peer review

Peer review

Academic assessment (1)
Academic evaluation (33)
Academic qualification (6)
Academic recognition (1)
Accreditation (70)
Code of ethics (30)
Code of practice (11)
Educational effectiveness (1)
Educational quality (58)
Educational standard (6)
League tables (32)
Learning outcomes (18)
Peer review (45)
Recognition of prior learning (1)
Student survey (32)
Study credits (111)
Study programme (93)

Employing a method based on competitive peer reviews, ANR attaches great importance to providing the scientific community with instruments

Audits and peer reviews can help embed stronger support for entrepreneurship. In a number of European countries (eg.

The institute produces a self evaluation every three years, one in preparation of the external review, and he other three years thereafter as a mid-term review.

Previous peer reviews rewards and prizes may also be cited. In the past few years several evaluation committees, mainly in the natural and life sciences, have used the outcomes of extended bibliometric studies carried out by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS.

Using subjective inputs peer reviews from academics and employers and quantitative data, such as the numbers of international students and faculty,

and global presence, with the quality of each determined by a combination of qualitative, subjective inputs peer reviews from academics and employers and quantitative data,

and the Momentum programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences(-)No action or initiative could have been identified that support the introduction of foreign experts in peer reviews.

including peer reviews and real time evaluation methods to promote cross-pollination such as NESTA's evaluation of Health Launchpad. 5 106 THE OPEN BOOK OF SOCIAL INNOVATION End notes 1. See for example,

. pdf 22 The Commission has set up the S3 Platform55 to support the regions through peer reviews and workshops to share best practices and work towards the preparation of these strategies.

The last two in depth cluster case studies and peer reviews, and foresight provide the opportunity to integrate the field knowledge held and concrete experimentation carried out, by regional actors in the spirit of an'entrepreneurial discovery process'.

leverage of private financing. 21 http://ec. europa. eu/information society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/index en. htm 32 3.'Cluster'in depth case studies and peer reviews:

The sources for their baseline and achievement value could be the monitoring system, official data bases, ad hoc surveys, peer reviews,

and a'twinning+'methodology that combines elements of traditional peer reviews and twinning in small learning groups of interested agencies.

This has been addressed by thematic network events, peer reviews and twinning. An example of this is the pre-commercial procurement that in many countries is a new approach on demand side support

and prepare recommendations on how to provide innovation support services more efficiently. 2. Carry out peer reviews (mandatory) to search for better practices in providing innovation support services.

The main objective of this task was to organise peer reviews through visiting programmes aimed at assessing current support mechanisms

This has been addressed by thematic network events, peer reviews and twinning. An example of this is the pre-commercial procurement that is a new approach on demand side support in many countries.

and included the synthesis of the project results. 2. Work package 2 included peer reviews of European agencies

and effectiveness of innovation agencies and programmes. 5. Work package 5 included peer reviews of good practices at innovation agencies outside of Europe. 6. Work package 6 included improving

IPF has invited also experts from European innovation support agencies to participate in peer review panels and as hosts for peer reviews.

Peer reviews have been beneficial for identifying good practises and it seems like it has been easier for the group to engage in identification and analysis than in transfer and implementation.

The work package has established a model for the conduct of peer reviews. However, there are areas for improvement,

Peer reviews outside of Europe are more challenging due to language issues, incentives and shorter time frames for reviews.

when arranging with these types of peer reviews. Twinning Twinning has been successful and three out of four of the countries that were involved actively in the twinning process have implemented some version of pre-commercial procurement.

Peer reviews cannot completely analyse transferability and hand over design recommendations; instead, the design recommendations have to be developed as a co-creation process at the beginning of the twinning exercise between those implementing the good practices and those providing the good practices.

the main sources have been the peer reviews of The irish initiative for High-Potential Startups, the Scottish Proof of Concept programme, the Finnish VIGO-and Young Innovative Enterprise-programme and The french Venture capital

Initiating and performing peer reviews, twinning's and EFQMASSESSMENTS do not happen automatically. Continuation of these activities will need probably a central body that facilitates the process

Develop and refine tools for learning, like Peer reviews, EFQM and Twinning. Be a platform that offers the service to assist agencies in learning through utilising the tools.

This will be complemented by external reviews of regulators'performance against the Framework. The self-assessments and external reviews of regulator performance will be publicly available.

Public consultation on the Framework was undertaken in September 2014. We anticipate releasing a final Framework in October as part of 2014 Spring Repeal Day.

and 3) Policy workshops to carry out peer reviews of policy schemes. The Innobarometer is an opinion poll conducted among enterprises to gather their appreciation of innovation challenges (see http://europa. eu. int/comm/enterprise/innovation/index. htm)

and a'twinning+'methodology that combines elements of traditional peer reviews and twinning in small learning groups of interested agencies.

Using formal programme evaluation/review mechanisms such as peer review or other external review schemes, and in general the adoption of an‘evaluation culture'for innovation support;

Implementation of formal programme evaluation/review mechanisms such as peer review or other external review schemes, and overall the adoption of an‘evaluation culture'for innovation support;

Further improvements in a future vision and strategy process refer to the introduction of peer reviews

but this country sees a growing use of peer reviews as a complementary assessment method. It is not possible through this enquiry to assess the quality

or of peer reviews that can hone and improve the analyses. Instead, consumers of such research have no option

According to the external review ordered by the European commission (13), the main areas for improvement were on industrial impact and articulation of vision and Key Performance Indicators for the programme.

The first external review of implementation of NRPE will be initiated in 3q 2014.29 Appendix I: Governance of the Research System in Ireland Source:

leverage of private financing. 21 http://ec. europa. eu/information society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/index en. htm 32 3.'Cluster'in depth case studies and peer reviews:

The sources for their baseline and achievement value could be the monitoring system, official data bases, ad hoc surveys, peer reviews,

in particular through peer reviews involving public officials, practitioners and regional stakeholders. The goal of this approach is to avoid unnecessary duplication and fragmentation of efforts,