Synopsis: Entrepreneurship: Profit:


Social Inclusion as Innovation.pdf.txt

"The Cafu Foundation Project does not seek profit, therefore it is connected not to the market

from profit with a social vision toward a fraternal attitude with those excluded, the perception


Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges- Locating the concept in theory and practice.pdf.txt

the private and not-for-profit sectors has, according to the government, explicitly been linked to promoting greater innovation in developing solutions to reducing re-offending

However, alternative funding can be made available within the not-for-profit sector Significant private and philanthropic funding has been encouraged through the

and profits are dedicated to community purposes Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 3 While the Community Interest

Activity taking place across the public, private and not-for-profit sectors involving social entrepreneurs,


social-innovation-mega-trends-to-answer-society-challenges-whitepaper.pdf.txt

as purely maximising profit, benefits and experience. Future-thinking companies are going to orient themselves more towards the B2s model

already profits from running clinics in the middle East, an example the government thinks the NHS could follow

extra income abroad Profit making hospital branches •Revenues can help close the NHS funding gap

a balance between profit for stakeholders and improved lives for individual citizens, focusing on progress both for business and our global society.


Southeast-economic-development-strategy.docx.txt

Operating Profit (â †000 963 -247 -236 Profit after Interest and Tax (â †000

-975 -574 -440 Employees 15 38 **35 ***2000 was the first full financial year as a commercial port company

whom there is a profit motivation; they are the people who use the services on a day-to-day basis. For example,

they can form a not-for-profit cooperative to deliver something that they collectively need


SPRINGER_Digital Business Models Review_2013.pdf.txt

profit formula†key resources†key processes††e. Ostenwalder et al. define ††A business model is a conceptual tool containing a

It also outlines the architecture of revenues, costs, profits associated with the business enterprise delivering value††(Teese 2010

economic approach focuses on how a firm can make a profit and key variables from this approach include revenue sources, pricing methodologies, cost struc

and ultimately captures profits (Slywotzky 1996. Decision variables focus on stakeholder identification, value creation, visions, values and networks and

Bertz (2002) Resources, sales, profits and capital 4 No No Hedman and Kalling 2003 Value network, resources


Tepsie_A-guide_for_researchers_06.01.15_WEB.pdf.txt

a value that is less concerned with profit and more with issues such as quality of life, solidarity and well-being. †18 Another way to consider †socialâ€

-profits and informal associations. We define citizen engagement in social innovation as the many ways

and a limited profit distribution). ) Lastly, the governance dimension includes: a decision-making power not based on

the distribution of profits generated. Further, social enterprises are engaged not organisations only in activities such as advocacy or grant giving, they must

to which profits are distributed. While there is often an implicit assumption that social enterprises are by nature new, entrepreneurial and innovative, it

whilst society as a whole profits a lot when these people are supported (e g . when offenders are rehabilitated instead of relapsing into crime

Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Wharton School Publishing 13. Bernard P. 1999. †Social cohesion:

profits, Innovation and Performance Measurement Separating Fact from Fictionâ€, Communique No 17, Centre for Civil Society Studies, Johns Hopkins


The future internet.pdf.txt

the potential profits to be made from monitoring and monetizing the communication of their users, and the demands of gov

-ity provision and profit, to allow sustainable new forms of multimedia communica -tions with an increasing importance in the future Internet

crucial aspect for Smartcities to become future engines of a productive and profit -able economy


The Impact of Innovation and Social Interactions on Product Usage - Paulo Albuquerque & Yulia Nevskaya.pdf.txt

which contributed a large percentage of the firm†s profits. Subscriptions declined from 12 million paying customers at the end of 2010 to 11.4 million at the end of March of 2011 and continued


The Relationship between innovation, knowledge, performance in family and non-family firms_ an analysis of SMEs.pdf.txt

firm growth and subsequent profit performance, which in turn can yield employment gains and contribute to the general economic health of a state, region, or nation (Wolff

knowledge into profit or else the expert would be acting as an entrepreneur. In turn the entrepreneur may not have the depth of knowledge that the specialist possesses (for

Currently, the SBA defines a business concern as one that is organized for profit; has a place of business in the USA;

Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Kish, L. 1994. Multipopulation survey designs.


The Role of Government Institutions for Smart Specialisation and Regional Development - Report.pdf.txt

-national co-operation networks, where regional policy-makers can take profit from each other†s experience

Evidence from Firms'Patents, Profits and Market value, American Economic Review, 76 (5): 984-1001 Kaufmann, D.,Kraay, A.,Mastruzzi, M. 2009) Governance matters VIII:


The Young Foundation-for-the-Bureau-of-European-Policy-Advisors-March-2010.pdf.txt

-profit sectors The background is that Europe is in the midst of profound transformation; it has suffered the worst financial and economic crisis in decades with

They are driven not by the need to maximise profit for shareholders and owners. There is currently no universally accepted

the non profit sector and the social economy-which can serve as a guide to

of non profit organisations and the social economy does not necessarily fall under the rubric of social innovation-many non profits and social economy

firms are not innovative although they do deliver benefits to the communities they serve. However, it is also the case that many social innovations do come

which earn a profit but are focussed on their social goals. lxvii Definitions of social enterprise vary,

portfolio of investment funds will cover a range of more than profit companies that have primarily social or environmental goals

failing to help non profits build capacity, grow and become financially sustainable. lxxxvi Venture philanthropy is a response to this criticism, and seek s

profits and commercial market rate equity and loans. lxxxvii There are six main features of venture philanthropy as it has come to be

-for-profits. These include social enterprises and social entrepreneurs, trading charities and socially driven commercial organisations.

now coordinated by universities, not-for-profit organisations, local or regional authorities (town halls,'Diputacion',regional government departments

profits earned through San Patrignano†s goods and services, following a principle of autonomy. The rest comes from private donors or companies that

-for-profits, 5%for individual projects, while 85%will be attributed to grants for other grant-giving organisations.

The Big Green Challenge, aimed at the not-for-profit sector is the first challenge prize of its kind.

-profits operate. One of the most important legislative developments over the last decade has been the creation of new legal forms for social businesses

There is also a limit on dividends of 35%of profits This new legal form has played a critical role in opening up new kinds of

†entrepreneurial not-for profits with limited social liability� Working paper delivered at the Voluntary Sector Studies Network (VSSN) meeting in Manchester, 2004.

not-for-profit sector. The first step in the cycle is funders†unrealistic expectations about how


the_open_book_of_social_innovationNESTA.pdf.txt

share and profit. In the social field the very measures of success may be contested as well as the tools for achieving results.

Cafã is a not-for-profit organisation which brings people together from all around the world in conversation through the use of Telepresence screens

The Big Green Challenge, aimed at the not-for-profit 3 PROTOTYPING AND PILOTS 55

the private market†s imperative for profit maximisation and capital growth. One example is Working Rite,

used for various kinds of social enterprises as well as for-profits. The forms used will include:

methods focused on profits residuals, and replacement costs; methods using multiple regressions and stepwise regressions; methods using artificial neural networks

Creating High Impact Non Profits. †Stanford Social Innovation Review. †Fall 2. A good summary of diffusion studies can be found in à berg,

-profit organisations trying to effect change on a systemic level. The Nike Foundation†s work to develop the ability of adolescent girls in developing

Grant programme which provides not-for-profit organisations with pro bono marketing, human resources and IT consulting services

which earn a profit but are focussed on their social goals. 1 The main challenge for social enterprises is to maintain their commercial

limit on dividends of 35 per cent of profits. The term also covers a wide

part of a company†s profits to a separate foundation, or the US model where an entrepreneur becomes rich through one business and then

451) Corporate not-for-profit management of social provision such as Academy Schools in the UK and Charter schools in the US

not-for-distributed profits such as BASF-GAIN initiative for Vitamin a in Africa, the Danone-Grameen yoghurt enterprise in Bangladesh and the

473) Bank-based funding for social enterprises and not-for-profit organisations including Banca Prossima in Italy


TOWARDS TOWARDS A NETWORK NETWORK OF DIGITAL BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS_2002.pdf.txt

intermediaries disappear †a process of natural selection will take place around profit to companies and value to customers. â€


Triple_Helix_Systems.pdf.txt

foundations, professional/trade associations, service organizations, not-for-profit corporations, trusts, etc..In universities, key R&d performers are the academic

for-profit contract research organizations. See http://www. socialsciences. leiden. edu/cwts/research/uirc -scoreboard-2011. html


Vincenzo Morabito (auth.)-Trends and Challenges in Digital Business Innovation-Springer International Publishing (2014) (1).pdf.txt

profits, revenues, recovery costs derived by critical data loss or inaccessibility. As a consequence they have to assess their information asset to decide about retaining

in terms of market share and profit The second case study has been analyzed by Sharma et al. 32, and shows the

•the mechanisms for appropriating the value of the product and making a profit on existing markets or that have yet to be created

by redistributing profits. These factors are forcing companies to rethink from the bottom up the way in which all of their business operations are organized and

sales and profits 15. In particular, the profit formula defines a company†s prof -itability, specifying how a company creates

and captures value for itself in terms of profit and it is of the utmost importance, because it determines the feasibility of the

profits? Two different interrelated aspects seem to have originated this trend: the configuration of the business model in relation to existing products and the

that ensures profits, but companies are called also, and are expected to excel, in formulating and implementing effective business models 3

cash flows and profits. Therefore, once the available capital was depleted quickly they were no longer able to continue operating.

profits In summary, the crucial factor for the success of a company is not the value of

developed within the company to other actors, allowing the increase of profits through the transfer of these technologies and projects, for example through


WEF_EuropeCompetitiveness_FosteringInnovationDrivenEntrepreneurship_Report_2014.pdf.txt

Profit zone Start up: Supporting the Establishment and Initial Expansion of Innovation-driven Ventures In the second, â€oestart up†phase of the entrepreneurship life

and profits that indicate future success at larger scales Even though major cities are booming, venture capital

start-ups profit from both events and mentoring Source: Salido, Sabã¡s and Freixas (2013), â€oethe Accelerator

start-up partner to profit from the resources and backbone of the large corporation partner. This section therefore

•Know of and profit from corporate search fields for innovation Entrepreneur perspective Large corporate

Know of and profit from corporate search fields for innovation Entrepreneurs in start-ups/innovative SMES need

SMES, a reduced tax rate for companies with reduced profits, and a set of dedicated instruments to support patenting

solutions and potential profits pop. To realize those â€oefast Emerging Profits, †the Cambrian Corporation would

need to govern itself in such a way that agility, sensing and capacity for pivots at speed are the overriding

Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971 and headquartered in Geneva Switzerland, the Forum is


WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf.txt

on average, to 63 percent of its profits (130th. Furthermore the labor market is inefficient and rigid (112th.

Driving Profits through Carbon Reduction. Available at http://www. worldwildlife. org/projects/the -3-solution

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*31.7.45 Albania indicator 2. 08 Mobile phone subscription, where the country ranks 39th, constitutes a competitive

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*31.7.45 Albania  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*71.9.137 Algeria  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*52.1.120 Angola  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*107.8.143 Argentina  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*38.8.73 Armenia  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*47.0.104 Australia  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*52.4.121 Austria  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.0.77 Azerbaijan  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*13.5.5 Bahrain  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.0.58 Bangladesh  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.8.83 Barbados  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*57.5.126 Belgium  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.8.83 Bhutan  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*83.4.140 Bolivia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*25.4.22 Botswana  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*68.3.136 Brazil  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.7.28 Bulgaria  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*43.9.95 Burkina faso  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*51.6.118 Burundi  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*21.4.14 Cambodia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*48.8.108 Cameroon  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*24.3.20 Canada  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*37.2.70 Cape verde  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*73.8.138 Chad  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.7.28 Chile  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*63.7.131 China  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*76.0.139 Colombia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*55.3.125 Costa rica  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*46.4.103 CÃ'te d†Ivoire  2014 World Economic Forum

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*19.8.11 Croatia  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*22.5.17 Cyprus  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*48.1.106 Czech republic  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.0.26 Denmark  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*43.5.93 Dominican republic  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*42.6.90 Egypt  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*38.1.72 El salvador  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.4.110 Estonia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*33.4.51 Ethiopia  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*39.8.76 Finland  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*64.7.132 France  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*43.5.93 Gabon  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*283.2.144 Gambia, The  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*16.4.10 Georgia  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.4.110 Germany  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*22.9.18 Ghana  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.0.96 Greece  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.9.85 Guatemala  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*91.2.142 Guinea  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*32.5.48 Guyana  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.4.79 Haiti  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*39.2.74 Honduras  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*22.9.18 Hong kong SAR Â 2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.7.114 Hungary  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.9.38 Iceland  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*62.8.130 India  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*32.2.46 Indonesia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.1.97 Iran, Islamic Rep  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*25.7.23 Ireland  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.9.38 Israel  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*65.8.134 Italy  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.3.99 Jamaica  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.7.114 Japan  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*28.9.34 Jordan  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*28.6.33 Kazakhstan  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.2.98 Kenya  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.9.30 Korea, Rep  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*12.4.4 Kuwait  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*33.4.51 Kyrgyz Republic  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1:

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*26.8.25 Lao PDR Â 2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.9.64 Latvia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*30.2.42 Lebanon  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*16.0.9 Lesotho  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*31.6.44 Libya  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*43.1.92 Lithuania  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*20.7.12 Luxembourg  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*8. 2...1 Macedonia, FYR Â 2014 World Economic Forum

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.8.63 Madagascar  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*34.9.57 Malawi  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*36.3.65 Malaysia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.5.112 Mali  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*41.0.86 Malta  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*68.2.135 Mauritania  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*28.2.32 Mauritius  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*53.7.122 Mexico  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.4.79 Moldova  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*24.6.21 Mongolia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*20.9.13 Montenegro  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*49.6.113 Morocco  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*37.5.71 Mozambique  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*48.9.109 Myanmar  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*21.8.15 Namibia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*31.5.43 Nepal  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*39.3.75 Netherlands  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*34.6.55 New zealand  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*64.9.133 Nicaragua  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*33.8.53 Nigeria  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.7.82 Norway  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*22.0.16 Oman  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*34.7.56 Pakistan  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.5.81 Panama  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.0.58 Paraguay  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*36.4.66 Peru  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.5.100 Philippines  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*41.6.87 Poland  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*42.3.89 Portugal  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*50.7.116 Puerto rico  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*11.3.3 Qatar  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*42.9.91 Romania  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*50.7.116 Russian Federation  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1:

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.9.38 Rwanda  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*14.5.6 Saudi arabia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*48.5.107 Senegal  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*36.8.69 Serbia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*25.7.23 Seychelles  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*32.4.47 Sierra leone  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.1.27 Singapore  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*47.2.105 Slovak Republic  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*32.5.48 Slovenia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*30.1.41 South africa  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*58.6.127 Spain  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*55.1.124 Sri lanka  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*27.9.30 Suriname  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*36.5.67 Swaziland  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*52.0.119 Sweden  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.1.35 Switzerland  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.0.58 Taiwan, China  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1:

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*86.0.141 Tajikistan  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*44.9.101 Tanzania  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.8.37 Thailand  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*11.0.2 Timor-Leste  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*29.1.35 Trinidad and tobago  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*62.4.129 Tunisia  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*40.2.78 Turkey  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*36.6.68 Uganda  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*54.9.123 Ukraine  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*14.9.7 United arab emirates  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*34.0.54 United kingdom  2014 World Economic Forum Rank Score out of 144)( 1†7

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*46.3.102 United states  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*41.9.88 Uruguay  2014 World Economic Forum Percent of responses

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*61.7.128 Venezuela  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.2.61 Vietnam  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*32.7.50 Yemen  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*15.1.8 Zambia  2014 World Economic Forum 2. 1: Country/Economy Profiles

6. 05 Total tax rate,%profits*..*35.3.62 Zimbabwe  2014 World Economic Forum  2014 World Economic Forum

This variable is a combination of profit tax(%of profits), labor tax and contribution(%of profits),

and other taxes(%of profits) 2013 SOURCE: World bank/International finance corporation, Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises

2. 2: Data Tables 470 The Global Competitiveness Report 2014†2015  2014 World Economic Forum

This indicator is a combination of profit tax(%of profits labor tax and contribution(%of profits),

and other taxes(%of profits) 2013 The total tax rate measures the amount of taxes and mandatory

contributions payable by a business in the second year of operation, expressed as a share of commercial profits.

The total amount of taxes is the sum of five different types of taxes and contributions payable after accounting for deductions

profit or corporate income tax, social contributions and labor taxes paid by the employer, property taxes, turnover taxes,


< Back - Next >


Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011