Synopsis:
Innovation: Open innovation:
ART17.pdf
In this section, the paper explicates the social and technological organizational structures which may permit a new era of open innovation.
Chesborough 11 describes a new paradigm of open innovation involving the design of technological systems which, in technological requirements, transcends the boundaries of a single firm.
creating software solutions to help innovative organizations develop new technologies within an open innovation environment. Knowledge is structured hierarchically.
and infrastructural needs of organizations engaged in open innovation. Such organizations, not surprisingly, need access to these distributed databases of knowledge.
may contribute to an open innovation paradigm where firms work together as part of an extended technological network 11.
This technique (and other techniques like it) may see application in open innovation, or the mode 2 of future knowledge production.
Intell. 91 (2)( 1997) 183 203.11 H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West, Open innovation: Researching a New paradigm Oxford, Oxford university Press, 2006.12 M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, The New Production of Knowledge:
ART19.pdf
Open innovation: Creating Products and Services through Collaboration. Tours, France, 15 18 june 2008. ISPIM, 2008.37 R. Molarius, N. Wessberg, J. Keränen, J. Schabel, Creating a climate change risk assessment procedure hydropower plant case, Finland,
ART40.pdf
In the corporate world, the rise of open innovation has emphasised the need for firms to work with their collaborators
In the open innovation systems firms are concerned less with stand-alone type foresight and more about how corporate strategy interfaces with the emerging research and innovation policy scenario.
This thinking was also the basis of the‘‘open innovation''concept in that it recognises centrally that innovation is a process of interaction between firms
FOREN Guide Foresight for Regional development Network A Practical Guide to Regional foresight, European commission, December 2001.6 H. Chesbrough, The era of open innovation, Sloan Management Review 44 (3)( 2003.
ART71.pdf
This could help us to identify potential partners with complementary interests at different places along this technology development progression, thereby serving‘Open innovation'purposes (Chesbrough 2006.
Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open innovatiion Researching a new paradigm, ed. H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke,
ART74.pdf
mobility and higher education Learning as a lifelong behaviour Vocational skills gaps Technological development Converging technologies The increasing pace of technological change Technology platforms Open innovation models Death of intellectual property?
growth Energy security Renewable energy Renewable energy Peak oil Global trade falters Converging technologies Increasing pace of change Increasing pace of change Open innovation
ART84.pdf
At the same time, with the notion of open innovation the focus on the firm as the key innovation actor has broadened substantially towards social entrepreneurs, users, customers, public sector and citizens 14,15.
Some of the proposed aspects of new innovation patterns such as the waste based innovation or the city level open innovation platform seem particularly suitable for aligning social and technological innovation towards structural transformation.
France Workshop envisioning the open innovation city with actors from city councils and companies involved with city level innovation in Paris 5. Innocamp Society Dominik Wind Until we see new land (Innovation camp Start-up),
Innovation Management, Lithuania Creative session with Global Creators in Vilnius by an Innovation consultancy 7. Waste Based (open innovation Jay Cousins Founder of Open Design City
, B. Sanders, In and out of sync, The Challenge of Growing Social innovations, NESTA Research report, 2007.14 H. W. Chesbrough, Open innovation:
open innovation, in: Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2006.16 E. Dönitz, F. Jégou, K.-H. Leitner, J. Mahn, G. Pitisci
ART86.pdf
All of this was interlaced with specific and recurrent displays of interest in and advocacy of cross-disciplinarity, open innovation,
ART90.pdf
The‘open innovation paradigm'1, which has been covered widely (and even hyped) in the literature is a Futures 59 (2014) 39 49 A r T I C L E I N F O Article history:
Although the principles underlying the open innovation concept have been subjected to critical analyses, which designated it as‘old wine in new bottles'2,
References 1 H. Chesbrough, Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business school Press, Boston, 2003.2 P. Trott, D. Hartman,
Why‘open innovation'is old wine in new bottles, International Journal of Innovation Management 13 (2009) 715 736.3 C. Cagnin, D. Loveridge, O. Saritas, FTA
in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research policy 5 (1976) 212 239.26 F. Piller, C. Ihl, Open innovation with Customers.
ART92.pdf
Chesbrough coined the term‘Open innovation'to describe the paradigm‘‘that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas,
Innovation networks Futures research Foresight Networked foresight Open innovation A b s T R A c T Along with the rise of the now popular‘open'paradigm in innovation management,
A way to practice open innovation are‘innovation networks'.'Under this term, cooperations organized as inter-organizational networks with the goal to innovate collaboratively are understood.
1) How is futures research related to the context of‘open innovation'in general, and to‘innovation networks'in particular?(
networked foresight. 2. 2. Linking futures research to innovation networks 2. 2. 1. Trends driving corporate innovation toward open innovation processes Innovation, i e.,
A preceding concept to open innovation that takes a corporate perspective is absorptive capacity. This initially analyzed the‘‘ability of firms to recognize the value of new information
and open innovation describes the efforts and reasoning of companies to open up their innovation processes. The primary goal is to create
Futures research and open innovation Futures research aims at systematically exploring predicting and/or explaining future developments with the means of different methods and techniques, e g.,
The link between futures research and open innovation became apparent in past research. Rohrbeck and Gemu nden 5 link three of the above-listed trends driving open innovation shortening life cycles
fast technological change and innovation speed to corporate foresight through the necessity of companies to renew their strategic resources as a result of these factors.
The link is deepened through various studies that discuss foresight methods as means to embrace the open innovation paradigm.
Rohrbeck, Ho lzle and Gemu nden discuss the role of futures research for corporate innovativeness in the form of foresight workshops 8. These workshops are identified as one instrument of Deutsche telekom for embracing the open innovation paradigm
They are described as instruments for open innovation as part of the ideal generation stage of the innovation process
and as inside-out and outside-in processes (see 40 for three open innovation process archetypes) where external knowledge is brought into the company
Second, past studies on foresight, collaboration in innovation and open innovation reveal the link between foresight and collaborative innovation,
However, systematic research about futures research in innovation networks as one form to embrace open innovation is lacking.
The transition from RWS-internal activities to open innovation projects and programs was facilitated through the integration of Deltares in 2007.4.1.3.
Transition path The transition toward an open innovation program has undergone several steps: from an initially government-internal planning program to an externally supported innovation program.
Accordingly, EICT aims at facilitating open innovation by providing a setting that is conducive to the flow of information between industry and research in information and communication technologies (ICT),
partners on their way to actually conducting open innovation. By establishing the public-private partnership and founding the Gmbh as its legal form
With clearly defined processes and rules and the focus on open innovation EICT is supposed to support the innovation capabilities of its partners. 4. 2. 4. Leadership Two aspects require special attention within the EICT:(
Consortia of partners from academia, industry and research institutes were encouraged to create open innovation ecosystems that integrate the knowledge triangle consisting of education
it is aimed explicitly at establishing open innovation structures and an intraorganizzationa knowledge exchange between the network partners.
/Futures 59 (2014) 62 78 72 provide frameworks for open innovation emerged in the last few years, e g.,
However, informal talks with network members showed that the transition toward an open innovation network is threatened potentially by inertia, rigid mindsets and a fear of opportunism.
the management of the organization cannot impose open innovation processes on its employees; it can only create an adequate environment with supporting instruments.
The EIT ICT Labs are an attempt to create an environment of open innovation, but the people therein still appear to be need in of adapting to the new notion of sharing results.
Futures research in the EIT ICT Labs can be characterized as thematically driven networked foresight conducted by equal partners. 5. 4. 2. Networked foresight linked to open innovation
When combining the differences in networked foresight with further research on collaboration in innovation at least two known‘process archetypes of open innovation'are observable in the cases:
second, the close connection between foresight, collaborative innovation and open innovation suggests that networked foresight is already being practiced,
its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm, Technological forecasting and Social Change 78 (2009) 231 243.6 H. Chesbrough, Open innovation:
and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business school Press, Boston, 2003.7 M. Dodgson, D. Gann, A. Salter, The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation:
creates an open innovation ecosystem, R&d Management 39 (2009) 420 430.9 O. Gassmann, Opening up the innovation process:
. Zook, Open-market innovation, Harvard Business Review 80 (2002) 80 89.12 O. Gassmann, E. Enkel, H. Chesbrough, The future of open innovation, R&d
) 1051 1067.38 H. Chesbrough, The era of open innovation, Sloan Management Review 44 (2003) 35 41.39 T. Heger, R. Rohrbeck, Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration
Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes, in: R&d Management Conference (RADMA), Lisboan, Portugal, 2004.41 C. Jasner, Walk of pain, Mckinsey Wissen 17 (2006) 44 49.42 W. G. Dyer
Science.PublicPolicyVol37\3. Adaptive foresight in the creative content industries.pdf
Open innovation society: a situation where all Figure 4. Positioning of the four scenarios Competitive business environment Oligopolistic business environment Negative public attitude towards creative content, lack of demand Positive public
attitude towards creative content, demand Incumbents take it all Incumbents take it All the open innovation society Society meets industry IT is not cool,
Science.PublicPolicyVol39\3. Coping with a fast-changing world.pdf
Networking to address open innovation Emerging rationales for FTA. Improving the robustness and dynamics of the R&i ecology to address (global) disruptions and engineer breakthroughs.
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011
