Cryptography (21) | ![]() |
Data analysis (29) | ![]() |
Data privacy (60) | ![]() |
Data science (10) | ![]() |
Drone (47) | ![]() |
E-commerce (7) | ![]() |
Fingerprint reader (11) | ![]() |
Gadget (150) | ![]() |
High-tech (6) | ![]() |
Image processing (94) | ![]() |
Mathematics (46) | ![]() |
Smart card (5) | ![]() |
Telematics (8) | ![]() |
Tv (313) | ![]() |
Box has been testing this with the company's own legal department to figure out which files may contain confidential information that would require extra precautions with how they're stored and shared.
and power of state##and commercial##surveillance. 2013 was an extraordinary year for those of us who are interested in privacy and data protection.
In the eyes of Europe s data protection authorities the unification of Google s disparate services represented an attempt to do new and serious things with people s information without true permission,
The Ovum study also demonstrated an overwhelming lack of trust in internet companies honesty about data protection;
Within days, European data protection regulators and activists were#demanding to know#what was happening with EU citizens data held on
Protection of IP and confidential information will become a key concern for companies. Much more than it is today.
and confidential information is protected by online services. Now that they know that###Enemy of the State###is for real
This expectation is set at some point by the site they are entering their personal data into.
and hit continue, you are agreeing to pages of legalese that pretty much state youdon thave any personal data
our so-thought personal data, is the inevitable evolution of social media sharing. Yet, who is to say that the company you are paying for privacy isn t turning around
what kind of personal data we re so eagerly sharing with the world. What we think is personal
with the interconnected age and concerns over personal data, are there any concerns from potential consumers over the idea of ingesting technology that contains so much information?
Individuals have access to their personal data via a Web dashboard or smartphone but companies are given only anonymous aggregated results of patterns and trends in behavior.)
Their prototype system openpds short for personal data store stores data from your digital devices in a single location that you specify:
She hates ceding control of her personal data online which is why she s building software that allows people to see where the information they upload to the cloud goes.#
As long as companies aren t saying what they do with users#information she ll work to make public how that personal data is shared.
and attention to ongoing quantifiable personal data, such as fitness, diet, and sleep-quality. Imagine a diabetics biochip detecting blood glucose levels within personalized parameters,
which personal data can be moved from the EU to the US for processing. The ruling against the 15-year-old law, known as Safe Harbour, threatens the business models of more than 3000 companies that use it to ship data to the US,
It means that The irish Data protection Commission which presides over Facebook data-export operations, is unable to use Safe Harbour as a reason not to investigate Facebook data protection practices in the US.
In a statement, The irish Data protection Commissioner confirmed that Schrems case would be brought back before The irish High court s soon as practicable The ruling also removes the legal blanket that allowed companies to send data gathered in the EU to the US for processing.
It not yet clear whether this will disrupt the day-to-day operation of major technology firms, but their ability to pool data from both sides of the Atlantic for analysis will be affected.
Apple new privacy policy explicitly states that personal data collected for its icloud service in the European Economic Area is shipped to Apple Inc in the US for processing via Cork in Ireland. t quite a huge thing to say that one region set of laws
Surveillance concerns Although the court decision is ostensibly about data protection, it inevitably addresses surveillance. The ruling backs up the claim by Schrems that he law and practice of the United states do not offer sufficient protection against surveillance by the public authorities of the data transferred to that country This claim must now be heard
Nyst says that data protection standards are emerging around the world, providing a crucial component of an internet that is not only hugely useful,
Paul Bernal of the University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK, says the judgement makes it hard to see how it is legal for any personal data gathered in the EU to now be sent to the US for processing. he ruling basically says US surveillance cannot be allowed to override our fundamental rights,
when data protection authorities of 28 member states review their cooperation with US spy agencies He added that he average consumer will not see any restrictions in daily use,
The key challenge is that existing magnetic card readers use plain text to store confidential information,
Because existing magnetic card readers use plain text to store confidential information, they are vulnerable to an untrusted card reader or skimming device.
Under so-called Safe harbor rules, U s. firms are allowed to transfer personal data of European citizens back to the U s..They only have to follow one set of rules on how data they store
and data protection landscape to make the EU the global center of gravity, "said Jim Koenig of Paul Hastings, a Washington, D c.-based law firm.
Laws in the European union view personal data privacy as a fundamental right. U s. laws consider it more an issue of consumer protection.
meant his data privacy rights were not being protected adequately. Schrems filed the case in Ireland, Facebook European headquarters.
"once personal data is transferred to the United states, the National security agency and other United states security agencies such as the Federal bureau of investigation are able to access it in the course of a mass and indiscriminate surveillance and interception of such data."
so they can safely exchange confidential information over the telephone.""Today, all telephone conversations are encrypted --i e. converted into gibberish
#Google s Unified Privacy Policy Draws Threat Of $15m Fine In The netherlands The national data protection authority in The netherlands has warned Google that it could be fined up to $15 million
to comply with Dutch data protection law. Google January 2012 decision to combine the privacy policies of some 60 different products in order for it to be able to gather more intel on webs users for targeting ads quickly triggered a data protection review in October 2012
led The french data protection watchdog. That action was followed by individual investigations by multiple data protection watchdogs in Europe with six member states,
including The netherlands, launching probes into Google handling of personal data in April last year. The Dutch data protection authority, the CBP, has evidently run out of patience with Google.
In a statement earlier this week, the CBP said it requires Google to gain unambiguous consent from users to combine multiple privacy policies across its products specifying that this consent cannot be gained by a general agreement to a privacy policy
but must be done ia a clear permission screen Google must also clearly explain what personal data is being obtained by which of its services and for what purpose,
and this information must be clearly and consistently conveyed in its privacy policy, it said.
The CBP is concerned also that Youbube be labeled clearly as a Google service albeit the Dutch DPA notes that Google seems to have taken already action on this point.
The CBP does add that Google has sent a letter to the six data protection authorities which launched reviews namely France, Germany, Italy, Spain,
ee disappointed with the Dutch data protection authority order, especially as we have made already a number of changes to our privacy policy in response to their concerns.
if a hospital started asking for additional decisions that maybe required additional data elements to be captured then the team would efinitely want to have a conversation with the patients to make sure they are comfortable with that Newhouse also points out that Analyticsmd makes a point of not capturing personal data such as patientsnames
so my personal data is not going to be snooped on and when people do have snooped their data on it only used in a very serious process of tracking down organised crime and terrorism?
and Facebook Data Datacoup one of the first companies to offer people money in exchange for their personal data has closed finished a trial of its service
and is now opening it to anyone (see Sell Your Personal data for $8 a Month).
and banking data (see ell Your Personal data for $8 a Month. Luth Research, a San diego company
Christopher Kuner is senior privacy counsel with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in Brussels and associate professor of data protection law at the University of Copenhagen n
The most effective method to protect data against cyber-spying is to process confidential information on dedicated computers that are connected not to the Internet.
Mining personal data is a billion-dollar business (see he Data Made Me Do it designed to elicit purchases, garner eyeballs,
major data protection and privacy considerations would have to be made. The EU has a robust legal framework on privacy and data protection.
These are recognised as fundamental rights and so related laws are among the highest ranking. Biometric data, such as iris scans, are treated often as special due to the sensitivity of the information they can contain.
And processing data accurately is another principle of EU data protection law. Even if we do find ourselves subject to unwanted iris-scanning from 40ft (12 metres),
cooperating closely with data protection authorities, 'the company said in a statement.''The ruling focussed on services directed to European users,
#Big U s. Data Breaches Offer Treasure trove for Hackers A massive breach of U s. federal computer networks disclosed this week is the latest in a flood of attacks by suspected Chinese hackers aimed at grabbing personal data,
The first breach has been linked to earlier thefts of personal data from millions of records at Anthem Inc, the second largest U s. health insurer,
safeguarding commercially confidential information, and assuring research institutes that requirements for sharing clinical data will not be nfunded mandates.
which would require the personal data of all passengers flying in and out of Europe to be stored up to five years.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011