Economist, Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network, World Economic Forum Soumitra Dutta, Dean, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate
Jennifer Blanke, Chief Economist, Head of the Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network Ciara Browne, Associate Director
Roberto Crotti, Quantitative Economist Gemma Corrigan, Project Associate Attilio di Batista, Junior Quantitative Economist Gaã lle Dreyer, Project Associate
Margareta Drzeniek-Hanouz, Director, Senior Economist Head of Competitiveness Research Thierry Geiger, Associate Director, Economist
Tania Gutknecht, Community Manager Caroline Ko, Economist Cecilia Serin, Senior Associate INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
INDUSTRIES TEAM Alan Marcus, Senior Director, Head of Information and Communication Technology Industries Aurã lie Corre, Team Coordinator, Telecommunication
Industry Aurã lien Goutorbe, Senior Content Manager Telecommunication Industry Qin He, Associate Director, Telecommunication Industry
Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy Peter Haynes (Atlantic Council) and M-H. Carolyn Nguyen (Microsoft
Country/Economy Profiles 95 How to Read the Country/Economy Profiles...97 Index of Countries/Economies...
99 Country/Economy Profiles...100 Part 3: Data Tables 249 How to Read the Data Tables...
251 Index of Data Tables...253 Data Tables...255 Technical Notes and Sources 323 About the Authors 329
Partner Institutes 335 Acknowledgments 343  2014 World Economic Forum  2014 World Economic Forum
Report is released at a time when economies need to solidify the recovery of the past year and leave the
Developed economies need to sustain their incipient economic recovery and find new areas of growth and employment creation;
developing economies need to build their resilience against turbulence in the markets and foster their
economies, accounting for over 98 percent of global GDP. In addition, it features a number of essays that
economy covered and data tables with global rankings for the NRI€ s 54 indicators We would like to convey our sincere gratitude to
and the economies around them will thrive accordingly  2014 World Economic Forum  2014 World Economic Forum
prosperity, for both advanced and emerging economies For more than 13 years, the NRI has provided decision makers with a useful conceptual framework
economies EXTRACTING VALUE FROM BIG DATA Data have had always strategic value, but with the magnitude of data available today†and our capability to
data-driven economy;(6) the role of regulation and trust building in unlocking the value of big data;(
addition, the Country/Economy Profile and Data Tables sections at the end of the Report present the detailed
results for the 148 economies covered by the study and the 54 indicators composing the NRI.
economies must overcome if they are to keep moving forward in integrating ICTS into more robust innovation
European economies, the Asian Tigers, and some of the most advanced Western economies. Three Nordic
economies†Finland, Sweden, and Norway†lead the rankings and are positioned among the top 5. Denmark
and Iceland, the remaining two Nordic economies also perform strongly, and despite small slips this
All these economies continue to boast outstanding business and innovation environments that are ranked consistently among the most conducive to
knowledge-intensive economies globally (2nd) and is an ICT-generation powerhouse. Sweden (3rd) maintains its position this year despite a slight improvement in its
United states, the largest economy in the world, in the top 10 shows that fully leveraging ICTS is not dependent
on small or medium-sized economies, but instead depends on undertaking the right investments and creating the right condition for it.
economy, the country early recognized the importance of ICTS to support its innovation and competitiveness
differences remain across European economies with Southern and Central and Eastern European economies continuing to lag behind.
A deeper analysis of the root causes of these differences shows that, in general, ICT infrastructure and individual uptake is more
provide for the economy and society in general. Within the Commonwealth of independent states, several countries improve their performances, reflecting the
diversify their economies and lead them toward more knowledge-intensive activities With three economies from the region in the top
10 of the NRI rankings and several countries showing improvement, Asia and the Pacific is very dynamic
and emerging economies and other trailing countries Regardless of their position on the development ladder
however, all Asian economies have much to gain from increased networked readiness. It will allow populations
Data-Driven Economy Chapter 1. 6, contributed by Peter Haynes of the Atlantic Council and M-H. Carolyn Nguyen at Microsoft
threat to the emerging data-driven economy, since they may reduce overall output as more and more
sustainable data-driven economy Building Trust: The Role of Regulation in Unlocking the Value of Big data
economies by (1) making public data accessible through open data formats,(2) promoting balanced legislation and (3) supporting education that focuses on data
COUNTRY/ECONOMY PROFILES AND DATA PRESENTATION Parts 2 and 3 of the Report feature comprehensive
profiles for each of the 148 economies covered this year as well as data tables for each of the 54 variables
Alexander, C. P. 1983. â€oethe New Economy. †Time Magazine, May 30. Available at http://content. time. com/time/magazine
Rank Country/Economy Value 2013 rank out of 144 1 Finland 6. 04 1 2 Singapore 5. 97 2
Rank Country/Economy Value 2013 rank out of 144 75 Romania 3. 95 75 76 Sri lanka 3. 94 69
economies For more than 13 years, the NRI has provided decision makers with a useful conceptual framework to evaluate the impact of ICTS at a global level and
economies EXTRACTING VALUE FROM BIG DATA Data have had always strategic value, but with the magnitude of data available today†and our capability to
The Economist Intelligence Unit released survey data showing that approximately two-thirds of executives feel that big data will help find
provide in transforming a nation†s economy and increasing its citizens†well-being, assessing ICT developments has been the object of much academic
that ICTS can actually provide to both the economy and society. Although data are still scarce in terms of ICT
the way ICTS are transforming both the economy and society. In several economies, the ICT industry
has become increasingly important and now accounts for a significant share of value-added and employment.
capacity of an economy and society to benefit from the use of ICTS. The success of a country
finally, the impacts that ICTS generate in the economy and in society. The three first subindexes can be
the firms in an economy to integrate ICTS into an internal technology-savvy, innovation-conducive environment that
economy and society. It includes a total of eight variables The economic impacts pillar (four variables
addition, it also measures the overall shift of an economy toward more knowledge-intensive activities
15,000 business leaders in all economies included in the Report. 8 The Survey represents a unique source of
includes 148 economies, four more than the 2013 edition. The newly covered countries are Bhutan, Lao
addition, the Country/Economy Profiles and Data Tables sections at the end of the Report present the detailed
results for the 148 economies covered by the study and the 54 indicators composing the NRI.
economies must overcome if they are to keep moving forward in integrating ICTS into more robust innovation
economies are color-coded based on their NRI overall score measured on a 1-to-7 scale, with best-and
worst-performing economies appearing in dark green and red, respectively. Finally, Appendix A of the present
dominated by Northern European economies, the Asian Tigers, and some of the most advanced Western economies.
Three Nordic economies†Finland Sweden, and Norway†lead the rankings and are positioned among the top 5. Denmark and Iceland
the remaining two Nordic economies, also perform strongly, and despite small slips this year they feature
All these economies continue to boast outstanding business and innovation environments that are ranked consistently among the most conducive to
Rank Country/Economy Value (out of 144) Group *1 Finland 6. 04 1 ADV 2 Singapore 5. 97 2 ADV
Rank Country/Economy Value (out of 144) Group *75 Romania 3. 95 75 CEE 76 Sri lanka 3. 94 69 DEVASIA
ADV=Advanced economies; CIS=Commonwealth of independent states and Mongolia; DEVASIA=Developing Asia; LATAM=Latin america and the Caribbean;
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score 1 Singapore 5. 87 1 5. 90 1 5. 84
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score 75 Mexico 3. 88 70 3. 68 85 4. 07
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score 1 Finland 6. 61 1 6. 88 18 6. 41 1 6. 55
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score 75 Bulgaria 4. 75 34 5. 26 119 3. 74 56 5. 26
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score 1 Sweden 6. 06 1 6. 59 3 5. 99 7 5. 60
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score 75 Georgia 3. 63 76 3. 43 110 3. 21 55 4. 24
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score 1 Singapore 5. 93 6 5. 63 1 6. 24
Rank Country/Economy Score Rank Score Rank Score 75 Vietnam 3. 41 96 2. 98 62 3. 85
position and evolution of different economies in the rankings over the past two years, highlighting different
knowledge-intensive economies globally (2nd) and is an ICT-generation powerhouse (9th. Improving the already
-based economy, has quickly and skilfully recognized the importance of ICTS to boost its innovation and
economy. Those assets, coupled with a stable political and regulatory environment (9th) and excellent conditions
rankings, is developed that economies continue to lead the way in creating robust and impactful digital ecosystems while
many developing and emerging economies have remained comparatively stagnant. This stagnation persists despite some improvements to their ICT infrastructures†specifically
economies to embrace the full potential that ICTS have to offer However, the NRI rankings reflect the situation only at a
economy based on both its current NRI score and its NRI evolution over the past three years.
economy is determined then according to whether it falls above or below the NRI average in 2014,
First of all, several oil-and gas-rich economies in the Commonwealth of independent states and Gulf Cooperation Council are quickly improving their digital
diversify their economies and are quickly developing their digital infrastructure in order not to miss the digital revolution
United states, the largest economy in the world, in the top 10 shows that fully leveraging ICTS is not dependent
on small or medium-sized economies, but instead depends on undertaking the right investments and creating the right condition for it
economy, the country early recognized the importance of ICTS to support its innovation and competitiveness
knowledge-intensive economy EUROPE AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES Europe has been at the forefront of developing a digital
differences remain across European economies with Southern and Central and Eastern European  2014 World Economic Forum
economies continuing to lag behind. A deeper analysis of the root causes of these differences shows that, in
provide for the economy and society in general. Boxâ 2 develops this analysis further and provides some
engage in an innovation-driven globalized economy. With a very good ICT infrastructure (11th), which translates
economies, there is some concern about the decreased ability of businesses to fully leverage ICTS to generate
13th) and in the economy in general (10th. Further improvements in the entrepreneurial environment by easing the procedures to open new businesses (103rd
1. The gap between Northwestern European economies and the rest of the Member States is reflected in all of
that could help diversify its economy and has attracted many global ICT companies thanks to its favorable
potential of the economy. Within the region, Croatia follows at 47th place, with Bosnia and herzegovina 68th) and Serbia (79th) lagging behind because of
128th) that could help to transform its national economy and lead it toward more productive activities
to diversify their economies and lead them toward more knowledge-intensive activities  2014 World Economic Forum
Advanced economies exhibited negative or sluggish growth, while emerging markets, and notably the BRICS economies†Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China
recently observed that many of these emerging economies are experiencing difficulties in maintaining the rapid economic
The NRI in BRICS economies, 2012 and 2014 BRICS 2012 BRICS 2014 Box 3: Challenges faced by BRICS economies to fully leverage ICTS
Cont†d Source: Authors†calculations Table A: The NRI in BRICS economies, 2012 and 2014
BRAZIL RUSSIAN FEDERATION INDIA CHINA SOUTH AFRICA 2012 2014 2012 2014 2012 2014 2012 2014 2012 2014
diversify an economy that otherwise continues to be very reliant on the extraction of fossil fuels. Going forward, the
for Azerbaijan to diversify its economy and make it less dependent on oil revenues while transitioning toward a
sharp contrast to other BRICS economies (see Boxâ 3 the Russian Federation moves up four positions to
With three economies from the region in the top 10 of the NRI rankings and several countries showing
emerging economies and other trailing countries Regardless of their position on the development ladder, all Asian economies have much to gain from
increased networked readiness. It will allow populations Figure A compares the NRI scores by pillar for the
BRICS economies in the 2012 and 2014 editions. Overall, the results have remained stable in virtually all pillars, and notably
other economies are progressing faster in developing and leveraging their ICT potential. Table A shows that since 2012â€
six places in the rankings†all other BRICS economies have dropped over time, in some cases significantly,
Challenges faced by BRICS economies to fully leverage ICTS (cont†d  2014 World Economic Forum
a technology-driven economy, with strong usage of ICTS among all society†s stakeholders. In addition, the
economy manages to improve its already developed infrastructure (5th) by, for example, expanding its international Internet bandwidth by a significant amount
Consequently, the economy scores strong social (6th and economic impacts (12th), although these could be
one of the most productive economies worldwide these have managed to extend to society, as social impacts have continued to improve (23rd.
leadership as the highest ranked economy in Developing Asia. Malaysia maintains relatively competitive regulatory (25th) and business (24th) environments
increase as the economy develops, but further investment in infrastructure and digital content (71st) are
as quickly as in other competing economies, and the country attains a relatively low 59th position on the skills
49th), comparable to those of advanced economies Yet, aside from mobile telephony, other technologies remain relatively scant, especially the breadth of
Sri lanka, another ASEAN economy, drops seven places to take the 76th position in the rankings
economies and is continuing on its declining trajectory to arrive at 83rd place in this edition. The drop in
emerging economies in several dimensions. Overall India†s networked readiness profile remains hindered by the quality of its political, regulatory, and business
economy and society Improving its position both within the ASEAN group and overall, the Philippines climbs eight places to
as in many other Asian economies, at a more advanced stage (43rd) than individual usage (91st
transition to a knowledge-based economy Panama continues its ascent in the rankings moving up three spots to 43rd place.
knowledge-based economy (65th Barbados suffers a significant drop in the rankings falling 16 positions to arrive at 55th place.
economy, as well as its low capacity to innovate (88th This situation results in modest economic impacts (61st
transition toward a knowledge-based economy (66th Colombia moves up three positions to reach 63rd
other economies have been faster to embrace the digital revolution. Overall, the country exhibits relatively high
other economies, and thus Mexico does not manage to digitally converge with more-advanced economies
The cost of accessing its existing ICT infrastructure remains high (93rd) and the quality of its educational
and modernize its economy which continues to rely heavily on mining. Overall weaknesses in its educational sector (134th), which does
poor innovation capacity (106th) and an economy that is not able to offer many knowledge-intensive jobs
with the necessary skills for the economy result in this disappointing position Finally, Paraguay (102nd), Venezuela (106th
economy (74th Despite some significant improvement in the uptake of ICTS by individuals and development in its
resource-based economy toward an innovation-driven one In the Levantine, both Jordan and Lebanon
ranks among the first 100 analyzed economies. As in the case of Egypt, ICT infrastructure (93rd) has slowly
the digital divide between advanced economies and emerging and developing ones persists. This is notable especially in terms of the economic and social impacts
diversify their economies and make them less dependent on volatile international energy prices Another trend that is confirmed by the results is that
rankings, Malaysia is the only other economy from the region that manages to score within the top 30,
differs across the five economies, they all seem to face difficulties in developing and benefiting from their digital
6 The Economist Intelligence Unit 2013 7 See Lanier 2010; see also Kakutani 2010 8 Browne et al. 2013
Alexander, C. P. 1983. â€oethe New Economy. †Time Magazine, May 30. Available at http://content. time. com/time/magazine
The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2013. â€oein Search of Insight and Foresight: Getting More out of Big data. †White paper,
The Economist Intelligence Unit. Available at http://www managementthinking. eiu. com/sites/default/files/downloads/In%20
lowest and highest country scores in the sample of economies covered by the GCI. In some instances, adjustments were made
score achieved by an economy on this indicator normalized on a scale from 0. 75 (worst) to 1. 00 (best), using the min-max
is assigned to an economy with a competition index score of 0, which means that a monopolistic situation prevails in the 19
1. 00 is assigned to an economy where all 19 categories are fully liberalized. Where data are missing for indicator 4. 03 (i e.,
economies, sparking innovation, and unleashing waves of creative destruction. But most of these data are
Similarly, research by the Economist Intelligence Unit and Capgemini indicates that big data analytics were responsible for a 26 percent improvement in
2 The Economist 2010 1. 2: The Internet of Everything 40 The Global Information technology Report 2014
The Economist. 2010. â€oedata, Data Everywhere. †Managing Information Special report, February 25. Available at http://www. economist
com/node/15557443 EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit. 2012. The Deciding Factor: Big Data and Decision making, June 12.
Report commissioned by Capgemini. Available at http://www. managementthinking. eiu. com /sites/default/files/downloads/The%20deciding%20factor final
-Growth Economy? †Policy Memo, September. Washington DC: Progressive Policy Institute (PPI. Available at http://www
-Growth-Economy-1. pdf Mandel, M. and J. Scherer. 2012. â€oethe Geography of the App Economy. â€
September 20, South Mountain Economics LLC. Available at http://files. ctia. org/pdf/The geography of the app economy. pdf Mclellan, C. 2013. â€oebig Data:
The European App Economy Creating Jobs and Driving Growth. Report sponsored by ACT September. Available at http://www. act4apps. org/wp-content
/uploads/2013/09/ACT-The-European-App-Economy-20131. pdf 1. 2: The Internet of Everything
Meanwhile, the Economist Intelligence Unit found that big data is enlisted most frequently to assist financial management and marketing/sales, and deemed least
8 The Economist Intelligence Unit 2013 9 This chapter contains examples from many clients whose identities
/The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2013. â€oethe Evolving Role of Data in Decision-making. †Available at http://www. economistinsights. com
in a Data-Driven Economy PETER HAYNES, Atlantic Council M-H. CAROLYN NGUYEN, Microsoft It is more than half a century since economist Fritz
Machlup, in his book The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United states, 1 developed the concept
of the knowledge economy, a term later popularized by management theorist Peter Drucker. 2 Both used
the phrase to differentiate between an economy based largely on goods and services produced by manual labor
and an economy based on the production of new ideas information, and knowledge The wide availability of low-cost information and
a knowledge economy than an information economy Early Internet-era ICTS enabled more efficient and
created during this period as a knowledge economy would be an exaggeration. Much information has been
is being called the â€oedata-driven economy, †may finally make possible a true knowledge economy†by which
companies (and entire economies) to keep growing the development of such an economy is an imperative
battered by global competition, commoditization, and shrinking product/service cycles, corporations seeking to maintain or grow their profit margins will increasingly
new economy can be founded However, the knowledge economy relies on the availability of an adequate supply of data to enable
the discovery of new knowledge. This requires policy frameworks that permit data†including personal data†to
economy. Furthermore, what is considered personal and acceptable use are individual decisions, subject to context, perceived value,
What is increasingly clear about an economy based on the collection, use, and analytics of big data
promising 21st-century knowledge economy THE DEMISE OF FAIR VALUE EXCHANGE All previous economic revolutions have been based
challenges of the data-driven economy. Most consumers understand that the discounts they receive via a loyalty
Rebalancing Socioeconomic Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy 68 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Â 2014 World Economic Forum
new economy, the information economy, has lately been to conceal the value of informationâ€. We†ve decided
Rebalancing Socioeconomic Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy  2014 World Economic Forum In other words, under the current model, the greater
that a data-driven economy may become a contracting economy. Like Lanier, we believe that if a truly
sustainable data-driven economy is to be established the way in which data are traded between individuals
and corporations will require a major reset. For a data -driven economy to thrive, individuals would have to
receive fair/appropriate monetary compensation for each specific datum they provide, perhaps with additional payments whenever that datum produces incremental
And a sustainable data-driven economy might also entail individuals paying fees (likely modest) for services they
the economy. Without fair value exchange for data along with inherent trust in the data ecosystem, everyone will
sustainability) into a data-driven economy, those data must be assigned monetary value, then metadata is the
Rebalancing Socioeconomic Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy 70 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Â 2014 World Economic Forum
economy, it cannot guarantee that entities handling the data will honor the permissions and policies associated
economic ecosystem in a data-driven economy, enabling the monetary value generated by data to be tracked
-driven knowledge economy is to be realized fully. Such dialogues will need, of course to be conducted on a
Economy Papers, No. 220. OECD Publishing. Available at http //www. oecd-ilibrary. org/science-and-technology/exploring-the
Rebalancing Socioeconomic Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy  2014 World Economic Forum PCAST (President†s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
Rebalancing Socioeconomic Asymmetry in a Data-Driven Economy 72 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Â 2014 World Economic Forum
powering and energizing our economy. †1 These were the words of Neelie Kroes, Vice-president of the European
economy. Mckinsey research shows that companies that use big data can deliver productivity and profit gains
21 Asia-Pacific economies) has developed a self -regulatory framework setting out the principles that economies should implement and companies then
follow to ensure a common, minimum level of data protection across member economies. The aim is to
enable the easier transfer of data among economies where the level of data protection regulation varies
greatly. Although some Asian economies (such as Pakistan) still lack data protection laws entirely or have introduced recently them (e g.,
, China and India), others†such as Japan†have developed well laws. Examples of minimum-level principles are the
economies such as India, Hong kong SAR the Republic of korea, and Singapore, as well as other efforts, such as the APEC
place across various sectors of the economy and society, it is sometimes difficult to quantify its full
as economists are now demonstrating that a fundamental problem exists in our ability to quantify the value of data, and this gap
of the economy as divided into two big categories †goods†and †services. ††22 Data are neither a good nor
only in the past couple of years have economists undertaken serious attempts to quantify the Internet†s
impact on the world†s economies. 23 One example of innovative data use that has a
ECONOMY Apart from producing and using data for better policymaking processes, the public sector can also
innovation and growth throughout economies. To realize the potential of data-driven innovation, policymakers need to develop coherent policies for the use of data
data-driven economy should provide a path for individuals to participate in research through informed consent.
An economy where both the public and private actors who base their decisions on data analysis will
data-driven innovation†s potential benefits for economies CONCLUSION We have begun already to see the impact technology
organizations, and economies that may benefit from it can thrive NOTES 1 Gray 2013 2 The Economist 2013a
3 Mayer-Schonberger and Cukier 2013 4 OECD 2013 5 IBM 2013 6 Manyika et al. 2011
24 The Economist 2013b 25 The Economist 2011 26 Dugas et al. 2013 27 Lu et al. 2012
28 Talbot 2013 29 Brynjolfsson et al. 2011 30 Cacciola and Gibbons 2012 31 Manyika et al. 2011
The Economist. 2011. â€oeattention, Citizens! †The Economist, November 16. Available at http://www. economist. com/node/21538656
††â€. 2013a. â€oecounting Raindrops. †The Economist, February 9 Available at http://www. economist. com/news/science-and
-technology/21571384-how-use-mobile-phone-networks-weather -forecasting-counting-raindrops ††â€. 2013b. â€oehave Germs, Will Travel. †The Economist, January 25
Available at http://www. economist. com/blogs/gulliver/2013/01 /tracking-flu-0 Esty, D c. and R. Rushing. 2007.
Governing by the Numbers: The Promise of Data-Driven Policymaking in the Information Age April.
Center for American Progress. Available at http://www americanprogress. org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/04/pdf
/data driven policy report. pdf Government of the Hong kong Special Administrative Region. No date Hong kong Efficiency Unit Homepage.
Rise of the Data-Driven Economy. †Progressive Policy Institute Policy Memo. October. Available at http://www. progressivepolicy
-Economy. pdf Manyika, J.,M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R, Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, and
Country/Economy Profiles  2014 World Economic Forum  2014 World Economic Forum The Global Information technology Report 2014 97
How to Read the Country/Economy Profiles The Country/Economy Profiles section presents a profile
for each of the 148 economies covered in The Global Information technology Report 2014. Each profile sum
-marizes an economy†s performance in the various di -mensions of the Networked Readiness Index (NRI
economy†s rank (out of 148 economies) and score (on a 1-to-7 scale) are reported
-mies in the income group to which the economy under review belongs. The country classification by income
Country/Economy Profiles 100 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Index of Country/Economy Profiles Country/Economy Page Albania 100 Algeria 101 Angola 102 Argentina 103
Armenia 104 Australia 105 Austria 106 Azerbaijan 107 Bahrain 108 Bangladesh 109 Barbados 110 Belgium 111
Country/Economy Page Ecuador 137 Egypt 138 El salvador 139 Estonia 140 Ethiopia 141 Finland 142
Country/Economy Page Lebanon 174 Lesotho 175 Liberia 176 Libya 177 Lithuania 178 Luxembourg 179
Country/Economy Page Qatar 211 Romania 212 Russian Federation 213 Rwanda 214 Saudi arabia 215 Seychelles 216
Country/Economy Profiles 100 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 101 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 102 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 103 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 104 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 105 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 106 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 107 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 108 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 109 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 110 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 111 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 112 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 113 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 114 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 115 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 116 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 117 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 118 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 119 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 120 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 121 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 122 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 123 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 124 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 125 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 126 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 127 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 128 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 129 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 130 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 131 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 132 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 133 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 134 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 135 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 136 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 137 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 138 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 139 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 140 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 141 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 142 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 143 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 144 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 145 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 146 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 147 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 148 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 149 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 150 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 151 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 152 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 153 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 154 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 155 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 156 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 157 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 158 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 159 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 160 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 161 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 162 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 163 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 164 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 165 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 166 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 167 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 168 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 169 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 170 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 171 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 172 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 173 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 174 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 175 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 176 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 177 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 178 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 179 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 180 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 181 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 182 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 183 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 184 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 185 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 186 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 187 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 188 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 189 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 190 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 191 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 192 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Notes: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 Following a correction on the data for indicators 8. 02 â€oegovernment online service
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 193 Notes: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 Country profile for Morocco initially reported. Please see the previous page for the
Country/Economy Profiles 194 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 195 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 196 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 197 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 198 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 199 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 200 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 201 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 202 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 203 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 204 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 205 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 206 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 207 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 208 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 209 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 210 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 211 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 212 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 213 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 214 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 215 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 216 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 217 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 218 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 219 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 220 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 221 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 222 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 223 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 224 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 225 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 226 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 227 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 228 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 229 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 230 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 231 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 232 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 233 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 234 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 235 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 236 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 237 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 238 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 239 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 240 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 241 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 242 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 243 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 244 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 245 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 246 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles The Global Information technology Report 2014 247 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
Country/Economy Profiles 248 The Global Information technology Report 2014 Note: Indicators followed by an asterisk(*)are measured on a 1-to-7 (best) scale.
Country/Economy Profiles†on page 97 1. Political and regulatory environment 6. Individual usage 5. Skills7.
148 economies included in The Global Information Technology Report 2014. The data tables are organized into 10 sections,
economy, this is indicated in a footnote. A detailed description for each indicator can be found in the
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 1 Singapore...6. 1 2 Finland...5. 7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 75 Tanzania...3. 5 76 Swaziland...3. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 1 Singapore...6. 1 2 Finland...5. 7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 75 Tanzania...3. 5 76 Swaziland...3. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 9 7 1 Luxembourg...5. 9 2 Singapore...5. 8
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 9 7 75 Guatemala...3. 9 76 Sri lanka...3. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 9 7 1 New zealand...6. 7 2 Finland...6. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 9 7 75 Montenegro...3. 6 76 Slovenia...3. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 8 7 1 Singapore...6. 1 2 Finland...6. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 8 7 75 Tanzania...3. 6 76 Philippines...3. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 5 7 1 Finland...5. 9 2 Hong kong SAR...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 5 7 75 Lesotho...3. 4 76 Armenia...3. 4
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 8 7 1 Finland...6. 2 2 Singapore...6. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 8 7 75 Armenia...3. 6 76 Montenegro...3. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 United states...19 2 Luxembourg...20 3 Japan...21 4 New zealand...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Honduras...73 76 Tunisia...74 77 Albania...75 78 Dominican republic...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Ireland...21 1 Singapore...21 3 Rwanda...23 4 Austria...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 67 Nicaragua...37 67 Philippines...37 67 Seychelles...37 78 Barbados...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Singapore...150 2 New zealand...216 3 Bhutan...225 4 Korea, Rep...230
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 74 Slovak Republic...545 76 Portugal...547 77 Bulgaria...564 78 Tunisia...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 1 Finland...6. 5 2 Sweden...6. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 75 Thailand...4. 9 76 Bosnia and herzegovina...4. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 2. 7 7 1 Hong kong SAR...4. 6 2 Qatar...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 2. 7 7 75 Colombia...2. 6 76 Mexico...2. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Macedonia, FYR...8. 2 2 Timor-Leste...11.0 3 Qatar...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Mozambique...37.5 76 El salvador...38.1 77 Armenia...38.8 78 Honduras...39.2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 New zealand...1 2 Georgia...2 2 Macedonia, FYR...2 2 Rwanda...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Germany...15 76 Benin...15 76 Cameroon...15 76 Colombia...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Canada...1 1 New zealand...1 3 Armenia...2 3 Georgia...2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 58 United arab emirates...6 58 United kingdom...6 58 United states...6 58 Yemen...6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 1 Japan...6. 2 2 Taiwan, China...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 75 Dominican republic...4. 9 76 Nigeria...4. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Korea, Rep...100.8 2 Finland...95.5 3 United states...95.3 4 Greece8...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Paraguay11...34.5 76 Dominican Republic5...34.0 77 Bahrain12...33.5 78 Algeria12...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 1 Switzerland...6. 1 2 Belgium...6. 0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 75 Seychelles...4. 2 76 Venezuela...4. 2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 5 7 1 Qatar...5. 6 2 Singapore...5. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 5 7 75 Mauritius...3. 5 76 Tanzania...3. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Iceland3...54,817. 2 2 Norway3...29,244. 2 3 Canada3...18,510. 4
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Croatia...2, 500.1 76 Mexico3...2, 449.5 77 Jordan...2, 369.7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Azerbaijan...100.0 1 Bahrain...100.0 1 Bhutan...100.0 1 Chile8...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 58 Morocco...99.0 58 Philippines8...99.0 58 Portugal...99.0 58 Tunisia...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Luxembourg...4, 088.5 2 Hong kong SAR...1, 426.6 3 Malta...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Timor-Leste...17.5 76 Albania...17.4 77 Indonesia...17.1 78 CÃ'te d†Ivoire...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Iceland...3, 139.3 2 Netherlands...2, 803.7 3 Korea, Rep...2, 751.6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Cape verde...24.3 76 Ukraine...23.5 77 Moldova...23.0 78 Dominican republic...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 1 Iceland...6. 6 2 Finland...6. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 9 7 75 Oman...5. 1 76 Mauritius...5. 0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Liberia3...0. 00 2 Sierra Leone3...0. 00 3 Hong kong SAR...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 El Salvador3...0. 26 76 Mozambique...0. 26 77 Venezuela...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Sri lanka...8. 22 2 Israel3...8. 39 3 Bangladesh...10.37
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Canada...32.57 76 Paraguay...32.63 77 Norway...33.89 78 Portugal...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Argentina1...2. 00 1 Australia5...2. 00 1 Austria6...2. 00
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 74 Ukraine19...1. 86 76 United Kingdom16...1. 85 77 Cape Verde17...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 7 7 1 Switzerland...6. 0 2 Finland...5. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 7 7 75 Panama...3. 6 76 Cambodia...3. 6
*How well does the educational system in your country meet the needs of a competitive economy?
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 1 Singapore...6. 3 2 Finland...6. 3
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 75 Kazakhstan...4. 1 76 Zambia...4. 0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Australia...133.0 2 Spain...128.5 3 Netherlands...128.4 4 New zealand...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Bosnia and herzegovina...89.3 76 Jordan...89.1 77 Turkey...88.9 78 Kyrgyz Republic...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Estonia...99.8 2 Latvia...99.8 3 Azerbaijan5...99.8 4 Georgia...99.7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Malaysia6...93.1 76 South africa...93.0 77 Indonesia...92.8 78 Myanmar...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Hong kong SAR...229.2 2 Saudi arabia...187.4 3 Kazakhstan...185.8 4 Russian Federation...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Spain...108.4 76 Iceland...108.1 77 Georgia...107.8 78 Ireland...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Iceland...96.2 2 Norway...95.0 3 Sweden...94.0 4 Denmark...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Egypt...44.1 76 Venezuela...44.0 77 Moldova...43.4 78 China...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Netherlands...97.2 2 Iceland...96.0 3 Bahrain...92.7 4 Denmark...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Panama...38.3 76 Egypt...37.9 77 Iran, Islamic Rep...37.0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Korea, Rep...97.4 2 Iceland...95.0 3 Netherlands...94.0 4 Luxembourg...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Colombia...32.1 76 Georgia...32.0 77 Panama...31.6 78 Iran, Islamic Rep...26.5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Switzerland...39.9 2 Netherlands...39.8 3 Denmark...38.8 4 France...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Venezuela...6. 7 76 Suriname...5. 5 77 Ecuador...5. 3
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Singapore...126.1 2 Japan...115.1 3 Finland...106.6 4 Korea, Rep...105.1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Mongolia...18.4 76 China...16.9 77 Turkey...16.5 78 Dominican republic...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 5. 5 7 1 Iceland...6. 7 2 United kingdom...6. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 5. 5 7 75 Mongolia...5. 6 76 Hungary...5. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 7 7 1 Sweden...6. 2 2 Iceland...6. 2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 7 7 75 Trinidad and tobago...4. 7 76 Croatia...4. 7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 1 Switzerland...5. 8 2 Finland...5. 7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 3. 6 7 75 Mexico...3. 5 76 Rwanda...3. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Japan1...301.1 2 Sweden1...294.5 3 Switzerland1...293.5 4 Finland1...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Egypt1...0. 6 76 Sri Lanka1...0. 6 77 Azerbaijan1...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 8 7 1 Finland...6. 2 2 Switzerland...6. 2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 8 7 75 Jamaica...4. 8 76 Cyprus...4. 8
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 4 7 1 United kingdom...6. 3 2 Korea, Rep...6. 2
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 4 7 75 Brunei Darussalam...4. 5 76 Mexico...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 1 Switzerland...5. 6 2 Finland...5. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 75 Poland...4. 0 76 Dominican republic...4. 0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 1 United arab emirates...5. 9 2 Qatar...5. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 0 7 75 Sierra leone...3. 9 76 Mexico...3. 9
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Korea, Rep...1. 00 1 Singapore...1. 00 1 United states...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 74 Tunisia...0. 48 76 Ethiopia...0. 47 77 Guatemala...0. 46
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 3 7 1 Rwanda...6. 2 2 United arab emirates...6. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 3 7 75 Jamaica...4. 3 76 Bangladesh...4. 3
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 3 7 1 Finland...5. 8 2 Korea, Rep...5. 7
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 3 7 75 Ghana...4. 3 76 Cyprus...4. 3
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Japan1...118.9 2 Finland1...110.1 3 Sweden1...88.8 4 Korea, Rep. 1...87.8
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Azerbaijan1...0. 1 76 Colombia1...0. 1 77 Jordan1...0. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 1 7 1 Finland...5. 7 2 Qatar...5. 5
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 1 7 75 Guyana...4. 1 76 Barbados...4. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Luxembourg...57.2 2 Singapore10...51.0 3 Switzerland...49.8 4 Sweden...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 75 Brazil...20.5 76 Mauritius...20.4 77 Turkey...20.2 78 Jamaica10...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 1 Qatar...6. 1 2 United arab emirates...6. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 75 Guatemala...4. 1 76 Tunisia...4. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 1 Iceland...6. 6 2 Finland...6. 6
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 2 7 75 Jamaica...4. 1 76 Guyana...4. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 1 7 1 Singapore...6. 1 2 United arab emirates...6. 0
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 4. 1 7 75 Guyana...4. 1 76 Costa rica...4. 1
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 Korea, Rep...1. 00 1 Netherlands...1. 00 3 Kazakhstan...
RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 71 Poland...0. 18 71 Uruguay...0. 18 77 Burkina faso...0. 16
scores for all economies on this particular indicator. The indicators derived from the 2012 and 2013 editions of the
The list of procedural steps compiled for each economy traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court
For each economy, the level of competition in each of the categories is assessed as follows: monopoly, partial
the needs of a competitive economy? 1=not well at all; 7 =extremely well 2012†2013 weighted average
Senior Economist at the Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network at the World Economic Forum In this capacity, he carries out research on national
Roberto Crotti is a Quantitative Economist with the Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network at the
Bureau Chief and US Business editor of The Economist and a Senior Researcher at Britain†s Institute for Fiscal Studies
Economy and Values Research center Manuk Hergnyan, Chairman Sevak Hovhannisyan, Board member and Senior Associate Gohar Malumyan, Research Associate
Julie Toth, Chief Economist Innes Willox, Chief executive Austria Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO Karl Aiginger, Director
Sosthene Gnansounou, Lead Economist Wilfried Houedokou, Economist Bhutan Bhutan Chamber of commerce & Industry Sherab Lhamo, Research Officer
Phub Tshering, Secretary general Druk Holding & Investment Randall Krantz, Strategy Adviser Bosnia and herzegovina MIT Center, School of economics and Business in Sarajevo
Fabiana Madsen, Economist and Associate Researcher Samuel Siewers, Bachelor Student in Economics Movimento Brasil Competitivo (MBC
Iman Al-Ayouty, Senior Economist Omneia Helmy, Acting Executive director and Director of Research Estonia Estonian Institute of Economic Research (ECES
ETLA€ The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Markku Kotilainen, Research director Petri Rouvinen, Research director Vesa Vihriã¤lã¤,Managing director
Thanasis Printsipas, Economist, Entrepreneurship Guatemala FUNDESA Felipe Bosch G.,President of the Board of directors Pablo Schneider, Economic Director
David O†Rear, Chief Economist Federation of Hong kong Industries Alexandra Poon, Director Hungary KOPINT-Tà RKI Economic Research Ltd
Conor Hand, Economist Israel Manufacturers Association of Israel (MAI Dan Catarivas, Foreign Trade & International Relations Director
Ona Grigiene, Deputy Head, Knowledge Economy and Special Surveys Statistics Division Vilija Lapeniene, Director General
Gediminas Samuolis, Head, Knowledge Economy and Special Surveys Statistics Division Luxembourg Luxembourg Chamber of commerce Christel Chatelain, Research Analyst
Carlo Thelen, Chief Economist, Member of the Managing Board Macedonia, FYR National Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Council
Ministry of the Economy Adolfo Cimadevilla Cervera, Technical Secretary for Competitiveness Sergio Merino Gonzã¡lez, Deputy General Director for
Michael B. Mundo, Chief Economist Marc P. Opulencia, Deputy Director Peter Angelo V. Perfecto, Executive director
Vladimir Dubrovskiy, Leading Economist United arab emirates Competitiveness Office Of Abu dhabi H. E. Mohammed Omar Abdulla, Undersecretary
preparedness of economies to leverage the networked economy, providing a unique platform for public-private dialogue on best policies and for determining
measures the extent to which 148 economies, from both the developed and developing worlds, take
In addition, the Report includes detailed profiles for the 148 economies covered this year together with data tables for each of the 54 indicators used in the computation of the NRI
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011