and the uncertainties involved in future global governance regimes. Foresight offers a means to explore these dimensions of science.
but also one characterised by exciting advances in science English declines as the lingua franca of science Triumph of globalism Reinvigorated global governance structures Active global citizenry that is science-savvy Global science
and social sciences Science supplying national needs General backlash against globalism Global governance of science at the intergoverrnmen level is fractured Regional
and effective governance, ICSU is recognised as a key player in international science and has been able to attract new funding.
Innovation policy roadmapping. 189 Eerola, A. and Loikkanen, T. 2009) Governance and Research of Nordic Energy system Transition-Summary Report of the Gorenest Project, VTT Research Notes 2505.
As current governance systems are incapable of tackling current and future, interconnected, global challennge (Ko nno la et al. 2012),
between national research systems, horizonttall between disciplines and policy areas, vertically across governance levels (from local to global)
For instance, at the level of international research infrastructures, issues like prioritisation criteria, funding, governance, evaluation and impact assessment are being discussed in Europe (European commission 2010a).
and innovation communities (KICS) of the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT) also face issues of governance, prioritisaatio and evaluation.
The articulation of thematic priorities for transnational research and innovation co-operation, e g. from EU level, raises issues related to their coherence with the priorities and needs of lower levels of governance, particularly in terms of
In more general terms, the OECD (2003) has called for horizontal coherence as a general governance objective ensuring that individual objectives
and publish shared priorities on a transnatiiona programme level Mapping of foresight exercises at all governance levels Establishment of a UEF,
OECD. 2003)‘ Policy coherence',Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, GOV/PUMA (2003) 4. Paris:
e)- governance and (e)- social cohesion. defence and security It was agreed then that in each area JRC-IPTS experts would analyse about 20 25 forward-looking reports which had been published recently by international organizations or the business sector;
and the role of EU in relation to global governance. Table 2 provides an example of such a crosscutting challenge that synthesizes issues from different thematic areas.
global governance. natural capital. society. economy. By the end of the workshop, a workable agreement had been reached on the definition of the following three overarcchin challenges:.
Fuerth, L. S. 2009)‘ Foresight and anticipatory governance',Foresight, 11:14 32. Georghiou, L. and Cassingena Harper, J. 2011)‘ From priority-setting to articulation of demand:
towards a multi-polar world and world governance. towards a new universalism (political-cultural transition.
For this, we need first of all to look at the Fraunhofer Society itself. 3. The Fraunhofer approach 3. 1 Strategic R&d planning within the Fraunhofer governance model Future-oriented technology analysis (FTA APPROACHES have been used within corporate strategic R&d planning at Fraunhofer for several years.
Fraunhofer has decentralised a highly governance model. Individual institutes may set their strategic and scientific focus very autonomously,
and financial system (includes a commitment to good governance, development, and poverty reduction, both nationally and internationally) Target 13 Address special needs of least developed countries (includes tariff
protection from consequences Increasing conflicts within states Global governance will be sought Table 3. Proposals and teams Round 1 Challenge Project ideas Selected projects Teams involved
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011