| Online survey (64) |  |
| Survey (267) | |
| Survey respondent (9) | |
| Survey response (7) | |
| Online survey (64) | |
| Survey (267) | |
| Survey respondent (9) | |
| Survey response (7) | |
since they require the development of a questionnaire, the performance of a survey either via traditional postal mail or via online survey, the collection and cleaning of the data and finally, the analysis of the data.
and explains one of the methods the future online survey in more detail. The German Foresight process of the BMBF delivers results on different levels:
This was the basis for an online survey but also the pre-judgements of the selection phase.
An online survey among experts from the German innovation landscape was performed in September 2008 in order to get broader assessment on the topics,
Especially the online survey which had the function of focussing the topics as well as an assessment function is described in more detail (Fig. 3). 3. 1. Starting phase of the process The process started with 14 broader topic fields that were derived from the German High-tech Strategy 2,
a nationwide online survey was carried out in September 2008. The results from this survey, expert interviews and a set of criteria were supposed to be inputs to select interesting candidates for BMBF relating to the targets 1) and 2) of the process. 3. 3. The online survey Intentionally
the whole foresight process did not start with asking for the demand as e g. the predecessor process Futur 13,14
The online survey was designed as a check if the topics that were already found as future-relevant for German science
The principle of the concept of the online survey questionnaire is shown in Fig. 4. The first page of the online survey explained the BMBF Foresight process and the online survey in general.
The second page of the online survey was shown when the participants had chosen their field. In the first evaluation part
The online survey is a contribution to the assessment phase, but cannot be a static selection mechanism for BMBF (see also 11).
For this, in a broad online survey, many participants are approached to involve more persons than the well-known lobbies in the definition and the assessment of new topics.
It was at this level that respondents to the online survey were asked to make their‘attractiveness'and‘feasibility'assessments,
Accordingly, the online survey and subsequent workshops invited participants to nominate new research axes as well. Despite its apparent elegance, there were problems with this schema.
A critical flaw in Phase 1 was to present a ranked list of research domains an apparent fait accompli based mostly on the results of the online survey to the community in the EWS without giving them the opportunity to debate the integrity of the domains included in the list. 9 Subsequently,
even though the list was derived almost solely from the responses of that same community to the online survey. 10 In the subsequent workshops held in Phase 2,
conduct interviews and carry out the online survey, but with so little time to work with, they decided to rely upon a single deliberative forum the Exploratory Workshop (EWS) near the end of the process to validate the domain rankings derived from analysis of the online survey. 12 This was always going to be problematic as it left too much to be achieved in a single one-day
meeting. For a start, despite the small size of Luxembourg, it was apparent that many people in the same thematic areas did not know one another.
or another in the online survey (Phase 1) and in the thematic group workshops (Phase 2). This meant that expert assessments of domain areas against the criteria were readily available to draw upon.
Fixed Robust portfolio modelling, online surveys. Autonomous Stakeholder workshops. Extensive Wide stakeholder participation in online surveys. Exclusive Limited but open stakeholder participation in the workshops.
T. Ko nno la et al.//Futures 43 (2011) 252 264 256 Table 1 (Continued) Project Outcomes Future perspectives Management Stakeholder engagement FISTERA:
A wide range of stakeholders have been involved as well as, on a smaller scale, the wider public in form of an online survey.
online survey targeted for expert group (with Webropol survey software) Inviting the expert group to the process
online survey targeted for expert group (with Webropol survey software) Testing and specifying the development paths constructed in the first futures workshop:
and print media 2. stepwise clustering of the findings into visions in interaction with innovation actors through interviews and an online survey 3. development and assessment of scenarios of future innovation landscapes 4. generation of policy implications.
The resulting visions were discussed with innovation experts with different perspectives on innovation patterns through interviews and an online survey.
The online survey was set up to support the qualitative interviews. Accordingly, participation was limited to a restricted circle of people with special expertise in relevant aspects of innovation or candidates for an interview.
and answered the online survey in advance to the interview. By adding qualitative information to the results of the survey,
Accordingly, a structured assessment of very different aspects of changing innovation patterns was possible within interviews of 30 min up to 3 h. Considering that the participation in the online survey was restricted to a specific circle of people
and used as a base for both the interviews and the online survey. By using visual rather than textual information it was aimed to mobilise tacit knowledge
Participants of the online survey extensively used the possibility to comment on the visions. Looking at the comments it is striking thatmany participants used a very informal language.
In order to test the approach (only very short textual information) respondents were asked to assess the clarity of the visions in the INFU online survey.
The approach proposed combined wide participation through online surveys and a wiki platform in combination with interviews and workshops with selected industry experts,
online surveys and video/teleconferences combined with structured interviews and face-to-face meetings. The meetings conducted during crucial phases such as the scenario formulation and the definition of a common vision for the roadmapping work.
a first online survey was launched. It identified 261 experts around the globe and a variety of ideas about future innovations linked to one or more KATS and to social,
2. Linking the findings of previous projects and research with the results of the mapping, the interviews and the first online survey.
the first online survey, industrial workshops, and interviews with industry representatives. It can be summarised into three main statements 26:1.
The latter took place through a second online survey that counted 359 participants. The roadmaps have been adapted for use by the European commission.
which also used inputs from the online surveys and the wiki open consultation. The combination of open
workshops) Use of common foresight with emphasis on expected impacts Literature review Online survey for the collection of ideas Scenarios and joint vision Multiple scenarios for synthesising drivers inputs in various forms
To interact with wider audiences'two online surveys and a wiki platform were used. An online platform was used by all partners to share
the results of online surveys, workshop discussions, interviews and partner meetings were used as input. As a result a number of research topics that would have been difficult to capture
including roadmapping group Formal Interviews, mutual learning workshops, online surveys, wiki platform, website, dissemination activities Personal contacts and Internet Informal Online surveys, wiki platform, website
, dissemination activities Research Partners'databases Formal Online surveys, wiki platform, website, dissemination activities Personal contacts and Internet Informal C. Cagnin,
In the design of the first online survey it was necessary to explain and convince partners of the benefits of elaborating the survey questions in a way that would enable it to capture future innovation ideas and the ways in
therefore, a consensus on the questionnaire used for the first online survey. Debate among partners took place through different communication channels:
The first online survey was designed also to collect information that would be helpful for understanding both future developments
The combination of open and collective (online surveys, wiki) with closed and expert-driven stages (interviews
The second online survey and the wiki platform also enabled different parties to outline RI topics in
Study 1 aimed to identify users'specific (future) needs and possible Lead User ideas concerning digital TV (DTV) in Flanders through an online survey (N=11.802 digital TV users.
namely the identification of unfulfilled needs and possible Lead User ideas related to the (future) use of DTV. 3. 1. 1. Methodological approach An online survey was set up
The methods combined bibliometric analysis, an online survey and a scenario building in order to better understand the factors involved in the initiation and spread of emerging diseases.
The RT Delphi is a way of addressing the problem of the generally large dropout rate in online surveys
and in combating EID were identified first by bibliometric analysis, online survey and scenario planning. Roadmaps of these technologies were built then.
a combinatiio of literature review/bibliometric analysis and online surveys were conducted to preliminarily captuur the trends of infectious diseases.
Then, an online survey using the netwoor of experts in APEC was launched to involve international experts in reviewing the identified trends of EID.
I Scenario planning Online survey Literature review+Bibliometric Analysis Aim to discuss longer term perspective to enhance the region's capacities that contribute to the successful prevention
The specific combination of methods (bibliometric analysis, online survey, scenario, and technology roadmapping) bears interesting potential and advannce important methodological issues in FTA.
Bibliometric analysis and online survey complement each other in providing insights which provided scope and focus to the study.
including an online survey, two expert-led scenario workshops, and other consultation processes..Participation: Foresight exercises usually demand broad participation for their success
These issues were complemented with additional issues from the FTA 2008 conference survey. 3 3. 2 Assessment of issues The formulated issues were assessed in an online survey by some 270 external experts who represented foresight practitiooners
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011