Nano artifact (19) | ![]() |
Nanoelectronics (8) | ![]() |
Nanomaterial (28) | ![]() |
Nanomedicine (3) | ![]() |
Nanoparticle (28) | ![]() |
Nanoscale (23) | ![]() |
Nanoscience (33) | ![]() |
Nanostructure (14) | ![]() |
Nanotech (462) | ![]() |
Nanotube (137) | ![]() |
The current paper discusses the application of thesituation'cum CSH metaphor for the case of nanoscience,
ethical and social impacts of nanosciences,-technologies, and-artifacts. The paper suggests that Inclusive foresight, reinforced with the principles of CSH, can be of use in the nano-field providing wider stakeholder representation during the research and development processes.
of any kind that depends on the systemic interaction between nanoscience, nano-technology and the artifacts themselves for their evolution into desirable artifacts:
The influence of the EU's Code of conduct (the Code hereafter) for nanoscience nano-technology and nano artifacts is a further matter shaping the future situation surrounding the nano-field.
& Social Change 1. 1. Anticipatory coordination for the responsible development of nanotechnology These general challenges become very specific in the case of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
about pressures towards valorisation of research as well as lack of uptake in sectors that could profit from the possibilities offered by nanoscience and nanotechnology.
i) GM plants and (ii) Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. Hence, this research is expected to contribute improving the strategic processes of priority setting in technoinstittutiona arenas both on the national and international level.
first in the area of genetically modified plants and then for the domain of Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. 2. Background and rationale 2. 1. Tailoring Foresight a revision During the last two decades the field of Foresight has developed a lot through practical experience
%and the recent rate of growth of nanoscience has been near to 14%.%Convergence/divergence. In fields that are established (with a dominant design or innormal science'under a given paradigm),
genetically modified plants and Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. For each domain, we will first characterise the institutional arrangement of the governance arenas and the knowledge configurations,
and programming arena by a stronger institutional steering on EU level. 5. 2. The case of Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies (N&n) Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies (N&n) are seen as thetop-down'miniaturisation movement of three domains:
To address field specificities for Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies, we will examine first institutional arrangements and later on Knowledge dynamics. 5. 2. 1. N&n:
It displays explicitly among the EU policies one dedicated to Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies. The European Technology platform for Nanoelectronics European Nanoelectronics Initiative Advisory Council (ENIAC) was launched in 2004 with the mission to bring together all leading players in the field
To sum up the analysis revealed two types of Foresight useful for underpinning the European research and innovation system in the area of Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies:(
involving nanoscience and engineering, social science, ethics, consumer protection and environmental interests. The working group issued a call for written evidence,
IPTS-ISTAG, European commission, Luxembourg, 2001.27 Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies:
www. nanotec. org. uk) of nanoscience and nanotechnologgy The goal is to carry out an independent study of likely developments
A Technical, Political and Institutional Map of Emerging technologies, Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London, 2003, July 14 Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and nanotechnologies:
which the emergence of new technologies is accompanied by mutual co-operation between technology development and impact analysis, between sustainability research and nanosciences,
nanoscience, nanotechnology and nano-artefacts and their social acceptance; stem cells and what they offer and their social dimensions.
funding and institutionalization of nanotechnology were linked closely to the ways that various branches of nanoscience
formally established a specific working group called the Interagency Working group on Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology (IWGN),
National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Leading to a New Industrial revolution',should approximately double the Federal government's annual investment in nanoscience,
The US Interagency Working group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (IWGN) published a worldwide study on Nanostructure Science and Technology in 1999.
Working group on Nanoscience, Nanostructure Science and Technology, in: A Worldwide Study, 1999.6 G. Bachmann, in:
, 2009.26 P. Dannemand Andersen, B. Rasmussen, M. Strange, J. Haisler, Technology foresight on Danish nanoscience and nano-technology, Foresight, J. Futur.
and Nanodevices, 1999.38 M. C. Roco, W s. Bainbridge, Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: NSET Workshop Report, National science Foundation (NSF), 2001.39 E. Fisher, Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI:
Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience, Res. Policy 37 (2008) 888.54 ETC Group action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration), Size matters!
in order to guide national investments in nanosciences and nanotechnologies Trends in S&t development in a selected group of countries;
trends in private sector investments worldwiide state-of-the-art in nanoscience and nanotechnollog in Brazil (main research groups, lab infrastruccture funding, training activities
aiming at comparing development of nanosciences and nanotechnologies in selected countries Challenges in communicating the outcomes of foresight studies. 251 supporting basic and applied research;
such as cognitive neuroscience and nanoscience, in which the role of ICSU was less obvious but where ICSU member organisations, could make a significant contribution.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011