| Air issues (333) |  |
| Biodegradation (20) | |
| Biodiversity loss (11) | |
| Cataclysmic event (304) | |
| Climate (241) | |
| Environment (174) | |
| Extinction (4) | |
| Forest issues (50) | |
| Global warming (47) | |
| Pollution (260) | |
| Soil issues (19) | |
| Water issues (96) | |
| Weather (99) | |
| Air issues (333) | |
| Biodegradation (20) | |
| Biodiversity loss (11) | |
| Cataclysmic event (304) | |
| Climate (241) | |
| Environment (174) | |
| Extinction (4) | |
| Forest issues (50) | |
| Global warming (47) | |
| Pollution (260) | |
| Soil issues (19) | |
| Water issues (96) | |
| Weather (99) | |
#To avert mass extinction, is genetic engineering the best option? Cornell University rightoriginal Studyposted by Blaine Friedlander-Cornell on September 30 2013with estimates that 15 to 40 percent of the world s species will be lost over the next 40 years due to warming
To avert mass extinctions the group thinks that three options each with its own set of challenges complications
as is evident from the recovery of readable DNA from long-extinct animals.""The experiment was done 60,000 years ago
Palaeontologists now hope the discovery of the red blood cells could allow them to finally answer questions about the metabolic rate of the extinct animals
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011