| Clear understanding (4) |  |
| Common understanding (26) | |
| Deeper understanding (11) | |
| Improved understanding (4) | |
| Scientific understanding (3) | |
| Shared understanding (27) | |
| Understanding (253) | |
| Clear understanding (4) | |
| Common understanding (26) | |
| Deeper understanding (11) | |
| Improved understanding (4) | |
| Scientific understanding (3) | |
| Shared understanding (27) | |
| Understanding (253) | |
The development of a common impact assessment model requires a clear understanding of the way foresight influences specific impact areas.
But there needs to be a clear understanding of the relevant parameters and of the causal relationships between theses parameters.
All gains and losses thought to be relevant are measured in the same units to enable Table II Categorisation of FTA METHODS Structurally open methods Structurally closed methods No fixed setting Predefined setting Mainly explorative More or less clear understanding of relevant
Clear understanding of both sets of factors offers a valuable decision aid to inform successful NEST management.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011