Tropes

impactlab_2010 02207.txt

#Monsanto Takes Fight To Control Your Food To Supreme court The battle over the non-regulated status of genetically modified crops has reached the US Supreme court. Monsanto has appealed, not surprisingly a lower court decision that halted the continued unregulated release and planting of the agrifood giants Roundup Ready Alfalfa. Background and implications of the case, after the jump In 2004 Monsanto and their partner Forage Genetics petitioned the USDA for the go-ahead to commercially release Roundup Ready alfalfa. A year later the USDA granted non-regulated status. Between 2005 and 2007 300,000 acres of the seeds were planted in the U s. Meanwhile in 2006, Geertson Seed Farms and Trask Family Farms filed a lawsuit against the Secretary of agriculture on the grounds that the USDA department responsible for the deregulated approval of the crop had violated the National Environmental Policy Act by not preparing an Environmental Impact Statement. In a position paper posted on their website Geerston Seed Farm explains the rationale for the original lawsuit. Geertson Seed Farms opposes the commercialization of Roundup Ready alfalfa because the USDA failed to properly consider the environmental impacts and associated economic effects of commercialization. The deregulation and commercialization of Roundup Ready alfalfa poses significant problems that must be considered and resolved in particular concerning biological contamination and weed resistance development. Agriculture Law reports that the district court agreed with the plaintiffs that the environmental assessment undertaken by the USDA was inadequate and a full impact statement is necessary. The court allowed Monsanto to join the suit as a defendant which is how the case arrived at the Supreme court. msnbc reported on the tone of the Supreme court hearing. Several justices appeared skeptical that the lower court had the authority to fully ban the sale of the product because of the pending environmental review. Chief justice John Roberts questioned why the court issued the injunction instead of simply remanding the matter back to the USDA. The hearing also gave Justice Antonin Scalia an opportunity to share his decidedly unscientific assessment of the situation by stating oethis isnt the contamination of the New york city water supply, No, no its not. He continues, oethis isnt the end of the world, it really isnt. Lets hope. With thoughts such as those and the fact that the USDA has completed now an Environmental Impact Statement that backs up their initial assessment to give the crop non-regulated status Id wager that come June when the court delivers its ruling that Monsanto will be back in the genetically modified alfalfa business. Shareholders will be pleased with the bump in share price while the rest of us hold our breath and hope that Justice Scalias words remain true. More on Monsanto at Treehugger. comstudy Finds Monsantos GMO Corn Causes Organ Damage in Rodentsthe Fight Over the Future of Food: Monsanto, GMOS, and How to Feed the Worldmonsanto oeseedless Corn Sold To South african Farmersgermany Bans Planting of Monsanto GM Cornout, Monsanto! No GMOS in National Wildlife Refuge, Says Federal Judgemonsanto and Michael Pollan Talk about Creating a World That Can Feed Itself

< Back - Next >