| Continuous learning (6) |  |
| Interactive learning (7) | |
| Learning (235) | |
| Learning process (16) | |
| Mutual learning (45) | |
| Social learning (11) | |
| Continuous learning (6) | |
| Interactive learning (7) | |
| Learning (235) | |
| Learning process (16) | |
| Mutual learning (45) | |
| Social learning (11) | |
for the purpose of supporting mutual learning, opening-up of national innovation systems and the development of new collaborative forms of European RTD funding.
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (3)( 2008) 369 387.21 J. F. Coates, Scenario planning from my perspective, Technol.
Opening up a fruitful dialogue among the FTA researchers and professionals facilitates also mutual learning across the FTA and risk assessment communities.
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis & Strategic management, Special issue FTA Seminar 2006,2008, pp. 369 387.19 E. A. Eriksson, K. M. Weber, Adaptive foresight:
Insights from the FORLEARN Mutual learning Process, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, 2006, Joint research Centre/European commission. 32 G. P. Hodgkinson, G. Wright, Confronting strategic
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process. Technology analysis & Strategic management 20: 369 87. City of Vienna. 2007a.
, academic debate and mutual learning among both academics and practitioners within project contexts such as Forlearn, 6 Costa22, 7 Forsociety8 and intense exchange with other approaches such as futures studies
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis & Strategic management 20 (3)( 2008) 369 387.9 E. A. Eriksson, K. M. Weber, Adaptive foresight:
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis & Strategic management 20 (3)( 2008) 369 387.7 T. Ko nno la, T. Ahlqvist, A. Eerola, S. Kivisaari
and quite often non-governmental organisation and civil society stakeholders 1. FTA, especially in the form of Foresight programmes, has come to be applied in the form of a mutual learning process,
and involves mutual learning processes, involving stakeholders and experts of many kinds. Such FTA calls for crossing the boundaries of disciplines, research traditions,
more conferences and symposia providing opportunities for mutual learning and exchange of ideas across communities of research
Mutual learning can be accomplished in the interaction between knowing agents. Briefly put these agents engage in a process of comparison
which we can engage in dialogue, debate, mutual learning, and the creation of shared understandings. There are many accounts of deep intellectual
Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis & Strategic management 20, no. 3: 369 87. Dierkes, M.,U. Hoffmann,
Insight from the FORLEARN mutual learning process. Technology analysis & Strategic management 20, no. 3: 369 87. Daheim, D,
and recognition of each other's feelings, for mutual learning, knowledge sharing and experimentation, all of which are critical to building the kind of interactions and inclusive dialogue across the network that lead to trust, legitimacy and a common identity.
Management system FTA roles Decide to be in business FTA supports mutual learning and shared understanding of network actors'views and feelings as well as of risks, opportunities, system capabilities and dynamic changes, all of
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 20 (3)( 2008) 369 387.73 B b. Hughes, P. D. Johnston, Sustainable futures:
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Tech. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (2008) 369 387.6 P. D. Andersen, M. Borup, K. Borch, J. Kaivo-oja, A. Eerola, T. Finnfjörnsson, E. Øverland
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Tech. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (2008) 369 387.60 U. Felt, M. Fochler, Machineries for making publics:
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Tech. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20 (3)( 2008) 369 387.2 R. Miller, Futures literacy:
The use of foresight studies stimulated mutual learning processes, allowing participants to learn from each other's perspectives on the future and providing them with a common foundation for future policies.
insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis & Strategic management 20 (2008) 369 387.26 J. Schoonenboom, Toekomstscenario's en beleid,(Scenarios and policies), Beleid en Maatschappij
In other words, mutual learning. At the same time, the process must be designed to cope with shifting objectives and stakeholders'expectations during the implementation phase (i e. the so-called responsiveness of the process) 13.
as well as mutual learning so that the process could adapt to needs along the way. In this way the approach proposed would link the strategic goals of the Commission with the operational aspects of the process.
According to the partners the interaction in such smaller events better enables mutual learning and is more effective than collecting information from industry representatives by other means.
Workshops with industry representatives were shaped in a way that spaces for mutual learning rather than the simple exchange of information would take place.
including roadmapping group Formal Interviews, mutual learning workshops, online surveys, wiki platform, website, dissemination activities Personal contacts and Internet Informal Online surveys, wiki platform, website
Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process, Technology analysis and Strategic management 20 (3)( 2008) 1 232.24 T. Ko nno la, Innovation roadmap:
Amongst the projects she was leading there were targeted activities supporting mutual learning on Foresight among practitioners
and enable mutual learning, the IF process calls for future-oriented, continuous interaction with current/anticipated users and a better integration of methods and approaches from different fields, including Foresight, user/market research and human-centred product design.
mutual learning and collective visioning 4. New (systemic) policy instruments have been/are being developed to facilitate such interaction between relevant stakeholders 5
not only for mutual learning or joint agenda setting, but also for legitimation purposes and for increasing the possibilities of success, especially within the early stages 17.
These include the notion of stakeholder involvement in decision processes of mutual appreciation and a shared understanding of stakeholders'views as well as of joint experimentation and mutual learning.
the mutual learning process between State and citizens'representatives enabled the development of shared decisions, which resulted in the design of more robust and consistent policies that were aligned with local needs.
To sum up, the implementation of the proposed system did not enable an effective space for mutual learning
the proposed system allowed mutual learning to take place. On the other hand, the learning process enabled the identification of the problem itself,
(thus supporting phases 3 and 4). Enabling spaces like this through foresight embedded within the proposed system to formalise this collective process of mutual learning and experimentation would enable increased communication across the value chain.
as well as mutual learning and experimentation. Ultimately, this process shall lead to increased legitimacy, ownership and transparency of decisions across the value chain.
foresight has been proven to be a useful tool for bringing together different stakeholders in processes of mutual learning and exchange of expectations of the future,
Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process',Technology analysis and Strategic management, 20: 369 87. Innovation policy roadmapping. 189 Eerola, A. and Loikkanen, T. 2009) Governance and Research of Nordic Energy system Transition-Summary Report of the Gorenest Project, VTT Research Notes 2505.
and ongoing initiatives in transnatiiona research co-ordination12 also provide many opportunities for mutual learning. The instruments and tools used by one mechanism can be useful in supporting others. 13
A recent evaluation14 of the EIT proposes to put in place‘robust procedures developed through a mutual learning process with the existing KICS'.
and implemennte early on to ensure success. There are also opportunities for mutual learning, because different departments and agencies may be faced with shared challennge
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011