University ranking

Academic ranking of world universities (20)
Global university ranking (16)
Qs world university rankings (23)
U-multirank (323)
University ranking (50)

Synopsis: Education: Level of education: University: College and university rankings: University ranking:

This action focuses on higher education and research, research evaluation criteria, university ranking, knowledge alliances and e-skills;

Sequestration impacting U s. universities Strong Position Masks Emerging Concerns The Times Higher education (THE) World University rankings reflect continued leadership of U s. educational institutions

The most popular are the Shangai Jiao Tong Academic ranking of world universities and the Times QS World University ranking.

Global rankings The growing concern for the quality and assessment of university-based research partly explains the increasing importance attached to university rankings, especially global rankings.

University rankings have become popular around the world because they appear to provide a simple method to gauge world class excellence

European Multidimensional University ranking System, a pilot project funded by DG Education and Culture, aimed at mapping multiple excellences (e g. teaching, innovation, community engagement and employability).

what Counts Many people think that university rankings provide an easy solution to measuring research performance and quality nationally and internationally.

University rankings have become an increasing influence on the higher education landscape since US News and World Report began providing consumer-type information about US universities in 1983.

It was followed quickly by the times QS World University ranking (henceforth Times QS, 2004), Webometrics or the Ranking Web of World Universities (2004), the Taiwan Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities (henceforth Taiwan, 2007),

and it is used widely by university rankings and research assessment. Thomson Reuters Web of Science covers over 9, 000 international and regional journals and book series in the natural sciences, social sciences,

and working with the Institute for Higher education Policy (USA) on a‘New Agenda for College and University ranking'.

and not aggregated up to a unified university ranking); anticipated use of RQF to determine allocation of significant funding for research through Government block grants programs that support research

In the late 1980s, the first university rankings were set up by newspapers. Their methods were not at all adequate;

The CHE University ranking is designed to help prospective students make an informed choice of study program and university,

The results of the CHE University ranking are published in"Der Studienführer"once a year; the indicators are freely available online

The methodology used by Shanghai Jiao Tong University to develop its own World University rankings relies exclusively on seemingly objective indicators,

RANKING Executive Summary In November 2004, the Times Higher education Supplement published its first World University ranking (WUR), a listing of the top 200 institutions across the globe.

In November 2004, the Times Higher published its first World University ranking (WUR), a listing of the top 200 institutions across the globe,

moving away from a mono-dimensional research focused approach to university rankings and allowing users to create individualised multidimensional rankings adapted to their needs and priorities,

While university rankings have been present in the U s. for a long time, over the past decade they have become increasingly important in countries in Europe and around the world,

Times Higher education World University rankings 2014-15. Retrieved October 2014, from http://www. timeshighereducation. co. uk/worlduniversity-rankings/2014-15/world-ranking Toohey, T. 2013, March 9).

36 5. 1. 1 Universities ranked in QS University ranking...36 5. 1. 2 Academic ranking of a Computer science Faculty...

Munchen Kreisfreie Stadt EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Rank R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1

Inner London East EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Rank R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1

Paris EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Rank R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1 37 Academic ranking

the EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Nr R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1 1 Academic ranking of a Computer science

R&d 5. 1. 1 Universities ranked in QS University ranking Table 13: Top ranking regions according to the Universities ranked in QS University ranking indicator Rank NUTS3 Code Region name Indicator Value EIPE Rank 1 UKL12 Gwynedd 100

266 2 DE711 Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt 83 7 3 DE125 Heidelberg, Stadtkreis 82 23 4 DE423 Potsdam, Kreisfreie Stadt 77

UKH12 Cambridgeshire CC 20 5 Indicator description Indicator ID Agrd 1 Name of indicator Universities ranked in the QS University ranking

Measures the number of universities in QS university ranking based in a region Unit of measurement Region's share in the total number of EU ranked universities to a region's share in the EU population Definition of ICT dimension none Unit of observation

Frequency of the Universities ranked in QS University ranking indicator values 1248 9 8 8 7 4 3 6 1 1 2 1 1 1

Descriptive statistics of the Universities ranked in QS University ranking indicator Number of observations Mean value Standard deviation Variance 1303 1. 16 7. 01 49.17 38 5. 1. 2

of indicator Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Academic ranking of a Computer science faculty Employer ranking of a Computer science faculty Citations ranking of a Computer science faculty R&d expenditures by ICT firms ICT FP7 funding

Measures the number of universities in QS university ranking Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the academic ranking of QS Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the employer ranking of QS Measures the performance

the EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Nr R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1 1 Academic ranking of a Computer science

of indicator Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Academic ranking of a Computer science faculty Employer ranking of a Computer science faculty Citations ranking of a Computer science faculty R&d expenditures by ICT firms FP7 funding

Measures the number of universities in QS university ranking Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the academic ranking of QS Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the employer ranking of QS Measures the performance

as reported by the QS University ranking. For a detailed description of the data source, see Section 5. 1. Information about the funding

in addition to the university ranking, it also offers the rankings described above by teaching subject, including Computer science.

and positions of the regional universities have fallen behind national university rankings. The entrepreneurial fabric's technological level and capacity for absorption of knowledge is limited.

While drawing on the experience of existing university rankings and of EU-funded projects on transparency in higher education, the new ranking system should be:

and sparking off debates among commentators of the sport for and against the new rule. 1 In university rankings,

The issue with the some of the current university rankings is that they tend to be presented

/University ranking (CHE; Germany) Studychoice123 (SK123; The netherlands) Specialized League tables and Rankings Financial times ranking of business schools and programmes (FT;

/en-us/2010/Page/Indicators http://www. arwu. org/ARWUMETHODOLOGY2010. jsp http://www. timeshighereducation. co. uk/world-university rankings/2010-2011/analysis

-methodology. html http://www. topuniversities. com/university rankings/world-university rankings http://www. socialsciences. leiden. edu/cwts/products-services/leiden-ranking-2010

A Cross-National Analysis of University ranking Systems. Higher education, 49,495-533.178 Dulleck, U. and R. Kerschbamer (2006."

University rankings, Diversity, and The New Landscape of Higher education (pp. 19-34). Rotterdam; Taipeh: Sense Publishers.

Tecnológico de Monterrey is one of the most prestigious universities in Latin america, ranking 279th in the QS WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2013 and 7th in the QS University rankings:

< Back - Next >

Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011