#Two months after Paypal opened its platform, 15,000 developers had used it to create new payment services The banks and credit card companies have spent 50 years building a proprietary, locked-down system that handles roughly $2 trillion in credit card transactions and another $1. 3 trillion in debit card transactions every year. Until recently, vendors had little choice but to participate in this system, even though like a medieval toll road it is long and bumpy and full of intermediaries eager to take their cut. All of that is about to change. A simple typo gave Michael Ivey the idea for his company. One day in the fall of 2008 Iveys wife, using her pink RAZR phone, sent him a note via Twitter. But instead of typing the letter d at the beginning of the tweet which would have sent the note as a direct message, a private note just for Ivey she hit p. It could have been an embarrassing snafu, but instead it sparked a brainstorm. Thats how you should pay people, Ivey publicly replied. Iveys friends quickly jumped into the conversation, enthusiastically endorsing the idea. Ivey, a computer programmer based in Alabama, began wondering if he and his wife hadnt hit on something: What if people could transfer money over Twitter for next to nothing, simply by typing a username and a dollar amount? Just a decade ago, the idea of moving money that quickly and cheaply would have been ridiculous. Checks took ages to clear. Transferring money from one bank account to another could take days, as banks leisurely handed off funds, levying fees nearly every step of the way. Credit cards made it a little easier to pass money to a friend provided that friend owned a credit card reader and didnt mind paying a few percentage points in fees or waiting a couple of days for the payment to process. Ivey got around that problem by using Paypal. Since 1998 Paypal had enabled people to transfer money to each other instantly. For the most part, its powers were confined to ebay, the online auction company that purchased Paypal in 2002. But last summer, Paypal began giving a small group of developers access to its code, allowing them to work with its super-sophisticated transaction framework. Ivey immediately used it to link users Twitter accounts to their Paypal accounts, and his new company, Twitpay, took off. Today, the service has almost 15,000 users. That may not sound like much, but it sends a message: Moving money, once a function managed only by the biggest companies in the world, is now a feature available to any code jockey. Ivey is just one of hundreds of engineers and entrepreneurs who are attacking the payment ecosystem, seeking out ways small and large to tear down the stronghold the banks and credit card companies have built. Square, a new company founded by Twitter cocreator Jack Dorsey, lets anyone accept physical credit card payments through a smartphone or computer by plugging in a free sugar-cube-sized device no expensive card reader required. A startup called Obopay which has received funding from Nokia, allows phone owners to transfer money to one another with nothing more than a PIN. Amazon com and Google are both distributing their shopping cart technologies across the Internet, letting even the lowliest etailers process credit cards for less than the old price cutting out middlemen, and figuring out ways to bundle payments to sidestep the credit card companies constant nickel-and-diming. Facebook appears to be building its own payment system for virtual goods purchased on its social network and on external sites. And last March, Apple gave itunes developers the ability to charge subscription fees through their applications making itunes the gateway for an entirely new breed of transaction. When Research in motion announced a similar initiative last fall at a session of the Blackberry Developer Conference in San francisco, programmers crowded the room, spilling out into the hallway. About 20 percent of all online transactions now take place over so-called alternative payment systems, according to consulting firm Javelin Strategy and Research. It expects that number to grow to nearly 30 percent in just three years. But perhaps nobody is as ambitious as Paypal. In November, it further opened up its code, giving anyone with rudimentary programming skills access to the kind of technology and payment-industry experience that Ivey used to build Twitpay. The move could unleash a wave of innovation unlike any weve seen since self-publishing came to the Web. Two months after Paypal opened its platform, 15,000 developers had used it to create new payment services, sending $15 million through the companys pipes. Software developer Big in Japan, whose Shopsavvy program lets people find an items cheapest price by scanning its barcode, used Paypal to add a oequick pay button to its app. Liveops, a call-center outsourcing firm, built a tool that streamlined payments to its operators, turning what had been a nightmare of invoicing and time-tracking into an automated process. Previously anybody who wanted to create a service like this would have had to navigate a morass of state and federal regulations and licensing bodies. But now engineers can focus on building applications, while leaving the regulatory and risk-management issues to Paypal. oei can focus on the social side of the business and not on touching money, as Ivey puts it. Paypal is just the latest company to try to harness the creative powers of the open Internet. Google created a platform that lets anyone buy or display online advertisements. Facebook allows any developer to write applications for its social network and Apple does the same with its itunes App store. Amazons Web Services provides developers the cloud-based processing power and storage space they need to build applications and services. Now Paypal has brought this same spirit of innovation and experimentation to the world of payments. Your wallet may never be the same. The banks and credit card companies have spent 50 years building a proprietary, locked-down system that handles roughly $2 trillion in credit card transactions and another $1. 3 trillion in debit card transactions every year. Until recently, vendors had little choice but to participate in this system, even though like a medieval toll road it is long and bumpy and full of intermediaries eager to take their cut. Take the common swipe. When a retailer initiates a transaction, the stores point-of-sale system provider the company that leases out the industrial-gray card reader to the merchant for a monthly fee registers the sale price and passes the information on to the stores bank. The bank records its fee and passes on the purchase information to the credit card company. The credit card company then takes its share, authorizes all the previous fees, and sends the information to the buyers bank, which routes the remaining balance back to the store. All in all, it takes between 24 and 72 hours for the vendor to get any money, and along the way up to 3. 5 percent of the sale has been siphoned away. In the earliest days of credit cards, those fees paid for an important service. Until the late 1950s, each card was tied usually to a single bank or merchant, limiting its usefulness and resulting in a walletload of unique cards. But when Bankamericard later renamed Visa offered to split its fees with other banks those banks began to offer Visa cards to their customers, and merchants began accepting Visa as a way to drive sales. Meanwhile, Visa and rival Mastercard as well as distant competitors American express and Discover used their share of the fees to build their own global technological infrastructures, pipes that connected all the various banks and businesses to ensure speedy data transmission. For its time, it was a technologically impressive system that, for a price, brought ease and convenience to millions of buyers and sellers. But today, vendors are seeing fewer benefits from paying those fees even as credit card companies have jacked them up over the years. Credit cards were once a way for a business to differentiate itself from competitors, but now that theyve grown ubiquitous, nearly all vendors must accept them or risk losing a huge swath of customers. According to a 2003 study in the Review of Network Economics, every sale by credit card costs a merchant six times what the same sale with cash would run. Cash comes with its own costs, such as requiring more oversight of cashiers, upkeep of vaults, and a banks services to process it.)Not that the store owner is ever quite sure how much a credit card transaction will cost. Mastercard and Visa charge hundreds of different rates called interchange fees for every type of card that runs through their networks; mileage cards tend to charge higher fees, for example. And if a retailer accepts one flavor of Visa, say, it has to accept them all, no matter the fee. In 1991, Mastercard had four fees, the highest of which had an interchange rate of 2. 08 percent. Today it has 243 fees, and the heftiest one tops out at over 3 percent more than a 50 percent jump. And yet the service provided has grown hardly any better, faster, or easier to access. oeit seems really odd that credit card companies can continue to charge a tax on the economy, says Aaron Patzer, founder of the financial management service Mint. com, which is owned now by Intuit. oeoutside the US government, they are the only entity that has the power to levy a fee across virtually every transaction. Maybe that made sense in the early 1960s, when computer infrastructure was expensive and proprietary. But now, with cheap bits everywhere, the actual cost to do a transaction is pennies. There is, in other words, a massive inefficiency to be exploited. And so, an army of engineers and entrepreneurs is rushing in, hoping to do to the payment world what has already been done to the music, movie, and publishing businesses unseat a legacy industry built on access and distribution, drive the costs to zero, undercut the traditional middlemen, and unleash a wave of innovation. Squares Dorsey sees his company as creating a new, open system that allows users to swap funds instantly, without a series of interlopers grabbing their share. oewe bring an engineering discipline to this problem, he says. oewhat we want to know is, how can we get right to the source? For businesses that depend on moving money, the distributed, lower-cost, easier-to-access future cant come soon enough. Mitchell Wolfe, an ecommerce veteran who ran Compaqs Canadian Internet sales team before moving on to a series of startups, has been wrestling with the payment industry for 15 years. oetheres friction all over the place, he says. He once helped build an ecommerce system for a Persian rug vendor and was stunned to find that the rug dealers bank required it to keep $250, 000 in its account in case a charge was disputed. The lesson stuck. When he started btrendie a members-only site that sells clothes and gear for pregnant women and new mothers, he decided to do as much as possible through Paypal. Now he accepts payments from customers into the same Paypal account he uses to pay his vendors. The money flows instantly, bypassing direct contact with banks or credit cards. That means no charges for moving money internationally, no extra staffers, no long delays while he waits for transactions to process, and he can keep better track of his cash and data. For Wolfe, the old payment world is a vestigial appendage. oethe less you have to deal directly with the banks and credit card companies he says, oethe better off you are. This is the kind of revolutionary fervor that Paypal was intended always to foment. Peter Thiel, Paypals cofounder and a die-hard libertarian, launched the company as a means of creating a stateless monetary system, making it possible for anyone to switch, instantly and easily, between global currencies. oepaypal will give citizens worldwide more direct control over their currencies than theyve ever had told before, he new employees in 1999, according to the book The Paypal Wars. oeit will be nearly impossible for corrupt governments to steal wealth from their people. But for most of its history Paypal acted more as an enabler a way of extending the credit card model of payment into the online realm than as a bomb-thrower. Customers didnt want to use Paypal to escape the tyranny of government currencies. They wanted to use it to spend money online without having to give out their credit card information to a million different vendors. By the turn of the millennium, Paypal pretty much operated as an online credit card company, charging vendors a percentage of every transaction to move funds from a buyers bank account to a sellers bank account. Still there were some hints of Paypals revolutionary capabilities. Unlike credit card companies, Paypal had need no to build and maintain an expensive digital network between vendors and banks around the world; it operated over the Internet. There was no need for a credit card reader, cutting point-of-sale system providers and their vigorish out of the equation. While credit card companies still paid fees to banks, a legacy from the days when they had to buy their cooperation, Paypal piggybacked on a communications system that enables digital transactions like direct deposits and automatic bill payment without charging a fee. Furthermore, Paypal users could keep their funds within their Paypal accounts, accruing interest and continuing to trade them with other Paypal users without ever once involving banks or anyone outside the Paypal ecosystem a friction-free shadow economy in its own right. All of these advantages meant that Paypal could charge lower transaction fees than traditional credit card companies. That may have been a good business model, but it wasnt exactly a game changer. In recent years, many other companies have come up with their own Paypal-like innovations, creative tweaks to further squeeze some margins out of the traditional credit card model. Apples itunes and Research in motions payments program reduce transaction fees by bundling a customers purchases before sending them to a credit card company for processing. Thats why you dont usually see a series of 99-cent charges on your credit card bill; they are processed as one lump sum. Virtual currencies, from Microsoft Points to Linden Dollars, encourage oein-world trade, incurring credit card and banking fees only when their users buy in. By reducing their exposure to traditional transaction systems, these companies are able to wring extra pennies of profit out of each sale which can aggregate into millions of dollars, turning their payment platforms into profit generators in their own right. Paypal moved even further away from its revolutionary roots in 2002, when it was purchased by ebay for $1. 5 billion. Suddenly the service, always a favored payment method on the site became almost entirely focused on making auctions easier. Between 2005 and 2008, Paypal went from serving as the payment provider for 47 percent of ebay auctions to facilitating more than 60 percent (ebay expects it to hit around 75 percent by 2011. That was a fine strategy as long as ebay was growing. But in CEO Meg Whitmans last years at the companys helm, as the auction platform started to see a slowdown in revenue growth, it became clear to the Paypal team that it was time to get aggressive again. Paypal started working with outside vendors, and by 2007 it was transacting $47 billion worth of business a year still a pittance compared to the trillions that moved through financial institutions. Scott Thompson, then Paypals CTO, started meeting with Osama Bedier, vice president of merchant services technology and his team. How, Thompson asked, could Paypal capture more of that business? Bediers team argued that Paypals users seemed to have plenty of ideas. They had pushed long for Paypal to expand into new businesses payroll, invoicing, business-to-business money transfers. But building out any one of those services would take years, and the timing wasnt right. Bedier pointed out that Paypals users had been responsible for many of the companys most successful innovations: Users dragged Paypal onto ebay in the first place. The company had resisted initially the move. Other users cobbled together Paypal-enabled oetip jars, which quickly spread across the blogosphere. What if the company opened up its code, embraced its developers, and turned its service into a platform? What if Paypal asked its users to create the tools and functions that would make it grow? Thompson loved the idea in theory but was skeptical that Bediers team could pull it off. Thompson, who had recently left Visa, was used hardly to Silicon valleys freewheeling, experimental culture. With his Boston accent, bushy Cliff Clavin mustache, and fondness for pleated pants and button-down shirts, he looked like a dotcom engineers straightlaced father. oewhere I come from, you cant just let developers come in here and open accounts and move money around, he says. Bedier was used to blasting through objections. Born in Cairo, he had spent a few years in Oregon as a preteen while his father earned a Phd. When the family moved back to Egypt Bedier put together a plan to return to the US. He persuaded his father to have a friend, an IT manager at Oregon State university, take legal guardianship. Bedier never left the States again. Now he turned his powers of persuasion on Thompson. He said he would prove he could make a more open system work. But first he had to figure out whether developers would play along. So in late 2007, he started on a road trip to meet with the people who were already building on Paypals limited open code. He met with more than 100 developers most of whom were eager to help build an easier, more flexible system. Paypal had been requiring buyers and sellers to go through several steps to complete a transaction go to its site, fill out forms, authenticate accounts. The developers envisioned something larger, a true digital currency that could be used on any Web site, that enabled money to move as easily as email: Send funds with a click, from and to anywhere and anyone on the Net. In April 2008, Bedier led a meeting at ebays North First street headquarters, where he presented his idea to CEO John Donahoe and his lieutenants. When Bedier was finished, he was stunned to get applause. oeit was like a lightbulb clicked on, Donahoe says. oei basically said, You have unlimited funding. This is the highest-potential business Ive ever seen in my career. Bedier hired executives from the banking and airline industries to help him design the platform. Soon other Paypal engineers were asking to be transferred to the project. They saw it as a return to Paypals original ambitions when Peter Thiel and his cofounder Max Levchin sought to create an entirely new currency not just a tool to help people sell used roller skates to one another. In homage to this legacy, Bediers team called the project X. com, the name of Elon musks payment company, which Paypal merged with back in 2000.)In November 2009, Paypal released the platform. In addition to the do-it-yourself ethos, X. com would sport a feature that should have terrified the traditional payment conglomerates: a new fee structure that charged vendors about one-third of what credit card companies were charging. Whatever the future of payments looks like, it will probably be brought about by people like Christian Lanng. A tall and wide 31-year-old with a booming, operatic voice, Lanng is sitting on the couch of his venture backers house in Copenhagen. When he talks about the way banks and credit card companies process payments, he gets so upset that his entire body tenses and his voice rises until its echoing off the stark white walls. oethis is the main battleground of capitalism! he says. oethis is the heart of it. Lanng rests his Macbook on a tree-stump table in front of him. For the last seven months, he and a dozen or so other coders have been building an e-invoicing company called Porta. At press time, Lanng was planning to rename the company Tradeshift. Already, the service has signed up two regions in Northern europe and one of the biggest cities in Brazil, but Lanng envisions something much bigger. He sees dynamic invoices that pay themselves that constantly monitor exchange rates, say, or the price of lumber, and then automatically send out an order to withdraw funds or to make a purchase just when the price is cheapest. Most of the information is already available there are plenty of databases that provide real-time pricing information, and he already has all of his clients account information and vital data. But Porta doesnt have the technology or expertise to handle the transactions themselves. Thats why Lanng is coding with X. com. For now Paypal has shied away from using revolutionary rhetoric. In discussing its role, company executives sound less like Thiel, bent on overthrowing the system, and more like a would-be thief strolling through a jewelry store, determined to appear nonthreatening. Were not an alternative to credit cards. We use credit cards in the Paypal wallet! Donahoe says. oethats part of the beauty of Paypal. And consumers, who have traditionally been shielded from credit card companies vendor fees and practices, may not care, or even notice, whether vendors use Paypal. But even if Paypal never fires a shot, it is clear that people are looking for an alternative to credit cards. In 2009, US consumer credit card debt saw a sustained drop for the first time in decades, falling for 10 straight months as the recession took hold. Meanwhile, to fee-socked consumers struggling to make their payments, the credit card companies have become symbols of an uncaring, greedy bureaucracy. oeas a longtime participant in the credit card industry, Im interested to watch whats going on right now, because credit card companies are actually yanking in credit, theyre raising fees, and people are choosing not to use credit cards, says Jack Stephenson, Paypals head of strategy. oeand the attitude a lot of people have about their credit card company is not a warm and fuzzy feeling right now. So I dont think, at least anytime in the next three to five years, that Paypal needs to do anything to convince people not to use credit cards online. I think people will make that choice on their own. A generation ago when people made the choice to switch to plastic, credit cards did not just replicate cash; they fundamentally changed how we used money. The ease with which people could make purchases encouraged them to buy much more than they had in the past. Entrepreneurs suddenly had access to easy though high-interest loans, providing a spark to the economy. Now, while it may be hard to predict what innovations Paypals platform will enable, its safe to say that the payment industry is going to change dramatically. As money becomes completely digitized, infinitely transferable, and friction-free, it will again revolutionize how we think about our economy. Link A simple typo gave Michael Ivey the idea for his company. One day in the fall of 2008 Iveys wife, using her pink RAZR phone, sent him a note via Twitter. But instead of typing the letter d at the beginning of the tweet which would have sent the note as a direct message, a private note just for Ivey she hit p. It could have been an embarrassing snafu, but instead it sparked a brainstorm. Thats how you should pay people, Ivey publicly replied. Iveys friends quickly jumped into the conversation, enthusiastically endorsing the idea. Ivey, a computer programmer based in Alabama, began wondering if he and his wife hadnt hit on something: What if people could transfer money over Twitter for next to nothing, simply by typing a username and a dollar amount? Just a decade ago, the idea of moving money that quickly and cheaply would have been ridiculous. Checks took ages to clear. Transferring money from one bank account to another could take days, as banks leisurely handed off funds, levying fees nearly every step of the way. Credit cards made it a little easier to pass money to a friend provided that friend owned a credit card reader and didnt mind paying a few percentage points in fees or waiting a couple of days for the payment to process. Ivey got around that problem by using Paypal. Since 1998 Paypal had enabled people to transfer money to each other instantly. For the most part, its powers were confined to ebay, the online auction company that purchased Paypal in 2002. But last summer, Paypal began giving a small group of developers access to its code, allowing them to work with its super-sophisticated transaction framework. Ivey immediately used it to link users Twitter accounts to their Paypal accounts, and his new company, Twitpay, took off. Today, the service has almost 15,000 users. That may not sound like much, but it sends a message: Moving money, once a function managed only by the biggest companies in the world, is now a feature available to any code jockey. Ivey is just one of hundreds of engineers and entrepreneurs who are attacking the payment ecosystem, seeking out ways small and large to tear down the stronghold the banks and credit card companies have built. Square, a new company founded by Twitter cocreator Jack Dorsey, lets anyone accept physical credit card payments through a smartphone or computer by plugging in a free sugar-cube-sized device no expensive card reader required. A startup called Obopay which has received funding from Nokia, allows phone owners to transfer money to one another with nothing more than a PIN. Amazon com and Google are both distributing their shopping cart technologies across the Internet, letting even the lowliest etailers process credit cards for less than the old price cutting out middlemen, and figuring out ways to bundle payments to sidestep the credit card companies constant nickel-and-diming. Facebook appears to be building its own payment system for virtual goods purchased on its social network and on external sites. And last March, Apple gave itunes developers the ability to charge subscription fees through their applications making itunes the gateway for an entirely new breed of transaction. When Research in motion announced a similar initiative last fall at a session of the Blackberry Developer Conference in San francisco, programmers crowded the room, spilling out into the hallway. About 20 percent of all online transactions now take place over so-called alternative payment systems, according to consulting firm Javelin Strategy and Research. It expects that number to grow to nearly 30 percent in just three years. But perhaps nobody is as ambitious as Paypal. In November, it further opened up its code, giving anyone with rudimentary programming skills access to the kind of technology and payment-industry experience that Ivey used to build Twitpay. The move could unleash a wave of innovation unlike any weve seen since self-publishing came to the Web. Two months after Paypal opened its platform, 15,000 developers had used it to create new payment services, sending $15 million through the companys pipes. Software developer Big in Japan, whose Shopsavvy program lets people find an items cheapest price by scanning its barcode, used Paypal to add a oequick pay button to its app. Liveops, a call-center outsourcing firm, built a tool that streamlined payments to its operators, turning what had been a nightmare of invoicing and time-tracking into an automated process. Previously anybody who wanted to create a service like this would have had to navigate a morass of state and federal regulations and licensing bodies. But now engineers can focus on building applications, while leaving the regulatory and risk-management issues to Paypal. oei can focus on the social side of the business and not on touching money, as Ivey puts it. Paypal is just the latest company to try to harness the creative powers of the open Internet. Google created a platform that lets anyone buy or display online advertisements. Facebook allows any developer to write applications for its social network and Apple does the same with its itunes App store. Amazons Web Services provides developers the cloud-based processing power and storage space they need to build applications and services. Now Paypal has brought this same spirit of innovation and experimentation to the world of payments. Your wallet may never be the same. Want to catch up? Heres a look at forms of digital currency and alternative payment methods used all over the world. Contactless smart cards: Smart cards use chip technology to communicate with card readers rather than direct contact between them. Many public transit cards are contactless smart cards: a passenger can touch or wave the card over the turnstile to gain entry. E-cash: Digital money that emulates properties of physical cash such as anonymous exchange. Public transit smart cards, such as Suica (Tokyo), Octopus (Hong kong) and Oyster (London), can be used as e-cash when anonymity is preserved by not registering the card with a central authority. Mobile banking, m-banking, m-payments: Mobile device-based applications for checking bank balances, making payments or transferring funds. Applications are being developed for sending, receiving and storing value directly in a device. POS terminal: Wireless point-of-sale terminals allow people with no access to brick -and-mortar banks to make deposits, withdrawals, payments, etc. Smart cards: The general term for any card with a specialized computer chip embedded, allowing it to process transactions more elaborately and securely than magnetic strip cards. Stored value card: A payment card in which digital money has been encoded either directly or as a link to an account to be debited when payment is made. Most gift cards are stored value cards. Virtual currency: A form of money used in an online virtual world, such as oelinden Dollars in Linden Labs Second life or oegold pieces in Blizzard Entertainments World of Warcraft. The banks and credit card companies have spent 50 years building a proprietary, locked-down system that handles roughly $2 trillion in credit card transactions and another $1. 3 trillion in debit card transactions every year. Until recently, vendors had little choice but to participate in this system, even though like a medieval toll road it is long and bumpy and full of intermediaries eager to take their cut. Take the common swipe. When a retailer initiates a transaction the stores point-of-sale system provider the company that leases out the industrial-gray card reader to the merchant for a monthly fee registers the sale price and passes the information on to the stores bank. The bank records its fee and passes on the purchase information to the credit card company. The credit card company then takes its share, authorizes all the previous fees, and sends the information to the buyers bank, which routes the remaining balance back to the store. All in all, it takes between 24 and 72 hours for the vendor to get any money and along the way up to 3. 5 percent of the sale has been siphoned away. In the earliest days of credit cards, those fees paid for an important service. Until the late 1950s, each card was tied usually to a single bank or merchant, limiting its usefulness and resulting in a walletload of unique cards. But when Bankamericard later renamed Visa offered to split its fees with other banks, those banks began to offer Visa cards to their customers, and merchants began accepting Visa as a way to drive sales. Meanwhile, Visa and rival Mastercard as well as distant competitors American express and Discover used their share of the fees to build their own global technological infrastructures pipes that connected all the various banks and businesses to ensure speedy data transmission. For its time, it was a technologically impressive system that, for a price, brought ease and conv s

< Back - Next >

Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011