while some foresight practitioners are likely to do the same for Section 2. 2. The three constituents of Adaptive foresight Adaptive foresight as discussed in this paper has three main roots or constituents.
the explicit inclusion of closed settings as part of foresight methodology is still uncommon among foresight practitioners, and not widely accepted among policy-makers, either.
and foresight practitioners can become frustrated following comprehensive exercises when recommendaation based on solid reasoning are implemented not.
Foresight practitioners (process consultants or core groups) play a major role in these processes, feeding results to decision-makers in charge of implementing the choices.
foresight practitioners (process consultants or core groups) and formal processes play relatively minor roles. Foresight methods preferred under this approach focus on key actors and their viewpoints, for example stakeholder analyses and Delphi studies.
Therefore, a special obligation rests upon the foresight practitioners to take this into account when planning foresight exercises.
the foresight practitioners need to channel and control the influence of such local champions during the conduct of the exercise,
as well as interviews with schoolteachers, politicians, municipal employees in the planning and social development department, visioning workshop participants and foresight practitioners.
Foresight practitioners do now deploy hybrid methodological frameworks where different approaches serve different purposes in specific phases in order to tailor Foresight to each specific purpose and context.
For most foresight practitioners, scenario development is the archetypal product of future studies because it is profoundly creative and capable of handling uncertainty.
As indicated below, the lessons often resonate with what foresight practitioners have discovered. The discussion is summarised in Table 3. The first generic lesson is that the formal articulation of futures takes place in situations where expectations abound
Foresight practitioners and scholars generally respond to such criticism by arguing that the role of foresight
1 foresight practitioners have concentrated traditionally on participatory methods based on qualitative data, on the grounds that quantitative extrapolation from past data is not sufficient to address the uncertainties of the future
Wewould like to highlight some of the aspects of the INFU experience that seemto be of particular relevance to be explored further by foresight practitioners
and Foresight practitioners to ongoing demands for studies that address our continuously changing complex emergent context.
The findings of this paper have implications for foresight practitioners and policy makers. In this paper the concept has successfully been applied for analysing recent foresight in Denmark.
interviiew with foresight practitioners, managers responnsibl for national foresight efforts in various countries, and; reviews of foresight project level summaries and overviews from the EFMN (part of the European foresight Knowledge sharing Platfoor which monitors
and foresight practitioners should pay heed to their generation as strategic foresight exercises develop. The process of sharing experiences, collective learning and understanding, creation of shared commitmeen to the main decisions to be made
including foresight practitioners. All particiipant were requested to prepare for the workshop by familiarizing themselves with the earlier results
< Back - Next >
Overtext Web Module V3.0 Alpha
Copyright Semantic-Knowledge, 1994-2011
