Changing markets, increased competition and new technologies have reduced product life times, demanding more rapid creation of products and their more rapid destruction.
therefore, escalating competition and specialisation This puts a premium on innovation. At the same time, innovation itself is globalising
security, bankruptcy legislation, competition policy, product market regulation, labour market regulation, finance markets and intellectual property protection.
exit and competition in the market. Furthermore, the process of creative destruction is most pronounced in periods of economic crisis and recovery,
Kirzner, I. 1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois Kirzner, I. 1997), â€oeentrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Processâ€, Journal of Economic
providing competition-based awards to small private sector companies of about USD 100 000+for proof of
Culture and Competition in Silicon valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Boston Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman (2000), â€oethe Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Researchâ€
business creations, business plan competitions, strategy games and discussions with entrepreneurs. These methods are placed better than classroom lectures to develop
Competition keeps increasing and as a consequence, all territories have to engage more strongly in innovation, both
as facilitators of balance between cooperation/competition, allowing the optimization of resources and continuous learning with the reduction of information exchange
With the globalization of economies and competition, innovation has become the most important factor in
The development of a pilot strategy in the region to ensure a greater emphasis on Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in secondary schools through competitions and enterprise modules
A strategy to assist companies in the life sciences sector in dealing with such challenges as expiry of patents, the costs of Research and development, global over-capacity in some areas and greater competition from Asia and the Far east
The development of a pilot strategy in the region to ensure a greater emphasis on Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in secondary schools through competitions and enterprise modules
The Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation announced in June 2012 that he had requested the Competition Authority to carry out a study of the ports sector in Ireland.
The Competition Authority is expected to publish the results of this market study in 2013 Its outcome will inform future Government policy on competition in the ports sector
A number of contributors to the consultation process pointed to an unacceptable incompatibility between the port and the railway.
but many of these contracts are lost to Irish companies as under EU law the tenders have to be open to competition from all EU States.
although they may be in competition with one another, the development of a successful branding and marketing strategy for their locality and the region in general will bring economic benefits to all
Cheaper overseas competition will increasingly threaten this sector in Ireland as many drugs are imminently due to fall out of patent
as well as the costs of Research and development, global overcapacity in some areas and greater competition from Asia and the Far east
A strategy to assist companies in the life sciences sector in dealing with such challenges as expiry of patents, the costs of Research and development, global over-capacity in some areas and greater competition from Asia and the Far east
and duplication (even interagency competition) of measure implementation. There should be proper liasion/consultation with local bodies, such as Local authorities
a six-month-long competition, rewarding national finalists with a camp to enthuse teachers and students to engage with
competition between actors involved on pledges â€oeit†s good that a space has been created that allows people to highlight and showcase
Worse still, by the mid-1990's, the competition among packaged software vendors for extending the
The New Frontier in Business Competition, Boston: Harvard Business school Press, 1993 Roach, Stephen S.,"America's Technology Dilemma:
see a competition of service providers making them more proactive and innovative. 50 However, these first
they must now face the global forces of competition. The globalization of the markets requires the adaptation of
global competition. A Culture of Innovation, with the features of a knowledge society, can only be
The higher competition of network management tools due to the apparition of tools developed formerly for the Internet era may reduce
and to construct a related critical mass at European level, while fostering competition openness and standardisation, involving consumer/citizen,
in order to drive innovation, competition, and research. Combining optical network technology with Cloud technology is key to addressing the future Internet/Cloud challenges.
i e. multiple NPS) could help distinguish competition in the service and network layers. Content and, most importantly, context awareness presents a possible option to
technology), and their peers (i e. other SMES that are not in direct competition with them).
•Competition or lack of alignment between national and regional political and policy objectives and
the competition for the subsidy resources. TUKE faculties were built gradually into centres of research excellence, within which are built permanent cooperation with relevant institutes of Slovak Academy of
markets where competition and consumer access stimulate productivity growth and innovation, and with a strong social component. †A focus on
ideas, competitions and so on) and ways of engaging citizens, users and others in the design and development of solutions
•Prizes and competitions †to engage the public and different fields •Regulation †well-conceived regulations can elicit much greater
These include calls for ideas, competitions, petitions, youth parliaments, citizen juries, participatory planning and budgeting and so on
competition, the programme has served to highlight innovative projects within fields as diverse as youth justice, environmental management
Prizes and competitions can be an effective means of uncovering new sources of social innovation.
competitions for the crowdsourcing of innovations say that it is the stage of framing a good question which is the key to the competition†s success. 1
These sites show how to run competitions for †mash up†ideas from citizens using government data, such as Sunlight Labs and Show Us a
are biodiversity competitions, recipe competitions and a felicitation ceremony for creative villagers 30) Media Spotlight.
to encourage creativity and new ideas †such as competitions and prizes online platforms and idea banks.
54) Competitions and challenges can be an effective means of uncovering new sources of social innovation.
market, however, competition is not always the driving force behind the development of new innovations in the social economy.
that competitions need to be structured in such a way that participants have the opportunity to collaborate,
favour of prizes and competitions is the way in which it provides those giving out the prize a means of finding a solution to a problem without
Indeed, with competitions, it is the participants who are expected to foot the financial risk. In the social
or competitions such as the Singapore Public service Awards. Another example of this is school inspections †inspectors assess and then
tested, with £20 million to be spent on a public competition for medical breakthroughs 325) Crosscutting budgets that support broad programmes which leave
Fund competition †The People†s 50 Millionâ€. Another example is †Help A London Parkâ€, an initiative launched by the Mayor of London to
and competitions provide another source of funding for activities at one remove from the state.
its prestigious annual awards competition, the programme has served to highlight innovative projects within fields as diverse as youth justice
407) Competitions and challenge funds can be an effective means of spurring social innovation. The X Prize Foundation, for example, have
Competitions 38; 54-55; 156; 170 Complaints Choirs 26; 27 Consortium Model 99 Co-ops 65-66;
dynamic interaction (with cooperation and competition) of several players in order to produce systemic results in terms of innovation and economic development
James Moore, Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems Harperbusiness;
competition ï€'for the local instances of the ecosystem: the models are decided by the local
infrastructure29. â€oewhere necessary and without distorting competition, public financing instruments will give increased priority to supporting the development of information
and the competition, providing to the small providers equal opportunities to offer their services and products, stimulating the local
increasing their choices about specialisation, co-operation and competition (Steinmueller, 1994 16 purpose to create a †critical mass†of knowledge resources to strengthen the local, regional
programmes and business plan competitions that are now are implemented increasingly worldwide (Morris, 1998) and are a key element for economic and social development in a
Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), Manchester, November Alvarez, S. A. and Busenitz, L. W. 2001), â€oethe entrepreneurship of resource-based theoryâ€
competition is fierce, putting a premium on innovation and efficiency, while making it harder to earn a return on investment
, finance sector competition is facing the challenge of Paypal and Google Wallet diffusion and adoption by digital natives. ††We think we†ll attract a new client
areas), the locus of competition has shifted from the price of the service to the satisfaction of the specific needs of customers:
and security related to this openness and ††instability††6 of digital competition are worth mentioning.
identity seems to be a relevant factor in an omnichannels retail competition. As for this issue, their research focuses on medium-sized retailing company selling
The results have shown that the competition has variability across products, with a relevance to Internet retailers of selling niche products.
competition and cooperation, 1st edn. Currency Doubleday, New york 6. Greenwood P-E (2012) The new instability:
order for them to stay in the competition; they have to act fast regarding understanding digital governance structures, processes and mechanisms
has managed to shift the locus of competition in the fast-paced technology market from product innovation to the innovation of the business model of reference for
based on collaboration and interactivity criteria and the new competition dynamics are based on the ability to build
competition is not only among individual organizations, but also, and mainly, among value creation systems composed by networks of companies
significantly transforming the traditional rules of competition, offer value propo -sitions and business models 39. First of all, the market is no longer just a physical
At the same time, the network has intensified also competition since the easier access to information and the reduction of variable costs stimulates
competition on prices and therefore requires the maximization of operational efficiency. In addition, it is easier for potential entrants to access distribution
enthusiastic at all the conventions and competitions it has taken part, winning the company a widespread support and a number of awards
solid company, facing some competition but with a large market to tap, showing no need for additional enabling infrastructure
and competition to attract investments and talents takes place. The EU Innovation Union Flagship emphasises the smart specialisation of regions as key to future competitiveness
and competition for funding through its various themes and instruments is increasing, particularly as many governments around Europe cut national research funding levels.
New patterns of competition are recognizable, especially at the regional level: for example, geographical concentrations of linked industries, like clusters, are of increasing importance
competition in the services sector and fragmentation of markets in key strategic sectors The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 (Figure 2
competitions, certification of entrepreneurship skills the setting-up and running of student training firms and teacher training and support. 31
external work being seen as competition and a threat to one†s own organization should be
competition and innovation in the economy. In recent years innovation-driven entrepreneurship has become an important
relevance of other difficulties increases, including severe competition, availability of skilled employees and managers, and
including the economy, taxation, regulations, competition and cash-flow issues. There were also a number of barriers that innovative SMES experience over and above those that
competition, whereas the recent experience of Switzerland indicates that public opinion may be blinded by short-term concerns about â€oemassive
Center for Industry, SME & Business Competition Studies University of Trisakti Tulus Tambunan, Director Iran, Islamic Republic of
market competition, both domestic and foreign, is important in driving market efficiency, and thus business
levels of competition and access to venture capital and financing that are analyzed in other pillars of the Index
competition (6th) and an environment that facilitates new business creation. Notwithstanding these strengths some concerns remain about the efficiency of Belgium†s
competition), ICT use, and business sophistication†although this arguably reflects some positive developments that took place before the Ukraine conflict
enhanced levels of competition (71st) and more flexible labor markets (although they remain rather rigid, 117th
increase competition, and encourage a more optimal allocation of financial resources. In most emerging Asian
with investment rules, greatly limit competition. China is becoming more innovative (32nd), but it is not yet an
competition remains limited by a number of barriers to entry, especially those affecting foreign investments
intended to increase the level of competition and efficiency in the functioning of Mexico†s markets have
1) boosting competition, especially in strategic sectors of the economy, by removing bottlenecks and barriers
119th in market competition and 102nd in public institutions Among the BRICS, China has lost 22 places in terms of market
competition since 2010, and both India and Brazil have lost considerable ground in all three areas
Public institutions Market competition Labor market efficiency GCI 2014†2015 rank Country 2014†2015 rank Since 2010*2014†2015 rank Since 2010*2014†2015 rank Since 2010
rise is led by improvements in its level of competition in the goods market (54th) thanks to the reduction of
quality of education and level of domestic competition The country will need to enhance competitiveness to further diversify its economy
Second, measures to intensify domestic competition 118th) would result in efficiency gains and contribute to energizing the economy by providing access to new
competition, and its labor market efficiency (52nd) has been improving thanks to increased flexibility (18th Going forward, as income per capita rises and Mauritius
foreign competition. In the near-term future, it will be important not to lose sight of these challenges for the
competition to foster economic diversification, and developing a sound financial market (126th. Also critical in view of the country†s rapidly growing population and
%A. Competition...67 %1. Domestic competition...variable h 6. 01 Intensity of local competition 6. 02 Extent of market dominance
6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy 6. 04 Effect of taxation on incentives to invest
6. 05 Total tax rate *6. 06 Number of procedures required to start a business*i
2. Foreign competition...variable h 6. 09 Prevalence of trade barriers 6. 10 Trade tariffs *6. 11 Prevalence of foreign ownership
h The competition subpillar is weighted the average of two components: domestic competition and foreign competition.
In both components, the included indicators provide an indication of the extent to which competition is distorted.
The relative importance of these distortions depends on the relative size of domestic versus foreign competition.
This interaction between the domestic market and the foreign market is captured by the way we determine the weights of the two components
Domestic competition is the sum of consumption (C), investment I), government spending (G), and exports (X), while foreign
competition is equal to imports (M) . Thus we assign a weight of C i+G+X)/(C i+G+X+M) to domestic competition and a
weight of M c i+G+X+M) to foreign competition i Indicators 6. 06 and 6. 07 combine to form one single indicator
j For indicators 6. 14, imports as a percentage of GDP, we first apply a log-transformation and then a min-max transformation
competition over these resources could eventually result in military conflict. Adverse changes in temperature and precipitation have started to
††â€. 1994. â€oelocational Competition and the Environment: Should Countries Harmonize Their Environmental Policies?
Domestic Competition VIII. Company Operations and Strategy IX. Government and Public Institutions X. Education and Human Capital
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 5...142 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 5...142 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...136 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...2. 6...144 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 1...132 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...85 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...8 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 8...15 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...121 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...46 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...79 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...28 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...6 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...106 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...139 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...95 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...52 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...75 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...110 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 9...134 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...86 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...109 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...33 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...117 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...137 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...27 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...44 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...56 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...59 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...112 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...83 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...37 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...17 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...45 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...72 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 0...133 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...89 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...29 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...113 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...108 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...31 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...124 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...87 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...105 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...12 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...118 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...71 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...42 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...129 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...102 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...140 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...88 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...4 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...47 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...80 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...91 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...53 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...119 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...60 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...126 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...58 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...39 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 4...1 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...57 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...111 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...21 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...13 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...114 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...107 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...69 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...23 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...30 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...93 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 7...141 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...22 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...54 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...43 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...90 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...76 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...34 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...97 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...3 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 1...131 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...24 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...64 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...99 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...82 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 9...135 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...48 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...96 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...100 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 6...104 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...94 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...14 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...26 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...130 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...50 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...49 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...73 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...84 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...67 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...68 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...70 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...61 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 3...51 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...63 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...7 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...18 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 4...120 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 0...74 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...78 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...40 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...81 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...128 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 2...127 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...116 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...20 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...32 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...66 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...36 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 5...35 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 8...16 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...98 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 5...115 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...41 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 7...19 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...2 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...122 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...123 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 4...38 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...3. 8...138 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...62 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 8...92 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...11 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 2...55 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...101 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 0...9 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...6. 1...5 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 9...10 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 7...103 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...2. 9...143 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 1...65 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 3...125 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...5. 6...25 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...4. 9...77 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition...466 6. 02 Extent of market dominance...467 6. 03 Effectiveness of antimonopoly policy...
6. 01 Intensity of local competition In your country, how intense is competition in the local markets?
1=not intense at all; 7=extremely intense 2013†14 weighted average SOURCE: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey.
In your country, to what extent does antimonopoly policy promote competition? 1=does not promote competition; 7=effectively promotes competition 2013†14
weighted average SOURCE: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey. For more details, refer to Chapter 1. 3 of this Report
2. 2: Data Tables 468 The Global Competitiveness Report 2014†2015  2014 World Economic Forum
6. 01 Intensity of local competition In your country, how intense is competition in the local
markets? 1=not intense at all; 7=extremely intense 2013†14 weighted average Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
promote competition? 1=does not promote competition 7=effectively promotes competition 2013†14 weighted average
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey 6. 04 Effect of taxation on incentives to invest
In your country, to what extent do taxes reduce the incentive to invest? 1=significantly reduce the incentive to invest
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011