Synopsis:
1. ict: Radar:
BBC 00888.txt
Radar has even been used, famously uncovering vast new areas of the vast Cambodian temple complex Angkor Wat.
impactlab_2013 00130.txt
It s surmounted by a spinning laser turret and knobbed with cameras, radar, antennas, and G. P. S. It looks a little like an ice-cream truck, lightly weaponized for inner-city work.
Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars. It wasn t something you could buy at Radio shack.#
impactlab_2013 00412.txt
and it works on the same principle that radar and sonar do#ut today s most advanced lidar is much more accurate,
Both use a combination of radar and computer vision to center the vehicle in the lane
The problem is that even the best radar -and vision-based pedestrian-avoidance systems fail to see the proverbial child running into the road 1 or 2 percent of the time.#
working with low-cost radar and camera components, will never adequately bridge that gap. It s chosen a different technical path,
Livescience_2013 01364.txt
Radar can't sense every component of the wind's movement for example. By using simulations she
On Monday the National Weather Service office in Norman Okla. gave residents 16 minutes of warning before the tornado even formed based on radar indicators that the storm clouds were circulating in such a way that a tornado was likely.
Colorado State university engineer V. Chandrasekar and his team are working to deploy small networks of radar in urban areas.
Traditional radar provides only one component of wind movement. What we are about is getting higher resolution in space
Livescience_2014 00782.txt
They might consider a fisheries agent based on a coastal atoll who uses a tethered balloon carrying a radar sensor to detect all vessels that enter the community's no-take fishing sanctuary.
popsci_2013 00259.txt
The acronym stands for light detection and ranging and it works on the same principle that radar and sonar do
Both use a combination of radar and computer vision to center the vehicle in the lane
The problem is that even the best radar -and vision-based pedestrian-avoidance systems fail to see the proverbial child running into the road 1 or 2 percent of the time.
Google is betting that established car manufacturers working with low-cost radar and camera components will never adequately bridge that gap.
Smart_Planet_1 00297.txt
It hasn't hit the radar. Smartplanet: We've asked water experts about why it matters.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011
