Foresight experience

Actual foresight (5)
Adaptive foresight (70)
Comprehensive foresight (3)
Conventional foresight (8)
Embedded foresight (16)
European foresight (16)
European foresight monitoring (11)
European forseight monitoring network (3)
Foresight (2109)
Foresight activity (209)
Foresight approach (45)
Foresight community (14)
Foresight exercise (272)
Foresight experience (13)
Foresight impact (15)
Foresight management (8)
Foresight method (100)
Foresight methodology (56)
Foresight objectives (15)
Foresight outlook (3)
Foresight phases (3)
Foresight portfolio (7)
Foresight practice (20)
Foresight practitioners (19)
Foresight process (144)
Foresight programme (80)
Foresight project (90)
Foresight report (42)
Foresight study (111)
Foresight system (17)
Foresight tools (13)
Hungarian technology foresight programme (3)
Impact of foresight (36)
Inclusive foresight (60)
International foresight (31)
Joint foresight (7)
National foresight (61)
New foresight (7)
Online foresight (7)
Organizational foresight (10)
Oriented foresight (6)
Participatory foresight (8)
Pre foresight (9)
Recent foresight (12)
Regional foresight (26)
Regional infrastructure foresight (10)
Regulatory foresight (42)
Specific foresight (6)
Strategic foresight (89)
Tailored foresight (4)
Technology foresight (253)
Traditional foresight (4)

Synopsis: Foresight: Foresight experience:


ART21.pdf

They were derived from previous foresight experiences and formulated by the responsible department (Referat. The BMBF Foresight process aimed at:


ART27.pdf

In an opening section, the general contours of science, technology and innovation (STI) policy in Luxembourg are traced, with a view to contextualising the FNR Foresight experience.


ART28.pdf

The foresight experience of the City of Vienna will be discussed against this framework. First, we introduce the impact assessment framework (Section 2). Then the main features of the process design (Section 3)


ART44.pdf

ii) Foresight experience, and (iii) principle affiliation/role. The results are analysed in greater detail in the fifth section.

because it was considered that a clear definition of the terms supported with examples would help the participants in completing the survey, particularly those with less Foresight experience,

1. Years of Foresight experience; 2. Country of residence; 3. Affiliation-type of organization represented. Then, the in the second part, the respondents were asked to identify a list of trends, drivers of change, wild cards/shocks, weak signals and discontinuities.

TD$FIG Fig. 2. Foresight experience. O. Saritas, J. E. Smith/Futures 43 (2011) 292 312 299 The diagram illustrates that:

Joint assessment of Foresight experience and trends. The respondents with more than 15 years of experience constituted the largest single group,

and differentiated. 3. 2. 3. 1. Joint assessment of Foresight experience and drivers of change. A balanced distribution is observed among the respondents with 1 3, 5 10 and over 15 years experience.

O. Saritas, J. E. Smith/Futures 43 (2011) 292 312 307 3. 2. 5. 1. Joint assessment of Foresight experience and discontinuities.

The respondents with a Foresight experience longer than 1 year expect most the majority of the weak signals to emerge in the medium term future (2016 2025),


ART76.pdf

In the foresight experience of small countries such as the foresight activity conducted in Austria named‘‘Delphi Austria,


Science.PublicPolicyVol37\4. Critical success factors for government-led foresight.pdf

Despite the spread of foresight experience across Europe and beyond, there has not so far Table 1. Foresight:


< Back - Next >


Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011