megabit per second

Megabit per second

Data transfer rate (4)
Gigabit per second (15)
Kilobit per second (21)
Megabit per second (140)
Terabit per second (5)

Synopsis: Ict: Communication systems: Telecommunication: Data transfer rates: Megabit per second:

(Focus) Eunika Mercier-Laurent-The Innovation Biosphere_ Planet and Brains in the Digital Era-Wiley-ISTE (2015).pdf.txt

Europe needs download rates of 30 Mbps for all of its citizens and at least 50%of European households subscribing to the Internet connections above 100 Mbps by 2020;

Basedoc.scn

G#4v 7084 Megabit per second 0#5#mbps Megabit per second 0#5#megabit per second Megabit per second G#4v 7085 Terabit per second

0#5#tbps Terabit per second 0#5#terabit per second Terabit per second G#3v 7086 Fax G#4v 7087 Fax

0#5#fax Fax G#4v 7088 Teletypewriter 0#5#teletypewriter Teletypewriter G#3v 7089 Global network

Forfas_South_East_Action_Plan_Publication.pdf.txt

10 Advanced broadband services are defined as services with speeds of at least 100 Mbps, and that are

Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations.pdf.txt

Union (by 2020: 100%coverage of EU households at 30 Mbps minimum+50 %take-up subscriptions at 100 Mbps minimum) and for wide deployment and

more effective use of digital technologies, applications and services Successful delivery of this Agenda will enable Europe to deliver a better quality

generation networks (over 30 Mbps), assessing the most suitable investment models, 89 etc. This may take the form of a stand-alone'Broadband Plan'(most

LGI-report-Re-thinking-the-Digital-Agenda-for-Europe.pdf.txt

Predicted 100 Mbps FTTC/VDSL European household coverage in 2020 31 Figure 7: Percentage of households passed by cable (2010) 36

needed to achieve 4 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload speed 42 Figure 15: The broadband deployment â€oegapâ€ in the United states 43

Figure 16: Cost of covering different geotypes, from most dense to least dense, in Spain 44

for a guaranteed 10 Mbps 61 Figure 25: Cost of meeting DAE objectives with and without cable in various scenarios 63

broadband for all Europeans in 2013,2) deployment of 30 Mbps broadband capability to all Europeans by 2020,

and (3) adoption of 100 Mbps broadband by 50%of European households by 2020 The detailed meaning of these goals is,

ultra-fast broadband) is less than 2 Mbps The evolution over time of consumer bandwidth demand during the busy hour

Eurodocsis 3. 0 cable systems already comfortably exceed the 100 Mbps called for in the DAE. Even with current technology, cable networks are capable of meeting realistic

Mbps 3 Similar considerations apply to 4g wireless systems. There are surely limitations on the ability of wireless solutions alone to meet DAE objectives in dense population centres

DOCSIS 6/12/30 Mbps LTE-2. 6 GHZ EUR 6 Rethinking the Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE

Mbps Mega bit per second (one million bits per second MDF Main distribution frame MDU Multiple Dwelling Unit

The DAE includes full broadband availability in 2013,100%availability of 30 Mbps henceforth called â€oefast broadbandâ€) in 2020,

and 50%adoption of 100 Mbps (henceforth called â€oeultra-fast broadbandâ€) by 2020.2 The rationale for promoting widespread deployment

ultra-fast (30 Mbps or more) broadband, seems clear enough. Widespread availability of broadband is viewed widely as an important contributor to European economic well

of broadband for all Europeans in 2013,2) deployment of 30 Mbps broadband capability to all European by 2020,

and (3) adoption of 100 Mbps broadband by 50%of European households â The detailed meaning of these goals is less clear.

is less than 2 Mbps â Ultra-fast broadband access is useful, but it is not necessary to assume that every

â Eurodocsis 3. 0 cable systems already comfortably exceed the 100 Mbps called for in the DAE.

of above 30 Mbps, and â€¢by 2020, to ensure that 50 %or more of European households subscribe to

Internet connections above 100 Mbps. 6 These goals would seem to be clear, but in fact a great deal of complexity and ambiguity

-fast broadband at speeds of 100 Mbps or more â€ to what degree might it be acceptable if they were concentrated in urban areas

Translating the above Cisco data into Mbps demand, during the average hour and during the busy hour, we have depicted the results in Table 2. Data networks are generally

>Mbps Busy Hr BW >Mbps 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 ---552 555 540 512 465 419

50 0. 15 0. 27 62 79 105 126 150 175 100 0. 31 0. 53 35 49 61 77 103 125

the average demand during the busy hour is well below 2 Mbps. This has important

Mbps 21 â€¢Ultra-fast broadband access is useful, but it is not necessary to assume that

â€¢Eurodocsis 3. 0 cable systems already comfortably exceed the 100 Mbps called for in the DAE.

conventional broadband (at speeds of less than, say, 10 Mbps) and ultra-fast broadband at speeds of 30 Mbps or greater.

A notable exception is a study that Analysys Mason and tech4i2 completed on behalf of the European commission. 29 The report has not yet been

30 Mbps deployment and 100 Mbps adoption, it is necessary to begin with a discussion of capabilities of the broadband technologies that are likely to be suitable for meeting

of conventional broadband (Section 4. 3) and of ultra-fast broadband at 30 Mbps and 100

Mbps (Section 4. 4 4. 1 Technologies for fast broadband Some have attempted to limit the discussion of Next Generation Access (NGA) in the

they are able to deliver 50 Mbps provided the copper sub-loop is shorter than about 400-500 meters.

Many have assumed consequently that FTTC/VDSL is relevant to 30 Mbps DAE objectives, but no more;

100 Mbps should be achievable. 38 Figure 6: Predicted 100 Mbps FTTC/VDSL European household coverage in 2020

Source: Yardley et al. 2012b 37 See RTR, â€oeconsultation input from RTR Gmbh (Austrian Regulatory authority for broadcasting and telecommunications) â€

least 30 Mbps for all Europeans by 2020. â€ 39 See Chapter 5 for more details

ambitious target for universal broadband coverage with speeds of at least 30 Mbps for all Europeans by 2020. â€ 42

-effectively covered at 30 Mbps with the fixed network. Since the 100 Mbps target refers

only to adoption by 50%of households, we assume that there is no need for mobile to

The 100 Mbps users can be located in areas that have higher density In Australia, where an ultra-fast government-owned National Broadband Network (NBN

OPEX that would be required to deploy broadband (with 4 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload speed) to all households in the United states. Underserved areas tend to be

OPEX needed to achieve 4 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload speed Source: FCC: â€oethe Broadband Availability Gapâ€, April 2010

A striking finding is that a disproportionately large fraction of the â€oegapâ€ is associated with covering a tiny fraction of the population.

A Eurodocsis 2. 0 system can deliver raw downstream bit rates of from 38 Mbps (64

-QAM) to 51 Mbps (256-QAM) in an 8 MHZ channel, and raw upstream bit rates of about

30 Mbps (64-QAM) in a 6. 4 MHZ channel. 64 61 Splitters are bidirectional passive components used to split

more than 200 Mbps through the bonding of four channels, or more than 400 Mbps through the bonding of eight channels;

and â€¢Upstream: more than 100 Mbps through the bonding of four channels Technical progress as to DOCSIS capabilities is,

however, very dynamic. It is therefore to be expected that substantially higher raw bit rates will be available downstream and

This yields 400 Mbps of usable throughput downstream. Development of CPE capable of 16 channels downstream and 8 channels upstream is already under way.

the 100 Mbps access speed threshold addressed in the DAE, even though a migration from todayâ€ s traffic patterns

speeds of 6, 12 or 30 Mbps, and using wireless (LTE at 2. 6 GHZ

DOCSIS 6/12/30 Mbps LTE-2. 6 GHZ EUR 61 If, however, one assumes that there is a requirement for guaranteed bandwidth of 10

Mbps, then the fixed solutions are greatly superior to wireless. LTE costs are highly sensitive to overall bandwidth requirements,

requirement for a guaranteed 10 Mbps Source: Feijoo/Gomez-Barroso (2010a It is worth noting once again that Cisco VNI data strongly suggest that average data

consumption per household during the busy hour will be less than 2 Mbps, even in 2020. We are thus much closer to the situation of Figure 23 than that of Figure 24 for the

DOCSIS 6/12/30 Mbps LTE-2. 6 GHZ EUR 62 Rethinking the Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE

incapable (at present, at least) of providing 30 Mbps, to say nothing of 100 Mbps, of usable symmetric capacity. 77

30 Mbps of guaranteed symmetric bandwidth seems to be enormously in excess of the average busy hour of residential consumers, even in

The Basic scenario, where 30 Mbps and 100 Mbps can be interpreted as advertised speeds, are probably somewhat below the level of realistic consumer expectations in

89 Feijoo and Barroso, op cit. Note that the figure shows a maximum speed of 30 Mbps

today, however, cable broadband offers of 100 Mbps or more are commonplace in many European countries

National Strategy on Digital Agenda for Romania.pdf.txt

Covered by broadband above 30 Mbps 100%by 2020 80%by 2020 66.0%(2013 Subscriptions to fixed broadband above 100 Mbps 50%by 2020 45%by 2020 25.0%(2013

Population to buy online 50%by 2015 30%by 2020 8. 0%(2013 Population to buy online cross-border 20%by 2015 5%by 2020 1. 0%(2013

above 30 Mbps Subscriptions to fixed broadband above 100 Mbps Regular internet usage overall Among disadvantaged

people Population that has never used the internet Key cross-border public services, online 4. 2. Improving social

connection at speeds of above 30 Mbps and only 50%could be covered with connections at speeds of

over 100 Mbps with a penetration rate of 26%,significantly lower than the one specified in the Digital

(i) access to speeds of above 30 Mbps for all Europeans, and (ii subscription of internet connection above 100 Mbps for 50%or more of European households.

These goals will only be achieved if the infrastructure deployment costs are lowered across the EU 5. 1. 3 National context

reached 66%,with 55%of population shared subscriptions with at least 30 Mbps and 25%of subscriptions

were with at least 100 Mbps. The Mobile broadband take-up is 41%in total subscriptions per 100 people

In 2013, the coverage of fast broadband, of minimum 30 Mbps was of 55%and the minimum of 100 Mbps