| Additive (4) |  |
| Beverages (179) | |
| Cooking (17) | |
| Eating (15) | |
| Food (545) | |
| Food chain (9) | |
| Food characteristics (1) | |
| Food companies (17) | |
| Food crisis (3) | |
| Food industry (7) | |
| Food safety (18) | |
| Food security (10) | |
| Foods (661) | |
| Fresh food (1) | |
| Grocery store (13) | |
| Healthy food (2) | |
| Nutrition (12) | |
| Pasteurization (1) | |
| Restaurants & cafes (36) | |
| Soy (7) | |
| Soy sauce (1) | |
| Traceability (10) | |
| Vegetable oil (2) | |
| Vegetarianism (12) | |
There is no such thing as a pork molecule#The labels we use today to describe our diets, labels such as vegetarian, Kosher, glucose free, vegan,
but on the molecular level there is no such thing as vegetarian and non-vegetarian molecules.
For vegetarians printed meat somewhat circumvents concerns about harmful or destructive use of animals for food.
Ethical vegans may still object at the use of nonhuman animals for human purposes; while non-destructive it is still exploitative.
Initially a vegetarian diet would seem logical as it is the simplest in terms of agricultural management. Soybeans provide basic proteins capable of sustaining human health.
obviously there would be no purpose in keeping animals meant for food. will the vegetarians jump on board?
Now vegans have no excuse! Haha just kidding but this is an amazing technology I think we can all appreciate.
This is a bit of a deal killer for vegans or those morally opposed to killing sentient animals for food.
Even as a vegetarian I realize that animals as a food source leverage land that is not possible to efficiently cultivate.
and other wetland creatures and live longer healthier lives just by adopting a vegetarian diet.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011