His first move was to offer free Wi-fi in Starbucks stores, along with a digital landing page with a variety of digital media choices, including free content from publications like The Economist.
we were not just doing something smart around Wi-fi, but we were doing something innovative around how we were connecting with customers.
Nevertheless, given the advances developments of the wireless communications sector in Romania, we envisage that these networks will be integrated
and thus complement existing wireless infrastructure constructed according to New Generation Wireless technology (e g. LTE), allowing for mobility,
and extending the levels of access coverage. Thus the primary objective of the National Plan for the Development of NGN Infrastructure is the definition
4th generation (LTE) was available only for 23.6%of population, compared with the EU average of 26.2%.
%and the most recent fast development of LTE coverage, driving fixed to mobile substitution. However, the low purchasing power, the demographic structure of the population as well as the low e-literacy of the older population result in low penetration of Internet connections even in grey and/or black areas;
The development of open data, federated identity, bottom-up wireless and sensor networks, open hardware and distributed social networks can potentially serve collective action and awareness.
A wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of spatially distributed wireless sensors to monitor physical conditions, such as temperature, sound, vibration, pressure, motion or pollutants,
and combine successfully different wireless and wired (optical) link technologies, fixed and ad hoc routing schemes and management schemes.
and then deploy, run, monitor Innovative combinations of network solutions and infrastructures, e g. sensor networks, free interoperable network services, open Wifi, bottom-up-broadband, distributed social networks,
RFID-tagged objects and other devices that see, hear, move, coordinate and‘reason'with each other.
The board also contains a Wifi antenna that enables the direct upload of data from the sensors in real time.
and the rapid growth of Wifi are also important. The price and availability of broadband access depends to a large extent on competition in the infrastructure market
and RFID significantly contribute to the optimization of the delivery chain processes (e g. sorting; delivery), which can subsequently be reflected in improved services, both in terms of the quality of service as well as pricing.
validation and adoption of Future Internet technologies (networking, mobile/wireless, Iot). Wide range of technologies and application areas.
Wireless communication technologies; Mobile health; E-Education; Sensor technologies; Renewable energy; Wearable technologies; 3d printing technologies; Augmented reality and virtual reality;
Wi-fi points, IP TV; Providing all public services, especially security, health education and economic services through web portals and applications;
Becoming a pilot area for new technologies such as 4g and 5g, Wimax, IPTV, Wi-fi points and Basaksehir mobile applications;
Technically, the adaptive lighting system consists of lighting posts, luminaires, cameras, sensors and Wi-fi connectivity.
cameras and Wi-fi. But when looking at the societal need to improve the perceived hospitality in the square,
A dedicated area was used for the pilot where all the books were tagged with RFID smart labels
and presence/occupancy (Passive Infra Red motion sensors SE-10, RFID Card Reader of MFRC500 and related components, together with RFID Tags-Cards).
Bluetooth, and Wi-fi connectivity to communicate with other devices. Essentially, technology should make our lives easier.
and involving users in the development TTKAAKKURI Product testing platform in the real healthcare environment Converging Networks Laboratory Wireless network testing From the city perspective the user's involvement provides excellent
The retail market including RFID Tags and the associated supply chain was considered the most promising 2008.
in Bagenalstown Provision of new library and civic centre in Borris Provision of new fire stations in Carlow Town and Hacketstown New civil defence headquarters in Bagenalstown Facilitation of wireless broadband
Provision of wireless broadband at quality signal strength and speed. Facilitate the deployment of competitive broadband access technologies.
and high quality cost effective wireless or other broadband solutions for rural areas. B. Development and expansion of the GRID electricity network and future connections to renewable sources of energy.
c1 (standard radio connections (FWA type) c2 WI-FI connections c3 Wimax connections c4 Other types of radio connections d) xdsl (metal
and mobile networks that can provide services at a fixed point. They will be funded from the universal service fund
0, 92%a través de WIMAX, el 0, 78%a través de 3g y el 0, 41%restante puede acogerse a la solución
TICS (e-commerce), RFID, automatización, Sistemas de Información geográfica-Intermodalidad Apoyo al desarrollo de una red de plataformas intermodales regionales en
partiendo del Plan de Extensión de Banda Ancha Rural (financiado con fondos FEADER), con Tecnología Wimax. Medidas:
Car infotainment systems embedded with 4G LTE and wireless hotspots will be integrated more seamlessly with home monitoring cameras
and Schlumberger who have worked together to develop a‘First Mile Wireless for Drilling (FMWD')solution for the oil
and 61.9%had a Wireless Local area network 95.3%of companies were set up with mobile phones. On the other hand 75.8%of companies with Internet access had a website.
87.3 85.9 95.0 97.7-Wireless Local area network 61.9 59.5 74.2 81.1-Internet connection 98.3 98.2 99.1 99.8-Mobile telephony 95.3 94.8 97.8 99.4
-Computers 71.6 72.3-Local area network 24.0 24.4-Wireless Local area network 16.4 17.6-Internet connection 65.7 67.7-Broadband (fixed or mobile) Internet connection (1) 98.5 99.0
and Carsten Schmoll Table of contents XV Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 259 Apostolos Kousaridas George Katsikas, Nancy Alonistioti, Esa Piri, Marko Palola,
Accessibility (open and by means of various/heterogeneous wireless/radio and wired interfaces) to the communication network but also to heterogeneous data, applications,
addressed and to be reinforced (migration of mobile network to IPV6 Internet, IPTV moving to Internet TV, etc.
Networked Enterprise & Radio frequency identification (RFID) and F5: Trust and Security. The authors would like to acknowledge
wireless, and mobile networks) and service physical infrastructures in order to provide an autonomic virtual resource overlay. 2. 1 Service Plane Overview The Service Plane (SP) consists of functions for the automatic (redeployment of new
which run on top of all current networks (i e. fixed, wireless and mobile networks) and service physical infrastructures.
Based on the current trends in telecommunications, vendors prognosticate that mobile networks will suffer an immense traffic explosion in the packet switched domain up to year 2020 1 4
and also spectrum efficiency can be enhanced thanks to new wireless techniques (e g.,, High Speed Packet Access, and Long term Evolution.
Heterogeneous systems providing densification and offload of the macrocellular network throughout pico, femtocells and relays or Wifi/Wimax interfaces also extend the radio range.
the number of wireless broadband subscriptions is exceed about to the total amount of fixed broadband subscriptions and this development Flat Architectures:
The expansion of wireless broadband subscribers not only inflates the volume of mobile traffic directly, but also facilitates the growth in broadband wireless enabled terminals.
However, more and more devices enable mobile access to the Internet, only a limited part of users is attracted
and gaming) will further boost this process and set new challenges to mobile networks. Since video and related entertainment services seems to become dominant in terms of bandwidth usage
growth of the mobile subscriptions, evolution of mobile networks, devices, applications and services, and significant device increase potential resulted by the tremendous number of novel subscriptions for Machine to machine-Machine communications. 2. 2 Scalability Problems of the Mobile Internet Existing wireless telecommunication
, 3gpp, 3gpp2, Wimax Forum) follow a centralized approach which cannot scale well to the changing traffic conditions.
and CSN for Wimax networks). Each anchor point maintains special units of information called contexts,
future mobile networks must specify architecture optimized to maximize the end-user experience, minimize CAPEX/OPEX, energy efficiency, network performance,
and to ensure mobile networks sustainability. 3 Evolution of Flat Architectures 3. 1 Evolution of the Architecture of 3gpp Mobile networks Fixed networks were firstly subject to similar scalability problems.
Progress of mobile and wireless communication systems introduced some fundamental changes. The most drastic among them is that IP has become the unique access protocol for data networks
and the continuously increasing future wireless traffic is also based on packet data (i e.,Internet communication.
These enable local breakout of certain IP traffic from the macro-cellular network or the H (e) Nodeb subsystems,
the flat nature of LTE and LTE-A architectures concerns only the control plane but not the user plane:
LTE is linked to the Evolved Packet Core (EPC) in the 3gpp system evolution, and in EPC, the main packet switched core network functional entities are still remaining centralized,
Architectures 4. 1 Motivations for Distributing Mobility Functions Flat mobile networks not only require novel architectural design paradigms, special network nodes and proprietary elements with peculiar functions
or LTE (Long term Evolution) base stations (enodebs) became distributed in a flatter scheme allowing almost complete distribution of radio
mobility management mechanisms in current wireless and mobile networks anchor the user traffic relatively far from users'location.
Furthermore, the BSR can be considered a special wireless edge router that bridges between mobile/wireless and IP communication.
In flat architectures the radio access network components could be compared much cheaper to HSPA and LTE devices today because of the economy of scale.
Ultra Flat Architecture for high bitrate services in mobile networks. In: Proc. of PIMRC'08, Cannes, France, pp. 1 6 (2008) 17.
a SIP-based Ultra Flat Mobile network Architecture. In: Proc. of PIMRC (Sep. 2009) 18. Faigl, Z.,Bokor, L.,Neves, P.,Pereira, R.,Daoud, K.,Herbelin, P.:
WIISE-A Completely Flat and Distributed Architecture for Future Wireless communication Systems, Wireless World Research Forum (Oct. 2008) 50.
apartment buildings, offices) generates more demand in deploying wireless 802.11-based mesh networks this expansion will be a patchwork of mesh networks;
which all physical objects are tagged by Radio frequency identification (RFID) transponders in order to be identified uniquely by information systems. However the concept has grown into multiple dimensions,
encompassing sensor networks able to provide real world intelligence or the goal-oriented autonomous collaboration of distributed objects via local wireless networks or global interconnections such as the Internet.
and wireless communication links between devices in their proximity and/or through global interconnections in the form of the current Internet and mobile networks or future fixed and mobile network infrastructures.
Entity Level Resource Level Real world sensor RFID actuator sensor sensor Entity-based Context Model models relevant aspects of Real world Real-world Internet
In a Radio frequency identification (RFID) based scenario the tags act as hosts for the resources in form of Electronic Product Codes (EPCS), IDS or other information as well as for value-added information in form of e g. sensor data.
The resource hosts are abstracted through the RFID readers due to the passive communication of the tags.
ASPIRE introduces a Business Event Generator (BEG) which implements additional logic for interactions using semantics of the specific RFID application.
services and resources. 4. 5 SENSEI The SENSEI architecture SENSEI aims at integrating geographically dispersed and internet interconnected heterogeneous WSAN (Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks) systems into a homogeneous
References ASPIRE Advanced Sensors and lightweight Programmable middleware for Innovative RFID Enterprise applications, FP7, http://www. fp7-aspire. eu/CONET Cooperating Objects Noe,
A Wireless-and Mobility-Related View. IEEE Wireless communications 17 (6)( 2010) J. Domingue et al. Eds.):
) Future Internet Assembly, LNCS 6656, pp. 81 90,2011. The Author (s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink. com. Towards a RESTFUL Architecture for Managing a Global Distributed Interlinked Data-Content-Information Space Maria Chiara Pettenati, Lucia
5) The transparency and the middleware (firmware based) nature of the proposed Cognitive Manger architecture makes relatively easy its embedding in any fixed/mobile network entity (e g.
where connectivity among devices is provided using heterogeneous wireless (e g.,, Wifi, UWB) and wired (e g.,, Ethernet, PLC) communication technologies.
For 100 M. Castrucci et al. testing purposes only a simplified version of the Cognitive Manager has been implemented in each node of the network,
Switching on the Wi-fi link causes more TCP retransmissions and an increased transfer time. This is natural
since Ethernet and Wi-fi have different throughputs. Without the cognitive framework, it is evident that the FTP session would not be terminated at all.
IEEE Wireless communications and Networking Conference-WCNC (2009) 22 Pasquini, R.,Verdi, F.,Magalh aes, M.:
and mobile network convergence 10 constitute only two representative examples for typical tussle spaces. The main argument for focusing on tussles in relation to socioeconomic impact of the future Internet is in the number of observed stakeholders in the current Internet and their interests.
However under some assumptions, Wifi hotspots can consume much less energy than UMTS (Universal mobile telecommunications system) networks.
Wifi and UMTS) on the technology used to communicate. Next generation networks, where a provider can control
RFID sensors and so on that are connected perpetually and transmit a variety of information including identity, bank accounts, location, and so on.
Sensor networks, RFID tags, smart appliances that communicate not only with the user but with their manufacturers, are examples of such devices.
Examples include illicit tracking of RFID tags (privacy violation) and cloning of data on RFID tags (identity theft).
Applications that involve such deployments typically cross organization boundaries. In light of the challenges and principles highlighted above,
Finally the chapter Kousaridas et al. entitled Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment reports on the network management protocol test that exploited the availability of different administrative domains in federated testbeds
The Author (s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink. com. Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment Apostolos Kousaridas1, George Katsikas1, Nancy Alonistioti1
in order to experiment on the improvement of Qos features by using the Self-NET software for self management over a Wimax network environment.
Experimentation, Testing Facilities, Self management, Future Internet, Wimax, Quality of Service 1 Introduction Several network management frameworks have been specified during the last two decades by various standardization bodies
while section 5 concludes this paper. 2 Experimental Facilities Decription The testing facility connecting a fixed Wimax network to the service-aware network is shown in Fig. 1. The Wimax network environment
There are also some contributory entities that assist in improving the traffic simulation by providing log information Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 261 Fig. 1. Octopus testbed Wimax
The Self-NET project carries out experiments over the Wimax testbed, remotely via the Internet.
NECM) to allow dynamically collect Wimax link information from the BS and to control Quality of Service (Qos) settings on the fly.
IEEE 802. 16d 5, the employed Wimax testbed is based on, specifies four different scheduling types, namely Unsolicited Grant Service (UGS), Real-time Polling Service (rtps), Non-real-time Polling Service (nrtps),
and tunneling from and to the Wimax link. Two routers are dedicated on the Octopus testbed for tunneling
and rerouted over the WIMAX air interface at the Octopus testbed. For the test environment provisioning
The first tunnel connects the Wimax BS with the Uoa BS Connector (10.1.3.3 10.1.3.1) while the second one connects the Wimax SS with the Uoa SS Connector (10.1.3.4 10.1.3.2),
creating an internal 10.1.3.0/24 network between these network entities. The traffic sent from the Uoa BS Connector (10.1.1.1) is routed over the IPIP tunnel to the Wimax BS Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 263 Fig. 3. Network topology
and IPIP tunneling and after the Wireless transmission (DL) to the Wimax SS, the Uoa SS Connector (10.1.2.1) receives the packets via the second tunnel.
The respective procedure occurs for the UL, while the Uoa SS Connector traffic is tunneled to the Wimax SS,
transmitted to the Wimax BS and routed again through IPIP tunnel to the Uoa BS Connector.
During the traffic exchange, the public IPS'are opaque, as the routing procedure explicitly uses the private addresses.
the Wimax network elements can be considered as available and configurable resources. We decided to use a separate RA for each IP tunneling machine
The NECM of the Wimax BS constantly monitors network device statistics (e g.,, UL/DL used capacity, TCP/UDP parameters, service flows),
Change the priority of 2 k R flows at the Wimax BS. Change the priority of 3 k R flows at the Wimax BS and the codec of 4 k R flows.
Two schemes for the selection of the optimal action have been proposed and they are described below (Fig. 4
and Fig. 5). According to the decision making output the configuration action is transferred either to the Wimax BS NECM
Testing End-to-end Self-Management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 265 Fig. 4. Decision-making algorithm for configuration action selection Simple Fig. 4 presents
If the PER is lower than a predefined threshold (PER-threshold) the NDCM decides to change all flows from low priority to high priority service class at the WIMAX BS side.
The change of the prioritization scheme at the Wimax BS side (e g.,, from low priority to high priority service class.
However, the Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 267 increase rate is not linear
Table 2 presents the reduction of the packet loss rate after the change of the prioritization (from low priority to high priority service class) at the Wimax BS of the 28 Voip flows that use G. 711.1 codec.
G. 711.1 Voip flows that traverse the Wimax BS and face high packet error rate. The modification of the service class prioritization at the BS side (from low priority to high priority class) is not effective,
Testing End-to-end Self management in a Wireless Future Internet Environment 269 Table 6. Qos features improvement after partial (70%)Voip codec change from G. 711.1
Different wireless links and networks have different capabilities and often service implementers and providers do not have a possibility to test their service over various networks of different access technologies.
Our empirical experiments show how a remote wireless link such as Wimax can be used remotely. However, in order to provide a wireless link as a bookable resource for a large set of customers,
Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems. IEEE Std. 802.16-2004 (October 2004) 6. Wahle, S.,Magedanz, T.,Gavras, A.:
Furthermore, new wireless sensor network technologies provide options for inclusion of additional intelligence and the capability
Traffic management configuration of large wireless networks consisting of multiple, distributed NES of varying technologies, is challenging, time 286 I. P. Chochliouros, A s. Spiliopoulou,
In the proposed test-bed, a heterogeneous wireless network environment has been deployed, consisting of several IEEE 802.11 Soekris access points (AP) 33 and an IEEE 802.16 Base Station (BS) 34,
Wi-fi) and multi-RATS (i e. Wifi, Wimax) were located in the corresponding area, consuming a video service delivered by VLC (video LAN client)- based service provider 35.
For the management of the NECMS, a NDCM has been deployed. The cognitive network manager installed per NE has undertaken several distinct actions, that is:(
i) The optimal deployment of a new Wifi AP;(ii) the self-optimization of the network topology through the assisted vertical handover of terminals from loaded to neighbouring-less loaded-APS or BS (s), and;(
iv) Possibility for automated handover between end-users of heterogeneous wireless technologies (Wifi, Wimax), especially in cases where there is extreme network traffic
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless communications, pp. 355 362 (2000) 292 I. P. Chochliouros, A s. Spiliopoulou,
AN-100u/UX Single Sector Wireless Access Base Station User Manual (2008) 35. C.:open-source multimedia framework, player and server, http://www. videolan. org/vlc J. Domingue et al.
Opportunistic Networks, Node Selection, Coverage Extension, Capacity Extension, Future Internet. 1 Introduction The emerging wireless world will be part of the Future Internet (FI.
Efficient Opportunistic Network Creation in the Context of Future Internet 295 Fig. 1. The emerging cognitive wireless world In 5, the selection and navigation of mobile sensor nodes
a Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15.1) 16 and a high-speed interface (e g. IEEE 802.11 family 17. According to the high-speed interface, each node has a transmission data rate of 15 Mbps. On the other hand,
the Bluetooth interface has a transmission data rate of 1 Mbps but it is used for a rather short-range coverage (e g. 10 meters).
IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local area networks, http://ieee802. org/11/18. Spyropoulos, T.,Psounis, K.,Raghavendra, C.:Spray and Wait:
An Efficient Routing Scheme for Intermittently Connected Mobile networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Delay-Tolerant Networking, WDTN (2005) Bringing Optical Networks to the Cloud:
and execute different tasks with core mobile network systems that are behind Telefónica Software Delivery Platform (SDP).
applications in which there are issues such as hand over of a client to another wireless source is present.
Strategies and Challenges for Interconnecting Wireless Mesh and Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 53 (3)( 2010) 2. Buxmann, P.,Hess, T.,Ruggaber, R.:
including mobile networks, as a participative tool for engaging citizens and tourists. Many initiatives have been launched by cities
Nowadays, there are no field experiences across the world allowing assessing, in the short term, the behavior of massive wireless sensor deployments.
WISEBED-Wireless Sensor Network Testbeds, http://www. wisebed. eu 34. Onelab2, ONELAB project, http://www. onelab. eu/35.
including broadband and mobile networks, to support multi-channel operations. Furthermore, all EU citizens need the necessary information to become digitally savvy;
including broadband and mobile networks, to support multi-channel operations; educating all citizens, so that they are digitally savvy-this is crucial for getting jobs
From 1. 3 billion RFID tags in 2005 to about 30 billion RFID today. Twitter processes 7 terabytes of data every day.
Wi-fi), working online as well as offline. The selection criteria for this model require an organization to carry out the following actions:
Indeed, goods receipts have been carried then out automatically with Kymantm by Datalogic Mobile Wireless Handheld Computer and Barcode Scanner.
the spread of mobile banking services represent the first step of an evolution that will conduct, thanks to new technologies such as RFID (Radio frequency identification) and NFC (Near Field Communication),
, GPS, Bluetooth and Near Field Communication (NFC) functions Increased bandwidth Large wireless bandwidth required to transmit large amount of data in real time (for example,
/)Foursquare (foursquare. com) Augmented Reality Wikitude (http://www. wikitude. com/app/)Internet of things Microsoft Sensormap Radio frequency identification (RFID) embedded in objects for tracking commercial products,
. illinois. edu/Greengps. html) Biketastic (http://biketastic. com) Healthcare Enhanced Holter ECG Wireless Respiratory and Audio Sensor (http://vivonoetics. com) Bodymedia FIT (http://www. bodymedia. com/)Adapted from 36 80 4 Social Listening new battery types with longer
The app includes a simple and free money transfer system available through wireless communication between devices
collected through mobile phones, GPS, Wifi, cell tower triangulation, RFID and other sensors. Using powerful machine learning algorithms,
Foursquare voluntary check in, automatic collection of location by different apps, Wi-fi recognition. One of the founders is Alex Pentland, Toshiba Professor at MIT,
Moreover, thanks to the Starbucks Digital Network, customers are offered extra content and entertainment when connected to the facility's Wi-fi (e g. on-line Music,
when the top management first decided that Wi-fi should be a feature of all Starbucks coffee shops,
Index Return on engagement, 142 Return on relationship, 142 RFID, 190 SSECURITY standards, 29,34 Semantic Analysis
and free Wi-fi. Should the ciudad moderna vision become reality, the city will have taken significant steps to increase government transparency
Big data has been fueled by both technological advances (such as the spread of radio-frequency identification, or RFID
Big data has been fueled by both technological advances (such as the spread of radio-frequency identification, or RFID
The infrastructure and digital content pillar (five variables) captures the development of ICT infrastructure (including mobile network coverage
After having achieved full mobile network coverage last year, its international Internet bandwidth capacity improves significantly to reach 77th place.
Infrastructure and digital content 3. 01 Electricity production, kwh/capita 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%population 3. 03 International Internet bandwidth, kb
Of the world's total inhabited areas, mobile network coverage will increase to 85 percent in 2017, up from 79 percent in 2012.10 In addition,
and chips inserted in automobiles), transactions logs (such as payment transactions), radio-frequency identification chips (RFID), navigation and location sensors, networks, and servers.
93.1318.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
93.1,318. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
90.1,356. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...124.81.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
120.280.0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...139.40.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
65.3,180. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...109.94.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
74.2,507. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
9 11,120. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
26.7,618. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
81.2,212. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
12 10,694. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
118.288.2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
60.3,698. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
31.6,935. 1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
146.15.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
15.9,688. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
106.699.5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
57.3,979. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
124.187.2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
73.2,700. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
16.9,163. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
32.6,807. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
142.44.0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...137.61.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
147.14.2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...122.83.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
138.72.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
119.283.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...138.58.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
3 18,510. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
111.570.3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
148.8.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...140.36.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
58.3,915. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
61.3,508. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...54.99.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
94.1,313. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
83.2,075. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...134.69.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
117.314.5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...108.94.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
75.2,500. 1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
51.4,414. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...32.100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
23.8,260. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
40.5,438. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
95.1,278. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...107.94.6 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
91.1,329. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...96.96.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
84.1,972. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
99.927.9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
18.8,933. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
141.57.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...130.73.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
8 12,997. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...53.99.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
22.8,449. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
97.1,109. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...128.79.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
127.147.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...119.85.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
79.2,273. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...57.99.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
28.7,460. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
115.451.2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...118.87.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
47.5,103. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
113.553.9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
135.90.2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...127.80.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
98.1,046. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
139.71.6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
100.916.3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...116.89.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
39.5,519. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
62.3,460. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
1 54,817. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
101.861.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...122.83.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
104.748.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
66.3,178. 1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
36.5,993. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
25.7,677. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
48.4,832. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
85.1,899. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
24.8,041. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
77.2,369. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
44.5,229. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
125.186.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...117.89.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
13 10,567. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
4 18,388. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
72.2,748. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...87.97.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
122.242.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...131.72.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
69.2,960. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...79.98.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
59.3,733. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...56.99.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
134.100.5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...125.81.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
136.87.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...144.16.4 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
49.4,524. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
89.1,401. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
45.5,159. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
63.3,268. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
140.65.9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...142.23.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
131.119.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...119.85.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
50.4,523. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...93.96.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
143.38.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...143.20.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
41.5,265. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
129.134.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...136.62.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
80.2,265. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
76.2,449. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
87.1,624. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...85.98.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
86.1,725. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...113.91.3 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
53.4,279. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
103.775.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
103.775.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
107.684.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...n/a n/a 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
128.140.0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...145.2.3 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
110.644.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
130.122.0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...141.35.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
35.6,092. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
14.9,984. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
109.647.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
126.164.6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...95.96.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
2 29,244. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...88.97.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
30.7,231. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...86.97.6 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
114.540.7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...111.92.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
82.2,100. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...97.96.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
20.8,766. 9 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...110.94.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
92.1,324. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...92.97.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
105.727.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
55.4,192. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...52.99.5 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
52.4,325. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
38.5,536. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...135.68.4 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
6 16,081. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
70.2,899. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
29.7,365. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
144.22.8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...80.98.4 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
17.9,008. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...55.99.4 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
123.226.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...114.91.1 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
42.5,238. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...49.99.7 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
71.2,806. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
145.21.3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...132.70.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
19.8,873. 8 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
43.5,231. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
27.7,544. 1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...49.99.7 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
46.5,131. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...48.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
34.6,350. 4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...43.99.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
112.558.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...81.98.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
67.3,081. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
116.383.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...93.96.8 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
5 17,383. 3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...28.100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
21.8,501. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
11 10,859. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
132.114.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...101.95.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
78.2,343. 0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
133.112.0 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...111.92.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
33.6,651. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
88.1,511. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...58.99.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
64.3,236. 6 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
137.74.4 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
54.4,265. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
10 11,107. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
37.5,697. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...51.99.6 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
7 13,639. 7 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...33.99.9 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
68.3,057. 2 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...1...100.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
56.4,137. 5 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...115.90.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
96.1,129. 1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...132.70.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
121.266.3 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...121.84.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
102.840.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...129.78.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
108.668.1 3. 02 Mobile network coverage,%pop...125.81.0 3. 03 Int'l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user...
276 3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate...277 3. 03 International Internet bandwidth...278 3. 04 Secure Internet servers...
n/a 3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate Percentage of total population covered by a mobile network signal 2012 SOURCE:
, fixed-line Internet, Wireless internet, mobile network, satellite? 1=not available at all; 7=widely available 2012 2013 weighted average SOURCE:
2013) 2014 World Economic Forum The Global Information technology Report 2014 325 Technical Notes and Sources 3. 02 Mobile network coverage rate Percentage of total
population covered by a mobile network signal 2012 This indicator measures the percentage of inhabitants who are within range of a mobile cellular signal,
fixed-line Internet, Wireless internet, mobile network, satellite? 1=not available at all; 7=widely available 2012 2013 weighted average Source:
His research covers the expansion of fixed and wireless broadband, national broadband agendas, municipal strategies for ICT use, Internet protocol network traffic demand,
IP-enabled services, wireless and spectrum policy, security, privacy, Internet governance, and ICT development. He joined Cisco in July 2005 from the FCC,
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011