Synopsis:
Innovation: Innovation performance:
ART20.pdf
such knowledge is important for comparing the innovation performance of nations to other economies. Finland is among the countries improving her position in worldwide performance comparisons
Innovation policy Science and Technology indicators Barometer Future-oriented knowledge 1. Introduction A growing number of different international comparison systems of the economic and innovation performance of nations have emerged within a decade 2
and innovation performance of the nation. 3. Results of technology barometer 3. 1. Indicator-based comparison Statistical indicators collected from the eight countries through OECD
ART27.pdf
National priorities National priorities (Research areas)( Research domains) Innovation in services Business service design and innovation Fostering the economic and legal environment for Innovation performance and development of the financial systems
ART28.pdf
with new employment patterns and with the need to further upgrade research and innovation performance. In 2006 it was decided
ART92.pdf
EIT ICT Labs The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) is the latest attempt of the European commission (EC) to increase European innovation performance.
Science.PublicPolicyVol37\7. Impact of Swiss technology policy on firm innovation performance.pdf
http://www. ingentaconnect. com/content/beech/spp Impact of Swiss technology policy on firm innovation performance: an evaluation based on a matching approach Spyros Arvanitis, Laurent Donzé and Nora Sydow This paper investigates the impact of the promotional activities of The swiss Commission of Technology
and Innovation (CTI) on the innovation performance of the supported firms based on a matched-pairs analysis of 199 firms supported by the CTI in the period 2000 2002.
CTI's promotional activities significantly improved the innovation performance of the firms that they supported with respect to six different measures of innovation performance.
on average enterpriise that were supported by the CTI would show a significantly higher innovation performance, measurre through six innovation measures (e g. sales, share of innovative products),
Fifthly, we provide a detailed discusssio of our methodology for estimating the impaac of CTI subsidies on the innovation performance of firms.
Hence, for the large majority of the projects there was enough time to have a measurable impact of R&d on their innovation performance.
particulaarl through co-financed research projects in cooperratio with universities, would show on average a significantly higher innovation performance,
and nonsubsiidize firms is performed by comparing the means of the innovation performance variables for the‘treated'firms
the means of the variables measuring innovation performance of the group of the treated firms and the group of the‘twin'non-treated firms were compared.
Results of the matched-pairs analysis Comparison of the innovation performance of subsidized firms depending on the subsidy quotient Table 4 provides a qualitative summary of the resuult of the comparison of the innovation performannce as measured by six different
5%test level Impact of technology policy on innovation by firms Science and Public policy February 2010 71 innovation performance than non-subsidized firms (at the 5%test level.
Subsidized firms show a significanntl higher innovation performance than structuralll similar non-subsidized enterprises. The detailed results in terms of figures for each innovation measure and each method are found in Tables A3 A6 in the Appendix.
reflecting the fact that firms with a high innovation performance are seleccte by the applied method to match subsidized firms that are expected to be highly innovative in ordde to obtain grants.
of tests of the statistical significance of the differences in column 4. These results show that there are substantial differeence in innovation performance.
Comparison of the innovation performance of high subsidy'and‘low subsidy'firms Table 5 contains a qualitative summary of the resuult of the comparison of the differences of the innovation performance of high-subsidy
Hence, for these cases we have some empirical evidence that the impact on innovation performance is dependent on the relative magnitude of the subsiid granted.
we found that the CTI promotion significcantl improved the innovation performance of supported firms with respect to six different measurre of innovation performance.
Comparison of subsidized/non-subsidized enterprises, matched by‘nearest neighbour'method Measures of innovation performance All non-active firms before matching Non-active firms after matching (control group) Active
Comparison of subsidized/non-subsidized enterprises, matched by‘calliper'method Measures of innovation performance All non-active firms before matching Non-active firms after matching (control group Active
Comparison of subsidized/non-subsidized enterprises, matched by‘kernel'method Measures of innovation performance All non-active firms before matching Non-active firms after matching (control group) Active
Comparison of subsidized/non-subsidized enterprises, matched by‘local linear regression'method Measures of innovation performance All non-active firms before matching Non-active firms after matching (control group
Results with respect to magnitude of subsidy quotient for 2000 2002, calculated using‘nearest neighbour'method Measures of innovation performance Subsidized firms:
Results with respect to magnitude of subsidy quotient (2000 2002) using‘calliper'method Measures of innovation performance Subsidized firms:
Appendix (continued) Table A. 9. Results with respect to magnitude of subsidy quotient (2000 2002) using‘kernel'method Measures of innovation performance Subsidized firms:
Results with respect to magnitude of subsidy quotient (2000 2002) using‘local linear regression'method Measures of innovation performance Subsidized firms:
Science.PublicPolicyVol39\5. Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking.pdf
Squicciarini, M. and Asikainen, A. 2010)‘ Sectoral innovation performance in the construction sector'.'Final report, task 1. Europe Innova, Innovation Watch.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011
