and constructive competition Flows are hampered severely: we need integration!!!Why we in the Canary islands miss opportunities to exploit, for a knowledge-based economy, the availability of good ideas and innovations?
New global markets with no competition The economical crisis of traditional industry sectors could foster investment in the knowledge based economy Losing the technological race with other competitor nations Cuts
and competitiveness poles relevant for regional industry Entrepreneurship and spin-off support (business plans competitions, regional venture capital funds) Incentives for regionally-relevant public research Entrepreneurship support (networks of individuals, training courses,
Mechanisms should be in place to detect activities facing increasing competition and to devote special attention to these,
to face up to the new forms of competition that are developing in the global economy. SMES are thus at the core of Cohesion Policy.
whether the smart specialisation strategy is able to resist global competition or take advantage of global competition opportunities (often niche markets).
Many reports are showing that lots of SMES do not use the full potential of either the internal or the external market.
This will result in an EU economy that is more competitive in a world of high energy prices and tough resource constraints and competition.
o Support of pupils, students and masterands to participate in competitions of ideasand innovative projects organized at national and international level (through financial stimulents.
and through competition and demonstration effects (via market competition and joint activities). While the region benefits from the spillovers through human capital Romanians account for the vast majority of the workforce of foreign-owned firms,
or to cope with growing international competition, or support potentially high growth companies to unleash latent comparative advantage through, for example, R&d and innovation policies, investments in skills formation,
The lack of destination management organizations at regional, county and local levels reflects the absence of a common integrated strategy which has negative consequence including an unjustified competition between complementary destinations such as Timisoara
and a wide range of smaller firms appears to be more conducive to competition and has the potential to maximize output and employment growth. 146.
and policies that should be a proper answer to challenges generated by the process of European population ageing as well as by a fierce competition globally.
competition and reduction of prices shall be promoted as a result of the competitive level development in the field of broadband communications.
and increase access to broadband communications especially in rural and disadvantaged areas. 6 In terms of competition it should be mentioned that Romania has a particular situation regarding the penetration rate of fixed telephony of only 20
Therefore, the main goal is to stimulate competition and to promote the development of mobile broadband as the proper solution for Romania,
"or open market competition for telecommunications or other policy options would be more effective? A national flexibility and a coordinated approach at EU level:
equal treatment and fair competition imposed by the national legislative framework. Benefits of Electronic Procurement System also take other values.
as well as those with innovative regulators looking for an intensifications of competition, such as in the UK, in the Netherlands,
. calling for more competition. In this context, the relatively slow development of international standards seems to favour Chinese companies aiming at conquering international markets starting from a strong and large home base.
start to take the Chinese competition seriously. A number of important recent mergers and acquisitions show the efforts to concentrate forces.
Europe has to face strong international competition. Joining forces, creating large markets and speeding up the setting of standards might be important for maintaining an influence not only of European industries but also of European political decision making concerning future energy supply.
Global Competition; Global Markets 1. The Research Questions Recently a territorial development model has arisen focused on territorial search of specialized diversification.
Increasing competition in international markets. Building the evidence base for RIS3 (I) SWOT Analysis R&d&i 14 Strengths Availability of broadband coverage throughout the territory (universal service).
1). At the global level, think tanks and policymakers, such as UNDP and the World Economic Forum have organised competitions‘challenges'and global summits 6,
Changing markets, increased competition and new technologies have reduced product life times, demanding more rapid creation of products and their more rapid destruction.
therefore, escalating competition and specialisation. This puts a premium on innovation. At the same time, innovation itself is globalising (Archibugi and Iammarino, 1997.
There should not be unnecessary obstacles to SMES and entrepreneurship in the institutions of the economy such as taxation, social security, bankruptcy legislation, competition policy,
policy should promote entry and exit and competition in the market. Furthermore, the process of creative destruction is pronounced most in periods of economic crisis and recovery,
Kirzner, I. 1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, The University of chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. Kirzner, I. 1997), Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, pp. 60-85.
and Barriers to competition (low-level indicators are: legal barriers, antitrust exemptions, barriers in network sectors and barriers in services.
) The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) programme is gated a double innovation programme providing competition-based awards to small private sector companies of about USD 100 000
Science-based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition, European Economic Review, Vol. 43, pp. 409-429.
Culture and Competition in Silicon valley and Route 128, Harvard university Press, Boston. Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman (2000), The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 217-226.
including virtual and real business creations, business plan competitions, strategy games and discussions with entrepreneurs. These methods are placed better than classroom lectures to develop 4. ENTREPRENEURSHIP SKILLS SMES, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION OECD 2010 169 entrepreneurial behaviours.
Competition keeps increasing and as a consequence all territories have to engage more strongly in innovation, both technological and social,
as facilitators of balance between cooperation/competition, allowing the optimization of resources and continuous learning with the reduction of information exchange costs.
INTRODUCTION With the globalization of economies and competition, innovation has become the most important factor in development, employment,
in order to avoid overlap and duplication (even interagency competition) of measure implementation. There should be proper liasion/consultation with local bodies
Tashatuvango/Shutterstock 2 5-9 may 2014 SPECIAL REPORT ESKILLS FOR GROWTH Euractiv a six-month-long competition, rewarding national finalists with a camp to enthuse teachers
John Higgins, director general of Digital Europe, the association for the digital technology industry in Europe, said that the initiative had created already competition between actors involved on pledges.
by the mid-1990's, the competition among packaged software vendors for extending the generality of their offerings became a syndrome with its own name:"
The New Frontier in Business Competition, Boston: Harvard Business school Press, 1993. Roach, Stephen S.,"America's Technology Dilemma:
where social services are delivered in quasi-markets we see a competition of service providers making them more proactive and innovative. 50 However,
and supporting the development of a strong and sustainable industrial foundation for global competition. 6 See:
policy makers have placed too much emphasis on short-term gains in the name of global competition. A Culture of Innovation, with the features of a knowledge society, can only be created based on a clear and concise strategic perspective.
The higher competition of network management tools due to the apparition of tools developed formerly for the Internet era may reduce the operational expenditures as well.
in order to drive innovation, competition, and research. Combining optical network technology with Cloud technology is key to addressing these challenges.
while fostering competition, openness and standardisation, involving consumer/citizen, ensuring trust, security and data protection with transparent and democratic governance and control of offered services as guiding principles (10,11). 1. 1 Autonomicity
in order to drive innovation, competition, and research. Combining optical network technology with Cloud technology is key to addressing the future Internet/Cloud challenges.
An effective scaling up of the infrastructure across multiple administrative domains (i e. multiple NPS) could help distinguish competition in the service and network layers.
and their peers (i e. other SMES that are not in direct competition with them). Suppliers are recognized in the OI literature as important sources of (joint) innovation (Ragatz et al, 1997.
Competition or lack of alignment between national and regional political and policy objectives and strategies may make dialogue difficult between universities and regional authorities.
Research activities at TUKE are supported adequately from the national research grants (TUKE is the third most successful university in Slovakia in the competition for the subsidy resources.
"The EU needs well functioning markets where competition and consumer access stimulate productivity, growth and innovation,
call for ideas, competitions and so on) and ways of engaging citizens, users and others in the design and development of solutions. 29 3. Prototyping.
Prizes and competitions to engage the public and different fields Regulation well-conceived regulations can elicit much greater innovation (such as feed in tariffs for energy.
These include calls for ideas, competitions, petitions, youth parliaments, citizen juries, participatory planning and budgeting and so on.
Through its prestigious annual awards competition the programme has served to highlight innovative projects within fields as diverse as youth justice, environmental management, education, public health and e-governance,
The Big Green Challenge, UK 86 Prizes and competitions can be an effective means of uncovering new sources of social innovation.
INSPIRATIONS AND DIAGNOSES 15 competitions for the crowdsourcing of innovations say that it is the stage of framing a good question
which is the key to the competition's success. 1 All of the methods that follow are not only prompts,
and patterns. 1 18 THE OPEN BOOK OF SOCIAL INNOVATION These sites show how to run competitions for‘mash up'ideas from citizens using government data, such as Sunlight Labs and Show Us a Better Way
There are also prizes there are biodiversity competitions, recipe competitions and a felicitation ceremony for creative villagers. 30) Media Spotlight.
Some of these methods are designed specifically to encourage creativity and new ideas such as competitions and prizes, online platforms and idea banks.
and then provides support to the winners. 54) Competitions and challenges can be an effective means of uncovering new sources of social innovation.
however, competition is not always the driving force behind the development of new innovations in the social economy.
This means 2 that competitions need to be structured in such a way that participants have the opportunity to collaborate,
One of the traditional arguments in favour of prizes and competitions is the way in
Indeed, with competitions, it is the participants who are expected to foot the financial risk. In the social economy,
or competitions such as the Singapore Public service Awards. Another example of this is school inspections inspectors assess and then share good practice.
with £20 million to be spent on a public competition for medical breakthroughs. 325) Crosscutting budgets that support broad programmes
such as the ITV/Big Lottery Fund competition‘The People's 50 Million'.'Another example is‘Help A London Park,
and competitions provide another source of funding for activities at one remove from the state.
Through its prestigious annual awards competition, the programme has served to highlight innovative projects within fields as diverse as youth justice, environmental management, education, public health and e-governance,
Image courtesy of the West Philly Hybrid X Team. 407) Competitions and challenge funds can be an effective means of spurring social innovation.
200 Community of Practice on Inclusive Entrepreneurship (COPIE) 137 Community Shared Agriculture 205 Competitions 38;
and organizations, is required a further stage in ICT technology adoption which exploits the dynamic interaction (with cooperation and competition) of several players in order to produce systemic results in terms of innovation and economic development.
May 2000) James Moore, Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, Harperbusiness;
encouraging the maximum coexistence and diversity of models and licences, supporting as much as possible the equal opportunities of service/solution publishing and fair competition;
Where necessary and without distorting competition, public financing instruments will give increased priority to supporting the development of information infrastructure and projects,
and the competition, providing to the small providers equal opportunities to offer their services and products, stimulating the local technological knowledge and development.
benefits and easier access to information flows within the network by governments and firms, increasing their choices about specialisation, co-operation and competition (Steinmueller,
and business plan competitions that are now are implemented increasingly worldwide (Morris, 1998) and are a key element for economic and social development in a national, regional or local innovation environment.
An exploration into turbulent waters, Discussion Paper 39, Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), Manchester, November.
They reflect a growing international competition among universities for talent and resources; at the same time they reinforce competition by their very results.
On the positive side they 1 http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Three points for a win 25 urge decision-makers to think bigger and set the bar higher,
and in (international cultural competitions, including awards granted by academies of science. Indicator of peer esteem.
Cultural awards and prizes won in (inter) national cultural competitions would be an additional indicator that goes beyond the traditional technology-oriented indicators.
and increase international competition. The rationales that drive these activities are diverse. Among others, they comprise (IAU, 2005:
and competition is fierce, putting a premium on innovation and efficiency, while making it harder to earn a return on investment.
, finance sector competition is facing the challenge of Paypal and Google Wallet diffusion and adoption by digital natives.‘‘
Indeed, for all groups of consumers, even the most mature (concentrated in large cities and industrial areas), the locus of competition has shifted from the price of the service to the satisfaction of the specific needs of customers:
Besides these strategy and marketing facets of digital business identity, the technical and social challenges to privacy and security related to this openness and‘‘instability''6 of digital competition are worth mentioning.
Considering, for example, a study by Brynjolfsson et al. 22 digital business identity seems to be a relevant factor in an omnichannels retail competition.
The results have shown that the competition has variability across products, with a relevance to Internet retailers of selling niche products.
Indeed, starting in April 2006 the Ofcom (an independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries) decided to implement a package of measures to address consumers
a revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation, 1st edn. Currency Doubleday, New york 6. Greenwood P-E (2012) The new instability:
Organizations have to understand that in order for them to stay in the competition; they have to act fast regarding understanding digital governance structures, processes and mechanisms.
Apple has managed to shift the locus of competition in the fast-paced technology market from product innovation to the innovation of the business model of reference for an entire market,
and interactivity criteria and the new competition dynamics are based on the ability to build and strengthen customer relationships through a highly personalized offer built on the specific needs of different customer segments. 1 This new context has changed
So we can say that today the competition is not only among individual organizations, but also, and mainly, among value creation systems composed by networks of companies.
and still is, significantly transforming the traditional rules of competition, offer value propositions and business models 39.
At the same time, the network has intensified also competition since the easier access to information and the reduction of variable costs stimulates competition on prices
and therefore requires the maximization of operational efficiency. In addition, it is easier for potential entrants to access distribution channels
and competitions it has taken part, winning the company a widespread support and a number of awards. 10.5 Mezzanine Developed on the concept used in the Sci-fi movie Minority report,
with a solid company, facing some competition but with a large market to tap, showing no need for additional enabling infrastructure.
and on generating the cash necessary to stay ahead of the competition. In this stage the explosive growth of earlier stages starts slowing down.
but might be more vulnerable to competition later due to lower entry barriers. In line with the Forum's mission, this report hopes to stimulate constructive debate across multiple stakeholders,
The contest starts at the regional level, with 25 different competitions that select award winners.
and create significant friction with incumbents that struggle to deal with the new competition often a key challenge for young high-impact firms that requires significant determination and stamina from their founders.
creation Societal impact Impact on job creation The 628 companies studied in this report created approximately 162,000 net jobs over the most recent two-year fiscal period prior to the 2013 competition.
and will have to make trade-offs between making new offerings ahead of the competition and cannibalization of their existing profit engines.
Do we think of ourselves too much inside a static industry vertical (that exposes us to competition we don't see yet coming?
as well as potentially established competition in the same or an adjacent niche. These challenges can slow their initial advancement given the focus on market share and geographic or product expansion.
dedicating resources to staying ahead of the competition (in the spirit of creative destruction). Simultaneously, learning effects and scale economies keep positive momentum on margins in this stage.
they are now subject to much intensified competition which finds it relatively easy to enter, as many service businesses are assetlight
The EY World Entrepreneur Of the Year judges for this year's competition offer the following themes they thought distinguished the winners
This is due, in part, to continued uncertainty about sections of the European fi nancial system, inadequate competition in the services sector and fragmentation of markets in key strategic sectors.
30 Public Systematic entrepreneurship education throughout the curriculum, tailoring content to market needs Initiatives exist in a dozen countries on cooperation between education and business, entrepreneurial competitions, certification of entrepreneurship skills
and monitoring degree of openness The not-invented-here syndrome that leads to external work being seen as competition
Entrepreneurs play a key role in securing competition and innovation in the economy. In recent years innovation-driven entrepreneurship has become an important part of Danish policy.
the importance of this issue decreases while the relevance of other difficulties increases, including severe competition, availability of skilled employees and managers,
competition and cash-flow issues. There were also a number of barriers that innovative SMES experience over and above those that do not innovate:
Here again, the examples of Nordic countries (and especially Finland) show how European education systems can be tuned better to global competition,
Competition among cities in late medieval and early modern Europe enabled many European regions to catch up with
Such decentralized political competition spawned a commercial revolution and paved the way for subsequent scientific, agricultural and industrial revolutions.
as the steel industry on which it depended was devastated The Competitiveness of Cities 15 in the late 20th century by slowing demand, higher costs and intense competition.
As global competition continues to pressure companies into relocating to lower-cost destinations from the Republic of korea to China,
various regulatory authorities exist within Dubai to ensure transparency and open competition in the key sectors within its free trade philosophy.
however, will face competition from other cities in the region, and from the continual economic headwinds that will buffet its many industries.
Rather, the logic of the global city calls for more competition and genuine economic freedom.
as well as internal political and economic competition for investment within the region. Consolidation and coordination of tax authorities,
Industrial, homogeneous competition is very intense. Many enterprises are in a low position on the value chain,
Director, Economic Research Marut Sen Gupta, Deputy Director General Indonesia Center for Industry, SME & Business Competition Studies, University of Trisakti Tulus Tambunan
Healthy market competition, both domestic and foreign, is important in driving market efficiency, and thus business productivity, by ensuring that the most efficient firms,
in addition to high levels of competition and access to venture capital and financing that are analyzed in other pillars of the Index.
and a strong propensity for on-the-job training (4th) the country benefits from a high level of technological adoption (15th) and highly sophisticated (10th) and innovative (13th) businesses that carry out their activities in a market characterized by high competition (6th)
The Russian Federation is placed at 53rd position this year with some improvements related to the efficiency of goods markets (in particular domestic competition), ICT use,
Improvements in the functioning of its goods market (85th) with enhanced levels of competition (71st)
In China, more reforms and liberalization are needed to improve market efficiency, increase competition, and encourage a more optimal allocation of financial resources.
along with investment rules, greatly limit competition. China is becoming more innovative (32nd), but it is not yet an innovation powerhouse.
However, market competition remains limited by a number of barriers to entry, especially those affecting foreign investments.
In addition, the results show that the benefits of the many adopted reforms intended to increase the level of competition
1) boosting competition, especially in strategic sectors of the economy, by removing bottlenecks and barriers to entry;(
The latter, however, still ranks a low 119th in market competition and 102nd in public institutions. Among the BRICS, China has lost 22 places in terms of market competition since 2010,
and both India and Brazil have lost considerable ground in all three areas. These results highlight how important it will be for emerging economies to promptly and efficiently implement structural reforms.
Rankings of the 20 largest emerging economies on selected components of the GCI Public institutions Market competition Labor market efficiency GCI 2014 2015 rank Country 2014
The country's rise is led by improvements in its level of competition in the goods market (54th) thanks to the reduction of red tape for new businesses and better infrastructure 67th),
Saudi arabia (24th) loses four positions in this year's edition, based on a less positive assessment of its quality of education and level of domestic competition.
Second, measures to intensify domestic competition (118th) would result in efficiency gains and contribute to energizing the economy by providing access to new entrants.
its efficient goods market (25th) is characterized by enabling conditions for both domestic and foreign competition,
characterized by low domestic and foreign competition. In the near-term future, it will be important not to lose sight of these challenges for the country's long-term competitiveness,
establishing a regulatory framework that encourages competition to foster economic diversification, and developing a sound financial market (126th).
17%A. Competition...67%1. Domestic competition...variable h 6. 01 Intensity of local competition 6. 02 Extent of market dominance 6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy 6. 04 Effect
of taxation on incentives to invest 6. 05 Total tax rate*6. 06 Number of procedures required to start a business
*i 6. 07 Time required to start a business*i 6. 08 Agricultural policy costs 2. Foreign competition...
variable h 6. 09 Prevalence of trade barriers 6. 10 Trade tariffs*6. 11 Prevalence of foreign ownership 6. 12 Business impact of rules
or has disappeared without specific measures. h The competition subpillar is weighted the average of two components:
domestic competition and foreign competition. In both components, the included indicators provide an indication of the extent to which competition is distorted.
The relative importance of these distortions depends on the relative size of domestic versus foreign competition.
This interaction between the domestic market and the foreign market is captured by the way we determine the weights of the two components.
Domestic competition is the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), government spending (G), and exports (X),
while foreign competition is equal to imports (M) . Thus we assign a weight of (C i+G+X)/(C i+G+X+M) to domestic competition
and a weight of M c i+G+X+M) to foreign competition. i Indicators 6. 06 and 6. 07 combine to form one single indicator. j For indicators 6. 14
, imports as a percentage of GDP, we first apply a log-transformation and then a min-max transformation. k The size of the domestic market is constructed by taking the natural log of the sum of the gross domestic product valued at purchased power parity (PPP) plus the total value (PPP estimates) of imports of goods
Rising competition over these resources could eventually result in military conflict. Adverse changes in temperature and precipitation have started to affect the capacity of many areas to produce food,
Locational Competition and the Environment: Should Countries Harmonize Their Environmental Policies? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1079, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale university..
or the intensity of market competition that are more qualitative than hard data can provide.
Domestic Competition VIII. Company Operations and Strategy IX. Government and Public Institutions X. Education and Human Capital XI.
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 5...142 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 5...142 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...136 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...2. 6...144 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 1...132 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...85 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...8 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 8...15 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...121 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...46 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...79 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...28 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...6 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...106 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...139 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...95 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...52 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...75 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...110 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 9...134 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...86 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...109 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...33 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...117 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...137 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...27 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...44 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...56 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...59 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...112 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...83 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...37 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...17 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...45 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...72 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 0...133 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...89 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...29 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...113 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...108 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...31 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...124 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...87 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...105 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...12 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...118 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...71 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...42 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...129 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...102 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...140 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...88 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...4 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...47 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...80 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...91 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...53 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...119 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...60 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...126 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...58 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...39 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 4...1 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...57 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...111 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...21 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...13 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...114 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...107 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...69 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...23 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...30 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...93 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 7...141 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...22 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...54 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...43 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...90 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...76 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...34 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...97 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...3 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 1...131 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...24 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...64 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...99 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...82 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 9...135 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...48 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...96 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...100 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...104 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...94 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...14 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...26 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...130 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...50 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...49 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...73 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...84 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...67 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...68 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...70 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...61 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...51 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...63 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...7 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...18 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...120 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...74 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...78 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...40 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...81 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...128 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...127 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...116 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...20 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...32 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...66 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...36 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...35 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 8...16 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...98 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...115 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...41 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...19 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...2 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...122 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...123 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...38 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...138 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...62 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...92 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...11 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...55 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...101 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...9 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...5 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...10 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...103 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...2. 9...143 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...65 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...125 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...25 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...77 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
465 6. 01 Intensity of local competition...466 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...467 6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy...
2. 6 6. 01 Intensity of local competition In your country, how intense is competition in the local markets?
2. 0 6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy In your country, to what extent does antimonopoly policy promote competition?
1=does not promote competition; 7=effectively promotes competition 2013 14 weighted average SOURCE: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey.
For more details, refer to Chapter 1. 3 of this Report. 2. 2: Data Tables 468 The Global Competitiveness Report 2014 2015 2014 World Economic Forum RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY VALUE 1 MEAN 3. 8 7
Goods market efficiency 6. 01 Intensity of local competition In your country, how intense is competition in the local markets?
World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey 6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy In your country, to what extent does antimonopoly policy promote competition?
1=does not promote competition; 7=effectively promotes competition 2013 14 weighted average Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey 6. 04 Effect of taxation on incentives to invest In your country,
to what extent do taxes reduce the incentive to invest? 1=significantly reduce the incentive to invest;
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011