| Darwin (132) |  |
| Lamarck (1) | |
Herd mentalitywriting in The American Naturalist, David Sloan Wilson quotes a buffalo expert named H. H. T. Prins,
Aiden just won the Young Naturalist Award from the American Museum of Natural history. Its kids like this that make
Darwin is watching!..After it was over, no one really wanted to help the guy inside...
Darwin, one of the great plant researchers, proposed what has become known as the root-brain#hypothesis. Darwin proposed that the tip of the root, the part that we call the meristem,
ever since Darwin who called the origin of flowering plants an'abominable mystery'Hochuli said. These newfound fossils reveal that flowering plants may have existed more than 100 million years longer than previously thought.
since ancient times to serve as medicines with the ancient Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder writing that they could help treat the eyes and skin.
#Darwin s Dark Knight: Scientist Risked Execution for Fox Study (Op-Ed) Brian Hare is an evolutionary anthropologist at Duke university
 For almost a century Darwin's biggest idea had a hole in it. To illustrate natural selection Darwin did not directly suggest that humans shared a common ancestor with apes.
Instead he used a concept that everyone was familiar with domestication. Everyone knew that you could selectively breed dogs for certain physical characteristics like size
Darwin wanted to stretch this idea a little further and suggest that instead of a human hand it was natural selection that drove evolution.
 The problem was that Darwin could not say how domestication started in the first place. No one was taking notes
#Darwin's Frogs Are in Steep Decline Some of nature's most fascinating fathers may be at risk of extinction.
Male Darwin's frogs swallow their offspring in the tadpole stage incubate their young in their vocal sacs
Scientists who later studied the mouth-brooding animals found that there are actually two species naming one Rhinoderma darwinii (Darwin's frog) and the other Rhinoderma rufum (Chile Darwin's frog.
The findings suggest Darwin's frogs have disappeared from or at least rapidly declined in many locations where they were recently abundant the researchers wrote in a paper published online June 12 in the journal PLOS ONE.
And Darwin's frogs don't seem to be adapting; the survey showed that the remaining populations were clinging to their shrinking native forests.
The researchers recommended that Darwin's frogs be listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN.
Chile Darwin's frogs meanwhile should get a possibly extinct tag the researchers said. Other factors could be contributing to the decline of Darwin's frog.
Their populations have taken a hit from volcanic eruptions in the southern Andes the researchers say. What's more the African clawed frog was introduced to Chile in the 1970s.
if Darwin's frogs have been affected by the fungus in the wild but the researchers say it's worth investigating.
Extinct Aussie cousins Darwin's frogs once had a close analog in eastern Australia known as gastric brooding frogs.
As Darwin mused It may be doubted whether there are many other animals which have played so important a part in the history of the world as have organized these lowly creatures.
a German naturalist and scholar later examined all the earliest documents on Wild Peter and concluded that he must have lived with people until shortly before he was captured
A German naturalist first described the animal in 1836 but little research has been conducted on the animal
since then due to the logistical challenge of traveling to these remote islands. 7 Most Misleading Animal Names A team of naturalists based at the College of Micronesia has conducted now the first-ever field study of the Mortlock Islands
This latest work detailed Tuesday (Oct 29) in the journal Zookeys only scratches the surface of P. pelagicus ecology Wiles said andhe hopes that it will motivate other naturalists
This descent with modification as Darwin put it eventually allows a population of interbreeding organisms
and friend of Erasmus Darwin used infusions of foxglove with surprising success to treat dropsy a disease now known as edema that can cause swelling bad enough to rip open the skin.
#Science Experiments for Kids Children are natural scientists. Their curiosity is boundless and with a little supervision during these easy science experiments even very young children can do oereal science.
You can contribute phenology data to Nature s Notebook an online program the USA National Phenology Network manages that collects observations of leaf phenology from professional and amateur naturalists.
Another commonly cited use of the phrase is American naturalist John Burroughs 1875 set of essays Birds and Bees Sharp Eyes and other Papers.
Famed naturalist John Muir fell in love with Yosemite and became the chief voice in its preservation.
and 22 feet (6. 65 m) Deep in 1917 American naturalist Jesse Walter Fewkes pegged the structure as a prehistoric water reservoir.
Heads named the locust Electrotettix attenboroughi after British naturalist and filmmaker Sir David Attenborough. A description of the new species was published today (July 30) in the journal Zookeys.
A dinosaur spider armored fish and ghost shrimp are some the other creatures named for the naturalist.
and naturalists use when exploring the natural world. Our goal was to give kids an understanding of the science underlying healthy ecosystems and sustainability
If we applied the same standards to Darwin's work, we'd say what a terrible experimenter he was.
was removed from her post after she sought to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles darwin's On the Origin of Species in the March issue (see'Turkish scientists claim Darwin censorship'.
'The articles on evolution and the cover with its picture of Darwin were pulled from the issue at the last minute.
T ŠBà °TAK produced a special Darwin issue in June, which included translations of articles from Scientific American and no Turkish authors.
and natural scientists, working shoulder-to-shoulder at Tel Megiddo and several other important Israeli sites. In the past, all too often, archaeologists and scientists worked together,
But Darwin eventually made peace with the peacock's train, and its plumage has become the poster child for his theory of sexual selection, in
because Darwin had suggested it, and nobody had gone out and tested the idea, she says. As she expected,
including attention from Creationists who were delighted to see Darwin questioned. Petrie and The french scientists published a rebuttal5.
Darwin was bothered by such traits since his theory of evolution couldn't completely explain them (The sight of a feather in a peacock's tail
Darwin was bothered by such traits since his theory of evolution couldn t completely explain them (âÂ#Âoethe sight of a feather in a peacock s tail
Darwin postulated that species change into other species by a gradual collection of mutations wherein the specimens with the'stronger'mutations survive.
and explain why fully completed species appear millions of years earlier than Darwin ever anticipated
Darwin actually thought mutations (sports as they were called then) only played a small role in evolution.
He thought the main driving force was from organisms continually being pressured to adapt over generations sort of like Lamarck's idea but much slower.
When scientists eventually discovered that heredity was passed on in discrete units as Gregor Mendel had begun to discover back in Darwin's time it looked like evolution was dead in the water so the evolutionary scientists put their heads together and decided mutations might provide the new
#What If Darwin Had existed Never? What would a world without Darwin look like? Many have argued that science would have developed much the same.
His theory of evolution by natural selection was in the air at the time an inevitable product of the way people were thinking about themselves
If Darwin hadn't proposed it then someone else would have most obviously the naturalist we know as the co-discoverer of natural selection Alfred Russel Wallace.
But Wallace's version of the theory was not the same as Darwin's and he had very different ideas about its implications.
And since Wallace conceived his theory in 1858 any equivalent to Darwin's 1859 Origin of Species would have appeared years later.
and that for a time were thought to overshadow Darwin's. The impact of Darwin's theory was limited not to science itself.
I suspect that in a world without Darwin it would have taken until the early twentieth century for the theory of natural selection to come to the attention of most biologists.
The impact of Darwin's theory was limited of course not to science itself--it has been seen as a major contributor to the rise of materialism and atheism.
In the eyes of its critics Darwin's theory of natural selection inspired generations of social thinkers and ideologues to promote harsh policies known as social Darwinism.
Creationists frequently claim that Darwin was directly responsible for generating the vision of Aryan racial superiority that inspired the Nazis to attempt the extermination of the Jews.
what happens in a world without Darwin is driven by the hope of using history to undermine the claim that the theory of natural selection inspired the various forms of social Darwinism.
The world in which Darwin did not write the Origin of Species would have experienced more or less all of our history's social and cultural developments.
In the world without Darwin the horrors would still exist but the theory of natural selection would not have the bogeyman image associated with it by its critics
We need to think harder about the wider tensions in our culture responsible for the ideologies that came to have the inoffensive Darwin as their figurehead.
This article was reprinted with permission from Darwin Deleted: Imagining a World without Darwin by Peter J. Bowler published by the University of Chicago Press. 2013 by The University of Chicago.
All rights reserved. What if anything lol. Evolution'theory'would of develop anyways yes. But evolution is not the only answer to the development of life On earth either.
They have happened many many times in the past before Darwin (and others) came along. The reasons are endless
but are in transition for their future descendants to have working wings to support Darwins theory.
because each time a discovery is made we try to fit it into Darwins model but it don't exactly fit
So Darwin would have been had better off he jumped overboard.@@nabone it is important to have a least a fundamental grasp of evolution...
In spite of your ill-will towards Darwin the evidence was always there to be discovered and would have been regardless.
While Darwin was first to publish a coherent theory of biological evolution and he deserves much credit for doing
There is not enought randomness in nature to support Darwins claims. For every species that is camouflage there are a hundred in brilliant colors saying I am here eat me.
Modern opponents to Darwin are so ignorant of what the man was about they do not realize they have more in common with Darwin than Evolutionists do.
Darwin had the same concerns they do. He said To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances for admitting different amounts of light
and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration could have been formed by natural selection seems I freely confess absurd in the highest degree.
Darwin was ignorant about DNA just like Creationists are. Modern Evolutionists give Darwin credit for having the right idea
but the flimsy evidence Darwin had at the time was mocked then and would still be mocked today
just as Creationists are mocked Darwin had no way of showing that all animals were related much less plants and animals.
Evolutionists can simply use DNA to show that all life on the planet is based on similar DNA
Darwin would be concerned just as about the moral and spiritual implications of modern genetics as Creationists are.
So why do Creationists continue to attack Darwin a man who was as afraid of his own discoveries as they are today
while ignorantly chowing down on genetically modified organisms that would have made Darwin throw up his organically grown lunch?
Yes even if Darwin never existed it is human nature to fabricate a story and sell it as truth when we don't have the answer to something just like the creationist
Because Darwin theory has been accepted widely as truth in the scientific community it is difficult to treat data objectively
What if Darwin had existed never Well they probably wouldn't be called the Darwin awards but the same people would still win. www. youtube. com/watch?
If Darwin never existed then none of us would ever know the joy of being a monkeys uncle rofl...
if Darwin had existed not or had died prior to writing Origin of the Species. To assume someone else would have offered the same concept
Whether folks were working on similar ideas during the time of Darwin is not relevant (i e. the moment in time when an idea bore fruit.
The beatification of Darwin as a sort of minor god in science is more of a cornerstone for secular progressives-than a fact of science.
Poor ole Darwin barely got his thesis in under the wire. Several other credentialed scientist were diddling with the concept.
Darwin cooked some books (burned a letter)- got published (more or less first) and spent the rest of his life in litigation.
Science (such as it was had compiled enough observations to make this theoretical leap with or without Darwin.
Darwin didn't do a particularly bad job of it. His thesis stood up well-well based on many of his own personal observations.
Still Darwin was one of his own greatest detractors. Evolution (as appealing as it is to the secular mind) simply doesn't have enough smoke
But Even Darwin lost sleep over this. Just consider an eye. Some where some thing sloshing around completely unaware of light-decides that vision would be a survival advantage.
What I believe that Darwin stumbled upon (and Mendelssohn too-for that matter) is genetic adaptability. There does appear to be excess code
Indeed Charles darwin's theory of evolution was highly similar to the theory proposed by his own uncle Erasmus Darwin decades earlier.
In the same way that Darwin did not invent evolutionary theory or more to the point that evolutionary theory was a product of the general intellectual gestalt of the time so too was social Darwinism.
Darwin was both a symptom and a contributor to this general sense. The Nazis did not become racists because of Darwin
but they were happy to use his work to further their cause because it meshed so well with their own agenda.
or lived for a while in Paris). You cannot divorce Darwin from Nazi racial theories so easily as claiming that Darwin merely told a sterile scientific truth that the Nazis happened to hijack.
Darwin saw what he saw through the lens of his time and place just as the Nazis did
Darwin made observations in nature and published it as a theory. had done he not so somebody else would have.
Darwin had nothing to do with the thinking of the Nazis and there is considerable time between them anyhow.
(which Darwin himself had pondered.)They would be better off in serving their intelligent design cause by pointing out the difficulty of explaining how to achieve complete functional spores
Every year for the past 30 years researchers have been acting like urban Darwins observing cliff swallows in Nebraska
Darwin thumping fundamentalists like you need to bring something to the table here. The article above just shows a small change hardly evidence for the grand theory of evolution which took microbes to man.@
and then jumped across thousands of miles of open ocean to appear in Australia where it devastated the banana industry in the Darwin region.
and edited by Darwin's son Francis Darwin and The british botanist Albert Charles Seward. Today would have been Darwin's 205th birthday.
To A r. WALLACE. DOWN April 6th 1859. I this morning received your pleasant and friendly note of November 30th.
My neighbour and an excellent naturalist J. Lubbock is an enthusiastic convert. I see that you are doing great work in the Archipelago;
*Darwin is referring to On the Origin of Species. To J. D. HOOKER. DOWN Nov 20th 1862.
Florida naturalists noticed that mangroves now grow in places that once were too chilly for the tropical trees.
In his time as a naturalist Charles darwin was fascinated with beetles and amassed one of the world's most important collections.
DNA of storied plant provides insight into the evolution of flowering plantsthe newly sequenced genome of the Amborella plant addresses Darwin's abominable mystery--the question of why flowers suddenly proliferated On earth millions of years ago.
therefore offer an explanation to Darwin's abominable mystery--the apparently abrupt proliferation of new species of flowering plants in fossil records dating to the Cretaceous period said Claude depamphilis of Penn State university.
Funding for the study came from the National Science Foundation University of Utah the Wilderness Society Southwestern Association of Naturalists Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology and American Society of Mammalogists.
Indeed one indication of how far removed we are from a truly'natural'landscape in England uninfluenced by human activity is the fact that natural scientists argue over what precise form this might have taken.
Teens from Ottawa and rural British columbia published their research in this week's issue of a scientific journal The Canadian Field-Naturalist.
My research won first prize at the Ottawa regional science fair and two of the judges were editors of The Canadian Field-Naturalist.
Local scientists recommended Daust publish his research in The Canadian Field-Naturalist to share his findings with the scientific community.
Naturalists are very comfortable with the idea of animals gaining a biological advantage by choosing to live together in high density'colonies'--such as ant nests or seabird rookeries--in certain parts of the landscape notes Hall.
Longino named one species Eurhopalothrix ortizae after Patricia Ortiz a Costa rican naturalist who died in a rock-fall accident this year.
Kasson and colleagues report in a recent issue of the Northeastern Naturalist thatailanthus can invade quickly in areas where large continuous stands of trees are cut down--clearcuts
which Darwin's natural selection pressure is able to counter or enhance these intrinsic biases. The new U. gibba genome shows that having a bunch of noncoding DNA is not crucial for complex life.
and increased extinction risk as with another Chilean mammal that Briceã o is researching called Darwin's Fox--named for the scientific genius that first discovered it--with barely 500 now left in the world.
and her then postdoctoral research associate Laura Burkle were delighted to discover meticulous data on a plant-pollinator network recorded by Illinois naturalist Charles Robertson between 1887 and 1916.
Now researchers from MIT along with a scholar from the University of Tokyo say that Darwin was on the right path.
Indeed the researchers suggest that humans first had the ability to sing as Darwin conjectured
what Darwin was talking about very vaguely because we know more about language now. Miyagawa for his part asserts it is a viable idea in part
blooming up to a month earlierusing the meticulous phenological records of two iconic American naturalists Henry David Thoreau and Aldo Leopold scientists have demonstrated that native plants in the eastern
because naturalists past and present kept good records of what they observed in nature Temple avers.
The new study keyed on the detailed phenological records of 32 native plant species in Concord Mass. kept between 1852 and 1858 by Thoreau a pioneering naturalist best known as the author of Walden as well as later records.
Both Thoreau and Leopold were part of the 19th century naturalist movement in which individuals often kept meticulous daily journals recording the things they observed in nature notes Temple.
since scientists have come to agree that Darwin's original drawing is given a bit simplistic that multiple species mix
which males have multiple mates (polygyny Darwin first theorized that the increased pressure of sexual selection in polygynous birds spurred the development of color differences between the sexes.
Darwin used domestic animals as a proof-of-principle that it is possible to change phenotypes by selection.
From the perspective of the birds these things are from Mars. Knutie says the flies now infest all land birds there including most of the 14 species of Darwin's finches two
Nest flies have been implicated in population declines of Darwin's finches including the two endangered species. Clayton says the pesticide--permethrin--is safe for the birds:
when she noticed Darwin's finches were coming to my laundry line grabbing frayed fibers from the line and taking it away presumably back to their nests she recalls.
They found cotton balls were collected by at least four species of Darwin's finches: the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis) small ground finch (Geospiza fuliginosa) small tree finch (Camarhynchus parvulus) and vegetarian finch (Platyspiza crassirostris.
It is from Darwin that we inherit the ideas that domestication involved isolation of captive animals from wild species and total human control over breeding and animal care.
What would Darwin say? The research is really exciting because it is making us completely rethink what it means to be domesticated Marshall said.
It's probably fortunate the Darwin had clear examples of animal breeding to consider as he thought about evolution.
and dogs and Darwin then uses artificial selection as a springboard to introduce the theory of natural selection.
and the role of natural selection more important than Darwin thought. It is also the case that the people who first domesticated animals valued wild ones more than did Darwin's Victorian neighbors.
The Modern View of Domestication a special issue of PNAS edited by Greger Larson and Dolores R. Piperno resulted from a meeting entitled Domestication as an Evolutionary Phenomenon:
The study which appears in Northeastern Naturalist (2014 Volume 21 Issue 1) presents an evaluation of the potential influence of climate change and habitat alteration on species occurrence patterns over time.
and collated with other data on GBIF and Encyclopedia of Life right on the day of publication through a specially designed format called Darwin Core Archive.
They indicate that this species has a structural memory is able to differentiate between inner and outer conditions as well as anticipate future risks scientists write in the journal American Naturalist.
As they formulate a new modern evolutionary synthesis in part with concepts that Darwin could not have known of evolutionary biologists continue to debate the importance of the environment and plasticity on evolutionary change and the origins of the diverse forms of life On earth today.
The effects of auxins in plants was observed first by Darwin in 1881 and since then this hormone has been the focus of many studies.
In the previous year it had help lead a partnership of diverse organizations to celebrate Darwin s ideas and theory of evolution for the bicentenary of his birth and the 150th anniversary of Origin of Species in 2009.
Darwin s work lies at the heart of our modern understanding of ecology and biodiversity,
and having built this partnership to celebrate the past achievement of Darwin s Origin of Species it planned to look towards the Future of Species in the light of the political importance of 2010.
The fact that the partnership expanded from 140 organizations in the Darwin year to three times that number in 2010 is a positive indicator of the scale of interest and concern.
The issue for Darwin was the lack of a fossil record, and in fact, he devoted an entire chapter in his book, On the Origin of Species, to imperfections in the geological record in general.
as it was for Darwin. We just had a lack of fossils. What we found in Ethiopia at 4. 4 million years ago is the closest we've ever come to that ancestor along our own line-unfortunately
to see what we would find because ever since Darwin, people have assumed sort of that modern chimpanzees haven't evolved very much,
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011