In particular, the EIPE project builds up a measurement of ICT R&d activity by observing the actual presence of ICT technology producers (universities, companies, R&d facilities), their R&d expenditures and bibliometric data.
the EIPE project builds up this measurement by observing the level of agglomeration of technology producers (universities, companies, R&d facilities), R&d expenditures and bibliometric data.
o Computer science and engineering with respect to university faculties, o Computer science with respect to scientific publications, o ICT hardware and software with respect to R&d activity performed in R&d centres,
the EIPE ID card Activity Characteristic Name of Indicator Indicator ID Nr R&d Agglomeration Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Agrd 1 1 Academic ranking of a Computer science
In particular, they acknowledge the importance given in EIPE to the presence and the quality of major knowledge production organisations, such as universities (and their computer science departments), private and public research centres (in particular those of multinational companies), innovative SMES
of indicator Universities ranked in the QS University ranking Academic ranking of a Computer science faculty Employer ranking of a Computer science faculty Citations ranking of a Computer science faculty R&d expenditures by ICT firms FP7 funding
Measures the number of universities in QS university ranking Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the academic ranking of QS Measures the performance of the Computer science faculty according to the employer ranking of QS Measures the performance
number of EU ranked universities to a region's share in the EU population The highest rank of a Computer science faculty in the academic ranking The highest rank of a Computer science faculty in the employer ranking The highest rank of a Computer science
The performance of universities and computer science faculties across the world, as reported by the QS University ranking.
each of the data source is described. 5. 1 QS WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS by QS The rankings of Universities
It was formed in 2008 to meet the increasing public interest in comparative data on universities and organisations,
000 universities in the world and evaluates over 700 of them, ranking the top 400.
This list is used to build an indicator of the location of a ranked university in a region within the current project.
The Employer reputation survey considers the students'employability as a key factor in the evaluation of international universities and in 2010 drew on over 5,
The main constraint is that it offers only a limited number of universities, which does not allow us to cover the entire population of the European higher education institutions. 5. 2 FP7 database by EC DG Connect The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development,
University of Technology. Ottaviano, G, . & Thisse, J.-F. 2004). Agglomeration and economic geography. In J. V. Henderson, P. Nijkamp, E s. Mills, P. C. Cheshire & J. F. Thisse (Eds.
Printed in Spain 1 A Policymakers Guide to Transnational Learning in Smart Specialisation Åge Mariussen*,Inger Midtkandal**and Ruslan Rakhmatullin***Botnia-Atlantica Institute, University of Vaasa (Finland
), Umeå University (Sweden), Nordland Research Institute (Norway)**European commission, JRC-IPTS, Seville (Spain) S3 Policy Brief Series n°05/2014 January
and just skip any thought of adapting universities to regional development needs. These and other obstacles to triple helix connectivity might be frustrating,
if you are able to create new university industry relations, or repair other flaws in your system of innovation,
such as the triple helix of universities and public policies does not support the industry and its suppliers sufficiently,
why is not this university generating more spin-offs? In seeking the explanations to this question,
you should look at spin-offs from other universities. Is there something wrong with the organization of the science park?
Or perhaps there is a lack of connectivity between the universities and industrial actors who has a potential to commercialize university-based innovations?
What about the absorptive capacity of your industries? Problems often have root causes, chains of causation
A common problem is that the university institutions have strengths in terms of research which is matched not by regional industries.
which are technologically related to the strengths of the University. With no industrial actors willing and able to industrialize university-based innovations
patents from your university are likely to be sold and industrialized in other regions. There might be ways around these structural problems,
providing you discover and use appropriate policies. In this discovery process, there is a lot to learn from the history of other more successful regions you identified in the first place.
Why are their industry better connected to regional universities? In many cases what appears to be a structural problem today is the result of policy decisions made some years ago.
For instance, in comparing connectivity between universities and industries between Nordic countries, we have found that an explanation to the excellent contacts between industries
and universities in Finland is due to certain reforms in the Finnish school system which created open doors from craft based education to poly-technical university-level education.
This is a good practice. The hypothesis is that it can be transferred to other regions in other countries through a reform of your existing educational institutions
Other good practices is the frequent contacts between some Norwegian universities and tourism is that the universities tries to support innovation in tourism through innovation programs,
in synergy with programs encouraging 11 tourist entrepreneurs to cooperate in promoting destinations. These are short term strategies,
Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU Cohesion Policy, Economic geography Working Paper, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen:
Csongrád and Hajdú-Bihar counties because of academic research in their universities the number of researchers is high. 7393 4120 Budapest 14125 capita (FTE) Apart from Budapest 8894 capita
and discussions about the further development and mainstreaming of ICT-ELI were conducted (list of participants is in the Annex 2). The authors are grateful to Professor Nancy Law (University of Hong kong) for organizing the expert workshop in Hong kong,
Ola Erstad (University of Oslo), Paul Kelley (Science+Technology in Learning), Marco Kools (OECD-CERI), Anne Looney (Irish National Council for Curriculum and Assessment
developed by researchers at Department of Social Informatics and methodology at the Faculty of social science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
) 12 8. 1 Decision-makers (e g. school head, chief education officer, university dean, etc. 16 10.7 Technology providers/developers 7 4. 7 Others 14 9. 4 Total 149 100.0 The vast majority of the respondents were from 22 European countries
teacher trainer researcher policy-maker (at EU, national, regional, local level) decision-maker (e g. school head, chief education officer, university dean, etc.
Name Affiliation Stefania Bocconi National Research Council of Italy Barbara Brecko JRC-IPTS Roberto Carneiro Portuguese Catholic University, Portugal Miroslava Cernochova
Charles University in Prague, Czech republic Jonatan Castaño-Muñoz JRC-IPTS Anusca Ferrari JRC-IPTS Conor Galvin University college Dublin, Ireland Seungyeon Han
Hanyang Cyber University, South korea Kampei Hayashi Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Panagiotis Kampylis JRC-IPTS Paul Kelley Science+Technology in Learning, United kingdom
Marco Kools CERI-OECD Carmen Lazaro Ítaca School, Spain Nancy Law University of Hong kong Chee-Kit Looi National Institute of Education
Yves Punie JRC-IPTS Magdalena Sverc Institute Anton Martin Slomsek, Slovenia Christine Redecker JRC-IPTS Tamotsu Tokunaga University of Tsukuba, Japan
Keith Turvey University of Brighton, United kingdom Stella Vosniadou National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Riina Vuorikari E-learning expert, Belgium 43 Participants in the'Scaling
of Education, Singapore Kai Ming Cheng University of Hong kong Seungyeon Han Hanyang Cyber University, South korea Ronghuai Huang Beijing Normal University, China Dae
Joon Hwang Korean Council for University Education, South korea Yu Kameoka Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Panagiotis Kampylis JRC-IPTS
Gwang-Jo Kim, UNESCO Bangkok Nancy Law University of Hong kong Chee-Kit Looi National Institute of Education
Singapore Jingyan Lu University of Hong kong Naomi Miyake University of Tokyo, Japan Jonghwi Park UNESCO Bangkok Yves Punie JRC-IPTS Mang She Education
Capability Maturity Model The Capability Maturity Model (CMM)( 4) was defined originally for software development by Carnegie mellon University
Version 1. 1. Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie mellon University, 2002.5. Spewak SH & Hill SC. Enterprise Architecture planning-developing a blueprint for data applications and technology.
and hosted by the Institute for Triple Helix Innovation based at the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United states of america. 13 A draft questionnaire was developed
SMES, research centres and universities. Once organised, these consortiums can participate in the programme by answering calls for proposals
1. Help for SMES and SME associations for outsourcing their research activities to providers of research services i e. universities or research centres.
No. of Phd Graduates in the Midwest Region 2008-2010 University of Limerick Mary Immaculate College Limerick Institute of technology 2008-2009 102 5 1 2009-2010
Currently 28%of graduates from the University of Limerick are being retained in the Midwest Region.
despite having no University 24 in the Region (there are a number of other Higher Level Institutes),
& Innovation Resources in the Midwest Region Chapter 04 4. 1 Higher education Institutes 4. 1. 1 University of Limerick Research Strengths The University of Limerick (UL
) recognises the mutual benefit that flows from engagement between the Midwest Region and the University's research goals.
Research Institutes represent the highest level of research infrastructure within the University, and provide focused support for research, both within faculties and across faculties.
University of Limerick currently has four research institutes, namely: The Materials and Surface Science Institute (MSSI),
while a new Clinical Education & Research Facility at the University Hospital Limerick campus will provide for the necessary education
is a collaboration between the University of Limerick, Limerick IT, IT Tralee and Mary Immaculate College.
Technology Centres are based in a University with support from partner colleges to deliver on the research needs of the companies.
Two Research Centres are hosted by the University of Limerick: The irish Centre for Composites Research and The Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Technology Centre.
The University also participates in a number of other research centres. Limerick Institute of technology is involved current in the International Energy Research Centre.
Collaboration between Industry and Higher education Institutes The Enterprise Research Centre in the University of Limerick has worked in collaboration with industry on a number of research initiatives.
It brings together people from businesses, universities, research, finance and technology organisations to stimulate innovation through knowledge transfer.
The Technology Transfer Office in the University of Limerick plays a key role in this area in the Midwest Region.
University of Limerick and Limerick Institute of technology have a key role to play. It is recommend that they continue to engage with other HEIS, private industry,
Enterprise Ireland NEXUS Innovation Centre Limerick Institute of technology Enterprise Research Centre Cook Medical University of Limerick Technology Transfer Office Vistakon IDA Ireland
Helpful inputs and suggestions were received from Joan Calzada Aymerich from the University of Barcelona (Chapter 4), Jake Kendall from the Gates Foundation, Anoush Tatevossian and Alex Rutherford from UN Global Pulse,
as well as the groups in the public sector, nonprofit, university and private in order to answer the needs of community Open Data Definition Open data means that data should be freely available to everyone to use
%and the Euro Area average of 8. 2%.As regards the implementation of E-learning solutions in universities,
in 2010 more than half of the universities (58%)had E-learning solutions, and in the years that followed other 9 universities have implemented such platforms by means of POSCCE and POSDRU financing.
Page 70 of 170 3. 1. 4 3. 1. 5 Strategic Lines of Development Strategic Lines of Development for ICT in Education in Romania Strategic Lines
women 83 71 53 57 University 50 50 39 37 Of which: women 29 29 24 23 1at the end of the year. 2source:
by means of governmental programmes and several other means The majority of the pupils in the urban environment have a satisfactory level of digital alphabetisation A great number of universities have already been equipped with e-learning platforms (more than 70
and the improvement of the access to technology irrespective of the provisions of the academic environment The computerisation of the libraries and the formation of digital competencies in the rural environment leading towards The decrease of the scholastic population in the pre-university teaching
between universities The students and the teachers'mobility The lack of collaboration between the business environment and the educational institutions The lack of correlation between the e-learning programmes included in the Sectoral Operational Programme Increase of economic competitiveness (SOP IEC) with the e-learning
universities, SMM, regulatory forum The introduction of fiscal facilities for the companies which invest in the research, development and innovation activity The technological advantage of the developed states from an economical point of view The increase competency
Romanian Office for Adoptions Page 146 of 170 Enrolment in education Primary school/high school/university Primary school 1. Enrolling based on the identity documents of parents
based on the means of the 8th grade exam, depending o preference University 1. Submission of Registration 2. Payment of the examination fee (if applicable) 3. Examination 4. Result
University of Debrecen DRS...Danube Region Strategy EDP...Entrepreneurial Discovery Process EKD...Individual Government Decision EMMI...
University of Pécs RIS3...Regional innovation strategy based on smart specialisation (national/regional research and innovation strategy for smart specialisation) RIA...
and 5 research institutes as well as from 24 university research teams sponsored by the HAS. 4
where the majority (in FTE) works outside Budapest or the central region owing mostly to the research-intensive universities of Baranya, Csongrád and Hajdú-Bihar counties.
as well as the promotion of partnerships between the universities, research institutions and innovation and technology centres.
More and more promising partnerships are established between the large companies and the universities. Start-up companies implementing world-class development with high growth capabilities appear.
The university and college R&d potential increases, knowledge centres are created, increasing economic openness. Many trans-European transport routes cross the region;
Lack of knowledge map in the universities. Very low wages to researchers in the international comparison.
Lack of entrepreneurship in the universities and research institutes, which can be caused by the sometimes contradictory and vague legislation and, in a sense, the over-regulated system.
The capacities and competences of the universities and the research institutes are linked to the corporate and public orders weakly compared to the possibilities.
if the university knowledge centres are strengthened and can put their research results effectively into practice and education,
Adjusting the trends of higher education to the economic needs improves the situation of trained young people in the rural university towns (Csongrád,
The participants of the working groups responsible for each sector involved the universities, research institutes, industrial platforms, clusters and the competent ministries.
basic types of organizations, namely, the universities as the organization training and spreading knowledge, the government research organizations which are engaged organizations in controlled strategic basic and applied research,
which is connected also to the mutual relations of the universities, the industry and the government.
Grouping of the RDI actors involved in the design Quadruple helix elements Groups Organisation Science Higher education institutions Universities Colleges Research institutes Academic and sectoral (public
The participants of the regional S3 working groups involved the representatives of the universities, research institutes, sectoral platforms, clusters and companies of the three counties in each region.
universities, research institutes, platforms, clusters, technology transfer organisations and incubators civil organisations and chambers entrepreneurs:
researchers, universities, research centres, university knowledge centres, etc. -public administration: counties, National Innovation Office, etc.
and universities are aligned not with the research needs of the industry. So-called soft innovation support instruments should be used also
of young researchers, further the harmonization of the university-academic and corporate capacities. Enhancing smart specialisation in frontier research ERDF,
of young researchers, further the harmonization of the university-academic and corporate capacities. Purchase of instruments and devices related to smart specialisation and supporting the interventions ensuring a new research generation in higher education 77 RDP Increasing the R&d activity and adaptation,
coordination of the academic/university capacities and the corporate capacities Purchase of instruments and devices related to smart specialisation and supporting the interventions ensuring a new research generation in higher education RDP Increasing the R&d
from grassroots movements, think-tanks and universities to big charities and public museums are hosting small-scale workshop spaces often with digital tools and 3d printing facilities (maker spaces and hacker spaces.
and University of Cambridge in November 2014 forecasts the growth of alternative finance (including peer-to-peer business lending,
These indicators now include innovative entrepreneurship and innovation in firms, universities and public research institutes,
as well as national research institutes and traditional universities. Building on existing schemes, such as innovation partnerships and PPPS with bigger telecommunications corporations, new schemes could be created to provide financial support for large-scale DSI experiments across Europe.
health authorities and universities to pilot large-scale DSI experiments around collaborative economy, direct democracy, distributed energy, civic health and bottom-up smart city solutions.
Ian Olney and Brian ferry Faculty of education University of Wollongong This paper describes a major development and research study that investigated the use of mobile technologies in higher education.
populations in university, but many university teachers are less than confident in their use. Even if a teacher is a competent and avid user of personal mobile devices,
he or she may feel ill-prepared to use them with students in pedagogically innovative and appropriate ways.
An alternative to personal learning is group-based professional development (PD) classes provided by universities.
These are often excellent sources of information and inspiration for university teachers, but few universities currently provide PD on personal mobile devices,
generally preferring to focus on more mainstream educational technologies such as computers, learning management systems software packages and audiovisual tools.
It is perhaps this last category that has seen the most interest and activity in terms of the use of mobile technologies in universities to date, that is, practical and administrative functions rather than pedagogical purposes.
and professional development activities through a dedicated website and a published handbook. 5. Implement the professional development activities for mobile learning across other faculties at the University of Wollongong
and disseminate in web-based template form to other universities across Australia and overseas. The following questions framed the research:
comprising investigation of the devices themselves and their functionality, the design and implementation of action learning professional development sessions for university teachers,
Palm Treo 680 smartphones and Apple 30g ipods were purchased by the University from Teaching and Learning funds, for use in the professional development workshops and implementations with students in classes.
and IT staff in the Faculty and University in consultation with the project leaders and project manager.
In this way, the workshop model is one that any university or institution could readily adapt
The project involved 19 people including teachers, IT and PD personnel from the university. It was a large and ambitious project that resulted not only in a range of innovative pedagogies,
and trains university and college students as student business advisors to provide customised Internet and e-commerce training to SMES.
the Case of Brazil, GEC Project, CRITO, Irvine University, www. crito. uci. edu. Wong, P.-K. and Y.-P. Ho (2004), E-commerce in Singapore:
Impetus and Impact of Globalization, GEC Project, CRITO, Irvine University, www. crito. uci. edu. World bank (2003), World Development Indicators Database, August 2003.
Zixiang, A t. and O. Wu (2004), Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-commerce in China, GEC Project, CRITO, Irvine University, www. crito. uci. edu
a study carried out on behalf of the Commission by Réseau Financement Alternatif (Belgium), the University of Bristol (UK), the University of Milan (Italy) and the Warsaw School of economics (Poland).
which include universities, are specialized in online dispute resolution. ECODIR is free of charge for consumers and involves a 3-step process of negotiation, mediation and recommendation.
A case study of buy. com, Green Design Institute at Carnegie mellon University, December 2008, available at:
Laura CORAS Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania eliza. paicu@yahoo. com Professor Phd Adrian Dumitru TANTAU Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Companies increasingly innovate with the aid of customers, suppliers, universities, competitors (Kruse, 2012), public research centres, competitors, groups of product users (Duarte and Sarkar, 2011), development partners,
and employees driven knowledge but proof of enhancing knowledge raised by universities and research laboratories in the innovation process of business actors is relatively scarce,
26%of innovative firms were engaged in co-operation with other enterprises, universities, public research institutes, suppliers, customers and competitors in the EU-27.
while the least common co-operation occurred with universities and research institutions (9%)(Mention, 2011).
Contents FOREWORD 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CHAPTER I REGIONAL INNOVATION, INNOVATION PLATFORMS AND UNIVERSITY RESEARCH 9 Orchestrating an Entrepreneurial Discovery Process 9 Open
Some Lessons 32 Open Innovation and Its Implication for Universities 41 How to Combine Openness and the Protection of Research Investments in University Inventions US and Nordic 49 CHAPTER II:
Foreword 5 Acknowledgements Last name First name Company/Organisation E-mail Aarts Emile Eindhoven University of Technology, Intelligent Lighting House e. h. l. aarts
Labs Europe & National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Innovation Value Institute martin. g. curley@intel. com den Ouden Elke Eindhoven University of Technology
Holzmann Thomas Strascheg Centre for Entrepreneurship Thomas. Holzmann@sce. de Huuskonen Mikko Lappeenranta University of Technology & the Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Finland Mikko.
Huuskonen@tem. fi Jussila Jari Tampere University of Technology jari. j. jussila@tut. fi Kärkkäinen Hannu Tampere University of Technology hannu. karkkainen
@tut. fi Kleibrink Alexander European commission (Joint Research Centre IPTS) alexander. kleibrink@ec. europa. eu Krawczyk Piotr JAMK University of Applied sciences Piotr.
KRAWCZYK@jamk. fi Kune Hank EDUCORE hankkune@educore. nl Lynn Carol National Chengchi University, New Club of Paris yehyunln@nccu. edu
. tw Markkula Markku EU Committee of the Regions, Aalto University markku. markkula@aalto. fi Pallot Marc MP CONEX
Nottingham University Business school, Presence & Innovation Lab Arts et Métiers Paristech marc. pallot@9online. fr Roos Jaspar Future Ideas EU & Chief
. sargsyan@cgi. com Schaffers Hans Aalto University School of business, Centre of Knowledge and Innovation Research (CKIR) hans. schaffers@aalto. fi Schmidt Suntje Leibniz
City of Eindhoven m. schreurs@eindhoven. nl Turkama Petra Aalto University Centre for Knowledge and innovation research (CKIR) petra. turkama@aalto. fi Valkenburg Rianne Eindhoven University of Technology, Intelligent Lighting Institute a c. valkenburg@tue
. nl 6 O P E N I N N O V A t I O N y E A r B o O k 2 0 1
In Schofield's article, open innovation and implications for universities are discussed. The drivers for practising open innovation need to change universities'behaviour and repositioning of their work in open innovation ecosystems.
The new role of universities also leads to new approaches in Intellectual Property (IP) management, interlinking universities to joint actions with other stakeholders and developing new operating modes for academic institutions
in the open innovation processes, beyond being only the scientific knowledge provider. Huuskonen elaborates the Intellectual Property rights (IPR) and intellectual capital in open ecosystems from a sharing and collaborative ecosystem perspective.
Innovation Platforms and University Research Orchestrating an Entrepreneurial Discovery Process The flow of targeted activities as parallel processes In this article we review the entrepreneurial discovery process as an active driver of open innovation ecosystems,
The Declaration calls for stimulating collaboration between citizens, businesses, universities and governments and for moving from the ERA towards European innovation ecosystems.'
universities, research institutions and enterprises. Operating since 2012, the EUE programme has brought together a broad group of researchers, innovators,
2 0 1 5 ACSI was developed co by the New Club of Paris and Finland's Aalto University.
and perspectives on real-world challenges brought to the camp by cities, regions, business organisations, universities and NGOS.
purposeful conversations and working with virtual worlds to explore what RIS3 collaboration could mean for their regions, the importance of Open Innovation 2. 0, the role of universities in entrepreneurial discovery,
as governments, businesses, universities and individuals learn to drive their own open entrepreneurial discovery processes.
Markku Markkula Advisor to the Aalto Presidents Aalto University President of the EU Committee of the Regions markku. markkula@cor. europa. eu Hank Kune Director, Innovation
because valuable innovation-related knowledge is being increasingly widely distributed to different actors, organisations (e g. companies, customers, suppliers, universities etc.)
In comparison to GBP 84 million of equity funding in UK according to the UK Alternative Finance Industry Report 2014 by Nesta and the University of Cambridge 14.
Lappeenranta University of Technology Press; 2013.9) Kärkkäinen H, Jussila J, Erkinheimo P, Hallikas J, Isokangas A, Jalonen H. Joukkoistamisen uusi aalto:
Hannu Kärkkäinen Professor Tampere University of Technology hannu. karkkainen@tut. fi Jari Jussila Researcher Tampere University of Technology jari. j. jussila@tut
Strong links with universities and academic experimenters, and education. Increasingly linkages established with related Future Internet initiatives.
Intertwined with universities educational programs, local innovation communities, living labs and SMES. Program and ecosystem creation Ecosystem building via use cases in thematic domains and in ICT domain.
The co-location centres are affiliated with universities. Different actor profiles result from the different positioning of the programmes in the innovation value chain.
From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations'.
. pdf Contact Dr Hans Schaffers Research director Aalto University School of business, Centre of Knowledge and Innovation Research (CKIR) hans. schaffers@aalto. fi Dr Petra
Turkama Director Aalto University School of business, Centre of Knowledge and Innovation Research (CKIR) petra. turkama@aalto. fi R E g I O N A l I N N
E A r C H 41 Open Innovation and Its Implication for Universities Abstract The article analyses open innovation trends and drivers affecting universities.
Driven by open innovation universities are placed in the centre of innovation ecosystems and are playing an ever-active role in knowledge creation, exchange and transfer.
universities have to consider specific factors in adapting to the open innovation paradigm. Such factors include a specific focus on knowledge co-creation and use-inspired research
These changes affect all organisations and institutions including government, public institutions and universities. Therefore it is important to understand the implication of open innovation on organisational development
1 5 Open innovation drivers affecting universities While companies are reshaping their organisational boundaries, universities are playing an everincreasing role in contributing to knowledge-based economies.
The Knowledge Economy Index developed by the World bank 5 considers education and innovation factors in measuring national effectiveness in developing knowledge-based economies.
Universities are not the exceptions and are affected by similar trends including: information, capital, people are becoming global assets The mobility
In addition there is an increasing trend of employees moving between industry and universities or keeping dual appointments.
This results in knowledge flows between universities, companies and external stakeholders; knowledge is becoming a source of competitive advantage This trend positions universities as key partners for industrial companies and places them in the epicentre of regional and national innovation ecosystems;
technology pace is increasing This drives universities to transform from classic academic institutions with an ivory tower mentality to entrepreneurial institutions proactively managing their knowledge.
Universities are building and managing strategic partnership and alliances with industry and technology companies; IP management is becoming a vital component of universities'strategies Universities are becoming more business savvy
in order to protect, manage and profit from their proprietary knowledge; innovation across the entire value chain This process positions universities as a key contributor to regional innovation and competitiveness.
In the era of open innovation universities play a more strategic and wider role as suppliers of an educated work force, knowledge, expertise and emerging technology.
At the same time universities act as partners and customers of regional services, SMES and large companies; growth of venture capital markets This trend makes it possible for promising ideas
and technologies to be developed further outside universities thus allowing universities to profit from their knowledge and research outputs;
customer expectations are increasing Universities are affected also by increasing customer sophistication, increased transparency and digitisation.
Such trends force universities to adapt innovative marketing strategies embracing social networks, interactive websites, intranet and content marketing techniques
in order to enhance their conversation with potential students, staff and public; pressure on universities to demonstrate impact from their research All economic players experience a growing economic and fiscal pressure.
As publically funded institutions, universities are required to demonstrate impact from their research. There is a growing public scrutiny of government funding,
which places additional pressure on universities to carry out cutting-edge research balancing between pure academic curiosity and translational outcome.
For example, research impact has been included in the new REF (Research Excellence Framework) assessment, which is the system for evaluating the quality of research in UK higher education institutions 7. Open innovation university To respond to global open innovation challenges universities need to open up their business models
and review their processes in order to facilitate open innovation interactions. There is a global rise of innovative and entrepreneurial universities
which are opening their organisational boundaries to play an active role in regional and national development.
We will define such universities as Open Innovation Universities. A typical open innovation university infrastructure includes the following functions:
strategy office to monitor international trends and benchmarking; marketing and communication department to interact with stakeholders and public;
alumni relationship office; research office to monitor and develop funding opportunities; technology and knowledge transfer offices;
education technology structures to develop education and learning products; industry liaison office for developing partnership with R E g I O N A l I N N O V A t I O N,
enterprise infrastructure focusing on entrepreneurship agenda within the university and professional and executive education units offering commercial programmes.
An open innovation university infrastructure is connected closely to government innovation initiatives, policies and research assessment strategies.
Figure 1 depicts an organisational structure of an open innovation university. To respond to an Open Innovation agenda,
universities are further adapting their strategies, processes and policies in order to develop innovative and sustainable business models.
Key trends in universities'open innovation practices include: knowledge co-creation and use-inspired research;
Knowledge co-creation and use-inspired research In its Global Information technology Report 2010-11,8 the World Economic Forum provides ranking of university-industry R & D collaboration based on
The ease of doing business between universities and industry is a key factor in pursuing an open innovation agenda.
Both university and industry represent inherent differences in their goals and organisational cultures which can affect the effectiveness of knowledge
Table 2 depicts the key differences affecting university-industry partnerships. Figure 1: Open Innovation University organisational structure 44 O P E N I N N O V A t I O N y E A r B o
O k 2 0 1 5 Table 2: Cultural differences between academia and industry Parameter Academia Industry Responsibility Social responsibilities Shareholders responsibilities Research type Basic research Applied research Output New
Research strategy Scientific freedom Technology roadmaps Time horizon Long-term Short-term A traditional role of university research is to conduct fundamental pre-competitive research
university and industry with overlapping interaction mechanism and a free circulation of elite between these areas.
income leveraging government funds access to facilities case studies source of funding demonstrating impact competitiveness knowledge based economy innovation national growth Examples of successful university
Catapults network 16, Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) 17 are specifically aiming at universities and developing value networks and partnership with large businesses and SMES.
Figure 3 shows the position of a university within an open innovation value network as a hub of innovation dialogue and activities.
Universities are playing a critical role as a key source of technology landscape mapping trends and technology scouting 18.
In parallel, companies are increasingly adapting a systematic technology scouting process building strategic partnership with universities.
The position of a university within an open innovation value network Need for stronger IP management Open innovation imposes new challenges on universities.
According to the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) universities provide a significant economic impact from their research 19.
According to the AUTM reports university licensing increased the USA's gross industry output by USD 836 billion (1996-2010),
university technologies supported an estimated three million jobs in the economy (1996-2010) and technology transfer contributed to creation of 671 new companies and 591 new products in 2011 alone.
There is an observable trend within universities to review their research strategies focusing on developing core expertise
Most successful universities run their own Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) and have strong teams of technology managers.
One of the UK's leading companies in technology transfer Imperial Innovations grew from the TTO to become the first UK university commercialisation company to complete the IPO.
University approaches to managing their IP portfolio range from open access initiatives to technology commercialisation programmes.
The Easy Access IP 22 is a growing initiative of more than 20 universities worldwide to offer free licences for their technologies to industry.
At the other end of the continuum are university funds 23, which act as venture capital to spur innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth.
According to the Thomson One database there were 26 university funds established between 1973 and 2010 24.
The main objective of such funds is to invest equity capital to university technology companies and speedup commercialisation processes within universities.
Another development in university innovation management and enterprise are collaborations between universities to expand the pool of technologies, expertise and capacity.
which recently named the top university business incubator in Europe. CETSQUARED is the enterprise collaboration between University of Bath, University of Bristol, University of Exeter, University of Southampton and University of Surrey 25.
New skills, programmes and learning technologies The spread of open innovation and a greater permeability of organisational boundaries place new demands on skills and capabilities of employees.
Universities need to respond to new requirements and prepare students who are market ready to embrace open innovation.
creativity and innovation management subjects into university curriculum across subject areas. For example, the University of Sidney 26 has been reviewing its curriculum,
placing the emphasis on integration of education and research, developing creative and flexible thinkers, fostering enquiring minds, developing leadership and communication skills.
The University of Aberdeen has introduced Sixth Century Courses 28, a range of innovative courses introducing students to the breath of disciplines and developing flexibility,
and chaos. A greater openness of university education programmes is manifested further through a rising choice of courses on MOOCS platforms (e g.
One of the ways that universities transfer their knowledge to public and business sectors is their continuing professional development courses and executive education programmes.
University marketing in the age of open innovation Open Innovation brings new opportunities and new challenges to universities in promoting their education programmes,
research outcomes and engaging with students, researchers, industry and wider community. The use of social media by universities is on the rise with many leading universities having hundreds of thousands followers on their social network pages.
For example the Massachusetts institute of technology has 170 000+followers on its Twitter page 35, more than 600 000+likes on its news page on Facebook 36 and 650 000+subscribers on its Open Course Ware page on Youtube with millions of views 37.
A greater transparency and openness in communication approaches results in new technology and trends in developing universities websites.
Universities are reshaping and restructuring their websites R E g I O N A l I N N O V A t I O N,
and is becoming a prominent feature in the university diary. Universities are gradually exploring crowdsourcing and crowdfunding opportunities.
While there is a need to pay some scrutiny to funding sources there are new crowdfunding platforms
while universities build experience and confidence in using new tools and solutions. External channels for knowledge transfer have been embraced already by researchers.
According to the study consulting and conversation channels resulted in staggering cumulative 44%(Figure 4). Conclusion Open innovation is affecting the way universities operate,
It is fundamental for universities to find the right balance between openness and knowledge commercialisation in order to perform their mission,
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 20, No 6, pp. 653-666.12) http://www. research. ibm. com/university/collaborativeresearch/ocr. shtml (13
) Perkmann M.,Salter A.,How to Create Productive Partnerships with Universities, MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer 2012 (14) Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe:
Research Technology Management, Jul-Aug 2013.19) Association of University Technology Managers. 20) Imperial Innovations Annual report, 2013.21) Making Industry-University partnerships work, Science Business Innovation Board (2012).(22) http://easyaccessip. com
(23) Croce A.,Grilli L.,Murtinu S.,Venture capital Enters Academia: An Analysis of University-Managed Funds, Journal of Technology Transfer, 2013.24) Thomson One database.
25) http://www. setsquared. co. uk (26) http://sydney. edu. au/(27) http://www. lse. ac. uk/intranet/students/LSE100
E A r C H 49 How to Combine Openness and the Protection of Research Investments in University Inventions US and Nordic Views Who owns the rights to university inventions and under which terms?
as the US system is based university and the Swedish system is based researcher. However, both systems seem to produce successful outcomes.
ownership of university patents is regulated as well as copyrighted in relation to computer programming. Regarding the other types of rights (e g. artistic copyright, design rights), the system relies on contractual freedom.
In universities, the issue is subject to rather sensitive debate on the balance of interests between the researcher,
the university and the societal interests, including also the interests of the surrounding business community and companies.
The university as a stakeholder has a mission to maintain a high level of research and education,
The university also has the duty to disseminate knowledge and make sure that the new knowledge is used widely.
Depending on the background philosophical motivations behind the university IPR system this is sometimes seen as contrary to the basic tasks of the university the greater the university's freedom
and distance from business companies is, the better the overall system. In the classic university philosophy of e g.
Robert K. Merton, the independency of the university is among the highest values of the university system 1. The business interests of companies may be seen as contradictory to this.
Yet, especially in the US system, the dissemination of knowledge does not only mean publishing articles in scientific journals,
Patenting may also be seen as contradictory to the universities'basic mission to encourage the free flow of new information on the other hand,
the US system being concentrated heavily around university ownership of IP, and the Swedish system representing a researchercentred system.
Finland basic principles of university IP Universities'duties According to the Finnish Universities Act (para. 2, 558/2009, unofficial translation), the mission of the university shall be to promote free research and scientific
'In carrying out their mission, the universities must promote lifelong learning, interact with the surrounding society
The issue of university inventions is particularly relevant regarding the last part, i e. promoting the impact of research findings and artistic activities on society.
According to Section 3 of the Act, the universities shall have autonomy with a view to securing the 50 O P E N I N N O V A t I O N y E A r
The universities are given an opportunity to express their opinion on proposed legislation concerning their issues.
The universities are divided into two main categories (Section 5 of the Act), the foundations (Aalto University, Tampere University of Technology),
which are governed also by the Finnish Foundations Act (109/1930) and corporations under public law (public universities).
The public universities are independent legal persons. The public universities may undertake commitments, obtain rights in their own name
and possess movable and immovable property. A university may pursue business activities which support the performance of their core mission (as in Section 2 of the Act).
In the following I shall concentrate into the main elements of the Act on the University Inventions 2 made at Higher education institutions (369/2006)
and the Act on the Right in Employee Inventions (656/1967). Basic principles of the Act on the Right to University Inventions (369/2006) The Act on the Right to University Inventions regulates the protection
and rights of patentable inventions created by employees of the Finnish universities. The allocation of rights regarding the research-initiated IPR depends on the nature of the research.
The main categories are‘open research'(the‘business as usual'type of research carried out in universities)
and‘sponsored research'3, which refers to outside financing of the research. Open research is done (Act, Sec. 3) under employment in the university, without outside financing or contractual partners.
Contract research is a research service carried out for remuneration. Contract research may involve partners outside the university either as researchers or financiers.
The main principle is stated, unless otherwise in the law, that the creator has the same right to the invention as any other (stand-alone) inventor.
The inventor must inform the university about the invention. The inventor has a right to equitable remuneration regarding the rights that are transferred to the university.
In the Finnish system, the essential criterion is whether the invention or research result was produced in open
Open research The university can (the Act on University Inventions, Section 6) take the rights to an invention created in open research under certain conditions.
or informed the university in writing of the intent to utilise the invention, the university can take the rights to the invention.
Before taking the rights, the university must enquire whether the inventor intends to utilise the invention himself.
If the university misses the six-month deadline after being informed of the invention, the university is deemed to have waived its right to the invention.
Despite the expression‘university can take the rights, 'the procedure in all its complexity is in practice a voluntary affair to the researcher.
The researcher has no reason not to proceed with patenting by himself if there is any hope of having the invention commercialised.
The researcher's own activity and actions in exploiting the invention rule out the legal rights of the university.
In comparison to the US and Swedish systems (see later in more detail) the Finnish system in this sense is some kind of hybrid of the university-centred model (US)
and the researcher-centred model (Sweden), leaving however room for speculation, the Finnish model is designed to be clear enough to support quick transaction processes and efficient utilisation of the invention.
Sponsored research The university has the right to redeem the rights relating to sponsored research within a period of six months from the invention disclosure by the inventor.
If the university does not claim the right within this timeframe in a written manner,
the university is deemed to have waived its rights to the invention. After the university has made the claim to the invention,
the researcher is obliged to sign the transfer agreement. Inventions in employment The law on Inventions in Employment (656/1967) concerns the allocation and protection of rights to inventions made under conditions of employment
Comparing legal principles inventions in employment vs university inventions The acts described above have common features
it can be said that the University Inventions Act leaves it essentially for the university and the inventor to agree who will be the owner of IP and the primary responsible for the utilisation of the invention.
The second feature drawing attention is that the university gets the rights primarily in sponsored research,
A researcher, who is employed by the university, is working under conditions of open research. He has the privilege of exploiting his inventions and gain the rights for himself.
Passivity during the process intentional or not may lead to the rights being transferred to the university.
The notion that the universities would be investing into research is not common to the Finnish higher education ideology.
The idea of an independent university in the sense described in e g. Robert K. Merton's philosophy is very close to home in the Finnish value system 4. The idea more common in both the US and Swedish systems
that commercial dissemination of inventions counts as duties of universities, seems remote to the Finnish ideology at least on the level of jurisdiction and administration.
and therefore an important part of the tasks of universities. If we think of the universities as independent and autonomous units,
it would be relatively easy to change the argument towards the idea of research funding as investment;
the university makes an investment into intangible assets, namely research results and findings. Like any investment, this could be successful or lead to failure.
This could make the universities more free to judge where to invest, but at the same time, the ultimate financier would set targets not necessarily scientific but economic.
This position would also mean greater independency and responsibility for the university as rights holder, rights owner, licensor and start-up/incubator.
The other issue regarding the University Inventions Act regards the position of sponsored research. The idea of strengthening the university's position in this area seems rather peculiar,
as this most certainly should reflect on the interest of the investor to participate if the result is awarded to the university,
why should a private company invest into such results? This is, in my understanding, not the case, however.
there are in fact two kinds of sponsored research one sponsored by state research institutes other than universities,
should not the law better reflect the actual practices in use in universities which it does not seem to be doing at the moment.
USA the university-centred system In this section, I shall make some observations regarding the US system.
OTD operates under Harvard university's supervision 5. The starting point of the policy of OTD is that all stakeholders, the university,
the publication must be carried out in agreement with the university. The invention must remain patentable; too early publication may jeopardise patentability,
The general principle is that the legal position of the university is stronger than in Finland.
The university owns the results created with research utilising the university's resources. It is the university that has the right to agree on the rights and the use of the IP.
In the case of OTD, the Harvard university has authorised the OTD to use some of the university's powers.
The inventions in the Harvard system are divided into two categories‘‘supported inventions'and‘incidental inventions'.
'The inventor has an obligation to inform the university about the invention. OTD defines the category in which the invention will be positioned.
Regarding incidental inventions, the university will have a right to use the invention for research and educational purposes,
As Harvard university tops all listings of the world's most prestigious universities, it is safe to conclude that
the system is most likely supportive to the international success of the university. Elements of US debate Bayh-Dole criticism In the US the debate on university inventions has continued for decades.
The starting point was the passing of the so-called Bayh-Dole Act in 1980, which re-organised the use of university inventions and related patents.
The university inventions were regarded as under-used as they were technically federal property. This was basically sound from the point of view of the federation's tactical interest,
but meant also that there was little incentive and thus use of the resource. There seems to be no real controversy regarding the views on Bayh-Dole's efficiency in this respect 7. In the US,
universities are considered to have an important role in disseminating inventions in society's interest. What is interesting from a European point of view
the case seems to be quite the opposite it is justified perfectly to consider a successful commercial adaptation to be part of the university's task
IP-based technology transfer is part of the universities'core missions, along with research, education and enhancing well-being 9. The universities should create a clear mission for their technology transfer,
which takes into account the principle of dissemination of inventions for societal benefit 10. Technology transfer is seen as a very practical line of operation, where skills,
which places the university inventions in the university's ownership, has been criticised e g. on creating a double incentive:
Sweden researcher in the centre Swedish universities do well in international rankings. In the Shanghai ranking 2014 Karolinska Institutet scores highest of the Swedish universities at rank 47, Uppsala 60 and Stockholm 78 19.
Swedish University Law (Högskolelagen 2 sect. amended 119/2013) defines education and research as the core missions of universities,
but in addition are the interaction with and giving information about research to society, as well as making efforts in order to have the research result used for a‘beneficial'purpose 20.
The definition of utilisation uses the Swedish word‘nyttan, 'which can be translated as‘benefit 'or‘gain'for the society.
the development in Europe is likely to have moved towards university-centrism during the past decades.
Karolinska Institutet 24 In Sweden universities are a part of public administration. The laws governing public institutions cover also universities,
like e g. the law on public information. As a starting point, the universities cannot operate in the market or foster business activities due to their nature as part of the State's administration.
For this reason, in the year 1995 Karolinska Institutet (KI) founded a separate holding-company (KI Holding AB) to take care of commercialisationrelated activities.
who seeks investable projects from universities not only from KI. The State owns all these companies,
Scilife Lab is owned co by four Swedish universities. 54 O P E N I N N O V A t
The KI model resembles the recent Danish‘node'strategy suggested for universities 25. In the‘node',the main target is not exactly legislative development but rather developing efficient commercial practices, deepening know-how of TT and developing deeper relationships with related businesses.
This is due to the fact that the researcher seems less dependent on the‘mother-university 'but has the legal position,
the Swedish universities however do not seem satisfied with their system but see that enhancing the universities'legal position in IP would be desired a direction in the future regarding university inventions.
Grace periods Would they allow a combination of openness and patenting? The US patenting system (as well as Canada,
The role of universities is probably changing slowly due to economic and technological development. It would make sense to see the universities'main task as investment to research,
the protection and utilisation of which are important parts of the universities'societal functions. This would enhance independency
and create a need for long-term planning of research activities from scientific and societal aspects.
The relationship between the researcher and the university needs a closer look. As the researcher is employed by the university,
it could be questioned, what is the reason and incentive for having the researcher make inventions on public funding that will become his or her personal assets.
It would clearly make more sense to have the rights being agreed on a contractual basis rather than have the legal disincentive to make all thus-produced IP automatically the property of the university.
Debate and legislation on university inventions tends to concentrate on patents. However, this is not the whole picture of IP created in universities there are copyrightable computer programs, content,
literal and artistic material and design to look after, too. In Finland, there is an exception regarding computer programming the IP of computer programming belongs to the employer,
unless it is a university, in which case the rights belong to the programmer. The direction of the incentive should be looked better at in this case.
and evaluate the role of universities in changing technological and economic circumstances. References (1) Merton R.,‘The key elements of university ideals:
communalism, universalism, disinterestedness, organised skepticism'(source: Wikipedia).()( 2) Translations available in English are unofficial. There are several unofficial translations available on the Internet with certain differences.
‘Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public interest',Washington. 8) This is compatible with the terms of the world's most prestigious science awards, the Nobel prize.
9) ibid. s. 2. 10) ibid. s. 4. N. B.,in the Finnish university debate it is claimed often that IPR privatises information
'16) ibid. s. 448.17) ibid. s. 445.18) ibid. s. 447.19) Of Nordic universities, the additional top 100 universities are Copenhagen (39), Oslo (69) and Helsinki (73).(20
‘The US model is focused very much on creating (economic) incentives for universities to commercialize their research output,
25)‘ Tech Transfer in Danish Universities what have learned we from ten years of trying to make money on research?'
D. Adjunct Professor, Lappeenranta University of Technology mikko. huuskonen@tem. fi 57 CHAPTER II: Open Innovation 2. 0:
Dr Marc Pallot Senior Research Associate Nottingham University Business school Marc. Pallot@nottingham. ac. uk Dr Thomas Holzmann Scientific Project Manager and Research Associate Strascheg Centre for Entrepreneurship Thomas. Holzmann@sce. de Piotr
Krawczyk Senior Lecturer JAMK University of Applied sciences Piotr. krawczyk@jamk. fi 64 O P E N I N N O V A t
or at universities and government institutions. Often, these organisations are based inside ministries and other public administrations.
research and development institutions and universities into internal innovation processes in the firms. The labs'operators thus offer cost intensive equipment to users who otherwise would have no resources to set up comparable technology intensive environments.
Design Research Lab, Udk Berlin The Design Research Lab belongs to the University of the Arts in Berlin (Udk.
The Technical University of Berlin and the Deutsche telekom Laboratories (T-Labs) founded the lab in 2005.
technical universities, research centres and techno-parks; O P E N I N N O V A t I O N 2. 0:
A changing role for knowledge organisations Many relevant aspects in the relationship between open innovation and academia can be found in the context provided by the concept of 3rd Generation Universities.
The framework of 3rd Generation Universities, as proposed by Wissema 6, describes the transition of Western (European) universities over the past millennium.
He distinguished three generations of universities that are markedly different with respect to their positioning in society and their working approach.
The first generation starting with the universities of Bologna and Paris in the middle Ages, was aimed at providing a kind of universal knowledge,
defending the truth through education in Latin, provided by professionals in colleges that used methods from scholastics and arts.
and often referred to as Humboldtian universities, were aimed at exploring nature through research, conducted by mono-disciplinary professionals who applied scientific methods
For the last thirty years we have had now the concept of third-generation universities, which aim to generate value from knowledge by supporting multi-disciplinary academic entrepreneurs in turning knowledge into services and products that impact society.
Third-generation universities combine education, research and value creation. However, the way they are organised and their positioning in society are markedly different.
These universities consequently need to build on the insights gained from their target group, and in addition they need to understand how the academic knowledge can be transferred effectively to those who can create value from it.
Many universities still operate at the level of the second generation. A true third-generation university applies a different approach to the working methods used by the previous generation.
Exploitation of knowledge should be a core business, and should become a third objective in addition to education and scientific research. 92 O P E N I N N O V A t
I O N y E A r B o O k 2 0 1 5 Universities should be eager to operate in an international and competitive market.
As an example, Eindhoven University of Technology has expressed the wish to become a third-generation university.
'and its strong record in working together with industry provide the university with the knowledge
the university is exploring ways to get more deeply involved in activities that take place at the level of the municipality of Eindhoven.
and Valkenburg, R.,Vision and roadmap urban lighting Eindhoven 2030 Research results, Eindhoven University of Technology, ISBN 978-90-386-3225-4 july 2012.4
) www. enigma-project. eu (5) www. eindhoven. nl/smartlight (6) Wissema, J. G.,(2009), Towards the Third Generation University, Edward Elgar Publishing
Elke den Ouden TU/e Fellow New Business Development In public-Private Value Networks Strategic Director Lighthouse Intelligent Lighting Institute@Eindhoven University
Rianne Valkenburg Value Producer Lighthouse & Professor of Design Innovation at The hague University of Applied sciences Intelligent Lighting Institute@Eindhoven University of Technology a c. valkenburg@tue
Scientific director Intelligent Lighting Institute@Eindhoven University of Technology e. h. l. aarts@tue. nl 2015 EU Yearbook O P E
universities, training centres and philanthropists all became active partners in Kanazawa city's efforts in preserving traditional Japanese crafts and folk art.
universities and research institutes were provided with resources to advance the relevant technologies (execution and resources).
As the second-largest University City in France, Lyon has sufficient supply of talent in the creative industries.
universities and research centers to achieve fields of excellence through offering high-quality business support services Fia's restaurant used 80%organic food.
Close to the city center, Midsweden University has over 7000 students doing research in environmental sciences tourism, sports and event technology."
Between dream and reality lies complexity. inaugural address delivered by Jan Rotmans on assuming office as a professor of‘Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions'at the Erasmus University Rotterdam on Friday, 3 june 2005.
Carol Yeh-Yun Lin, Professor National Chengchi University, Taiwan New Club of Paris, board member yehyunln@nccu. edu. tw 104 O P
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011