Academic assessment (1) | ![]() |
Academic evaluation (33) | ![]() |
Academic qualification (6) | ![]() |
Academic recognition (1) | ![]() |
Accreditation (70) | ![]() |
Code of ethics (30) | ![]() |
Code of practice (11) | ![]() |
Educational effectiveness (1) | ![]() |
Educational quality (58) | ![]() |
Educational standard (6) | ![]() |
League tables (32) | ![]() |
Learning outcomes (18) | ![]() |
Peer review (45) | ![]() |
Recognition of prior learning (1) | ![]() |
Student survey (32) | ![]() |
Study credits (111) | ![]() |
Study programme (93) | ![]() |
, legal cases, maps, translations or editing of major works within academic standards. Table 1 identifies the primary form of communications for the main discipline groups.
and generally improving scientific and academic standards in Germany. Methodology, incl. time-frame, resources, costs, technologies:
Notable strengths include its large market size (19th) and high educational standards, in particular its high enrollment rates (it is ranked 20th on the quantity of education subpillar).
and in the EU may come to play a harmonising role with regard to educational standards in Europe, but they are not yet effective (Westerheijden et al.,
For our field-based rankings, subject-level approaches to quality and educational standards do exist. In business studies, thetriple crown'of specialized
works within academic standards. 12 See: http://www. kowi. de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp/assessing-europe-university-based-research. pdf 61 Table 3-2:
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011