Wi-fi in Starbucks stores, along with a digital landing page with a variety of digital media choices
âoewe were not just doing something smart around Wi-fi, but we were doing something innovative
advances developments of the wireless communications sector in Romania, we envisage that these networks will be integrated and thus complement existing wireless infrastructure constructed according to
New Generation Wireless technology (e g. LTE), allowing for mobility, and extending the levels of access
coverage Thus the primary objective of the National Plan for the Development of NGN Infrastructure is the
available to 96.2%of Romanian population (96.3%in the EU). Meanwhile, 4th generation (LTE) was
development of LTE coverage, driving fixed to mobile substitution However, the low purchasing power, the demographic
federated identity, bottom-up wireless and sensor networks, open hardware and distributed social networks can potentially serve collective action
diverse, and combine successfully different wireless and wired (optical) link technolo -gies, fixed and ad hoc routing schemes and management schemes.
network services, open Wifi bottom-up-broadband, distribut ed social networks, p2p infrastructures OPEN NETWORKS 40 Growing a Digital Social Innovation Ecosystem for Europe
video cameras, RFID-tagged objects and other devices that see, hear, move, coordinate and â reasonâ with each other
The board also contains a Wifi antenna that enables the direct upload of data from the sensors in real time.
and the rapid growth of Wifi are also important The price and availability of broadband access depends to a large extent on competition in the
and RFID significantly contribute to the optimization of the delivery chain processes (e g. sorting; delivery), which can subsequently be reflected in
tagged with RFID smart labels and the customers who volunteered to be participants could use NFC
Red motion sensors SE-10, RFID Card Reader of MFRC500 and related components, together with
RFID Tags-Cards. The air condition-controlling device, built upon the RTD-NET Daikin interface
extremely low-power Quark processor, Bluetooth and Wi-fi connectivity to communicate with other devices. Essentially, technology should make our
lives easier. Wearable technology falls into a long tradition of innovating through the lenses of a cus
â¢Converging Networks Laboratory â Wireless network testing From the city perspective the userâ s involvement
The retail market including RFID Tags and the associ -ated supply chain was considered the most promis
â¢Facilitation of wireless broadband in Bagenalstown, Tullow and rural Carlow â¢Provision of care centres at Tullow, Bagenalstown and Carlow
Provision of wireless broadband at quality signal strength and speed Facilitate the deployment of competitive broadband access technologies
and high quality cost effective wireless or other broadband solutions for rural areas B. Development and expansion of the GRID electricity network and future connections to renewable sources
c2 WI-FI connections c3 Wimax connections c4 Other types of radio connections d) xdsl (metal molding wires
other supports e) UTP/FTP connections satellite, other means out of which e1 UTP/FTP cable
0, 92%a travã s de WIMAX, el 0, 78%a travã s de 3g y el 0, 41%restante puede acogerse
0, 92%a travã s de WIMAX, el 0, 78%a travã s de 3g y el 0, 41%restante puede acogerse
0, 92%a travã s de WIMAX, el 0, 78%a travã s de 3g y el 0, 41%restante puede acogerse
TICS (e-commerce), RFID, automatizaciã n, Sistemas de Informaciã n geogrã¡ficaâ â'Intermodalidad â¢Apoyo al desarrollo de una red de plataformas intermodales regionales en correlaciã n con las
commerce), RFID, automatizaciã n, Sistemas de Informaciã n geogrã¡ficaâ Apoyo al desarrollo de una red de plataformas intermodales regionales en correlaciã n con las
commerce), RFID, automatizaciã n, Sistemas de Informaciã n geogrã¡ficaâ Apoyo al desarrollo de una red de plataformas intermodales regionales en correlaciã n con las
fondos FEADER), con Tecnologã a Wimax Medidas -Complementar las actuaciones previstas en la Agenda Digital para Espaã a en relaciã n a las
fondos FEADER), con Tecnologã a Wimax Complementar las actuaciones previstas en la Agenda Digital para Espaã a en relaciã n a las
Car infotainment systems embedded with 4G LTE and wireless hotspots will be integrated more seamlessly with home monitoring
develop a â First Mile Wireless for Drilling (FMWDÂ) solution for the oil and gas industry to enable full collaboration
The IT has prioritised its research activity in target areas such as ICT, mobile networks and services and pharmaceutical science
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 259 Apostolos Kousaridas George Katsikas, Nancy Alonistioti, Esa Piri
rate or due to transient wireless link interruption in areas of poor coverage), render -ing the typical reaction of congestion control mechanism of TCP inappropriate.
wired and wireless, yielding a different trade-off between performance, efficiency and cost, and affecting several base functions again
â¢Accessibility (open and by means of various/heterogeneous wireless/radio and wired interfaces) to the communication network but also to heterogeneous data, ap
-forced (migration of mobile network to IPV6 Internet, IPTV moving to Internet TV etc.)) otherwise leading to segmentation and specialization per application/service
Networked Enterprise & Radio frequency identification (RFID) and F5 Trust and Security. The authors would like to acknowledge
wireless, and mobile networks) and service physical infrastructures in order to pro -vide an autonomic virtual resource overlay
i e. fixed, wireless and mobile networks) and service physical infrastructures â¢Aware and Self-aware functions:
-rent trends in telecommunications, vendors prognosticate that mobile networks will suffer an immense traffic explosion in the packet switched domain up to year 2020
thanks to new wireless techniques (e g.,, High Speed Packet Access, and Long term Evolution). ) Heterogeneous systems providing densification and offload of the macro
-cellular network throughout pico, femtocells and relays or Wifi/Wimax interfaces also extend the radio range.
the number of wireless broadband subscriptions is about to exceed the total amount of fixed broadband subscriptions and this development
The expansion of wireless broadband subscribers not only inflates the volume of mobile traffic directly, but also facilitates the growth in broadband wireless enabled
terminals. However, more and more devices enable mobile access to the Internet, only a limited part of users is attracted
this process and set new challenges to mobile networks. Since video and related enter -tainment services seems to become dominant in terms of bandwidth usage, special
mobile networks, devices, applications and services, and significant device increase potential resulted by the tremendous number of novel subscriptions for Machine-to
Existing wireless telecommunication infrastructures are prepared not to handle this traffic increase, current mobile Internet was designed not with such requirements in
, 3gpp, 3gpp2, Wimax Fo -rum) follow a centralized approach which cannot scale well to the changing traffic
and CSN for Wimax networks Each anchor point maintains special units of information called contexts,
future mobile networks must specify architecture optimized to maximize the end-user experience, minimize CAPEX/OPEX, energy efficiency, net
and to ensure mobile networks sustainability 3 Evolution of Flat Architectures 3. 1 Evolution of the Architecture of 3gpp Mobile networks
Fixed networks were firstly subject to similar scalability problems. The evolution of DSL access architecture has shown in the past that pushing IP routing and other func
Progress of mobile and wireless communication systems introduced some funda -mental changes. The most drastic among them is that IP has become the unique access
protocol for data networks and the continuously increasing future wireless traffic is also based on packet data (i e.,
traffic from the macro-cellular network or the H (e) Nodeb subsystems, in order to offload the network elements in the PS and EPC PS domain.
However, the flat nature of LTE and LTE-A architectures concerns only the control plane but not the user plane:
LTE is linked to the Evolved Packet Core (EPC) in the 3gpp system evolution, and in EPC
the main packet switched core network functional entities are still remaining central -ized, keeping user IP traffic anchored.
Flat mobile networks not only require novel architectural design paradigms, special network nodes and proprietary elements with peculiar functions, but also demand
-UTRAN (Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network) or LTE (Long term Evolution) base stations (enodebs) became distributed in a flatter scheme allowing
mechanisms in current wireless and mobile networks anchor the user traffic relatively far from usersâ location.
Furthermore, the BSR can be considered a special wireless edge router that bridges between mobile/wireless and IP communication.
In order to achieve this, mobility support in the BSR is handled at three layers: RF channel mo
-nents could be compared much cheaper to HSPA and LTE devices today because of the economy of scale.
in mobile networks. In: Proc. of PIMRCÂ 08, Cannes, France, pp. 1â 6 (2008 17. Daoud, K.,Herbelin, P.,Guillouard, K.,Crespi, N.:
a SIP-based Ultra Flat Mobile network Architecture. In: Proc. of PIMRC (Sep. 2009 18. Faigl, Z.,Bokor, L.,Neves, P.,Pereira, R.,Daoud, K.,Herbelin, P.:
Future Wireless communication Systems, Wireless World Research Forum (Oct. 2008 50. Gurtov, A.,et al.:Hi3: An efficient and secure networking architecture for mobile hosts
objects are tagged by Radio frequency identification (RFID) transponders in order to be identified uniquely by information systems. However, the concept has grown into
place via local wired and wireless communication links between devices in their prox -imity and/or through global interconnections in the form of the current Internet and
mobile networks or future fixed and mobile network infrastructures One important property of the RWI which distinguishes it from the current Internet
proprietary wireless protocols will see continued use as well. To deal with this het -erogeneity, services â in the form of standard Web Services and DPWS1, but more
RFID actuator sensor sensor Entity-based Context Model models relevant aspects of Real world Real-world Internet
In a Radio frequency identification (RFID) based sce -nario, the tags act as hosts for the resources in form of Electronic Product Codes
The resource hosts are abstracted through the RFID readers due to the passive communication of the tags.
logic for interactions using semantics of the specific RFID application. Query plan -ning is done through the definition of an ECSPEC
internet interconnected heterogeneous WSAN (Wireless Sensor and Actuator Net -works) systems into a homogeneous fabric for real world information and interaction
RFID Enterprise applications, FP7, http://www. fp7-aspire. eu /CONET Cooperating Objects Noe, FP7 http://www. cooperating-objects. eu
A Wireless-and Mobility-Related View. IEEE Wireless communications 17 (6)( 2010 J. Domingue et al. Eds.):
) Future Internet Assembly, LNCS 6656, pp. 81â 90,2011 Â The Author (s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink. com
fixed/mobile network entity (e g. Mobile Terminals, Base Station, Backhaul network entities, Core network entities: the most appropriate network entities
-work, where connectivity among devices is provided using heterogeneous wireless e g.,, Wifi, UWB) and wired (e g.,
, Ethernet, PLC) communication technologies. For 100 M. Castrucci et al testing purposes, only a simplified version of the Cognitive Manager has been imple
Switching on the Wi-fi link causes more TCP retransmissions and an increased transfer time. This is natural, since
Ethernet and Wi-fi have different throughputs. Without the cognitive framework, it is evident that the FTP session would not be terminated at all.
IEEE Wireless communications and Net -working Conference-WCNC (2009 22 Pasquini, R.,Verdi, F.,Magalhaëoees, M.:
-tween autonomous systems 11 and mobile network convergence 10 constitute only two representative examples for typical tussle spaces
However under some assumptions, Wifi hotspots can consume much less energy than UMTS (Universal mobile telecommunications system) networks.
Wifi and UMTS) on the technology used to communicate. Next generation networks, where a provider can control
phones, RFID sensors and so on that are connected perpetually and transmit a variety of information including identity, bank accounts, location, and so on
Sensor networks, RFID tags, smart appliances that communicate not only with the user but with their manufacturers, are examples of such devices.
-ing of RFID tags (privacy violation) and cloning of data on RFID tags (identity theft).
âoetesting End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environmentâ reports on the network management protocol test that exploited the availability of dif
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment Apostolos Kousaridas1, George Katsikas1, Nancy Alonistioti1, Esa Piri2
-tures by using the Self-NET software for self management over a Wimax network environment. The monitoring and configuration capabilities that differ
Internet, Wimax, Quality of Service 1 Introduction Several network management frameworks have been specified during the last two
The testing facility connecting a fixed Wimax network to the service-aware network is shown in Fig. 1. The Wimax network environment consists of Airspan Micro
-MAX base station (BS) 7 and Airspan Prost subscriber station (SS) located on the Octopus testbed at Oulu 4. The BS and SS operate in a laboratory environment with
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 261 Fig. 1. Octopus testbed Wimax and Self-NET software federation
ITGLOG), printing and plotting specific metrics (ITGDEC, ITGPLOT) and remotely controlling the traffic generation (ITGAPI.
The Self-NET project carries out experiments over the Wimax testbed, remotely via the Internet.
Wimax link information from the BS and to control Quality of Service (Qos) set -tings on the fly.
802. 16d 5, the employed Wimax testbed is based on, specifies four different scheduling types, namely Unsolicited Grant Service (UGS), Real-time Polling Service
-ing from and to the Wimax link. Two routers are dedicated on the Octopus testbed for tunneling and routing IP traffic.
Wimax BS with the Uoa BS Connector (10.1.3.3 â 10.1.3.1) while the second one connects the Wimax SS with the Uoa SS Connector (10.1.3.4 â 10.1.3.2),
creating an internal 10.1.3.0/24 network between these network entities. The traffic sent from the Uoa BS Connector (10.1.1.1) is routed over the IPIP tunnel to the Wimax BS
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 263 Fig. 3. Network topology and IPIP tunneling
and after the Wireless transmission (DL) to the Wimax SS, the Uoa SS Connector 10.1.2.1) receives the packets via the second tunnel.
The respective procedure occurs for the UL, while the Uoa SS Connector traffic is tunneled to the Wimax SS, trans
-mitted to the Wimax BS and routed again through IPIP tunnel to the Uoa BS Con
-nector. During the traffic exchange, the public IPSÂ are opaque, as the routing proce -dure explicitly uses the private addresses
Resource Adaptor (RA), where, for example, the Wimax network elements can be considered as available and configurable resources.
The NECM of the Wimax BS constantly monitors network device statistics (e g UL/DL used capacity, TCP/UDP parameters, service flows), which are periodically
â¢Change the priority of 2k â â oe flows at the Wimax BS â¢Change the priority of 3k â â oe flows at the Wimax BS and the codec of 4k â â oe
flows Two schemes for the selection of the optimal action have been proposed and they are described below (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5
-ther to the Wimax BS NECM in order to execute the change priority action via SNMP set command
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 265 Fig. 4. Decision-making algorithm for configuration action selection â Simple
change all flows from low priority to high priority service class at the WIMAX BS
â¢The change of the prioritization scheme at the Wimax BS side (e g.,, from low
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 267 increase rate is not linear
from low priority to high priority service class) at the Wimax BS of the 28 Voip
G. 711.1 Voip flows that traverse the Wimax BS and face high packet error rate.
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 269 Table 6. Qos features improvement after partial (70%)Voip codec change from G. 711.1 to
Different wireless links and networks have different capabilities and often service implementers and providers do not have a possibility to test their service over various
remote wireless link such as Wimax can be used remotely. However, in order to provide a wireless link as a bookable resource for a large set of customers, the estab
Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems. IEEE Std 802.16-2004 (October 2004 6. Wahle, S.,Magedanz, T.,Gavras, A.:
Furthermore, new wireless sensor network technologies pro -vide options for inclusion of additional intelligence and the capability, for the network
Traffic management configuration of large wireless networks consist -ing of multiple, distributed NES of varying technologies, is challenging, time
In the proposed test-bed, a heterogeneous wireless network environment has been deployed, consisting of several IEEE 802.11 Soekris access points (AP) 33 and an
Wi-fi) and multi-RATS (i e. Wifi, Wimax were located in the corresponding area, consuming a video service delivered by VLC
video LAN client)- based service provider 35. For the management of the NECMS a NDCM has been deployed.
of a new Wifi AP;(ii) the self-optimization of the network topology through the
-gies (Wifi, Wimax), especially in cases where there is âoeextremeâ network traffic and/or overload, affecting the network functionality
IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless communications, pp. 355â 362 (2000 292 I. P. Chochliouros, A s. Spiliopoulou, and N. Alonistioti
AN-100u/UX Single Sector Wireless Access Base Station User Manual (2008 35. C.:open-source multimedia framework, player and server
The emerging wireless world will be part of the Future Internet (FI. All kinds of devices and networks will have the interconnection potential.
-trated in Fig. 6. Each node features 2 interfaces, a Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15.1) 16 and
Bluetooth interface has a transmission data rate of 1 Mbps but it is used for a rather
IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local area networks, http://ieee802. org/11 /18. Spyropoulos, T.,Psounis, K.,Raghavendra, C.:
Scheme for Intermittently Connected Mobile networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Delay-Tolerant Networking, WDTN (2005
and execute different tasks with core mobile network systems that are behind Telefã nica Software Delivery Platform (SDP.
Content Adaptive Network Aware Joint Optimization of Wireless Video Transmission. IEEE Communications Magazine 45 (1), 84â 90 (2007
issues such as hand over of a client to another wireless source is present. However, in IP networks, it may be complicated more to have autonomous links among peers
-ing Wireless Mesh and Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communica -tions 53 (3)( 2010 2. Buxmann, P.,Hess, T.,Ruggaber, R.:
mobile networks, as a participative tool for engaging citizens and tourists. Many ini -tiatives have been launched by cities,
term, the behavior of massive wireless sensor deployments Acknowledgements. Although only a few names appear on this paper, this work
WISEBED-Wireless Sensor Network Testbeds, http://www. wisebed. eu 34. Onelab2, ONELAB project, http://www. onelab. eu
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment Introduction Experimental Facilities Decription Mechanism for Service-Aware Network Self management
world class ICT infrastructure throughout Europe, including broadband and mobile networks to support multi-channel operations.
throughout Europe, including broadband and mobile networks, to support multi -channel operations; educating all citizens, so that they are digitally savvy-this is
RFID tags in 2005 to about 30 billion RFID today Twitter processes 7 terabytes of
data every day Facebook processes 10 terabytes of data every day 220 Terabytes of Web Data 9 Petabytes of data
integrate all the features of the device itself (e g. camera, gps, Wi-fi), working online as well as offline.
Kymantm by Datalogic Mobile Wireless Handheld Computer and Barcode Scanner. Besides technology issues, the investment in this solution has covered
thanks to new technologies such as RFID (Radio frequency identification) and NFC (Near Field Communication), to a whole new way to consider costumersâ
, GPS, Bluetooth and Near Field Communication (NFC) functions Increased bandwidth Large wireless bandwidth required to transmit large amount of data
â¢Radio frequency identification (RFID) embedded in objects for tracking commercial products, in large animals for tracing
â¢Wireless Respiratory and Audio Sensor (http://vivonoetics. com â¢Bodymedia FIT (http://www. bodymedia. com
transfer system available through wireless communication between devices, and other functionalities for â â bill splittingâ â as well as small transfers in social occa
-tion data, collected through mobile phones, GPS, Wifi, cell tower triangulation RFID and other sensors. Using powerful machine learning algorithms,
it provides extremely accurate profiling and segmentation of consumers based on habits and spending preferences. This tool allows to transform existing data into predictive
Wi-fi recognition One of the founders is Alex Pentland, Toshiba Professor at MIT, serial entre
and entertainment when connected to the facilityâ s Wi-fi (e g. on-line Music Table 10.17 Company
when the top management first decided that Wi-fi should be a feature of all Starbucks coffee shops, giving customers the clear message that the
RFID, 190 S Security standards, 29,34 Semantic Analysis, 200 Sentence-level sentiment analysis, 70 Sentiment analysis, 67,69, 71,72, 75,77, 85
The guiding principle in the development of WITÂ s research environment has been the prioritisation of its research activities in critical areas (most notably ICT/mobile networks and services and pharmaceutical science)
The prioritised areas of ICT (mobile networks and services) and pharmaceutical and molecular biotechnology research have developed into large-scale research centres of international reputation and with a strong interdisciplinary focus.
spread of radio-frequency identification, or RFID, chips and social trends (such as the widespread adoption of
spread of radio-frequency identification, or RFID, chips and social trends (such as the widespread adoption of
including mobile network coverage, international Internet bandwidth, secure Internet servers, and electricity production) as well as the accessibility of digital content
having achieved full mobile network coverage last year its international Internet bandwidth capacity improves significantly to reach 77th place.
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%population 3. 03 International Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user 3. 04 Secure Internet servers per million population
mobile network coverage will increase to 85 percent in 2017, up from 79 percent in 2012.10 In addition, a
RFID), navigation and location sensors, networks and servers â¢Streaming data, such as computer network data phone conversations, and so on
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...124.81.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...139.40.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...109.94.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...137.61.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...122.83.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...138.58.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...140.36.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...54.99.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...134.69.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...108.94.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...32.100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...107.94.6 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...96.96.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...130.73.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...53.99.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...128.79.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...119.85.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...57.99.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...118.87.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...127.80.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...116.89.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...122.83.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...117.89.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...87.97.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...131.72.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...79.98.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...56.99.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...125.81.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...144.16.4 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...142.23.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...119.85.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...93.96.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...143.20.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...136.62.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...85.98.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...113.91.3 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...145.2.3 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...141.35.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...95.96.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...86.97.6 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...111.92.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...110.94.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...92.97.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...52.99.5 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...135.68.4 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...80.98.4 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...55.99.4 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...114.91.1 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...49.99.7 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...132.70.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...49.99.7 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...48.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...93.96.8 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...111.92.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...51.99.6 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...115.90.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...132.70.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...121.84.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...129.78.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...125.81.0 3. 03 Intâ l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate...277 3. 03 International Internet bandwidth...278 3. 04 Secure Internet servers...
3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate Percentage of total population covered by a mobile network signal 2012
SOURCE: International Telecommunication Union (ITU), ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database 2013 (December 2013 edition
, fixed-line Internet, Wireless internet, mobile network, satellite 1â=Â not available at all; 7â=Â widely available 2012â 2013 weighted average
3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate Percentage of total population covered by a mobile network signal 2012
This indicator measures the percentage of inhabitants who are within range of a mobile cellular signal, irrespective of whether
expansion of fixed and wireless broadband, national broadband agendas, municipal strategies for ICT use Internet protocol network traffic demand, and Internet
wireless and spectrum policy, security, privacy, Internet governance, and ICT development. He joined Cisco in
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011