab rat bred with a specific hypersensitivity to certain food

Caen University-The study published in the peer-reviewed journal Food and Chemical Toxicology found that rats fed on a diet of 33 per cent NK603 corn

âÂ#Âoethere has not been one study that links the genetically engineered corn or any approved genetically modified food on the market to allergies.

Just because âÂ#Âoeno documented case of any health problem in humansã¢Â# has been âÂ#Âoelinked toã¢Â# genetically modified food doesn't mean there isn't a connection it only means that the bribed crooks who call themselves Ã

The environmental enslavement prospects the New world Order envisions with genetically modified food is greater than that with radium

It is possible that specific GMO foods in the future--ones not studied and certified yet--may turn out to be more harmful than their non-GMO counterparts.

and found to be at least as safe for consumptions as non-GMO foods. Environmental concerns remain to be tested more fully perhaps but so far so good.

How can anyone claim that the food is safe if you only test it for 90 days?

and market authorizations for the thousands of chemicals and GM foods that were authorized on the basis of these studies should be revoked.

The results indicate that it would be prudent for GM CROPS that are destined for human food

when billions of you are hanging GMO algae food sustenance bags off the sides of your houses

and other blood-making organsã¢Â#Âll of which are signs of severe toxicity. 3. This past year Food Chemical Toxicology published the results of a two-year study conducted by scientists at the University of Caen

and are forcing farmers to dump even more varieties of toxic chemical herbicides and pesticides on our foods in order to stay ahead of nature s race.

GMO foods got sideeffects -if they arent carefully made and tested yet they can also be healthy and better if doen right.

and GMO foods-but if you have to choose inbetween GMO food and starvation for a month-there is nothing to choose.

They are already working on better solutions than GMO foods. 3-D printers can now print food that provides everything you need to survive.

The only reason this hasn't completely solved our food problem already is that the technology is fairly new

http://newsfeed. time. com/2013/05/24/nasa-funded-3d-food-printer-could-it-end-world-hunger/Here is an article from Popsci detailing the same thing:

Versus the choice of malnutrition or weird food its easy to choose weird food. There is a second but even more weird alternative that


popsci_2013 01087.txt

toys wristwatches airplane parts food. Now scientists are working to apply similar 3-DâÂ#Ârinting technology to the field of medicine accelerating an equally dramatic change.

According to the Food and Drug Administration liver toxicity is the most common reason for a drug to be pulled from clinical trials as well as from the marketplace after it's been approved.


popsci_2013 01103.txt

Austrian food futurist Hanni RÃ Â tzler and Josh Schonwald author of The Taste of Tomorrow.

obviously there would be no purpose in keeping animals meant for food. will the vegetarians jump on board?

This could be a viable alternative to supplement our food supply cheers. yea sure say good bye to all those cows why raise em

In the right hands of a food processing major it would perhaps contest any naturally-sourced protein in both nutritional values and taste.

Over 40%of our man made greenhouse methane comes from livestock for food. With an exponentially growing population of 8. 3 billion there isn't enough feed in the world to keep that number of cattle pigs

I don't want anymore ALTERED FOODS being made we have enough people dying of CANCER & other processed food ailments for a lifetime?

and then the unused food value that remains in the blood of the calf after slaughter is available for meat production plus some additionally highly processed nutrients. 2) Amoral

or those morally opposed to killing sentient animals for food. I see where this can have value

Even as a vegetarian I realize that animals as a food source leverage land that is not possible to efficiently cultivate.


popsci_2013 01270.txt

While it would be exceptionally nice to be able to preserve some of the natural beauty of the earth growing pressure on the environment global food sources


popsci_2013 01299.txt

We can grow food withotu sunlight. Real issue is our direction..will we actually collide

Our food sources will of course be affected directly since plants will stop photosynthesizing immediately and this will affect the supply of food âÂ#Âoeon handã¢Â#Â

which would be the thing that determines how long humans are able to live âÂ#Âthe ambient temps being around zero food preservation will not be a problem

but staying warm will. The food in our refrigerators will probably be eaten within a matter of days

and grocery stores will be pressed hard to keep the shelves stocked certainly not with fruits and vegetables other than whatã¢Â#Â#s canned

and corn (although keeping entire barns warm would be a problem) then butcher these animals for food

which would provide a slightly longer term supply of food heavy on the protein but then that would be gone say a few months after the sun stopped shining at

and food for the livestock very carefully and will probably use fire instead of electricity for cooking starting about month 3 if not sooner

That would never happen the food supplies would be gone long! One commenter Lifestream said âÂ#Âoewhile nature wonã¢Â#Â#t survive-humans will at least a portion of us.

We can grow food without sunlight. âÂ# This isnã¢Â#Â#t just more of that crazy optimism but contains several remarkable<b>epistemological fallacies.

because the real and only issue is FOOD and STAYING WARM both of which will be impossible almost immediately for some and soon after for all.

How could these things be going on with no light and no food and subzero temps?


popsci_2013 02388.txt

and Ecological Consequences of Fukushima in which the amount of cancers caused by radiation in our food

Nuclear radiation is used daily to irradiate foods to prevent spoilage with no adverse health effect whatsoever.


Popsci_2014 00283.txt

and flies literally swarmed over the food. The conditions were little better in Panama city and in the intermediate towns.

and conscienceless food adulterators were spending money by the millions to defeat the purpose of the people to establish a health bureau in Washington to prevent disease


Popsci_2014 01145.txt

and food processing among others. We ve also invented a number of processes ourselves. He explains that the source material in the intake bay will be fed into shredders and reduced to the size of quarters.


ScienceDaily_2013 02913.txt

#Defending food crops: Whitefly experimentation to prevent contamination of agricultureon November 8th Jove the Journal of Visualized Experiments will introduce a new technique to aid in the development of defenses against diseases threatening food crops worldwide.

The method published under the title Transmitting Plant viruses Using Whiteflies is applicable to such at-risk crops as tomatoes and common bean plants.

and her colleagues write that numerous genera of whitefly-transmitted plant viruses (such as Begomovirus Carlavirus Crinivirus Ipomovirus Torradovirus) are part of an emerging and economically significant group of pathogens affecting important food


ScienceDaily_2013 04773.txt

It could also find a market in food and beverage packaging. Tour and his colleagues at Rice

He said the material could help to solve longstanding problems in food packaging too. Remember when you were a kid you'd get a balloon


ScienceDaily_2013 04776.txt

When we apply fertilizer in the United states only about 10 percent of the nitrogen makes it into the food.


< Back - Next >


Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011