Literature review

Academic literature (5)
Literature (200)
Literature review (43)
Scientific literature (6)

Synopsis: Scientific literature: Literature: Literature review:


ART14.pdf

The research mainly involved a literature review of available documentation on past and present foresight programmes and their results. 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

and goal attainment levels. 2. A conceptual framework to characterise emerging knowledge societies The findings of the literature review on the major characteristics of the emerging knowledge societies suggest that the characteristics

but also of social changes and the building of social 4 For an analysis of the major findings of the literature review see 1. 541 E. Amanatidou,

'The findings of the literature review on what constitutes the major characteristics of the emerging knowledge and risk societies are synthesised into a conceptual framework describing a more participatory‘knowledge society'.

The way these factors are linked to each other, based on the findings of the literature review, 6 is shown by the lines connecting the factors. 3. Contribution of foresight to the emerging knowledge societies The above conceptual framework facilitates the identification of areas where foresight impacts may contribute to the strengthening

'The identification of such areas was the subject of the second part of 5 This conceptual framework will be validated via interviews with experts in relevant fields. 6 For an analysis of the major findings of the literature review,

see 1. 542 E. Amanatidou, K. Guy/Technological forecasting & Social Change 75 (2008) 539 557 the literature review,


ART17.pdf

A literature review of related work in the field of technology opportunities analysis is presented. We consider a possible, radically decentralized context for the conduct of future design.

A literature review of related work in the field of technology opportunities analysis is presented. A case study of new technology architecture in the information technology domain is presented.


ART19.pdf

for instance, defining the scenario methods the most creative and literature review evidence based, while future workshops are interactive and expert panels more for addressing expert opinions.

literature reviews and other such methods are used in both approaches. However, risk assessments utilize more systematic and standardised methods, especiaall in risk identification phase.


ART22.pdf

and extend the findings from our literature review, we organised an information exchange with thirty practitioners.

and our own literature review 2. Scenario exercises are used often as ameans of collecting and synthesizing complex information


ART3.pdf

improving the literature review, Scientometrics 53 (2002) 351 370.6 K. Bo rner, C. Chen, K. W. Boyack, Visualizing knowledge domains, Annual Review of Information science and Technology 37 (2003) 179 255.7 A l. Porter, E. Yglesias, A. Kongthon, C. Courseault, N c. Newman, Getting


ART42.pdf

Typical methods employed here are literature reviews, interviews with experts, horizon scanning. Roughly Horton's subtasks (i),(ii) and (iii.


ART43.pdf

literature review and research options, European Management Journal 23 (1)( 2005) 27 36.31 U. Steger, A. Ionescu-Somers, O. Salzmann, The economic foundations of corporate


ART47.pdf

Design/methodology/approach A literature review carried out in context of the EU funded transport project OPTIC (see www. optic. toi. no) reveals that differentiating between different types of uncertainty is possible.

A literature review carried out in context of the EU funded transport project OPTIC (see DLR and KIT,

a literature review and a research agenda'',Research policy, Vol. 37, pp. 740-60. Justen, A.,Schippl, J.,Ho lt, A. and Fleischer, T. 2010),‘Expect the unexpected:


ART50.pdf

In fact, our literature review has detected not specific innovative research efforts geared to bridging the gap between these two fields of knowledge. 4. How to reconcile territorial foresight and urban planning Despite its apparent benefits,


ART71.pdf

Improving the literature review. Scientometrics 53, no. 3: 351 70. Porter, A l, . and I. Rafols. 2009.


ART72.pdf

Literature review, expert panel, and scenario are three major methods that are used commonly around the world,

B scenario is used often with literature review, expert panel, and trend extrapolation/megatrends; B the Delphi method is used often with literature review, expert panel,

and brainstorming; and B workshop is used with literature review, expert panel, and scenario. VOL. 15 NO. 1 2013 jforesight jpage 7 Scenario requires extensive knowledge of the field under investigation,

and information from other sources is expected to be interpreted (Mietzner and Reger, 2005). The Delphi method is regarded as one of the useful information sources for scenario (Loveridge, 1999.


ART78.pdf

trend extrapolation), highlighting that they were combined with literature review, scenarios and expert panels. These conclusions have to be interpreted with care,

or in combination with, traditional qualitative methods based on literature reviews. Identification of trends and wildcards: Quantitative methods can also be used to identify outliers (outstanding observations) which could be revised further by experts as potential wild cards.


ART87.pdf

such as Expert Panels, Interviews, Modelling and Literature reviews. The uncertainty avoidance dimension has several implications for national management and planning cultures.


ART89.pdf

workshops) Use of common foresight with emphasis on expected impacts Literature review Online survey for the collection of ideas Scenarios and joint vision Multiple scenarios for synthesising drivers inputs in various forms


ART90.pdf

a literature review, ejov Special issue on Living Labs 10 (2008. K. De Moor et al.//Futures 59 (2014) 39 49 49


ART92.pdf

/Futures 59 (2014) 62 78 76 In the literature review two paths that indicate networked foresight as the next generation of futures research were identified:


Science.PublicPolicyVol37\4. Critical success factors for government-led foresight.pdf

a detailed literature review; a short email questionnaire; interviiew with foresight practitioners, managers responnsibl for national foresight efforts in various countries, and;

literature reviews, scenarios, brainstorminng and expert panels. The most striking result is the popularity of the four methods:


Science.PublicPolicyVol37\5. Future technology analysis for biosecurity and emerging infectious diseases in Asia-Pacific.pdf

a combinatiio of literature review/bibliometric analysis and online surveys were conducted to preliminarily captuur the trends of infectious diseases.

I Scenario planning Online survey Literature review+Bibliometric Analysis Aim to discuss longer term perspective to enhance the region's capacities that contribute to the successful prevention


Science.PublicPolicyVol39\10. Challenges in communicating the outcomes of a foresight study.pdf

scanning and a literature review. The timeline tool was used also as an alternative for scenario planning. The guidelines used in the process include:.


Science.PublicPolicyVol39\12. National, sectoral and technological innovation systems.pdf

draws conclusions and makes suggestions for future research. 2. Literature review and the configuration of the innovation systems The conception of the configuration of the three innovattio systems is established on the theoretical foundations of different system approaches.


Science.PublicPolicyVol39\7. On concepts and methods in horizon scanning.pdf

Focused expert review which is assisted by experts'survey, literature review and attending conferences. The first combination can be considered to be more in line with the exploratory scanning approach,

The value of the more‘conventional'methods like expert surveys, literature review and conferennc visits is more relevant for targeted tasks requiring expert inputs like reviewing the state-of-the-art in a given field, searching for comprehensive reports on weak signals

specific for survey and conferencces large for focused expert review, literature review Duration: observation time Through reports, blogs, groups, social networks, Twitter, sites, etc.

For literature review and selection of conferences same reference framework Verification method Cross-referencing with other articles Discussions with experts Discussions with experts;

In literature review based on documents selected for review based on experts'knowledge. In conferences through discussions with peers Existing strategies and relevant stakeholders Medium Medium High As reported/criticised in raw resources.


Science.PublicPolicyVol39\8. Facing the future - Scanning, synthesizing and sense-making in horizon scanning.pdf

The particularly novel issues from this survey were added to the issues collected from the literature review. 4. These issues plus the 73 additional issues identified by the survey participants can be found at<http://foresight. jrc. ec. europa. eu/bepa. html


< Back - Next >


Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011